Prevalence of symptoms in glioma patients throughout the disease trajectory: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Glioma patients suffer from a wide range of symptoms which influence quality of life negatively. The aim of this review is to give an overview of symptoms most prevalent in glioma patients throughout the total disease trajectory, to be used as a basis for the development of a specific glioma Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) for early assessment and monitoring of symptoms in glioma patients. METHODS: A systematic review focused on symptom prevalence in glioma patients in different phases of disease and treatment was performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE according to PRISMA recommendations. We calculated weighted means for prevalence rates per symptom. RESULTS: The search identified 2.074 unique papers, of which 32 were included in this review. In total 25 symptoms were identified. The ten most prevalent symptoms were: seizures (37%), cognitive deficits (36%), drowsiness (35%), dysphagia (30%), headache (27%), confusion (27%), aphasia (24%), motor deficits (21%), fatigue (20%) and dyspnea (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Eight out of ten of the most prevalent symptoms in glioma patients are related to the central nervous system and therefore specific for glioma. Our findings emphasize the importance of tailored symptom care for glioma patients and may aid in the development of specific PROMs for glioma patients in different phases of the disease.

Use of a Symptom Diary on Oncology Wards: Effect on Symptom Management and Recommendations for Implementation.

BACKGROUND: Management of symptoms is essential in reducing the symptom burden of cancer patients. The effect of symptom diaries on symptom management to date has been evaluated only in ambulatory settings. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to identify the key facilitators for successful implementation of symptom diaries on oncology wards from patients' and professionals' perspectives and to evaluate implementation outcomes. METHODS: In 2 cycles of action research, the Utrecht Symptom Diary (USD) was implemented on 3 oncology wards and a daycare unit. Key facilitators for implementation were identified by thematic coding of interviews. The effect of the implementation was evaluated in cycle II in a pretest-posttest design. We performed statistical tests (Mann-Whitney/t test/χ2) on Symptom Management Performance items in questionnaires and medical records. RESULTS: We interviewed 25 patients, 8 doctors, and 25 nurses. Seven key facilitators for implementation emerged. After implementation of the USD in cycle II, Symptom Management Performance was significantly (P < .05) improved for patients (3/12 items, n = 33 pretest/26 posttest) and professionals (6/12 items, n = 21 pretest/19 posttest). Significantly more symptoms (P = .00), working hypotheses (P = .023), treatment plans (P = .00), and interventions (P = .00) were reported (n = 47 pretest/47 posttest). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the USD significantly improved symptom management in oncology wards. We recommend (1) using a diagnosis-specific diary; (2) making clear, individualized working-arrangements; (3) training professionals; (4) using the plan-do-check-act cycle; (5) acting multidisciplinary; (6) providing guidelines and training; and (7) assuring adequate information communications technology (ICT). IMPLICATIONS: Symptom diaries are increasingly used, but implementation is challenging. This study provides knowledge on their benefits and an evidence-based strategy for implementation with positive outcomes achieved in patient care.

Symptom Monitoring in Glioma Patients: Development of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Glioma Module.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Symptoms in glioma patients are distinctly different from symptoms in patients with other types of cancer and have a high impact on quality of life. In this study, a stepwise approach of developing a glioma module for assessment of symptoms, based on a Dutch adapted and validated version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, is described. METHODS: Three phases of instrument development were conducted: a systematic literature review and a focus group interview with experts were performed (phase I) to generate relevant symptoms and construct a preliminary module (phase II). In phase III, the preliminary module was evaluated (n = 25) and pretested (n = 45) in glioma patients representing all phases of the disease. RESULTS: Our glioma module contains 11 generic and 6 neurologic symptoms. Patients completed the glioma module in a median of 5 minutes, and 56% of the patients required some assistance to complete the instrument. CONCLUSION: The glioma module has initial validity and will benefit from prospective validation in a larger cohort of patients with glioma.