Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Pain Pract ; 2024 Mar 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553945

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) approved the first pain medicine fellowship programs over three decades ago, designed around a pharmacological philosophy. Following that, there has been a rise in the transition of pain medicine education toward a multidisciplinary interventional model based on a tremendous surge of contemporaneous literature in these areas. This trend has created variability in clinical experience and education amongst accredited pain medicine programs with minimal literature evaluating the differences and commonalities in education and experience of different pain medicine fellowships through Program Director (PD) experiences. This study aims to gather insight from pain medicine fellowship program directors across the country to assess clinical and interventional training, providing valuable perspectives on the future of pain medicine education. METHODS: This study involved 56 PDs of ACGME-accredited pain fellowship programs in the United States. The recruitment process included three phases: advanced notification, invitation, and follow-up to maximize response rate. Participants completed a standard online questionnaire, covering various topics such as subcategory fields, online platforms for supplemental education, clinical experience, postgraduate practice success, and training adequacy. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 39/56 (69%) standing members of the Association of Pain Program Directors (APPD). All PDs allowed fellows to participate in industry-related and professional society-related procedural workshops, with 59% encouraging these workshops. PDs emphasized the importance of integrity, professionalism, and diligence for long-term success. Fifty-four percent of PDs expressed the need for extension of fellowship training to avoid supplemental education by industry or pain/spine societies. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the challenge of providing adequate training in all Pain Medicine subtopics within a 12-month pain medicine fellowship. PDs suggest the need for additional training for fellows and discuss the importance of curriculum standardization.

2.
Eye Contact Lens ; 46(3): 174-181, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31206369

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: There is a recognition that nerve dysfunction can contribute to chronic ocular pain in some individuals. However, limited data are available on how to treat individuals with a presumed neuropathic component to their ocular pain. As such, the purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of our treatment approaches to this entity. METHODS: A retrospective review of treatments and outcomes in individuals with chronic ocular pain that failed traditional therapies. RESULTS: We started eight patients on an oral gabapentinoid (gabapentin and/or pregabalin) as part of their pain regimen (mean age 46 years, 50% women). Two individuals reported complete ocular pain relief with a gabapentinoid, in conjunction with their topical and oral medication regimen. Three individuals noted significant improvements, one slight improvement, and two others no improvement in ocular pain with gabapentin or pregabalin. We performed periocular nerve blocks (4 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 1 mL of 80 mg/mL methylprednisolone acetate) targeting the periocular nerves (supraorbital, supratrochlear, infratrochlear, and infraorbital) in 11 individuals (mean age 54 years, 36% women), 10 of whom had previously used a gabapentinoid without ocular pain improvement. Seven individuals experienced pain relief after nerve blocks that lasted from hours to months and four failed to benefit. Five of the individuals who experienced pain relief underwent repeat nerve blocks, weeks to months later. CONCLUSIONS: Approaches used to treat chronic pain outside the eye can be applied to ocular pain that is not responsive to traditional therapies.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Ocular/tratamiento farmacológico , Gabapentina/administración & dosificación , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Pregabalina/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bupivacaína/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Acetato de Metilprednisolona/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nervio Oftálmico/efectos de los fármacos , Manejo del Dolor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
Anesth Analg ; 126(2): 489-494, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28991116

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation after general surgery is associated with worse outcomes, prolonged hospital stay, and increased health care cost. Postoperatively, patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) may be categorized into 1 of 3 groups: extubated patients (EXT), patients with objective medical indications to remain ventilated (MED), and patients not meeting these criteria, called "discretional postoperative mechanical ventilation" (DPMV). The objectives of this study were to determine the incidence of DPMV in general surgery patients and identify the associated operative factors. METHODS: At a large, tertiary medical center, we reviewed all surgical cases performed under general anesthesia from April 1, 2008 to February 28, 2015 and admitted to the ICU postoperatively. Patients were categorized into 1 of 3 cohorts: EXT, MED, or DPMV. Operative factors related to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS), duration of surgery, surgery end time, difficult airway management, intraoperative blood and fluid administration, vasopressor infusions, intraoperative arterial blood gasses, and ventilation data were collected. Additionally, anesthesia records were reviewed for notes indicating a reason or rationale for postoperative ventilation. Categorical variables were compared by χ test, and continuous variables by analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis H test. Categorical variables are presented as n (%), and continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) as appropriate. Significance level was set at P≤ .05. RESULTS: Sixteen percent of the 3555 patients were categorized as DPMV and 12.2% as MED. Compared to EXT patients, those classified as DPMV had received significantly less fluid (2757 ± 2728 mL vs 3868 ± 1885 mL; P < .001), lost less blood during surgery (150 [20-625] mL vs 300 [150-600] mL; P< .001), underwent a shorter surgery (199 ± 215 minutes vs 276 ± 143 minutes; P< .001), but received more blood products, 900 (600-1800) mL vs 600 (300-900) mL. The DPMV group had more patients with high ASA PS (ASA III-V) than the EXT group: 508 (90.4%) vs 1934 (75.6%); P< .001. Emergency surgery (ASA E modifier) was more common in the DPMV group than the EXT group: 145 (25.8%) vs 306 (12%), P< .001, respectively. Surgery end after regular working hours was not significantly higher with DPMV status compared to EXT. DPMV cohort had fewer cases with difficult airway when compared to EXT or MED. When compared to MED patients, those classified as DPMV received less fluid (2757 ± 2728 mL vs 4499 ± 2830 mL; P< .001), lost less blood (150 [20-625] mL vs 500 [200-1350] mL; P < .001), but did not differ in blood products transfused or duration of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In our tertiary medical center, patients often admitted to the ICU on mechanical ventilation without an objective medical indication. When compared to patients admitted to the ICU extubated, those mechanically ventilated but without an objective indication had a higher ASA PS class and were more likely to have an ASA E modifier. A surgery end time after regular working hours or difficult airway management was not associated with higher incidence of DPMV.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/tendencias , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Incidencia , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos
4.
Cureus ; 16(6): e61662, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38966438

RESUMEN

Introduction Peripheral intravenous (IV) administration sets are a source of infection that increases morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. In this quality improvement project, we aimed to enhance compliance with peripheral IV hub disinfection at anesthesia induction to follow the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) safe medication injection guidelines. Methods This study was conducted in the main operating suite of the University of Miami's principal hospital between June and October 2023. Audits of scrubbing device utilization by the anesthesiology team and focus groups were conducted before and after two educational interventions. Educational efforts focused on increasing compliance with peripheral IV disinfection using scrubbing devices.  Results Mean use per case, inferred from the number of devices dispensed, nearly doubled from 0.44 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.59) to 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.88) (P < 0.0001). Implications regarding steps to further enhance compliance are discussed. Conclusions Through a simple educational program, scrubbing device utilization increased significantly from baseline.

5.
Cureus ; 16(3): e56367, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501026

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To improve situational awareness in the operating room (OR), a virtual online operating room of hazards (ROH) with deliberately placed risks was created. We hypothesized that subjects first participating in the virtual online ROH would identify more hazards during an in-person ROH exercise in a physical OR than those in the control group who only received didactic training. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial at a major academic medical center, enrolling 48 pre-clinical medical students with no previous OR exposure during their classes. Control and experimental group subjects participated in a brief, online didactic orientation session conducted live over Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, Inc., San Jose, CA) to learn about latent hazards in the OR. Experimental group subjects further interacted with a virtual online operating ROH in which latent hazards were present. The fraction of deliberately created latent hazards placed in a physical, in-person OR identified by subjects was calculated. RESULTS: Experimental group subjects identified a significantly larger fraction of the created hazards (41.3%) than the control group (difference = 16.4%, 95% CI: 11.3% to 21.4%, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the number of non-hazards misidentified as hazards between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in the virtual online environment resulted in greater recognition of latent operating room hazards during a simulation conducted in a physical, in-person OR than in a didactic experience alone. Because creating an in-room experience to teach the identification of latent hazards in an OR is resource-intensive and requires removing the OR from clinical use, we recommend the virtual online approach described for training purposes. Adding items most misidentified as hazards is suggested for future implementation.

6.
Cureus ; 12(9): e10684, 2020 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33133850

RESUMEN

Background The internet has had an enormous influence on the field of medicine. In this regard, Statista, a market and consumer data company, estimated in 2019 that more than half the world's population (>four billion people) were active internet users. Accessing the World Wide Web has become the second nature for most. In the medical field, many patients look to the internet for information regarding certain procedures. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to assess the readability level of more than 492 online sources with information on a wide array of interventional pain procedures. Objective The aim is to determine the readability of online patient educational materials for interventional pain procedures. Study design This is a retrospective review. Methods We downloaded and reformatted to plain text 492 internet-based patient educational materials for 17 different interventional pain procedures. Plain text was processed using Readability Studio (Oleander Software Ltd., Vandalia, Ohio, USA), which employs 10 quantitative readability scales that are widely used and accepted in the medical literature. Results The software determined the average reading level (or grade level) of the 492 online sources we examined to be 12.1, with a range of 10.9 to 13. Limitations Google is not the only online search engine patients utilize for information, and the top links for each search could change over time. Also, some patients prefer videos rather than text to learn about their disease and treatment options. Finally, depending on their provider, the links that patients are directed to may be significantly more or less readable. Conclusions The average American adult reads at the eighth grade level. The National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association have recommended education materials be made available at the third to seventh grade level. Our analysis shows patient educational materials found online for interventional pain procedures to be overly technical, with an average reading level (or grade level) of 12.1.

7.
Anesth Prog ; 65(1): 52-55, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29509524

RESUMEN

A patient with recent jaw reconstruction presented for treatment of postoperative oropharyngeal hemorrhage. Asleep nasal fiberoptic intubation was attempted, but a rare and unanticipated complication ensued: rupture of right facial artery pseudoaneurysm. The difficult airway algorithm was followed up to the point of surgical airway. While nasal or oral fiberoptic intubation is often perceived as the safest approach for management of a difficult airway, we discuss alternative treatment strategies for patients with a facial pseudoaneurysm. Such alternatives include preoperative angiographic endovascular embolization of the vessel(s) feeding the pseudoaneurysm, and/or elective tracheostomy.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Vía Aérea/métodos , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/terapia , Algoritmos , Arterias/lesiones , Tecnología de Fibra Óptica , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Masculino , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA