Mapping the Landscape of Equitable Access to Advanced Neurotechnologies in Canada.

Geographic, social, political, and economic factors shape access to advanced neurotechnologies, yet little previous research has explored the barriers, enablers, and areas of opportunity for equitable and meaningful access for diverse patient communities across Canada. We applied a mixed-mode approach involving semi-structured interviews and rating scale questions to consult with 24 medical experts who are involved in the care of patients who undergo functional neurosurgery targeting the brain. Seven major themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: Health care system, Neurotechnology features, Patient demographics, Target condition features, Ethics, Upstream barriers and enablers, and Areas of opportunity. Descriptive statistics of the Likert-scale responses suggest that interviewees perceive a disparity between the imperative of access to advanced neurotechnologies for people living in rural and remote areas and the likelihood of achieving such access. The results depict a complex picture of access to functional neurosurgery in Canada with pockets of excellence and a motivation to improve the availability of care for vulnerable populations through the expansion of distributed care models, improved health care system efficiencies, increasing funding and support for patient travel, and increasing awareness about and advocacy for advanced neurotechnologies.

The Location of the Parasympathetic Fibres within the Vagus Nerve Rootlets: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature.

The vagus nerve has motor, sensory, and parasympathetic components. Understanding the nerve's internal anatomy, its variations, and relationship to the glossopharyngeal nerve are crucial for neurosurgeons decompressing the lower cranial nerves. We present a case report demonstrating the location of the parasympathetic fibres within the vagus nerve rootlets. A 47-year-old woman presented with a 1-year history of medically refractory left-sided glossopharyngeal neuralgia and a more recent history of left-sided hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm. magnetic resonance imaging showed her left posterior inferior cerebellar artery distorting the lower cranial nerves on the affected left side. The patient consented to microvascular decompression of the lower cranial nerves with possible sectioning of the glossopharyngeal and upper sensory rootlets of the vagus nerve. During surgery, electrical stimulation of the most caudal rootlet of the vagus nerve triggered profound bradycardia. None of the more rostral rootlets had a similar parasympathetic response. This case is the first demonstration, to our knowledge, of the location of the cardiac parasympathetic fibres within the human vagus nerve rootlets. This new understanding of the vagus nerve rootlets' distribution of pure sensory (most rostral), motor/sensory (more caudal), and parasympathetic (most caudal) fibres may lead to a better understanding and diagnosis of the vagal rhizopathies. Approximately 20% of patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia also have paroxysmal cough. This could be due to the anatomical juxtaposition of the IXth cranial nerve with the rostral vagal rootlets with pure sensory fibres (which mediate a tickling sensation in the lungs). A subgroup of patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia have neuralgia-induced syncope. The cause of this rare condition, "vago-glossopharyngeal neuralgia," has been debated since it was first described by Riley in 1942. Our case supports the theory that this neuralgia-induced bradycardia is reflexively mediated through the brainstem with afferent impulses in the IXth and efferent impulses in the Xth cranial nerve. The rarer co-occurrence of glossopharyngeal neuralgia with hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm (as seen in this case) may be explained by the proximity of the IXth nerve with the more caudal vagus rootlets which have motor (and probably sensory) supply to the throat. Finally, if there is a vagal rhizopathy related to compression of its parasympathetic fibres, one would expect it to be at the most caudal rootlet of the vagus nerve.

Ablation Surgeries for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Reported Case Series.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ablative lesion procedures remain as the last option in treatment of refractory depression. Contemporary ablative psychosurgeries involve producing lesions in the anterior limb of the internal capsule (bilateral anterior capsulotomy - BAC), the supragenual anterior cingulate gyrus and cingulum (bilateral anterior cingulotomy - BACING), and subgenual anterior cingulate gyrus and subcortical orbitofrontal white matter (bilateral subcaudate tractotomy - BST). A combination of BACING and BST is known as limbic leukotomy (bilateral limbic leukotomy - BLL). All procedures claim some success, but cohorts are small, depression assessment instruments differ, and inclusion and outcome criteria and follow-up duration vary. In some cohorts, more than one type of surgery was performed in several patients, further confounding interpreting the available data. Current evidence is equivocal on which surgical target works best. Method and Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) standard on published cohorts was conducted to review and identify which is the best standalone ablative procedure for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) based on response rate (event rate) and adverse-effect profile using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: As a standalone neurosurgical procedure, we found that BAC appears to be the most effective and safest of all the ablative targets for TRD. A major limitation of this conclusion is the paucity of published case series where sample sizes are small and all are open label.

Tremor and Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Essential Tremor Before and After Replacing Their Standard Deep Brain Stimulation With a Directional System.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with essential tremor treated with thalamic deep brain stimulation may experience increased tremor with the progression of their disease. Initially, this can be counteracted with increased stimulation. Eventually, this may cause unwanted side-effects as the circumferential stimulation from a standard ring contact spreads into adjacent regions. Directional leads may offer a solution to this clinical problem. We aimed to compare the ability of a standard and a directional system to reduce tremor without side-effects and to improve the quality of life for patients with advanced essential tremor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six advanced essential tremor patients with bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation had their standard system replaced with a directional system. Tremor rating scale scores were prospectively evaluated before and after the replacement surgery. Secondary analyses of quality of life related to tremor, voice, and general health were assessed. RESULTS: There was a significantly greater reduction in tremor without side-effects (p = 0.017) when using the directional system. There were improvements in tremor (p = 0.031) and voice (p = 0.037) related quality of life but not in general health for patients using optimized stimulation settings with the directional system compared to the standard system. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of advanced essential tremor patients who no longer had ideal tremor reduction with a standard system, replacing their deep brain stimulation with a directional system significantly improved their tremor and quality of life. Up-front implantation of directional deep brain stimulation leads may provide better tremor control in those patients who progress at a later time point.

Hypoactivity in the Paraterminal Gyrus Following Bilateral Anterior Capsulotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral anterior capsulotomy (BAC) is one of the ablative neurosurgical procedures used to treat major depressive disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder when all other therapies fail. Tristolysis, a reduction in sadness, is the most striking clinical effect of BAC and is seen in the first 1 to 2 weeks after surgery. This retrospective study measured regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) following surgery to identify which cortical regions were impacted and could account for this clinical effect. METHODS: All patients had their capsulotomies done in Vancouver by the same team. Pre- and postoperative single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion scans were analyzed for 10 patients with major depressive disorder and 3 with obsessive-compulsive disorder. rCBF was measured semiquantitatively by calculating the ratio between an identified region of interest and a whole brain reference area. RESULTS: Decreased rCBF was found in the paraterminal gyri. Increased rCBF was found in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortices and in the left lateral temporal lobe. CONCLUSIONS: BAC causes hypoactivity in the paraterminal gyri and is the most likely explanation for its tristolytic effect, suggesting that the paraterminal gyrus is the limbic cortical locus for the emotion of sadness. Increased activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortices may be occurring via connectional diaschisis, and suppression by overactive paraterminal gyri during depression may account for some of the neurocognitive deficits observed during depressive episodes.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Spasmodic Dysphonia: A Blinded Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Stimulation in Two Patients.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising new therapy for patients with spasmodic dysphonia (SD). The preliminary results from our randomized controlled trial showed good clinical effects with unilateral left thalamic stimulation in 6 right- handed patients. This suggests that the pathological process underpinning SD may have a "hemisphere dominant" pathway. We describe 2 patients with concurrent essential tremor and SD who had previously undergone bilateral thalamic DBS for their limb tremor. Both patients experienced an unanticipated improvement of their SD symptoms. One patient was right-handed, and the other was mixed left-handed. To investigate the amount of SD improvement following DBS therapy in each hemisphere, 4 different settings were tested: both sides on, left side on, right side on, and both sides off. Both patients most improved following bilateral stimulation. There was, however, a powerful unilateral benefit in both patients with only a small additional benefit from bilateral stimulation. The right-handed patient improved most with left-hemisphere stimulation whereas the mixed left-handed patient improved most with right hemisphere stimulation. There was some discrepancy between the two tests applied in the second patient reflecting the known difficulties to evaluate vocal symptom improvement in SD. We discuss the possible correlation of handedness and speech hemisphere dominance as well as the need for more reliable tests to measure SD severity. Ultimately, we recommend a bilateral approach for future studies, using a patient perception test as the primary outcome and functional imaging to further investigate the correlation of handedness and the amount of hemisphere dominance in SD.

Defining the Anatomy of the Vagus Nerve and Its Clinical Relevance for the Neurosurgical Treatment of Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia.

The neurosurgical treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia includes microvascular decompression or rhizotomy of the nerve. When considering open section of the glossopharyngeal nerve, numerous authors have recommended additional sectioning of the 'upper rootlets' of the vagus nerve because these fibers can occasionally carry the pain fibers causing the patient's symptoms. Sacrifice of vagus nerve rootlets, however, carries the potential risk of dysphagia and dysphonia. In this study, the anatomy and physiology of the vagus nerve rootlets are characterized to provide guidance for surgical decision-making. Twelve patients who underwent posterior fossa craniotomy with intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring of the vagus nerve rootlets were included in this study. In the 7 patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia, the clinical outcomes and complications were further analyzed. In half of the patients, electrophysiological data demonstrated pure sensory function in the rostral rootlet(s) of the vagus nerve and motor responses in its caudal rootlets. This orientation of the vagus nerve, with some pure sensory function in its most rostral rootlet(s), was defined as Type A. In the other half of patients, all vagus nerve rootlets (including the most rostral) had motor responses. This was defined as Type B. The surgical strategy was guided by whether the patient had a Type A or Type B vagus nerve. For those with Type B, no vagus nerve rootlets were sacrificed. None of the patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia developed any permanent neurological deficits. We recommend intraoperative electrophysiological testing of the vagus nerve rootlets. If the testing reveals motor innervation in the rostral vagal rootlet (Type B), that rootlet may be decompressed but should not be sectioned to avoid a motor complication. Patients with pure sensory innervation of the rostral rootlet(s) (Type A) can have decompression or section of those rootlets without complication.

Coughing as a Side Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation due to Peripheral Stimulation of the Vagus Nerve: Case Report.

The authors describe how severe coughing and breathing issues were caused by a deep brain stimulation (DBS) system due to current induction in the adjacent vagus nerve. A 57-year-old man with Parkinson's disease (PD) who received bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS presented with coughing and breathing difficulty when his DBS system was activated. The intensity of coughing was directly related to the amount of stimulation. When the DBS system was turned off, his cough resolved immediately. A system check revealed no radiographic abnormalities and all electrode impedances were within the normal range. We hypothesize that the coughing was caused by an induced electromagnetic stimulation of the vagus nerve from the extensions, which were running in close proximity to the nerve in the neck. Since the patient could not tolerate the coughing at stimulation settings required to ameliorate his PD symptoms, we ultimately exchanged the extensions and moved them further away from the vagus nerve. This resulted in immediate, complete, and continuous relief of the patient's symptoms.

An Analysis of Clinical Outcome and Tractography following Bilateral Anterior Capsulotomy for Depression.

INTRODUCTION: Bilateral anterior capsulotomy (BAC) is an effective surgical procedure for patients with treatment-resistant major depression (TRMD). In this work, we analyze the connectivity of the BAC lesions to identify connectivity "fingerprints" associated with clinical outcomes in patients with TRMD. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of ten patients following BAC surgery. These patients were divided into "responders" and "non-responders" based on the relative change in the Beck depression inventory (BDI) score after surgery. We generated the dorsolateral prefrontal associative (DLPFC) pathways and the ventromedial prefrontal limbic (vmPFC) pathways going through the anterior limb of the internal capsule and analyzed if the overlap of the BAC lesions with these pathways was associated with either outcome. Finally, we used the BAC lesions of our patients to generate group-averaged connectivity "fingerprints" associated with either outcome. RESULTS: Six patients were responders (≥50% improvement in BDI), four patients were non-responders (<50% improvement). No significant impairments were found in most neuropsychological tests after surgery. The overlap analysis showed that in the responder group, there was less involvement of the DLPFC pathways than the vmPFC pathways (p = 0.001). Conversely, in the non-responder group, there was no significant difference between the involvement of both pathways (p = 0.157). The responder and non-responder connectivity fingerprint showed significant connections with the vmPFC limbic areas. However, the non-responder connectivity fingerprint also showed stronger connectivity to associative areas including the DLPFC and lateral orbitofrontal cortices. CONCLUSIONS: The optimum outcome following BAC surgery in this cohort was associated with interruption of vmPFC pathways and the relative preservation of DLPFC pathways.

Canadian Assessment of Deep Brain Stimulation Access: The Canada Study.

BACKGROUND: The Canada Health Act requires reasonable access to all medically necessary therapies. No information is available to assess the current access to neuromodulation across Canada. This study quantifies the current rate of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the entire country of Canada. Analyses were performed to determine whether there were differences in access based on provincial or territorial location, rural or non-rural region, or socioeconomic status. METHODS: All implanted DBS devices in Canada over a 2-year epoch (January 2015 to December 2016) were supplied by either Boston Scientific or Medtronic. Investigators received anonymized data from these companies, including patient age and home residence region. The 2016 Statistics Canada census data were used to determine the rate of DBS surgery and whether access was related to provincial location, rural versus non-rural region or socioeconomic status. RESULTS: A total of 722 patients were studied. The rate of DBS surgery for the entire country was ten per million population per year. Saskatchewan was significantly above (374%) the national average, whereas Quebec (40%) and Newfoundland & Labrador (32%) were significantly below the national average. No patients from the three territories received DBS. There were no significant differences in access from rural versus non-rural areas or in regions within provinces with different socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantify all patients receiving DBS within an entire country. The current rate of DBS surgery within Canada is ten cases per million per year. Statistically significant regional differences were discovered and discussed.

Unilateral Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Voice Tremor.

BACKGROUND: Voice tremor (VT) is the involuntary and rhythmical phonatory instability of the voice. Recent findings suggest that unilateral deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim-DBS) can sometimes be effective for VT. In this exploratory analysis, we investigated the effect of Vim-DBS on VT and tested the hypothesis that unilateral thalamic stimulation is effective for patients with VT. METHODS: Seven patients with VT and previously implanted bilateral Vim-DBS were enrolled in the study. Each patient was randomized and recorded performing sustained phonation during the following conditions: left thalamic stimulation, right thalamic stimulation, bilateral thalamic stimulation (Bil-ON), and no stimulation (Bil-OFF). Perceptual VT ratings and an acoustic analysis to find the rate of variation of the fundamental frequency measured by the standard deviation of the pitch (f0SD) were performed in a blinded manner. For the purposes of this study, a "dominant" side was defined as one with more than twice as much reduction in VT following Vim-DBS compared to the contralateral side. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare the effect of the dominant side stimulation in the reduction of VT scores and f0SD. The volume of activated tissue (VAT) of the dominant stimulation side was modelled against the degree of improvement in VT to correlate the significant stimulation cluster with thalamic anatomy. Finally, tractography analysis was performed to analyze the connectivity of the significant stimulation cluster. RESULTS: Unilateral stimulation was beneficial in all 7 patients. Five patients clearly had a "dominant" side with either benefit only seen following stimulation of one side or more than twice as much benefit from one side compared to the other. Two patients had similar benefit with unilateral stimulation from either side. The Wilcoxon paired test showed significant differences between unilateral dominant and unilateral nondominant stimulation for VT scores (p = 0.04), between unilateral dominant and Bil-OFF (p = 0.04), and between Bil-ON and unilateral nondominant stimulation (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between Bil-ON and unilateral dominant condition (p = 0.27), or between Bil-OFF and unilateral nondominant (p = 0.23). The dominant VAT showed that the significant voxels associated with the best VT control were located in the most ventral and medial part of the Vim nucleus and the ventralis caudalis anterior internus nucleus. The connectivity analysis showed significant connectivity with the cortical areas of the speech circuit. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral dominant-side thalamic stimulation and bilateral thalamic stimulation were equally effective in reducing VT. Nondominant unilateral stimulation alone did not significantly improve VT.

Deep Brain Stimulation Target Selection for Parkinson's Disease.

During the "DBS Canada Day" symposium held in Toronto July 4-5, 2014, the scientific committee invited experts to discuss three main questions on target selection for deep brain stimulation (DBS) of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). First, is the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the globus pallidus internus (GPi) the ideal target? In summary, both targets are equally effective in improving the motor symptoms of PD. STN allows a greater medications reduction, while GPi exerts a direct antidyskinetic effect. Second, are there further potential targets? Ventral intermediate nucleus DBS has significant long-term benefit for tremor control but insufficiently addresses other motor features of PD. DBS in the posterior subthalamic area also reduces tremor. The pedunculopontine nucleus remains an investigational target. Third, should DBS for PD be performed unilaterally, bilaterally or staged? Unilateral STN DBS can be proposed to asymmetric patients. There is no evidence that a staged bilateral approach reduces the incidence of DBS-related adverse events.

Establishing a Standard of Care for Deep Brain Stimulation Centers in Canada.

During the "DBS Canada Day" symposium held in Toronto July 4-5, 2014, the scientific committee invited experts to share their knowledge regarding deep brain stimulation (DBS) management of movement disorders in three domains: (1) the programming algorithms, (2) the necessary team to run a neurosurgery program, and (3) the appropriate scales to better define in a more comprehensive fashion the effect of the brain surgery. Each presentation was followed by an open discussion, and this article reports on the conclusions of this meeting on these three questions. Concerning programming, the role of the pulse width and the switching off of the stimulation at night for thalamic stimulation for the control of tremor have been discussed. The algorithms proposed in the literature for programming in Parkinson's disease (PD) need validation. In dystonia, the use of monopolar vs bipolar parameters, the use of low vs high frequencies and the use of smaller versus larger pulse widths all need to be examined properly. Concerning the necessary team to run a neurosurgical program, recommendations will follow the suggestions for standardized outcome measures. Regarding the outcome measures for DBS in PD, investigations need to focus on the non-motor aspects of PD. Identifying which nonmotor symptoms respond to DBS would allow a better screening before and satisfaction postoperatively. There is an important need for more data to determine the optimal programming protocol and the standard measures that should be performed routinely by all centers.

Cyclization of Motor Cortex Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Programming guidelines for motor cortex stimulation (MCS) in neuropathic pain requires further investigation. After optimizing voltage as a percentage of motor threshold, we evaluated the effect of cyclizing time of stimulation on pain relief for chronic neuropathic pain. METHODS: Six patients were enrolled into this trial. In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded manner, patients were programmed to receive stimulation 100, 83.3, 66.7, or 50% of the time in 30-min intervals. Outcomes were assessed after 14 days on each setting with a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the SF36 quality of life questionnaire. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the different cyclized settings as measured by the VAS, MGPQ, or SF36 in our cohort. There were two distinct subgroups: responders (n = 4) and nonresponders (n = 2) to cyclization. Responders continued to have pain relief when stimulation was reduced to only 50% of the time (15 min ON/15 min off). Interestingly, this group subjectively preferred the 50% stimulation timing compared to 100%. Nonresponders could not tolerate cyclizing because of increased pain. CONCLUSIONS: In this small cohort, cyclization of MCS settings revealed two distinct subgroups: responders and nonresponders. Responders tolerated stimulation in all settings and 50% stimulation (15 min ON/15 min off) was their subjectively preferred setting. Cyclization in responders will prolong battery life and delay the need for INS replacement and may offer improved pain relief. Building from our previous work, we recommend clinicians consider following the Vancouver MCS programming algorithm presented in this manuscript.

Eligibility Criteria for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease, Tremor, and Dystonia.

In this review, the available evidence to guide clinicians regarding eligibility for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the main conditions in which these forms of therapy are generally indicated-Parkinson's disease (PD), tremor, and dystonia-is presented. In general, the literature shows that DBS is effective for PD, essential tremor, and idiopathic dystonia. In these cases, key points in patient selection must include the level of disability and inability to manage symptoms using the best available medical therapy. Results are, however, still not optimal when dealing with other aetiologies, such as secondary tremors and symptomatic dystonia. Also, in PD, issues such as age and neuropsychiatric profile are still debatable parameters. Overall, currently available literature is able to guide physicians on basic aspects of patient selection and indications for DBS; however, a few points are still debatable and controversial. These issues should be refined and clarified in future studies.

Medical Management of Parkinson's Disease after Initiation of Deep Brain Stimulation.

In this review, we have gathered all the available evidence to guide medication management after deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Surprisingly, we found that almost no study addressed drug-based management in the postoperative period. Dopaminergic medications are usually reduced, but whether the levodopa or dopamine agonist is to be reduced is left to the personal preference of the treating physician. We have summarized the pros and cons of both approaches. No study on the management of cognitive problems after DBS has been done, and only a few studies have explored the pharmacological management of such DBS-resistant symptoms as voice (amantadine), balance (donepezil) or gait disorders (amantadine, methylphenidate). As for the psychiatric problems so frequently reported in PD patients, researchers have directed their attention to the complex interplay between stimulation and reduction of dopaminergic drugs only recently. In conclusion, studies addressing medical management following DBS are still needed and will certainly contribute to the ultimate success of DBS procedures.

Stereotactic mesencephalotomy for palliative care pain control: A case report, literature review and plea to rediscover this operation.

Introduction Stereotactic mesencephalotomy is an ablative procedure which lesions the pain pathways (spinothalamic and trigeminothalamic tracts) at the midbrain level to treat medically refractory, nociceptive, contralateral pain. Sparsely reported in contemporary English language literature, this operation is at risk of being lost from the modern-day neurosurgical practice. Methods We present a case report and brief review of the literature on stereotactic mesencephalotomy. A 17-year-old girl with cervical cord glioblastoma and medically refractory unilateral head and neck pain was treated with contralateral stereotactic mesencephalotomy. The lesion was placed at the level of the inferior colliculus, half way between the lateral edge of the aqueduct and lateral border of the midbrain. Results The patient had no head and neck pain immediately after the procedure and remained pain-free for the remainder of her life (five months). She was weaned off her pre-operative narcotics and was able to leave hospital, meeting her palliative care goals. Conclusions Cancer-related unilateral head and neck nociceptive pain in the palliative care setting can be successfully treated with stereotactic mesencephalotomy. We believe that stereotactic mesencephalotomy is the treatment of choice for a small number of patients typified by our case. The authors make a plea to the palliative care and neurosurgical communities to rediscover this operation.

The Influence of Positioning and Muscle Activity on Motor Threshold during Motor Cortex Stimulation Programming.

Background: Stimulation parameters are crucial for the efficacy and safety of motor cortex stimulation (MCS). Motor threshold (MT) can be defined as the lowest voltage that produces motor contraction. The final stimulation parameters are always a smaller percentage of MT in order to avoid seizures. We determined how patient position and activity affect MT. Methods: Prospective MT measurements were made while patients were either lying down or sitting up, and in a resting state or while actively contracting the target muscle. Paired 1-tailed t tests were performed to assess for statistically significant differences between MT measurements made under the 4 different combinations of position and activity. Results: The MT was lower when the target muscle was being actively contracted compared to resting in both supine and upright positions (both p < 0.001). The MT was also lower when upright compared to supine in both resting and active states of muscle contraction (both p < 0.001). The mean difference between supine resting and upright active states is 0.79 V. Conclusion: When selecting final stimulation parameters for MCS, clinicians should be aware that the lowest MT is elicited while patients are seated upright and actively contracting the target muscle. Using this method of determining the MT when calculating the final stimulation parameters could reduce the chance of MCS-induced seizures. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Long-term follow-up of motor cortex stimulation for neuropathic pain in 23 patients.

BACKGROUND: Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is being offered to patients suffering from neuropathic pain. Outcome prediction, programming and especially sustaining a long-term treatment effect represent major challenges. We report a retrospective long-term analysis of our patients treated with MCS over a median follow-up of 39.1 months. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the time course of the treatment effect in MCS for neuropathic pain. METHODS: Twenty-three closely followed patients treated with MCS were retrospectively analyzed. Reduction in pain measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) was defined as the primary outcome parameter. VAS pain level and adverse events were documented at the 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month follow-ups. RESULTS: The mean VAS under best medical treatment was 7.8 (SD 1.2, range 5-9) with escalation to 9.3 (SD 0.9, range 6-10) when the patients' medications were missed or delayed. About half of the patients (47.8%) experienced a satisfactory (>50%) reduction in pain during the first month of treatment. The best treatment results were seen at the 3-month follow-up (mean VAS 4.8, SD 1.9, -37.2% compared to baseline). A decline in the treatment effect was generally observed at the subsequent follow-up assessments. Six patients had their devices explanted during the follow-up period due to loss of treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, MCS failed to provide long-term pain control for neuropathic pain. Many aspects of MCS still remain unclear, especially the neural circuits involved and their response to long-term stimulation. Means must be developed to overcome the problems in this promising technique.