Hairline fractures following volar plating of the distal radius: a recently recognized hardware-related complication.

OBJECTIVES: Intraoperative hairline longitudinal fractures were recently reported in association with distal radius volar plating. Our aim was to further analyze this newly described complication. METHODS: A retrospective radiographic and chart review was performed on 225 patients who underwent distal radius plating between June 2013 and June 2015. The Acu-Loc/Acu-Loc2© plating system (Acumed, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used in 208 cases, and the VariAx© plating system (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) was used in 17 cases. Three independent reviewers performed a blind evaluation of all relevant radiographs for the occurrence of longitudinal fractures around the plate, and validity was considered only when there was agreement among all three of them. RESULTS: Hairline longitudinal fractures were identified in 57 cases (25%), 55 with the Acu-Loc/Acu-Loc2© system and 2 with the VariAx© system. All fractures occurred with volar plating. Fracture occurrence was associated with age over 59 years, female gender, extra-articular fractures, and the use of Hexalobe screws (Acu-Loc/Acu-Loc2© system). CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the source of fracture occurrence lies within the screw design and that better screw design and possibly tapping in patients at risk may reduce the occurrence of intraoperative hairline longitudinal fractures. Further clinical and biomechanical research is needed to better understand this newly reported complication.

A Comparison of Locking Plates and Intramedullary Pinning for Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Metacarpal shaft fractures that necessitate surgery are frequently fixated with either intramedullary pins or plates and screws. This study compared outcome measurements of these two techniques. METHODS: Patients operated on for closed shaft fractures of metacarpals 2-5 were examined at least 1 year after injury. All fractures were fixated by pinning between years 2013 and 2015 and by locking plates and screws between 2016 and 2017. Evaluation included range of motion measurements for all fingers compared with the contralateral hand; comparison of grip strength; finger alignment and rotation; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; and radiographic measurements of fracture reduction and healing. RESULTS: Thirty patients with 39 fractured metacarpals treated by pinning were compared with 29 patients with 35 fractured metacarpals treated by locking plate and screws. Both groups had similar characteristics and preoperative fracture patterns on radiograph. Patients in the plate group were found to have significantly improved outcomes in total range of motion of the operated digits (loss of 4° extension, 10° flexion, and 14° total vs 10° extension, 19° flexion, and 29° total), grip strength (93% vs 83% of contralateral hand), rotational deformity (5 digits, 1° vs 15 digits, 6°), and DASH score (10.5 vs 15.6). Radiographic bone healing time (59 vs 50 days) and operative time (58 vs 41 minutes) were both significantly longer in fractures fixated by plates. CONCLUSIONS: Fixation with locking plates allows earlier mobilization without need for splinting. Our study supports the use of this method over intramedullary pinning for metacarpal shaft fractures.