Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 199
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 110, 2024 Mar 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555466

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The reduction of myocardial infarction (MI) and narrowing the gap between the populations with and without diabetes are important goals of diabetes care. We analyzed time trends for sex-specific incidence rates (IR) of first MI (both non-fatal MI and fatal MI) as well as separately for first non-fatal MI and fatal MI in the population with and without diabetes. METHODS: Using data from the KORA myocardial infarction registry (Augsburg, Germany), we estimated age-adjusted IR in people with and without diabetes, corresponding relative risks (RR), and time trends from 1985 to 2016 using Poisson regression. RESULTS: There were 19,683 people with first MI (34% fatal MI, 71% men, 30% with diabetes) between 1985 and 2016. In the entire study population, the IR of first MI decreased from 359 (95% CI: 345-374) to 236 (226-245) per 100,000 person years. In men with diabetes, IR decreased only in 2013-2016. This was due to first non-fatal MI, where IR in men with diabetes increased until 2009-2012, and slightly decreased in 2013-2016. Overall, fatal MI declined stronger than first non-fatal MI corresponding to IRs. The RR of first MI substantially increased among men from 1.40 (1.22-1.61) in 1985-1988 to 2.60 (2.26-2.99) in 1997-2000 and moderately decreased in 2013-2016: RR: 1.75 (1.47-2.09). Among women no consistent time trend for RR was observed. Time trends for RR were similar regarding first non-fatal MI and fatal MI. CONCLUSIONS: Over the study period, we found a decreased incidence of first MI and fatal MI in the entire study population. The initial increase of first non-fatal MI in men with diabetes needs further research. The gap between populations with and without diabetes remained.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Infarto del Miocardio , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Incidencia , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Riesgo , Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 35(2): 317-326, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37819401

RESUMEN

We examined incidence rates (IR) for all distal radius fracture (DRF) events based on inpatient and outpatient data from a large statutory health insurance in Germany. Of all DRF, 56% were treated as inpatients, and thus, 44% treated as outpatients. IR were higher in women than in men. PURPOSE: Although a distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures in the elderly population, epidemiological data are limited. Many studies examine only hospitalized patients, do not analyze time trends, or include only small populations. In this retrospective population-based observational study, routine data on inpatient and outpatient care of persons aged ≥ 60 years insured by a large statutory health insurance in Germany were analyzed from 2014 to 2018. METHODS: DRF were identified by ICD-10 codes. All DRF events of an individual were considered with a corresponding individual washout period. Incidence rates (IR) and time trends were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution per 100,000 person-years, with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] and age-sex standardization to the German population in 2018. Associations of calendar year, age, sex, and comorbidity with IR were examined using Poisson regression estimating incidence rate ratios (IRR) with CI. RESULTS: The study population consists of 974,332 insured individuals, with 16,557 experiencing one or more DRF events during the observation period. A total of 17,705 DRF events occurred, of which 9961 (56.3%) were hospitalized. Standardized IR were 439 [424-453] (inpatient: 240 [230-251], outpatient: 199 [189-209]) in 2014 and 438 [423-452] (inpatient: 238 [227-249], outpatient: 200 [190-210]) in 2018. Female sex, older age, and comorbidity were associated with higher IR and adjusted Poisson regression showed no significant time trend (IRR overall 0.994 [0.983-1.006]). CONCLUSION: A relevant proportion of DRF were treated in outpatient settings, so both inpatient and outpatient data are necessary for a valid estimate.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Radio , Fracturas de la Muñeca , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Pacientes Internos , Fracturas del Radio/epidemiología
3.
Diabet Med ; 41(4): e15241, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37845176

RESUMEN

AIM: To determine both the risk of first ever ulcer (FEU) and its time to onset in a population which had loss of protective sensation (LOPS) in the foot either with or without loss of protective pain (LOPP). METHODS: People with diabetes and LOPS without history of FEU presenting in a specialist clinic were included. LOPP was diagnosed by reduced vibration perception and pain perception by using a pinprick simulator. Participants were followed by routine foot checks, phone interview or by letter until the occurrence of a FEU, death or the end of observation period. Survival functions in LOPP strata were compared by log rank test. The hazard ratio (HR) of an FEU in people with compared to people without LOPP was estimated using Cox regression. Time to first ulcer was estimated using the framework of an accelerated failure time (AFT) model. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty participants were followed up for a median of 48.3 months. Pain perception was lost in 55.4%. Eighteen people with LOPP developed a FEU (25.0%) as opposed to six (10.3%) of those with no LOPP (p = 0.02). Age-sex-adjusted HR for FEU was 3.0 (p = 0.02) for people with compared to people without LOPP. Age-sex-adjusted time to FEU for people with LOPP was approximately half (p = 0.03) than people without LOPP. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that estimation of LOPP is included in routine practice because of its high predictive value for a FEU.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Humanos , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Pie Diabético/epidemiología , Pie Diabético/prevención & control , Úlcera , Pie , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Percepción del Dolor
4.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 181, 2024 05 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807236

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Triggers have been developed internationally to identify intensive care patients with palliative care needs. Due to their work, nurses are close to the patient and their perspective should therefore be included. In this study, potential triggers were first identified and then a questionnaire was developed to analyse their acceptance among German intensive care nurses. METHODS: For the qualitative part of this mixed methods study, focus groups were conducted with intensive care nurses from different disciplines (surgery, neurosurgery, internal medicine), which were selected by convenience. Data were analysed using the "content-structuring content analysis" according to Kuckartz. For the quantitative study part, the thus identified triggers formed the basis for questionnaire items. The questionnaire was tested for comprehensibility in cognitive pretests and for feasibility in a pilot survey. RESULTS: In the qualitative part six focus groups were conducted at four university hospitals. From the data four main categories (prognosis, interprofessional cooperation, relatives, patients) with three to 15 subcategories each could be identified. The nurses described situations requiring palliative care consults that related to the severity of the disease, the therapeutic course, communication within the team and between team and patient/relatives, and typical characteristics of patients and relatives. In addition, a professional conflict between nurses and physicians emerged. The questionnaire, which was developed after six cognitive interviews, consists of 32 items plus one open question. The pilot had a response rate of 76.7% (23/30), whereby 30 triggers were accepted with an agreement of ≥ 50%. CONCLUSION: Intensive care nurses see various triggers, with interprofessional collaboration and the patient's prognosis playing a major role. The questionnaire can be used for further surveys, e.g. interprofessional triggers could be developed.


Asunto(s)
Grupos Focales , Cuidados Paliativos , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Grupos Focales/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa , Alemania , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/psicología , Enfermería de Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Enfermería de Cuidados Críticos/normas , Enfermería de Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Gesundheitswesen ; 85(S 02): S145-S153, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36940696

RESUMEN

The German research data center for health will provide claims data of statutory health insurances. The data center was set up at the medical regulatory body BfArM pursuant to the German data transparency regulation (DaTraV). The data provided by the center will cover about 90% of the German population, supporting research on healthcare issues, including questions of care supply, demand and the (mis-)match of both. These data support the development of recommendations for evidence-based healthcare. The legal framework for the center (including §§ 303a-f of Book V of the Social Security Code and two subsequent ordinances) leaves a considerable degree of freedom when it comes to organisational and procedural aspects of the center's operation. The present paper addresses these degrees of freedom. From the point of view of researchers, ten statements show the potential of the data center and provide ideas for its further and sustainable development.


Asunto(s)
Empleo , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Alemania
6.
Diabet Med ; 39(7): e14861, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35472098

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes (GDM) in the short term is associated with various complications during pregnancy; however, in the long run, women have an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, short- and long-term follow-up postpartum is recommended. METHODS: We assessed the proportion of postpartum diabetes screening among 12,991 women with their first GDM-diagnosed pregnancy in the study period in the nationwide German GestDiab register between 2015 and 2017. In addition to assessing prevalence, we assessed if the probability of postpartum screening was associated with maternal characteristics or pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 38.2% (95% CI 32.8%-43.7%) of our sample underwent postpartum diabetes screening, irrespective of its timing. Around 50% of women (19.3% of the total sample) undertook the screening in the recommended time frame of 6-12 weeks postpartum. We found that age, native language, pre-pregnancy BMI, smoking status, number of previous pregnancies, fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels as well as previous pregnancies with GDM and treatment with insulin were associated with participation in the postpartum diabetes screening in our sample. CONCLUSION: In our study, more than 60% of the women with GDM did not participate in postpartum diabetes screening. This is a missed opportunity in a high-risk population to detect glucose intolerance. Consequently, appropriate interventions to prevent the progression to T2DM cannot be initiated. Further research should investigate barriers and enabling factors and allow developing a multilevel approach for GDM postpartum care.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Gestacional , Intolerancia a la Glucosa , Glucemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Femenino , Intolerancia a la Glucosa/epidemiología , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Humanos , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo
7.
Diabet Med ; 39(7): e14833, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35324027

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is unclear whether socio-economic status (SES) is associated with glycaemic control in people with recently diagnosed diabetes. The aim was to investigate whether SES is related to haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) during the first year after diagnosis in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and if metabolic, quality of care or mental factors may explain the association. METHODS: In the German Diabetes Study, people with type 1 (n = 274, median age 36 [25th; 75th percentile: 28; 48] years) and type 2 diabetes (n = 424, 54 [47; 60] years) underwent detailed metabolic characterisation within the first year after diagnosis. SES was documented using a standardised questionnaire. Associations between SES and HbA1c were assessed using multivariable linear regression and restricted cubic spline regression analyses. Additional covariables were patient characteristics, laboratory measurements, health behaviour, quality of care and depression variables. Models were separately fitted for diabetes type, SES and its dimensions (income, education, occupation). RESULTS: Higher SES score was associated with lower HbA1c (-0.7 mmol/mol per unit increase in SES, 95% CI: -1.1; -0.2 mmol/mol [-0.1%, 95% CI: -0.1; 0.0%]) in people with type 1 diabetes. Included covariates did not attenuate this association. In people with type 2 diabetes, effect estimates were close to zero indicating no relevant difference. CONCLUSION: Socio-economic inequalities in HbA1c already exist during the first year after diagnosis in people with type 1 diabetes. The absence of association between glycaemic control and SES in type 2 diabetes could be due to the lower complexity of diabetes therapy compared to type 1 diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto , Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Control Glucémico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad
8.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 37(6): 587-590, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35674859

RESUMEN

Most studies reported reduced health care use among people with diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This may be due to restricted medical services or people avoiding health care services because they fear being infected with COVID-19 in health care facilities. The aim of our study was to analyse hospitalisation and mortality in people with and without diabetes in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic year 2020 compared to 2017-2019. The data were sourced from a German statutory health insurance company covering 3.2 million people. We estimated age-sex standardised rates of mortality, all-cause hospitalisation, hospitalisation due to coronary heart disease (CHD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, diabetic foot syndrome (DFS), and major and minor amputations in people with and without diabetes. We predicted rates for 2020 using Poisson regression based on results from 2017-2019 and compared these with the observed rates.In people with diabetes, the hospitalisation rate for major amputation was significantly increased, while all-cause hospitalisation rate and hospitalisation due to CHD, AMI and DFS were significantly decreased compared to the previous period. Moreover, we found a significantly increased mortality and hospitalisation rate for minor amputation in people without diabetes while all-cause hospitalisation and hospitalisation due to CHD and AMI was significantly lower during the COVID-19 pandemic year 2020.We observed changes in health care utilisation and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to previous years in people with and without diabetes. Concerning diabetes care, the increase of hospitalisations due to amputation in people with diabetes with a simultaneous reduction in DFS needs special attention.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedad Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Infarto del Miocardio , Amputación Quirúrgica , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Pie Diabético/epidemiología , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Hospitalización , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Pandemias
9.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 20(1): 163, 2022 Dec 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36514069

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The amount of empirical research on whether people in fact include health-related changes in leisure time into health state valuations is limited and the results are inconclusive. In this exploratory study, we analyse whether time aspects of diabetes self-care might explain the ratings of the health state (HSR) in addition to the effects of physical and mental health-related quality of life. METHODS: Using the data from participants with diagnosed type 2 diabetes in the population-based KORA FF4 study (n = 190, 60% Male, mean age 69 ± 10 years), multiple logistic regression models were fitted to explain HSR (good vs. poor) in terms of the SF-12 physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores, time spent on diabetes self-care and a number of background variables. RESULTS: There was no significant association between time spent on diabetes self-care and HSR in models without interaction. Significant interaction term was found between the SF-12 PCS score and time spent on self-care. In models with interaction self-care time has a small, but significant impact on the HSR. In particular, for a PCS score under 40, more time increases the chance to rate the health state as "good", while for a PCS score above 40 there is a reverse effect. CONCLUSIONS: The additional impact of self-care time on HSR in our sample is small and seems to interact with physical health-related quality of life. More research is needed on whether inclusion of health-related leisure time changes in the denominator of cost-effectiveness analysis is sufficient.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Calidad de Vida , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Autocuidado , Alemania/epidemiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas
10.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 30(3): 304-312, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33098336

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To analyze the concordance of new prescription of antihyperglycemic agents between two data sources: patients' self-reports and statutory health insurance (SHI) data among patients with diabetes. METHODS: Within a cross-sectional study, 494 patients with diabetes were interviewed if and which new prescriptions of diabetes medication they received within the last 3 or 6 months. SHI data for 12 months were linked to cover these periods. For the agreement measurement, SHI data was set as reference, and kappa, positive predictive value (PPV), and sensitivity were calculated for single Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes and cumulated code groups. RESULTS: The number of new prescriptions within 3 or 6 months was low, with 5.5% (n = 27) for Metformin/self-report being the highest. Contingency tables were unbalanced and showed large numbers in the no/no-cells. Regarding non-agreement, we found new prescriptions slightly more often in SHI data only than in self-reports only, with insulin and metformin representing an exception. Agreement results were moderate with large confidence intervals (CI). The values for cumulated "all drugs in diabetes" were: kappa = 0.58 (95% CI: 0.51-0.65), PPV = 62.0 (53.4-70.2), sensitivity = 55.6 (47.3-63.6). CONCLUSIONS: Patients reported a low number of new prescriptions within the last 3 or 6 months. In general we found moderate agreement and in case of non-agreement that self-report no/SHI yes was slightly more frequent than vice versa. These results were based on small case numbers, but could nevertheless be considered when collecting self-reported information on the prescription of antihyperglycemic agents.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Hipoglucemiantes , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Prescripciones , Autoinforme
11.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 30(5): 531-560, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33617072

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To identify and describe publications addressing the agreement between self-reported medication and other data sources among adults and, in a subgroup of studies dealing with cancer patients, seek to identify parameters which are associated with agreement. METHODS: A systematic review including a systematic search within five biomedical databases up to February 28, 2019 was conducted as per the PRISMA Statement. Studies and agreement results were described. For a subgroup of studies dealing with cancer, we searched for associations between agreement and patients' characteristics, study design, comparison data source, and self-report modality. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 3392 publications. Included articles (n = 120) show heterogeneous agreement. Eighteen publications focused on cancer populations, with relatively good agreement identified in those which analyzed hormone therapy, estrogen, and chemotherapy (n = 11). Agreement was especially good for chemotherapy (proportion correct ≥93.6%, kappa ≥0.88). No distinct associations between agreement and age, education or marital status were identified in the results. There was little evaluation of associations between agreement and study design, self-report modality and comparison data source, thus not allowing for any conclusions to be drawn. CONCLUSION: An overview of the evidence available from validation studies with a description of several characteristics is provided. Studies with experimental design which evaluate factors that might affect agreement between self-report and other data sources are lacking.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Farmacia , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Registros Médicos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Autoinforme
12.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 259(5): 1089-1101, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32974733

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To analyze the recent time trend in Saxony. METHODS: Data were based on administrative files in Saxony (Eastern Germany) to assess recipients of blindness allowance newly registered between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2017. We estimated age-sex standardized incidence of all-cause and cause-specific blindness and used Poisson regression to examine age- and sex-adjusted time trends. RESULTS: We identified 5114 new cases of blindness (63.3% female, 59.9% ≥ 80 years). We observed a markedly decrease in incidence of blindness: all-causes 2009: 15.7 per 100,000 person years [95% confidence interval: 14.6-17.0]; 2017: 8.9 [8.1-9.8]; age-related macular degeneration 2009: 6.9 [6.1-7.7], 2017: 3.8 [3.3-4.3]; glaucoma 2009: 2.6 [2.2-3.1], 2017: 1.8 [1.4-2.2]; diabetic retinopathy 2009: 1.5 [1.2-1.9], 2017: 0.7 [0.5-1.0]; myopia 2009: 0.7 [0.5-1.1], 2017: 0.4 [0.2-0.5]; optic atrophy 2009: 0.9 [0.6-1.2], 2017: 0.5 [0.3-0.7]; and cataract 2009: 0.5 [0.3-0.8], 2017: 0.1 [0.1-0.3]. The annual reduction was between 5 (glaucoma, relative risk 0.95 [0.92-0.98]) and 16% (cataract, relative risk 0.84 [0.78-0.91]). CONCLUSION: The age- and sex-standardized incidence of blindness decreased among all common causes of blindness in Saxony in the last decade.


Asunto(s)
Catarata , Retinopatía Diabética , Ceguera/epidemiología , Ceguera/etiología , Catarata/epidemiología , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino
13.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 213, 2021 01 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33499827

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence that repetitive negative thoughts are often associated with adverse health outcomes. The study aims are (i) to identify the frequency and valence of thoughts about health in people with diabetes mellitus using questions based on the day reconstruction method (DRM) and (ii) to analyse associations between thoughts about health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), diabetes-related distress and depressive symptoms. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of a random sample of a German statutory health insurance population with diabetes aged between 18 and 80 linking questionnaire and claims data. Associations between frequency and valence of thoughts about health on a previous day and HRQoL assessed by a 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, diabetes-related distress assessed using the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale and depressive symptoms assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were analysed using linear and logistic regression analysis, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Thoughts about health were analysed in 726 participants (86% type 2 diabetes, 62% male, mean age 67.6 ± 9.7 years). A total of 46% had not thought about their health the day before, 17.1% reported low frequency and negative thoughts, 21.4% low frequency and positive thoughts, 12.1% high frequency and negative thoughts and 3.4% high frequency and positive thoughts. The presence of thoughts about health irrespective of their frequency and valence is associated with a lower physical and mental component summary score of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Negative thoughts are associated with high diabetes-related distress. Frequent or negative thoughts are associated with depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Thoughts about health are a part of everyday life for a substantial number of people with diabetes. Surprisingly, even positive thoughts are associated with poorer HRQoL in our study. Further research within the DRM paradigm is needed to understand how thoughts about health may affect people's (assessment of) state of health. Thoughts about health should be considered in diabetes education and patient counselling with a view to preventing and treating emotional disorders. More attention should be paid to the outcomes of interventions that may themselves lead to an increase in the frequency of thoughts about health.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
14.
Diabetologia ; 63(3): 648-658, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31865404

RESUMEN

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Data on trends of end-stage renal disease among people with diabetes are lacking. We analysed the incidence of end-stage renal disease, defined as renal replacement therapy, among people with and without diabetes, and the corresponding relative risk. Moreover, we investigated time trends for the period 2002-2016. METHODS: In this retrospective population-based study we analysed data from one dialysis centre of a region in Germany covering a population of about 310,000 inhabitants. We estimated the age- and sex-standardised incidence rates for chronic renal replacement therapy among adults with and without diabetes and the corresponding relative risks. The time trend was analysed using Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2016, 1107 people (61.2% male; mean age 71.6 years; 48.7% with diabetes) had a first renal replacement therapy. During the study period, the incidence rate in the population with diabetes varied from 93.6 (95% CI 50.4, 136.7) in 2002 to 140.5 (95% CI 80.6, 200.4) in 2016 per 100,000 person-years. In the population without diabetes the incidence rate was substantially lower and reached 17.3 (95% CI 10.9, 23.6) in 2002 and 24.6 (95% CI 17.5, 31.7) in 2009. The relative risk comparing people with and without diabetes was 3.57 (95% CI 3.09, 4.13). No significant change in the incidence rates was found during the observation period, either in the population with or in the population without diabetes, and thus the relative risk also remained constant. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: People with diabetes have a higher risk of needing renal replacement therapy than those without diabetes, a fact that remained constant over a time period of 15 years.


Asunto(s)
Nefropatías Diabéticas , Fallo Renal Crónico , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Nefropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Nefropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/etiología , Nefropatías Diabéticas/terapia , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 36(6): e3310, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32162755

RESUMEN

People with diabetes have a largely increased risk of stroke compared with people without diabetes. Exact data on incidence of stroke in people with and without diabetes are important for improvements in preventive diabetes care, avoidance of fatal outcomes and as a solid basis for health policy and the economy. However, published data are conflicting, underlining the necessity for this systematic review of population-based studies on incidence, relative risks (RRs) and changes in stroke rates over time. The purpose of our review is to evaluate the incidence of stroke in the diabetic population and its differences with regard to sex, ethnicity, age and regions; to compare the incidence rate (IR) in the diabetic and non-diabetic populations and to investigate time trends. We will perform a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS designed by an experienced information scientist. Two review authors will independently screen the abstracts and full texts of all references on the basis of inclusion criteria regarding types of study, types of population and the main outcome. Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias will be undertaken by two review authors working independently. We will assess IR or cumulative incidence (CumI) and RR of stroke comparing the diabetic and non-diabetic populations. The attributable risk (AR = proportion of stroke among persons with diabetes that is attributable to diabetes) and the population attributable risk (PAR = proportion of stroke in the whole population that is attributable to diabetes) will be considered where available. In conclusion, this review will help to summarize the available evidence for incidence of stroke in the diabetic and nondiabetic population. The publication of this protocol will contribute to making the search strategy, methods, and assessment of reviews transparent and accessible for all involved professional groups.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/fisiopatología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Incidencia , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
16.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 270(5): 501-511, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31520149

RESUMEN

There is a need for interventions supporting patients with mental health conditions in coping with stigma and discrimination. A psycho-educational group therapy module to promote stigma coping and empowerment (STEM) was developed and tested for efficacy in patients with schizophrenia or depression. 30 clinical centers participated in a cluster-randomized clinical trial, representing a broad spectrum of mental health care settings: in-patient (acute treatment, rehabilitation), out-patient, and day-hospitals. As randomized, patients in the intervention group clusters/centers received an illness-specific eight sessions standard psychoeducational group therapy plus three specific sessions on stigma coping and empowerment ('STEM'). In the control group clusters the same standard psychoeducational group therapy was extended to 11 sessions followed by one booster session in both conditions. In total, N = 462 patients were included in the analysis (N = 117 with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, ICD-10 F2x; N = 345 with depression, ICD-10 F31.3-F31.5, F32-F34, and F43.2). Clinical and stigma-related measures were assessed before and directly after treatment, as well as after 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months (M12). Primary outcome was improvement in quality of life (QoL) assessed with the WHO-QOL-BREF between pre-assessment and M12 analyzed by mixed models and adjusted for pre-treatment differences. Overall, QoL and secondary outcome measures (symptoms, functioning, compliance, internalized stigma, self-esteem, empowerment) improved significantly, but there was no significant difference between intervention and control group. The short STEM module has proven its practicability as an add-on in different settings in routine mental health care. The overall increase in empowerment in both, schizophrenia and depression, indicates patients' treatment benefit. However, factors contributing to improvement need to be explored.The study has been registered in the following trial registers. ClinicalTrials.gov: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/ Registration number: NCT01655368. DRKS: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/ Registration number: DRKS00004217.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Trastorno Depresivo/rehabilitación , Empoderamiento , Enfermos Mentales/psicología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Esquizofrenia/rehabilitación , Estigma Social , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Autoimagen
17.
BMC Pulm Med ; 20(1): 267, 2020 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33059650

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation offers potential benefits to people with asthma. It is however unknown if rehabilitation favourably affects patients' health care needs. We therefore examined if rehabilitation reduced needs and, in addition, if it improved asthma control. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients with asthma were surveyed in three rehabilitation clinics at admission and at discharge. Additionally, we surveyed 78 participants with asthma twice 4 weeks apart. The latter sample (i.e. the control group) was recruited through other pathways than rehabilitation clinics. The Patient Needs in Asthma Treatment (NEAT) questionnaire and the Asthma Control Test (ACT) were completed at baseline and follow-up. Differences between baseline and follow-up and between rehabilitation and control group were examined by t-tests and chi-squared-tests. Univariate ANCOVAS were used to examine if NEAT and ACT follow-up scores differed significantly between groups. Within the rehabilitation group, linear regressions were used to examine if self-reported utilization of more interventions that addressed needs were associated with NEAT scores at follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, there were no differences between the rehabilitation and the control group regarding needs and asthma control. At follow-up, the rehabilitation group showed reduced needs (t(149) = 10.33, p <  0.01) and increased asthma control (t(130) = -6.67, p <  0.01), whereas members of the control group exhibited no changes. Univariate ANCOVAS showed that unmet follow-up needs (F(1, 212) = 36.46, p <  0.001) and follow-up asthma control (F(1, 195) = 6.97, p = 0.009) differed significantly between groups. In the rehabilitation group, self-reported utilization of more interventions was associated with reduced needs (ß = 0.21; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence suggestion that pulmonary rehabilitation in adults with asthma may reduce asthma-related needs and confirms previous findings that rehabilitation may improve asthma control.


Asunto(s)
Asma/psicología , Asma/rehabilitación , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Autoinforme
18.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1901, 2020 Dec 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33302924

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests that the information needs of people with diabetes mellitus differ across patient groups. With a view to being able to provide individualized information, this study aims to identify (i) the diabetes-related information needs of people with diabetes mellitus; (ii) different subgroups of people with specific information needs; and (iii) associated characteristics of the identified subgroups, such as sociodemographic characteristics, diabetes-related comorbidities, and well-being. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was based on data from 837 respondents with diabetes mellitus who participated in the population-based KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Augsburg Region) Health Survey 2016 in Southern Germany (KORA GEFU 4 study) (45.6% female, mean age 71.1 years, 92.8% Type 2 diabetes). Diabetes-related information needs were assessed with a questionnaire asking about patients' information needs concerning 11 diabetes-related topics, e.g. 'long-term complications' and 'treatment/therapy'. Subgroups of people with different information needs and associated characteristics were identified using latent class analysis. RESULTS: We identified the following four classes of people with different information needs: 'high needs on all topics', 'low needs on all topics', 'moderate needs with a focus on complications and diabetes in everyday life', and 'advanced needs with a focus on social and legal aspects and diabetes research'. The classes differed significantly in age, years of education, type of diabetes, diabetes duration, diabetes-related comorbidities, smoking behaviour, diabetes education, current level of information, and time preference. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge about different patient subgroups can be useful for tailored information campaigns or physician-patient interactions. Further research is needed to analyse health care needs in these groups, changes in information needs over the course of the disease, and prospective health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Análisis de Clases Latentes , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
19.
Gesundheitswesen ; 82(12): 992-997, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32069508

RESUMEN

The fourth Junior Research Academy in Health Services Research was once again funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in 2017. The academy was initiated by the Centre for Health and Society (chs) in Düsseldorf with the participation of the Centre for Health Services Research Cologne (ZVFK), the Research Centre for Health Communication and Health Services Research (CHSR) of the Clinic and Polyclinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy of the University Hospital Bonn, the Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Services Research (IZVF) in Witten and the Institute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology (IVE) of the University Marburg. The aims of the Junior Research Academy are for imparting skills in the development and elaboration of innovative project ideas, to increase the number of proposals from the field of health services research to the DFG, to strengthen basic research within health services research in Germany and to network the scientific community. Young researchers from all over Germany were eligible to apply for participation by submitting an application in the form of a research proposal. A total of 83 applications were received. The 21 most promising applicants (14 women and 7 men) were selected in a 2-stage review process; 20 of these completed the Junior Research Academy program. After a one-day preparatory workshop, the preparation and review of a sample application, an academy week and a finalisation phase, all applications were submitted to the DFG on time. Of these proposals, 9 were funded. The first alumni meeting of the DFG Junior Research Academy took place in Düsseldorf in July 2019.


Asunto(s)
Academias e Institutos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Femenino , Alemania , Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos de Investigación
20.
Gesundheitswesen ; 82(7): e77-e93, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32698208

RESUMEN

More than half of the German population has difficulties in dealing with health information. It is an important task of health services research to examine how healthcare professionals and health care organizations can meet this challenge. The DNVF Memorandum Health Literacy (Part 1) defines the terms of individual and organizational health literacy, presents the national and international state of research and ethical aspects of health literacy research in health care settings. The relevance of health literacy research is worked out in different phases of life, for different target groups and in different healthcare contexts. Central research topics and future research desiderata are derived.


Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud , Atención a la Salud , Alemania , Personal de Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA