Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 105(4): 631-638, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38092231

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of combination therapy (hydrodilatation and subdeltoid bursa injection with corticosteroid, mobilization, and physical therapy [PT]) with that of PT alone for treating frozen shoulder. DESIGN: A prospective, 2-arm parallel, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation clinic of a private academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n=70) with frozen shoulder (freezing stage). INTERVENTIONS: Participants (n=35) in the combination group underwent hydrodilatation and subdeltoid bursa injection with corticosteroid twice, mobilization, and usual-care PT for 8 weeks; participants (n=35) in the PT group received only the usual-care PT for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measures were pain scores on a visual analog scale, range of motion (ROM), the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), quality of life (evaluated using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36]), and self-assessment of the treatment effect. RESULTS: Compared with the PT group, the combination group had significantly better pain (during activity), SPADI, SDQ, active and passive ROM, and self-assessment scores (all P<.001) as well as scores on some parts of the SF-36 (physical function and bodily pain, P<.05). Between-group differences were significant at the 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-month follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of hydrodilatation (with corticosteroid), bursal corticosteroid injection, and joint mobilization with PT was superior to PT alone for treating frozen shoulder, and the effects persisted for at least 6 months.


Asunto(s)
Bursitis , Articulación del Hombro , Humanos , Hombro , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Calidad de Vida , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Hombro , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Clin Rehabil ; 37(9): 1189-1200, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37021475

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether combination of corticosteroid subdeltoid injections and physiotherapy was more effective than either treatment alone in chronic subacromial bursitis. DESIGN: Prospective, three-arm randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation department of an academic hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients with chronic subacromial bursitis. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into corticosteroid injection (N = 36), physiotherapy (N = 40) and combined (N = 35) groups. Two corticosteroid subdeltoid injections in corticosteroid group, 8-week physical therapy emphasising on therapeutic exercise in physiotherapy group, and combined both treatments in combined group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were pain visual analogue scale and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at 8 weeks after finishing treatment. The secondary outcome measures were active range of motion, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, patient's evaluation of treatment effect, and symptom recurrence. RESULTS: Group comparison showed significant statistical difference in shoulder flexion (P < 0.003) and patient's evaluation of treatment effect (P < 0.001). The time and group interactions comparison revealed significant statistical differences in pain score (P < 0.024), external rotation (P < 0.044) and patient's evaluation of treatment effect (P < 0.001). The above statistics were in favour of the corticosteroid and combined groups rather than physiotherapy group. The percentage of recurrence was 36.1, 7.5 and 17.1 in the corticosteroid, physiotherapy and combined groups, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid subdeltoid injection, or combined with physiotherapy, was superior to physiotherapy alone, but the recurrence rate was least in the physiotherapy group.


Asunto(s)
Bursitis , Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Enfermedad Crónica , Bursitis/diagnóstico , Bursitis/terapia , Dolor , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico , Dolor de Hombro/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro/terapia
3.
Clin Rehabil ; 36(2): 230-239, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34791911

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To study the addition of feedback-guided neck strength home exercise to physical therapy as an enhanced rehabilitation programme in the treatment of patients with chronic neck pain. DESIGN: A prospective randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation department of an academic hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients with chronic neck pain. INTERVENTIONS: The patients in both groups received supervised physical therapy sessions 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Patients in Group A (N = 38) used the neck strengthening exerciser device for 20 min daily at home for 6 weeks and patients in Group B (N = 20) performed 20 min of daily regular neck exercise at home for 6 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Neck disability index, pain visual analogue scale, active range of motion of the neck, Patient Global Assessment and patient evaluation of treatment effect. All subjects were assessed at baseline as well as at 6- and 12-week follow-ups. RESULTS: At the 6-week follow-up, Group A exhibited significantly greater improvements (P < 0.05) in pain Visual Analogue Scale (Group A: 2.97 ± 1.57; Group B: 4.20 ± 1.82), neck disability index (Group A: 13.95 ± 8.07; Group B: 20.07 ± 9.14) and active cervical extension (Group A: 65.26 ± 12.76; Group B: 51.45 ± 11.78). At 12-week follow-up, Group A also exhibited significantly greater active cervical extension (Group A: 67.74 ± 11.94; Group B: 53.85 ± 14.09; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Adding neck strengthening exerciser home training to physical therapy was demonstrated to be more effective than physical therapy alone for patients with chronic neck pain.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor de Cuello , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Terapia por Ejercicio , Retroalimentación , Humanos , Dolor de Cuello/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA