Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 42(2): 193-199, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36596905

RESUMEN

Enterococci are the most frequent gram-positive bacteria recovered from pyogenic liver abscesses (PLA). This study aims to analyze the impact of the presence of Enterococcus spp. on PLA outcome. We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics and outcome of all PLA cases in which Enterococcus spp. was isolated between January 2010 and September 2019 in a French university hospital and compared them to PLA without Enterococcus spp. Enterococci were recovered from 68 of the 359 (19%) PLA cases. Among the 78 isolates, Enterococcus faecalis (n = 37, 47.7%) and Enterococcus faecium (n = 32, 41%) were the most frequent. Enterococcal PLA were more often of biliary origin (79.4% versus 54.6%, p < 0.001) or post-surgical (35.3% versus 18.6%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis showed an independent association between the isolation of Enterococcus spp. and 3-month mortality (HR 2.51, p = 0.011), primary failure (HR 2.15, p = 0.006), but not with relapses (HR 0.86, p = 0.739). In the subgroup of enterococcal PLA, portal vein thrombosis was the only factor significantly associated with 3-month mortality (univariate HR 3.45, p = 0.023) or primary treatment failure (multivariate, HR 4.02, p = 0.006). Enterococcus spp. identification in a PLA is associated with a higher mortality and primary treatment failure.


Asunto(s)
Enterococcus faecium , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Absceso Piógeno Hepático , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Absceso Piógeno Hepático/terapia , Enterococcus , Enterococcus faecalis , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Poliésteres/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
2.
J Infect ; 81(3): e96-e98, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32474039

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The CURB-65 is a severity score to predict mortality secondary to community acquired pneumonia and is widely used to identify patients who can be managed as outpatients. However, whether CURB-65 can be applicable to COVID-19 patients for the decision of outpatient treatment is still unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-centre study assessing the performance of the CURB-65 to predict the risk of poor outcome, defined as the need for mechanical ventilation and/or death, among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The association between the CURB-65 and the outcome was assessed by a univariable Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients were hospitalized between March 15th and April 14th, 2020. According to the CURB-65, 171 (61.3%) patients were considered at low risk (CURB-65 01), 66 (23.7%) at intermediate risk (CURB-65=2), and 42 (15.1%) had high risk of 30-day mortality (CURB-65 35). During the study period, 88 (31.5%) patients had a poor outcome. The CURB-65 was strongly associated with a poor outcome (Pfor linear trend <0.001). However, among patients with a CURB-65 of 01, thus considered at low risk, 36/171 (21.1%) had a poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the applicability of CURB-65 to guide the decision of inpatient or outpatient care is scarce, as it does not safely identify patients who could be managed as outpatients.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Coronavirus , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Neumonía , Atención Ambulatoria , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Reino Unido
3.
J Infect ; 81(6): e4-e6, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32853602

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients hospitalized in a COVID-19 ward unit more than 100 days after their admission. METHODS: All eligible patients were contacted by phone by trained physicians and were asked to answer to a dedicated questionnaire. Patients managed in hospital ward without needing intensive care were compared with those who were transferred in intensive care units (ICU). RESULTS: We included 120 patients after a mean (±SD) of 110.9 (±11.1) days following admission. The most frequently reported persistent symptoms were fatigue (55%), dyspnoea (42%), loss of memory (34%), concentration and sleep disorders (28% and 30.8%, respectively). Comparisons between ward- and ICU patients led to no statistically significant differences regarding those symptoms. In both group, EQ-5D (mobility, self-care, pain, anxiety or depression, usual activity) was altered with a slight difference in pain in the ICU group. CONCLUSION: Most patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19 still have persistent symptoms. While there were few differences between HRQoL between ward and ICU patients, our findings must be confirmed in larger cohorts, including more severe patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Alta del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Fatiga/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Ann Med ; 52(7): 367-375, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32723107

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictive factors of unfavourable outcome among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Paris area. An unfavourable outcome was defined as the need for artificial ventilation and/or death. Characteristics at admission were analysed to identify factors predictive of unfavourable outcome using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Based on the results, a nomogram to predict 14-day probability of poor outcome was proposed. RESULTS: Between March 15th and April 14th, 2020, 279 COVID-19 patients were hospitalized after a median of 7 days after the first symptoms. Among them, 88 (31.5%) patients had an unfavourable outcome: 48 were admitted to the ICU for artificial ventilation, and 40 patients died without being admitted to ICU. Multivariable analyses retained age, overweight, polypnoea, fever, high C-reactive protein, elevated us troponin-I, and lymphopenia as risk factors of an unfavourable outcome. A nomogram was established with sufficient discriminatory power (C-index 0.75), and proper consistence between the prediction and the observation. CONCLUSION: We identified seven easily available prognostic factors and proposed a simple nomogram for early detection of patients at risk of aggravation, in order to optimize clinical care and initiate specific therapies. KEY MESSAGES Since novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, a minority of patients develops severe respiratory distress syndrome, leading to death despite intensive care. Tools to identify patients at risk in European populations are lacking. In our series, age, respiratory rate, overweight, temperature, C-reactive protein, troponin and lymphocyte counts were risk factors of an unfavourable outcome in hospitalized adult patients. We propose an easy-to-use nomogram to predict unfavourable outcome for hospitalized adult patients to optimize clinical care and initiate specific therapies.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Cuidados Críticos , Hospitalización , Nomogramas , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Paris , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
5.
J Clin Med ; 8(12)2019 Dec 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31835320

RESUMEN

Sickle cell disease (SCD) prevalence has increased rapidly in Europe as a result of an increase in the life expectancy of these patients and the arrival of SCD migrants from Africa. The aim of our study was to compare the phenotypes of adult patients born in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) who migrated to France with those of patients with the same origin who were born in France. This single-center observational study compared the demographic, clinical and biological characteristics of SCD adult patients of SSA origin who were born in France or SSA. Data were collected from computerized medical charts. Groups were compared using multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for age, gender and type of SCD. Of the 323 SCD patients followed in our center, 235 were enrolled, including 111 patients born in France and 124 patients born in SSA. SCD genotypes were balanced between groups. Patients born in Africa were older (median age 32.1 (24.4-39) vs. 25.6 (22.1-30.5) years, p < 0.001) and more often women (n = 75 (60.5%) vs. 48 (43.2%), p = 0.008). The median age at arrival in France was 18 years (13-23). The median height was lower among patients born in SSA (169 (163-175) vs. 174.5 cm (168-179), p < 0.001). Over their lifetimes, patients born in France had more acute chest syndromes (median number 2 (1-4) vs. 1 (0-3), p = 0.002), with the first episode occurring earlier (19 (11.6-22.3) vs. 24 (18.4-29.5) years, p < 0.007), and were admitted to intensive care units more often (53.3% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.006). This difference was more pronounced in the SS/Sß0 population. Conversely, patients born in SSA had more skin ulcers (19.4% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.03). No significant differences were found in social and occupational insertion or other complications between the two groups. Patients born in SSA had a less severe disease phenotype regardless of their age than those born in France. This difference could be related to a survival bias occurring in Africa during childhood and migration to Europe that selected the least severe phenotypes.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA