RESUMEN
Background: The Surgical Infection Society (SIS) published evidence-based guidelines for the management of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) in 1992, 2002, 2010, and 2017. Here, we present the most recent guideline update based on a systematic review of current literature. Methods: The writing group, including current and former members of the SIS Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee and other individuals with content or guideline expertise within the SIS, working with a professional librarian, performed a systematic review using PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from 2016 until February 2024. Keyword descriptors combined "surgical site infections" or "intra-abdominal infections" in adults limited to randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Additional relevant publications not in the initial search but identified during literature review were included. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system was utilized to evaluate the evidence. The strength of each recommendation was rated strong (1) or weak (2). The quality of the evidence was rated high (A), moderate (B), or weak (C). The guideline contains new recommendations and updates to recommendations from previous IAI guideline versions. Final recommendations were developed by an iterative process. All writing group members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: This updated evidence-based guideline contains recommendations from the SIS for the treatment of adult patients with IAI. Evidence-based recommendations were developed for antimicrobial agent selection, timing, route of administration, duration, and de-escalation; timing of source control; treatment of specific pathogens; treatment of specific intra-abdominal disease processes; and implementation of hospital-based antimicrobial agent stewardship programs. Summary: This document contains the most up-to-date recommendations from the SIS on the prevention and management of IAI in adult patients.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Intraabdominales , Humanos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/terapia , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
Background: Active and recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections are associated with morbidity and mortality after surgery in adults. Current recommendations suggest delaying elective surgery in survivors for four to 12 weeks, depending on initial illness severity. Recently, the predominant causes of COVID-19 are the highly transmissible/less virulent Omicron variant/subvariants. Moreover, increased survivability of primary infections has engendered the long-COVID syndrome, with protean manifestations that may persist for months. Considering the more than 600,000,000 COVID-19 survivors, surgeons will likely be consulted by recovered patients seeking elective operations. Knowledge gaps of the aftermath of Omicron infections raise questions whether extant guidance for timing of surgery still applies to adults or should apply to the pediatric population. Methods: Scoping review of relevant English-language literature. Results: Most supporting data derive from early in the pandemic when the Alpha variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) predominated. The Omicron variant/subvariants generally cause milder infections with less organ dysfunction; many infections are asymptomatic, especially in children. Data are scant with respect to adult surgical outcomes after Omicron infection, and especially so for pediatric surgical outcomes at any stage of the pandemic. Conclusions: Numerous knowledge gaps persist with respect to the disease, the recovered pre-operative patient, the nature of the proposed procedure, and supporting data. For example, should the waiting period for all but urgent elective surgery be extended beyond 12 weeks, e.g., after serious/critical illness, or for patients with long-COVID and organ dysfunction? Conversely, can the waiting periods for asymptomatic patients or vaccinated patients be shortened? How shall children be risk-stratified, considering the distinctiveness of pediatric COVID-19 and the paucity of data? Forthcoming guidelines will hopefully answer these questions but may require ongoing modifications based on additional new data and the epidemiology of emerging strains.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Alberta , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Servicios de SaludRESUMEN
Background: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) and surgical stabilization of sternal fractures (SSSF) involves open reduction and internal fixation of fractures with an implantable titanium plate to restore and maintain anatomic alignment. The presence of this foreign, non-absorbable material presents an opportunity for infection. Although surgical site infection (SSI) and implant infection rates after SSRF and SSSF are low, they present a challenging clinical entity. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society's Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee and Chest Wall Injury Society's Publication Committee convened to develop recommendations for management of SSIs or implant-related infections after SSRF or SSSF. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane database were searched for pertinent studies. Using a process of iterative consensus, all committee members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF who develop an SSI or an implant-related infection, there is insufficient evidence to suggest a single optimal management strategy. For patients with an SSI, systemic antibiotic therapy, local wound debridement, and vacuum-assisted closure have been used in isolation or combination. For patients with an implant-related infection, initial implant removal with or without systemic antibiotic therapy, systemic antibiotic therapy with local wound drainage, and systemic antibiotic therapy with local antibiotic therapy have been documented. For patients who do not undergo initial implant removal, 68% ultimately require implant removal to achieve source control. Conclusions: Insufficient evidence precludes the ability to recommend guidelines for the treatment of SSI or implant-related infection following SSRF or SSSF. Further studies should be performed to identify the optimal management strategy in this population.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de las Costillas , Pared Torácica , Humanos , Fracturas de las Costillas/cirugía , Fracturas de las Costillas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Costillas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Deficiency of coagulation factor VIII in hemophilia A disrupts clotting and prolongs bleeding. While the current mainstay of therapy is infusion of factor VIII concentrates, inhibitor antibodies often render these ineffective. Because preclinical evidence shows electrical vagus nerve stimulation accelerates clotting to reduce hemorrhage without precipitating systemic thrombosis, we reasoned it might reduce bleeding in hemophilia A. Using two different male murine hemorrhage and thrombosis models, we show vagus nerve stimulation bypasses the factor VIII deficiency of hemophilia A to decrease bleeding and accelerate clotting. Vagus nerve stimulation targets acetylcholine-producing T lymphocytes in spleen and α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α7nAChR) on platelets to increase calcium uptake and enhance alpha granule release. Splenectomy or genetic deletion of T cells or α7nAChR abolishes vagal control of platelet activation, thrombus formation, and bleeding in male mice. Vagus nerve stimulation warrants clinical study as a therapy for coagulation disorders and surgical or traumatic bleeding.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Trombosis , Estimulación del Nervio Vago , Ratones , Masculino , Animales , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Hemofilia A/terapia , Receptor Nicotínico de Acetilcolina alfa 7/genética , Plaquetas , Hemorragia/terapia , Nervio VagoRESUMEN
The innate immune system protects against infection and tissue injury through the specialized organs of the reticuloendothelial system, including the lungs, liver, and spleen. The central nervous system regulates innate immune responses via the vagus nerve, a mechanism termed the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway. Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits proinflammatory cytokine production by signaling through the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit. Previously, the functional relationship between the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway and the reticuloendothelial system was unknown. Here we show that vagus nerve stimulation fails to inhibit tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production in splenectomized animals during lethal endotoxemia. Selective lesioning of the common celiac nerve abolishes TNF suppression by vagus nerve stimulation, suggesting that the cholinergic pathway is functionally hard wired to the spleen via this branch of the vagus nerve. Administration of nicotine, an alpha7 agonist that mimics vagus nerve stimulation, increases proinflammatory cytokine production and lethality from polymicrobial sepsis in splenectomized mice, indicating that the spleen is critical to the protective response of the cholinergic pathway. These results reveal a specific, physiological connection between the nervous and innate immune systems that may be exploited through either electrical vagus nerve stimulation or administration of alpha7 agonists to inhibit proinflammatory cytokine production during infection and tissue injury.
Asunto(s)
Acetilcolina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Acetilcolina/fisiología , Endotoxemia/inmunología , Sepsis/inmunología , Transducción de Señal/fisiología , Esplenectomía , Animales , Endotoxemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Endotoxemia/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Noqueados , Ratas , Ratas Endogámicas Lew , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/microbiología , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Severe sepsis, a lethal syndrome after infection or injury, is the third leading cause of mortality in the United States. The pathogenesis of severe sepsis is characterized by organ damage and accumulation of apoptotic lymphocytes in the spleen, thymus, and other organs. To examine the potential causal relationships of apoptosis to organ damage, we administered Z-VAD-FMK, a broad-spectrum caspase inhibitor, to mice with sepsis. We found that Z-VAD-FMK-treated septic mice had decreased levels of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a critical cytokine mediator of organ damage in severe sepsis, and suppressed apoptosis in the spleen and thymus. In vitro, apoptotic cells activate macrophages to release HMGB1. Monoclonal antibodies against HMGB1 conferred protection against organ damage but did not prevent the accumulation of apoptotic cells in the spleen. Thus, our data indicate that HMGB1 production is downstream of apoptosis on the final common pathway to organ damage in severe sepsis.
Asunto(s)
Apoptosis/inmunología , Proteína HMGB1/fisiología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/patología , Clorometilcetonas de Aminoácidos/farmacología , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de Caspasas , Femenino , Proteína HMGB1/inmunología , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Sepsis/inmunología , Sepsis/terapiaRESUMEN
Background: Manifestations of gallbladder disease range from intermittent abdominal pain (symptomatic cholelithiasis) to potentially life-threatening illness (gangrenous cholecystitis). Although surgical intervention to treat acute cholecystitis is well defined, the role of antibiotic administration before or after cholecystectomy to decrease morbidity or mortality is less clear. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society's Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee convened to develop guidelines for antibiotic use in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease to prevent surgical site infection, other infection, hospital length of stay, or mortality. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database were searched for relevant studies. Evaluation of the published evidence was performed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system. Using a process of iterative consensus, all authors voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: We recommend against routine use of peri-operative antibiotic agents in low-risk patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We recommend use of peri-operative antibiotic agents for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. We recommend against use of post-operative antibiotic agents after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis. We recommend against use of post-operative antibiotic agents in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild or moderate acute cholecystitis. We recommend a maximum of four days of antibiotic agents, and perhaps a shorter duration in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for severe (Tokyo Guidelines grade III) cholecystitis. Conclusions: This guideline summarizes the current Surgical Infection Society recommendations for antibiotic use in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Colecistitis Aguda , Colecistitis , Colelitiasis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Colecistitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Colecistitis/etiología , Colecistitis/cirugía , Colecistitis Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Colelitiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Colelitiasis/etiología , Colelitiasis/cirugía , HumanosRESUMEN
Background: Open fractures, defined as fractures communicating with the environment through a skin wound, cause substantial morbidity after traumatic injury. Current evidence supports administration of prophylactic systemic antibiotic agents to patients with open extremity fractures to decrease infectious complications. Methods: The Therapeutic and Guidelines Committee of The Surgical Infection Society convened to revise guidelines for antibiotic use in open fractures. PubMed was queried for pertinent studies. Evaluation of the published evidence was performed using the GRADE framework. All committee members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: In type I or II open extremity fractures, we recommend against administration of extended-spectrum antibiotic coverage compared with gram-positive coverage alone to decrease infections complications, hospital length of stay or mortality. In type III open extremity fractures, we recommend antibiotic therapy for no more than 24 hrs after injury, in the absence of clinical signs of active infection, to decrease infectious complications, hospital length of stay or mortality, and we recommend against extended antimicrobial coverage beyond gram-positive organisms to decrease infectious complications, hospital length of stay or mortality. In type III open extremity fractures with associated bone loss, we recommend antibiotic therapy in addition to systemic therapy to decrease infectious complications. Conclusions: Although antibiotic agents remain a standard of care for infection prevention after open extremity fractures, our findings and surveys of clinical practice patterns clearly show that additional robust clinical trials are needed to provide stronger corroborating evidence.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Fracturas Abiertas , Humanos , Fracturas Abiertas/complicaciones , Fracturas Abiertas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Extremidades , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/complicaciones , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) can result in life-threatening illness requiring surgery. Surgical options for managing severe or fulminant, non-perforated C. difficile colitis include total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy or creation of a diverting loop ileostomy with antegrade vancomycin lavage. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society's Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee convened to develop guidelines for summarizing the current SIS recommendations for total abdominal colectomy versus diverting loop ileostomy with antegrade lavage for severe or fulminant, non-perforated C. difficile colitis. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database were searched for pertinent studies. Severe infection was defined as laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile infection with leukocytosis (white blood cell count of ≥15,000 cells/mL) or elevated creatinine (serum creatinine level >1.5 mg/dL). Fulminant infection was defined as laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile infection with hypotension or shock, ileus, or megacolon. Perforation was defined as complete disruption of the colon wall. Total abdominal colectomy was defined as resection of the ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon with end ileostomy. For the purpose of the guideline, the terms subtotal colectomy, total abdominal colectomy, and rectal-sparing total colectomy were used interchangeably. Diverting loop ileostomy with antegrade enema was defined as creation of both a diverting loop ileostomy with intra-operative colonic lavage and post-operative antegrade vancomycin unless otherwise specified. Evaluation of the published evidence was performed using the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Using a process of iterative consensus, all committee members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: We recommend that total abdominal colectomy be the procedure of choice for definitive therapy of severe or fulminant, non-perforated C. difficile colitis. In select patients, colon preservation using diverting loop ileostomy with intra-colonic vancomycin may be associated with higher rates of ostomy reversal and restoration of gastrointestinal continuity but may lead to development of recurrent C. difficile colitis. Conclusions: This guideline summarizes the current Surgical Infection Society recommendations regarding use of total abdominal colectomy versus diverting loop ileostomy with antegrade lavage for adults with severe or fulminant, non-perforated C. difficile infection.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Colitis , Clostridioides , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/métodos , Colitis/cirugía , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Ileostomía/métodos , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodosRESUMEN
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, races across academia and industry have been initiated to identify and develop disease modifying or preventative therapeutic strategies has been initiated. The primary focus has been on pharmacological treatment of the immune and respiratory system and the development of a vaccine. The hyperinflammatory state ("cytokine storm") observed in many cases of COVID-19 indicates a prognostically negative disease progression that may lead to respiratory distress, multiple organ failure, shock, and death. Many critically ill patients continue to be at risk for significant, long-lasting morbidity or mortality. The human immune and respiratory systems are heavily regulated by the central nervous system, and intervention in the signaling of these neural pathways may permit targeted therapeutic control of excessive inflammation and pulmonary bronchoconstriction. Several technologies, both invasive and non-invasive, are available and approved for clinical use, but have not been extensively studied in treatment of the cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients. This manuscript provides an overview of the role of the nervous system in inflammation and respiration, the current understanding of neuromodulatory techniques from preclinical and clinical studies and provides a rationale for testing non-invasive neuromodulation to modulate acute systemic inflammation and respiratory dysfunction caused by SARS-CoV-2 and potentially other pathogens. The authors of this manuscript have co-founded the International Consortium on Neuromodulation for COVID-19 to advocate for and support studies of these technologies in the current coronavirus pandemic.
RESUMEN
Background: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures is recommended in patients with flail chest or multiple displaced rib fractures with physiologic compromise. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) and surgical stabilization of sternal fractures (SSSF) involve open reduction and internal fixation of fractures with a plate construct to restore anatomic alignment. Most plate constructs are composed of titanium and presence of this foreign, non-absorbable material presents opportunity for implant infection. Although implant infection rates after SSRF and SSSF are low, they present a challenging clinical entity often requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy, debridement, and potentially implant removal. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society's Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee and Chest Wall Injury Society's Publication Committee convened to develop recommendations for antibiotic use during and after surgical stabilization of traumatic rib and sternal fractures. Clinical scenarios included patients with concomitant infectious processes (sepsis, pneumonia, empyema, cellulitis) or sources of contamination (open chest, gross contamination) incurred as a result of their trauma and present at the time of their surgical stabilization. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for pertinent studies. Using a process of iterative consensus, all committee members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF in the absence of pre-existing infectious process, there is insufficient evidence to suggest existing peri-operative guidelines or recommendations are inadequate. For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF in the presence of sepsis, pneumonia, or an empyema, there is insufficient evidence to provide recommendations on duration and choice of antibiotic. This decision may be informed by existing guidelines for the concomitant infection. For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF with an open or contaminated chest there is insufficient evidence to provide specific antibiotic recommendations. Conclusions: This guideline document summarizes the current Surgical Infection Society and Chest Wall Injury Society recommendations regarding antibiotic use during and after surgical stabilization of traumatic rib or sternal fractures. Limited evidence exists in the chest wall surgical stabilization literature and further studies should be performed to delineate risk of implant infection among patients undergoing SSSRF or SSSF with concomitant infectious processes.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles , Fracturas de las Costillas , Sepsis , Pared Torácica , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de las Costillas/complicaciones , Fracturas de las Costillas/cirugía , Costillas , Sepsis/complicaciones , Pared Torácica/cirugíaRESUMEN
The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway is a physiological mechanism that inhibits cytokine production and diminishes tissue injury during inflammation. Recent studies demonstrate that cholinergic signaling reduces adhesion molecule expression and chemokine production by endothelial cells and suppresses leukocyte migration during inflammation. It is unclear how vagus nerve stimulation regulates leukocyte trafficking because the vagus nerve does not innervate endothelial cells. Using mouse models of leukocyte trafficking, we show that the spleen, which is a major point of control for cholinergic modulation of cytokine production, is essential for vagus nerve-mediated regulation of neutrophil activation and migration. Administration of nicotine, a pharmacologic agonist of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, significantly reduces levels of CD11b, a beta(2)-integrin involved in cell adhesion and leukocyte chemotaxis, on the surface of neutrophils in a dose-dependent manner and this function requires the spleen. Similarly, vagus nerve stimulation significantly attenuates neutrophil surface CD11b levels only in the presence of an intact and innervated spleen. Further mechanistic studies reveal that nicotine suppresses F-actin polymerization, the rate-limiting step for CD11b surface expression. These studies demonstrate that modulation of leukocyte trafficking via cholinergic signaling to the spleen is a specific, centralized neural pathway positioned to suppress the excessive accumulation of neutrophils at inflammatory sites. Activating this mechanism may have important therapeutic potential for preventing tissue injury during inflammation.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno CD11b/fisiología , Inhibición de Migración Celular/inmunología , Agonistas Colinérgicos/administración & dosificación , Regulación hacia Abajo/inmunología , Infiltración Neutrófila/inmunología , Transducción de Señal/inmunología , Bazo/inmunología , Bazo/inervación , Animales , Antígeno CD11b/biosíntesis , Antígeno CD11b/metabolismo , Carragenina/fisiología , Femenino , Mediadores de Inflamación/antagonistas & inhibidores , Mediadores de Inflamación/metabolismo , Mediadores de Inflamación/fisiología , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Modelos Animales , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Neutrófilos/metabolismo , Neutrófilos/patología , Nicotina/administración & dosificación , Bazo/citología , Esplenectomía , Nervio Vago/inmunologíaRESUMEN
The autonomic nervous system maintains homeostasis through its sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions. During infection, cells of the immune system release cytokines and other mediators that cause fever, hypotension, and tissue injury. Although the effect of cytokines on the nervous system has been known for decades, only recently has it become evident that the autonomic nervous system, in turn, regulates cytokine production through neural pathways. We have previously shown that efferent vagus nerve signals regulate cytokine production through the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha7, a mechanism termed "the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway." Here, we show that vagus nerve stimulation during endotoxemia specifically attenuates TNF production by spleen macrophages in the red pulp and the marginal zone. Administration of nicotine, a pharmacological agonist of alpha7, attenuated TNF immunoreactivity in these specific macrophage subpopulations. Synaptophysin-positive nerve endings were observed in close apposition to red pulp macrophages, but they do not express choline acetyltransferase or vesicular acetylcholine transporter. Surgical ablation of the splenic nerve and catecholamine depletion by reserpine indicate that these nerves are catecholaminergic and are required for functional inhibition of TNF production by vagus nerve stimulation. Thus, the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway regulates TNF production in discrete macrophage populations via two serially connected neurons: one preganglionic, originating in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve, and the second postganglionic, originating in the celiac-superior mesenteric plexus, and projecting in the splenic nerve.
Asunto(s)
Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/inmunología , Endotoxemia/inmunología , Bazo/inervación , Factores de Necrosis Tumoral/inmunología , Nervio Vago/inmunología , Animales , Estimulación Eléctrica , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente , Macrófagos/inmunología , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Nicotina/inmunología , Nicotina/metabolismo , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Receptores Nicotínicos/inmunología , Bazo/citología , Receptor Nicotínico de Acetilcolina alfa 7RESUMEN
Background: Facial fractures are common in traumatic injury. Antibiotic administration practices for traumatic facial fractures differ widely. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society's (SIS's) Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee convened to develop guidelines for antibiotic administration in the management of traumatic facial fractures. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database were searched for pertinent studies. Pre-operative antibiotics were defined as those administered more than 1 hour before surgery. Peri-operative antibiotics were those administered within 1 hour of the start of surgery depending on the type of antibiotic and as late as ≤24 hours after surgery. Post-operative antibiotics were defined as those administered >24 hours after surgery. Prophylactic antibiotics were those administered for >24 hours without a documented infection. Evaluation of the published evidence was performed with the GRADE system. Using a process of iterative consensus, all committee members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: We recommend that in adult patients with non-operative upper face, midface, or mandibular fractures, prophylactic antibiotics not be prescribed and that in adult patients with operative, non-mandibular fractures, pre-operative antibiotics likewise not be prescribed. We recommend that in adult patients with operative, mandibular fractures, pre-operative antibiotics not be prescribed; and in adult patients with operative, non-mandibular facial fractures, post-operative (>24 hours) antibiotics again not be prescribed. We recommend that in adult patients with operative, mandibular facial fractures, post-operative antibiotics (> 24 hours) not be prescribed. Conclusions: This guideline summarizes the current SIS recommendations regarding antibiotic management of patients with traumatic facial fractures.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Fracturas Mandibulares , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Humanos , Fracturas Mandibulares/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Background: The Surgical Infection Society (SIS) Guidelines for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) were published in October 2009 in Surgical Infections. The purpose of this project was to provide a succinct update on the earlier guidelines based on an additional decade of data. Methods: We reviewed the previous guidelines eliminating bite wounds and diabetic foot infections including their associated references. Relevant articles on the topic of complicated SSTIs from 2008-2020 were reviewed and graded individually. Comparisons were then made between the old and the new graded recommendations with review of the older references by two authors when there was disparity between the grades. Results: The majority of new studies addressed antimicrobial options and duration of therapy particularly in complicated abscesses. There were fewer updated studies on diagnosis and specific operative interventions. Many of the topics addressed in the original guidelines had no new literature to evaluate. Conclusions: Most recommendations remain unchanged from the original guidelines with the exception of increased support for adjuvant antimicrobial therapy after drainage of complex abscess and increased data for the use of alternative antimicrobial agents.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Drenaje , Humanos , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Background: As the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues globally, high numbers of new infections are developing nationwide, particularly in the U.S. Midwest and along both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. The need to accommodate growing numbers of hospitalized patients has led facilities in affected areas to suspend anew or curtail normal hospital activities, including elective surgery, even as earlier-affected areas normalized surgical services. Backlogged surgical cases now number in the tens of millions globally. Facilities will be hard-pressed to address these backlogs, even absent the recrudescence of COVID-19. This document provides guidance for the safe and effective resumption of surgical services as circumstances permit. Methods: Review and synthesis of pertinent international peer-reviewed literature, with integration of expert opinion. Results: The "second-wave" of serious infections is placing the healthcare system under renewed stress. Surgical teams likely will encounter persons harboring the virus, whether symptomatic or not. Continued vigilance and protection of patients and staff remain paramount. Reviewed are the impact of COVID-19 on the surgical workforce, considerations for operating on a COVID-19 patient and the outcomes of such operations, the size and nature of the surgical backlog, and the logistics of resumption, including organizational considerations, patient and staff safety, preparation of the surgical candidate, and the role of enhanced recovery programs to reduce morbidity, length of stay, and cost by rational, equitable resource utilization. Conclusions: Resumption of surgical services requires institutional commitment (including teams of surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, pharmacists, therapists, dieticians, and administrators). Structured protocols and equitable implementation programs, and iterative audit, planning, and integration will improve outcomes, enhance safety, preserve resources, and reduce cost, all of which will contribute to safe and successful reduction of the surgical backlog.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/normas , Guías como Asunto , Control de Infecciones/normas , Pandemias/prevención & control , Atención Perioperativa/normas , COVID-19/epidemiología , Instituciones de Salud/normas , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a critical mediator of lethal sepsis. Previously, we showed that apoptotic cells can activate macrophages to release HMGB1. During sepsis, apoptosis occurs primarily in lymphoid organs, including the spleen and thymus. Currently, it is unclear whether this accelerated lymphoid organ apoptosis contributes to systemic release of HMGB1 in sepsis. In this study, we report that splenectomy significantly reduces systemic HMGB1 release and improves survival in mice with polymicrobial sepsis. Treatment with a broad-spectrum caspase inhibitor reduces systemic lymphocyte apoptosis, suppresses circulating HMGB1 concentrations, and improves survival during polymicrobial sepsis, but fails to protect septic mice following splenectomy. These findings indicate that apoptosis in the spleen is essential to the pathogenesis of HMGB1-mediated sepsis lethality.
Asunto(s)
Proteína HMGB1/sangre , Sepsis/terapia , Esplenectomía , Animales , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de Caspasas , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Linfocitos/citología , Ratones , Sepsis/mortalidad , Bazo/citología , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Background: Surgical research is potentially invasive, high-risk, and costly. Research that advances medical dogma must justify both its ends and its means. Although ethical questions do not always have simple answers, it is critically important for the clinician, researcher, and patient to approach these dilemmas and surgical research in a thoughtful, conscientious manner. Methods: We present four ethical issues in surgical research and discuss the opposing viewpoints. These topics were presented and discussed at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Surgical Infection Society as pro-con debates. The presenters of each opinion developed a succinct summary of their respective reviews for this publication. Results: The key subjects for these pro-con debates were: (1) Should patients be enrolled for time-sensitive surgical infection research using an opt-out or an opt-in strategy? (2) Should patients who are being enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing surgery with a non-operative intervention pay the costs of their treatment arm? (3) Should the scientific community embrace open access journals as the future of scientific publishing? (4) Should the majority of funding go to clinical or basic science research? Important points were illustrated in each of the pro-con presentations and illustrated the difficulties that are facing the performance and payment of infection research in the future. Conclusions: Surgical research is ethically complex, with conflicting demands between individual patients, society, and healthcare economics. At present, there are no clear answers to these and the many other ethical issues facing research in the future. Answers will only come from continued robust dialogue among all stakeholders in surgical research.
Asunto(s)
Ética en Investigación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/ética , Comunicación , Congresos como Asunto , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Consentimiento Informado/normas , Publicación de Acceso Abierto/ética , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/economía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/ética , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-associated viral infection (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) is a virulent, contagious viral pandemic that is affecting populations worldwide. As with any airborne viral respiratory infection, surgical and non-surgical patients may be affected. Methods: Review and synthesis of pertinent English-language literature pertaining to COVID-19 infection among adult patients. Results: COVID-19 disease that requires hospitalization results in critical illness approximately 25% of the time and requires mechanical ventilation with positive airway pressure. Acute kidney injury, a marked hypercoagulable state, and sometimes myocarditis can be features of COVID-19 in addition to the characteristic severe acute lung injury. Even if not among the most seriously afflicted, older patients with medical comorbidities are both predisposed to infection and risk increased morbidity and mortality, however, all persons presenting for surgical intervention should be suspected of infection (and thus transmissibility) even if asymptomatic. Although most elective surgery has been curtailed by administrative or governmental fiat, patients will still need urgent or emergency operative intervention for time-sensitive disease processes such as malignant neoplasia or for true emergencies such as perforated viscus or traumatic injury. It is possible to provide safe surgical care for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients and minimize nosocomial transmission to healthcare workers. Conclusions: This guidance will facilitate appropriate protection of patients and staff, and maintenance of infection control measures to assist surgical personnel and facilities to prepare for COVID-19-infected adult patients requiring urgent or emergent operative intervention and to provide optimal patient care.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/normas , Control de Infecciones/normas , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Adulto , Aerosoles/efectos adversos , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/virología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Instituciones de Salud/normas , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/normas , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Background: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) affects four million people worldwide. Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) occurs in less than 15% of cases but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Administration of antibiotics is standard treatment for gastrointestinal perforations, including PPU. Although fungal growth is common in peritoneal fluid cultures from patients with PPU, current data suggest empiric anti-fungal therapy fails to improve outcomes. To examine the role of anti-fungal agents in the treatment of PPU, the Surgical Infection Society hosted an Update Symposium at its 37th Annual Meeting. Here, we provide a synopsis of the symposium's findings and a brief review of prospective and retrospective reports on the subject. Methods: A search of Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed between January 1, 2000, and November 1, 2018, comparing outcomes of PPU following empiric anti-fungal treatment versus no anti-fungal therapy. We used the search terms "perforated peptic ulcer," "gastroduodenal ulcer," "anti-fungal," and "perforated" or "perforation." Results: There are no randomized clinical trials comparing outcomes specifically for patients with PPU treated with or without empiric anti-fungal therapy. We identified one randomized multi-center trial evaluating outcomes for patients with intra-abdominal perforations, including PPU, that were treated with or without empiric anti-fungal therapy. We identified one single-center prospective series and three additional retrospective studies comparing outcomes for patients with PPU treated with or without empiric anti-fungal therapy. Conclusion: The current evidence reviewed here does not demonstrate efficacy of anti-fungal agents in improving outcomes in patients with PPU. As such, we caution against the routine use of empiric anti-fungal agents in these patients. Further studies should help identify specific subpopulations of patients who might derive benefit from anti-fungal therapy and help define appropriate treatment regimens and durations that minimize the risk of resistance, adverse events, and cost.