RESUMEN
Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome (ARS) type 1 is a rare autosomal dominant condition characterized by anterior chamber anomalies, umbilical defects, dental hypoplasia, and craniofacial anomalies, with Meckel's diverticulum in some individuals. Here, we describe a clinically ascertained female of childbearing age with ARS for whom clinical targeted sequencing and deletion/duplication analysis followed by clinical exome and genome sequencing resulted in no pathogenic variants or variants of unknown significance in PITX2 or FOXC1. Advanced bioinformatic analysis of the genome data identified a complex, balanced rearrangement disrupting PITX2. This case is the first reported intrachromosomal rearrangement leading to ARS, illustrating that for patients with compelling clinical phenotypes but negative genomic testing, additional bioinformatic analysis are essential to identify subtle genomic abnormalities in target genes.
Asunto(s)
Segmento Anterior del Ojo , Anomalías del Ojo , Enfermedades Hereditarias del Ojo , Proteína del Homeodomínio PITX2 , Femenino , Humanos , Segmento Anterior del Ojo/anomalías , Anomalías del Ojo/diagnóstico , Anomalías del Ojo/genética , Anomalías del Ojo/patología , Enfermedades Hereditarias del Ojo/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Hereditarias del Ojo/genética , Enfermedades Hereditarias del Ojo/patología , Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/genética , Proteínas de Homeodominio/genéticaRESUMEN
Chromothripsis is characterized by shattering and subsequent reassembly of chromosomes by DNA repair processes, which can give rise to a variety of congenital abnormalities and cancer. Constitutional chromothripsis is a rare occurrence, reported in children presenting with a wide range of birth defects. We present a case of a female child born with multiple major congenital abnormalities including severe microcephaly, ocular dysgenesis, heart defect, and imperforate anus. Chromosomal microarray and mate pair sequencing identified a complex chromosomal rearrangement involving the terminal end of the long arm of chromosome 2, with two duplications (located at 2p25.3-p25.1 and 2q35-q37.2 regions) and two deletions (located at 2q37.2-q37.3 and 2q37.3 regions) along with structural changes including inverted segments. A review of the literature for complex rearrangements on chromosome 2 revealed overlapping features; however, our patient had a significantly more severe phenotype which resulted in early death at the age of 2 years. Breakpoints analysis did not reveal the involvement of any candidate genes. We concluded that the complexity of the genomic rearrangement and the combined dosage/structural effect of these copy number variants are likely explanations for the severe presentation in our patient.
RESUMEN
Complex structural chromosome abnormalities such as chromoanagenesis have been reported in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). They are usually not well characterized by conventional genetic methods, and the characterization of chromoanagenesis structural abnormalities from short-read sequencing still presents challenges. Here, we characterized complex structural abnormalities involving chromosomes 2, 3, and 7 in an AML patient using an integrated approach including CRISPR/Cas9-mediated nanopore sequencing, mate pair sequencing (MPseq), and SNP microarray analysis along with cytogenetic methods. SNP microarray analysis revealed chromoanagenesis involving chromosomes 3 and 7, and a pseudotricentric chromosome 7 was revealed by cytogenetic methods. MPseq revealed 138 structural variants (SVs) as putative junctions of complex rearrangements involving chromosomes 2, 3, and 7, which led to 16 novel gene fusions and 33 truncated genes. Thirty CRISPR RNA (crRNA) sequences were designed to map 29 SVs, of which 27 (93.1%) were on-target based on CRISPR/Cas9 crRNA nanopore sequencing. In addition to simple SVs, complex SVs involving over two breakpoints were also revealed. Twenty-one SVs (77.8% of the on-target SVs) were also revealed by MPseq with shared SV breakpoints. Approximately three-quarters of breakpoints were located within genes, especially intronic regions, and one-quarter of breakpoints were intergenic. Alu and LINE repeat elements were frequent among breakpoints. Amplification of the chromosome 7 centromere was also detected by nanopore sequencing. Given the high amplification of the chromosome 7 centromere, extra chromosome 7 centromere sequences (tricentric), and more gains than losses of genomic material, chromoanasynthesis and chromothripsis may be responsible for forming this highly complex structural abnormality. We showed this combination approach's value in characterizing complex structural abnormalities for clinical and research applications. Characterization of these complex structural chromosome abnormalities not only will help understand the molecular mechanisms responsible for the process of chromoanagenesis, but also may identify specific molecular targets and their impact on therapy and overall survival.
RESUMEN
MYC-rearranged B-cell lymphoma (BCL) in the pediatric/young adult (YA) age group differs substantially in disease composition from adult cohorts. However, data regarding the partner genes, concurrent rearrangements, and ultimate diagnoses in these patients is scarce compared to that in adult cohorts. We aimed to characterize the spectrum of MYC-rearranged (MYC-R) mature, aggressive BCL in the pediatric/YA population. A retrospective study of morphologic, immunophenotypic, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results of patients age ≤ 30 years with suspected Burkitt lymphoma (BL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL), and a MYC-R by FISH between 2013-2022 was performed. Two-hundred fifty-eight cases (129 (50%) pediatric (< 18 years) and 129 (50%) YA (18-30 years)) were included. Most MYC-R BCL in pediatric (89%) and YA (66%) cases were BL. While double-hit (DH) cytogenetics (MYC with BCL2 and/or BCL6-R, HGBCL-DH) was rare in the pediatric population (2/129, 2%), HGBCL-DH increased with age and was identified in 17/129 (13%) of YA cases. Most HGBCL-DH had MYC and BCL6-R, while BCL2-R were rare in both groups (3/258, 1%). MYC-R without an IG partner was more common in the YA group (14/116 (12%) vs 2/128 (2%), p = 0.001). The pediatric to YA transition is characterized by decreasing frequency in BL and increasing genetic heterogeneity of MYC-R BCL, with emergence of DH-BCL with MYC and BCL6-R. FISH to evaluate for BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements is likely not warranted in the pediatric population but should continue to be applied in YA BCL.
Asunto(s)
Reordenamiento Génico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-myc , Humanos , Adolescente , Niño , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Femenino , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-myc/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Preescolar , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Linfoma de Células B/genética , Linfoma de Células B/patología , Linfoma de Burkitt/genética , Linfoma de Burkitt/patologíaRESUMEN
Purpose: The specialty of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics (LGG) was created in 2017 in an effort to reflect the increasing convergence in technologies and approaches between clinical molecular genetics and clinical cytogenetics. However, there has not yet been any formal evaluation of the merging of these disciplines and the challenges faced by Program Directors (PDs) tasked with ensuring the successful training of laboratory geneticists under the new model. Methods: An electronic multi-question Qualtrics survey was created and was sent to the PD for each of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited LGG fellowship programs at the time. The data were collected, and the responses were aggregated for each question. Results: All of the responding PDs had started training at least 1 LGG fellow. PDs noted challenges with funding, staff shortages, molecular/cytogenetics content integration, limited total training time, increased remote work, increased sendout testing, and a lack of prior cytogenetics knowledge among incoming fellows. Conclusion: This survey attempted to assess the challenges that LGG PDs have been facing in offering and integrating clinical molecular genetics and clinical cytogenetics fellowship training. Common challenges between programs were noted, and a set of 6 concluding comments are provided to facilitate future discussion.