Imatinib in combination with hydroxyurea versus hydroxyurea alone as oral therapy in patients with progressive pretreated glioblastoma resistant to standard dose temozolomide.

A randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 study of patients with progressive, recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) for whom front-line therapy had failed was conducted. This study was designed to determine whether combination therapy with imatinib and hydroxyurea (HU) has superior antitumor activity compared with HU monotherapy in the treatment of recurrent GBM. The target population consisted of patients with confirmed recurrent GBM and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 who had completed previous treatment comprising surgical resection, irradiation therapy, and first-line chemotherapy (preferably temozolomide (TMZ) containing regimen) and who have progressed despite treatment. If first-line chemotherapy did not contain TMZ, a second completed chemotherapy was acceptable. The primary efficacy parameter was progression-free survival (PFS). The primary comparison of combination therapy versus monotherapy for PFS was not significant (adjusted P = 0.56). The hazard ratio (HR) (adjusted HR = 0.93) was not clinically relevant. The median PFS for the combination arm was low at 6 weeks and similar to the median PFS in the monotherapy arm (6 weeks). The 6-month PFS for the two treatment groups was very similar (5% in the combination arm vs. 7% in the monotherapy arm). No clinically meaningful differences were found between the two treatment arms, and the primary study end point was not met. Among the patients receiving imatinib, no adverse events were reported that were either previously unknown or unexpected as a consequence of the disease.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib fails to inhibit pancreatic cancer progression.

Imatinib targets KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR) and is highly effective in the treatment of CML and GIST patients. Pancreatic cancers express KIT and PDGFRs. Therefore, 26 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were randomized to either gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 weekly) or imatinib (2x400 mg po) treatment daily. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was confirmed histologically and expression of KIT and PDGFRbeta was determined immunohistochemically in the biopsy specimens. Quality of life was assessed with two standard questionnaires. No objective responses were seen in either group. Median time to progression was 77 and 29 days (P=0.411) and median survival time was 140 and 60 days (P=0.517) for gemcitabine and imatinib, respectively. Survival and treatment responses were independent of KIT and PDGFRbeta expression in patients treated with imatinib. Grade 3/4 toxicities of imatinib treatment were anemia, elevated liver enzymes, vomiting, and dyspnea. Patients treated with imatinib reported diarrhoea and/or altered bowel function more frequently, which were treatable symptomatically. Quality of life was similar in both groups. In this small series of pancreatic cancer patients, treatment with imatinib was not associated with a significant control of cancer progression.

Influence of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs on trough level of imatinib in glioblastoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Imatinib mesylate is used in combination with hydroxyurea (HU) in ongoing clinical phase II studies in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). CYP3A4 enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) like carbamazepine, phenytoin, and oxcarbazepine--as well as non-EIAEDs like valproic acid, levetiracetam, and lamotrigine--are frequently used in patients with GBM. Since CYP3A4 is the major isozyme involved in the metabolism of imatinib, we investigated the influence of EIAEDs on imatinib pharmacokinetics (pk). METHODS: GBM patients received 600 mg imatinib p.o./o.d. in combination with 1.0 g HU p.o./o.d..together with either EIAEDs, non-EIAEDs, or no antiepileptic drug (non-AEDs) comedication. Trough plasma levels of imatinib and its active main metabolite N-desmethyl-imatinib (CGP74588) were determined biweekly in these patients, total 543 samples being collected from 224 patients (up to 6 times / patient). All three groups were compared to each other and with historical pharmacokinetic data obtained from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). RESULTS: Mean imatinib trough levels in patients not receiving AEDs ( 1404 ng/ml, CV 64%) and on non-EIAEDs (1374 ng/ml, CV 46%) were comparable with mean imatinib trough levels of the historical control group of CML patients (1400 ng/ml, CV 50%). Mean trough levels of imatinib were reduced up to 2.9-fold (477 ng/ml, CV 70%) in patients treated with EIAEDs. Only slight, but although significant differences were observed in the mean trough level of the metabolite CGP74588 between EIAED-, non-EIAED and no-AED patients, 240 ng/ml (CV 57%), 351 ng/ml (CV 34%) and 356 ng/ml (CV 52%), respectively. The corresponding mean level for CML patients was 300 ng/ml (CV 50%). CONCLUSION: Significant decreases of imatinib and CGP74588 trough levels were observed for patients receiving EIAEDs. The EIAED-induced reduction in trough imatinib levels can be avoided by switching to non-EIAEDs comedication or compensated by administering higher imatinib doses. In addition these data demonstrate that there is no significant difference in the pharmacokinetics of imatinib between patients with glioblastoma and CML.

Imatinib mesylate for targeting the platelet-derived growth factor beta receptor in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with refractory pancreatic, bile duct, colorectal, or gastric cancer--a dose-escalation Phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: In previous experimental models, because of its ability to inhibit the activity of platelet-derived growth factor beta receptor, imatinib decreased the interstitial fluid pressure and improved the delivery and efficacy of anticancer drugs, including fluorouracil. The objective of this Phase I study was to define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of imatinib in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with chemotherapy-refractory gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: A 3-patient cohort dose-escalating study design was used. Patients received leucovorin 200 mg/m2 followed by fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2 as a 24-hour infusion on Days 1 and 2 combined with imatinib on Days -4, -3, -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, and 4. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks, and the imatinib dose was escalated from 300 mg daily to 700 mg daily in 100-mg steps. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled at 5 dose levels. Frequent and dose-dependant National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 1-4 adverse events with suspected relation to the treatment were anemia (43%), nausea (33%), fluid retention (27%), elevated serum gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase (20%), and diarrhea. DLTs were severe neutropenia, central fluid retention, and severe nausea observed in 1 patient each, resulting in an MTD for imatinib of 600 mg per day. There were no differences in imatinib pharmacokinetics before or during chemotherapy. A minor response was observed; and signs of clinical activity, including the resolution of ascites and improvement in performance status, were noted in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of biweekly fluorouracil/leucovorin and imatinib 600 mg daily given in a week-on/week-off schedule was feasible and safe. Nausea and fluid retention represented the DLTs.