Sidedness Matters: Surrogate Biomarkers Prognosticate Colorectal Cancer upon Anatomic Location.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic location of primary tumors across the colon correlate with survival in the metastatic setting, whereas left-sided tumors may exhibit superior survival compared with right-sided tumors. The Oncotype Recurrence Score (RS) assay is a clinically validated predictor of recurrence risk in patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). Previous studies had indicated that without adjuvant chemotherapy, CDX2-negative stage II CRC tumors are associated with a lower rate of disease-free survival than CDX2-positive stage II CRC tumors. We aimed to evaluate whether these two validated prognostic biomarkers may correlate with primary tumor location, and whether tumor location may reflect differential prognosis in stage II CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with T3 mismatch repair-proficient (MMR-P) stage II CRC for whom RS assay was performed. Pathological report was reviewed for exact primary tumor location and CDX2 immunostaining. RS and CDX2 expression were correlated with primary tumor location. RESULTS: The analysis included 1,147 patients with MMR-P stage II CRC (median age 69 years [range 29-93]). Tumor distribution across the colon was as follows: 46% (n = 551) were right-sided and 54% (n = 596) were left-sided. RS was higher in right-sided tumors (p = .01). The RS results gradually decreased across the colon (cecum, highest score; sigmoid, lowest score; p = .04). Right-sided tumors exhibited more CDX2-negative tumors (p = .07). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that right-sided colorectal tumors may display worse prognosis compared with left-sided tumors in MMR-P stage II CRC. Primary tumor location may serve as a prognostic factor that should be taken into account for recurrence risk assessment and consideration of adjuvant treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Sidedness matters, even in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). Using two previously established prognostic tools, the Oncotype DX assay and CDX2 expression, this study found that right-sided tumors may display worse prognosis compared with left-sided tumors in mismatch repair-proficient stage II CRC. Therefore, primary tumor location should be taken into account for recurrence risk assessment and consideration of adjuvant treatment.

Impact of the 12-Gene Colon Cancer Assay on Clinical Decision Making for Adjuvant Therapy in Stage II Colon Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the 12-gene Colon Cancer Recurrence Score Assay-a clinically validated prognosticator in stage II colon cancer after surgical resection-on adjuvant treatment decisions in T3 mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) stage II colon cancer in clinical practice. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all patients with T3 MMR-P stage II colon cancer (Clalit Health Services members) with Recurrence Score results (time frame January 2011 to May 2012). Treatment recommendations pretesting were compared with the treatments received. Changes were categorized as decreased (to observation alone/removing oxaliplatin from the therapy) or increased (from observation alone/adding oxaliplatin to the therapy) intensity. RESULTS: The analysis included 269 patients; 58%, 32%, and 10% of the values were in the low (<30), intermediate (30-40), and high (≥41) score groups, respectively. In 102 patients (38%), treatment changed post-testing (decreased/increased intensity 76/26 patients). The overall impact was decreased chemotherapy use (45.0% to 27.9%; P < 0.001). Treatment changes occurred in all score groups, but more frequently in the high (change rate 63.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 42.3%-80.6%) than in the intermediate (30.6%; 95% CI 21.0%-41.5%) and low (37.6%; 95% CI 30.0%-45.7%) score groups. The direction of the change was consistent with the assay result, with increased intensity more common in higher score values and decreased intensity more common in lower score values. CONCLUSIONS: Testing significantly affected adjuvant treatment in T3 MMR-P stage II colon cancer in clinical practice. The study is limited by its design, which compared treatment recommendations pretesting to actual treatments received post-testing, lack of a control group, and nonassessment of confounding factors that may have affected treatment decisions.

Gastric cancer: biology and clinical manifestations in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) in Israel remains incompletely characterized. The aim of this study was to define the clinical and pathological characteristics of GC in Israel and to compare them to the general Western population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 461 consecutive GC patients treated at a single institution between 1995 and 2007. Epidemiological and clinical-pathological data were retrieved from the patients' medical files and the institutional electronic database and analyzed using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, histopathological findings, clinical course, and prognostic factors for disease outcome were all similar to those reported in the Western literature. Findings unique to the Israeli population included: (1) rarity of GC-associated risk factors; (2) increased GC incidence in Ashkenazi Jews; (3) high incidence of second primary malignancy and family history of cancer; and (4) no dominancy of proximal GCs. CONCLUSION: There do not appear to be any major differences in the biology or clinical manifestations of GC in Israel. Western recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of GC may therefore be applied to the Israeli patient population.

Prospective phase II study of neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and bevacizumab for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus bevacizumab as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective phase II study, 22 patients with adenocarcinoma and 6 with squamous cell carcinoma received 2 4-day cycles of bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) infusion on day 1 followed by 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) as a 96-h continuous infusion on days 1-4, separated by a 3-week interval. RESULTS: The response rate was 39%, the R0 resection rate was 43%, and the median overall survival (OS) was 17 months. The regimen was well tolerated, with the most common severe toxicities being venous thromboembolism (10%), nausea, and gastrointestinal bleeding (7% each). In 37 patients previously treated with cisplatin and 5-FU alone at our institution and thus serving as historical controls, the response rate was 30%, the R0 resection rate was 44%, and the median OS was 23 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups of patients. CONCLUSION: Adding bevacizumab to cisplatin and 5-FU neoadjuvant chemotherapy was active and well tolerated but did not seem to improve the resection rate or OS compared with prior regimens, including the historical controls at our institution.

Disease-related mortality within the first year after subtotal esophagectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal carcinoma has poor prognosis. Surgery is still considered to be the mainstay of treatment. The mortality rate within the first year after surgery is unknown, but identifying risk factors for early mortality would increase our ability to predict the outcome of these patients and might improve patient selection. METHODS: All patients who had undergone subtotal esophagectomy for cancer between 2003 and 2008 were included in this retrospective series. Patients with less than 12 months follow-up, perioperative mortality, and death from unrelated causes were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A included all oncological mortality cases within 12 months of surgery. Group B included all patients who survived longer than 12 months following surgery. RESULTS: Of 81 patients who met the inclusion criteria, group A included 18 patients and group B included 63 (median survival 10 and 25 months, respectively). A higher proportion of patients were operated for pN1 disease in group A (72% versus 33%, p = 0.0004). R(0) esophagectomy rate was lower in group A (39% versus 76%, p = 0.03). Metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) was higher in group A (mean: 46% versus 10%, p = 0.0003). Multivariate analysis identified LNR as an independent risk factor for first-year oncological mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 1.04, p = 0.0001; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.06]. No differences were found in preoperative variables including age, gender, tumor histology, type of operation, and administration of or response to neoadjuvant therapy. Response to neoadjuvant therapy was associated with R(0) resection. CONCLUSIONS: pN1 disease, resection margin involvement, and high LNR were found to be risk factors for first-year oncological mortality after esophagectomy for cancer.

One hundred transhiatal esophagectomies: a single-institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is considered the mainstay of treatment for esophageal carcinoma. Transhiatal esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is considered relatively safe with an oncological outcome comparable to that using the transthoracic approach. OBJECTIVES: To review the results of the first 100 transhiatal esophagectomies performed in a single Israeli center. METHODS: The records of all patients who had undergone transhiatal esophagectomy during the period 2003-2009 were reviewed. The study group comprised the first 100 patients. All patients who had undergone colon or small bowel transposition were excluded. Indications for surgery included esophageal cancer, caustic injury and achalasia. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 19.5 months. The anastomotic leakage rate was 15% and all were managed successfully with local wound care. The benign stricture rate was 10% and all were managed successfully with endoscopic balloon dilation. Anastomotic leakage was found to be a risk factor for stricture formation. Overall survival was 54%. Response to neoadjuvant therapy was associated with a favorable prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Transhiatal esophagectomy is a relatively safe approach with adequate oncological results, as long as it is performed in a high volume center.

Is local excision after complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer an acceptable treatment option?

PURPOSE: The role of local excision in patients with good histological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer is unclear, mainly because of possible regional nodal involvement. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between pathological T and N stages following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer and the outcome of patients with mural pathological complete response undergoing local excision. METHODS: This investigation was conducted as a retrospective analysis. Between January 1997 and December 2007, 320 patients with T3 to 4Nx, TxN+ or distal (≤ 6 cm from the anus) T2N0 rectal cancer underwent neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation followed by surgery. Radiotherapy was standard and chemotherapy consisted of common fluoropyrimidine-based regimens. RESULTS: After chemoradiation, 93% patients had radical surgery, 6% had local excision, and 3% did not have surgery. In the 291 patients undergoing radical surgery, the pathological T stage correlated with the N stage (P = .036). We compared the outcome of patients with mural complete pathological response (n = 37) who underwent radical surgery (group I) and those (n = 14) who had local excision only (group II). With a median follow-up of 48 months, 4 patients in group I had a recurrence and none in group II had a recurrence; one patient died in group I and none died in group II. Disease-free survival, pelvic recurrence-free survival, and overall survival rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, nodal metastases were rare in patients with mural complete pathological response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (3%), and local excision did not compromise their outcome. Therefore, local excision may be an acceptable option in these patients.

Phase II study of UFT with leucovorin plus hepatic arterial infusion with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for non-resectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Compared with systemic therapy, hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) increases the response to fluoropyrimidines. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with non-resectable, colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases received irinotecan 120 mg/m(2), followed by leucovorin (LV) 20 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m(2) administered by HAI every 2 weeks, plus UFT (tegafur-uracil) 200 mg/m(2)/day with LV 30 mg/day on days 1-22, followed by a 6-day rest. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 65% (all 20 patients achieving a partial response). Ten patients (32%) had stable disease. The median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were 12 and 36 months. OS was similar in patients with low versus high expression of thymidylate synthase (TS) and/or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The regimen was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: UFT with LV plus HAI irinotecan and 5-FU/LV was a feasible and effective treatment for non-resectable CRC liver metastases, increasing response, TTP and OS. TS and DPD levels in liver metastases did not predict outcome.

Endoscopic ultrasound: doubtful accuracy for restaging esophageal cancer after preoperative chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The role of endoscopic ultrasound in evaluating the response of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is controversial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of EUS in restaging patients who underwent NAC. METHODS: The disease stage of patients with esophageal cancer was established by means of the TNM classification system. The initial staging was determined by chest and abdominal computed tomography and EUS. Patients who needed NAC underwent a preoperative regimen consisting of cisplatin and fluouracil. Upon completion of the chemotherapy, patients were restaged and then underwent esophagectomy. The results of the EUS staging were compared with the results of the surgical pathology staging. This comparison was done in two groups of patients: the study group (all patients who received NAC) and the control group (all patients who underwent primary esophagectomy without NAC). RESULTS: NAC was conducted in 20 patients with initial stage IIB and III carcinoma of the esophagus (study group). Post-chemotherapy EUS accurately predicted the surgical pathology stage in 6 patients (30%). Pathological down-staging was noted in 8 patients (40%). However, the EUS was able to observe it in only 2 patients (25%). The accuracy of EUS in determining the T status alone was 80%. The accuracy for N status alone was 35%. In 65% of examinations the EUS either overestimated (35%) or underestimated (30%) the N status. Thirteen patients with initial stage I-IIA underwent primary esophagectomy after the initial staging (control group). EUS accurately predicted the surgical pathology disease stage in 11 patients (85%). CONCLUSIONS: EUS is an accurate modality for initial staging of esophageal carcinoma. However, it is not a reliable tool for restaging esophageal cancer after NAC and it cannot predict response to chemotherapy.

A Potentially Malignant Giant Esophageal Paraganglioma.

Paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors derived from extraadrenal autonomic paraganglia, which may secrete catecholamines. They are potentially metastatic and require very long-term follow-up. Esophageal paragangliomas are extremely rare and present a diagnostic challenge. Lack of clinical suspicion and unrecognized catecholamine hypersecretion may lead to hemodynamic instabilities during surgery. Two patients with esophageal paragangliomas were previously reported. We report a 39-year-old man with a giant high-risk esophageal paraganglioma who underwent a hybrid minimally invasive 3-hole esophagectomy.

The addition of cetuximab to preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with high rate of long term survival: Mature results from a prospective phase Ib/II trial.

AIM: This phase IB/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the addition of cetuximab to standard preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). METHODS: Patients (pts) with resectable LAEC (T2-3N0-1M0, T1-3N1M0 or T1-3N0-1M1A) received an induction cycle of cisplatin 100 mg/m2, day 1, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m2/day, days 1-5, followed 4 weeks later by radiotherapy, 50.4 Gy, given with 2 cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and escalating doses of 5-FU, days 1-4 and 29-32. Pts received 10 weekly infusions of cetuximab, 250 mg/m2, with a loading dose, 400 mg/m2. Surgery was planned 6-8 weeks after CRT. RESULTS: 64 pts were treated and 60 completed CRT. Median age was 65 years and 66% were males. Adenocarcinoma/squamous ratio was 61%/39%. Tumors were advanced: 95% T3 and 67% N1. Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 72%, with two (3%) toxic deaths. The 5-FU maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was 1000 mg/m2/day. Clinical complete response rate was 33%. Of the 55 operated pts, R0 resection was achieved in 51 (93%) and pathological complete response (pCR) in 18 (33%), with 8 (14%) postoperative deaths. The 5-year survival rate for all pts was 38%. Pts with squamous histology had higher pCR (55% vs 20%, p = 0.015), local control (96% vs. 74%, p < 0.001) and 5-year survival (58% vs 25%, p = 0.011) rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the addition of cetuximab to standard preoperative CRT is feasible. R0, pCR and local control rates are encouraging. Pts with squamous cell tumors benefited more from the addition of cetuximab.

Overall survival with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer: single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 37 patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, who prior to surgery received 2 cycles of chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) as 3-h intravenous infusion on day 1 followed by 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m(2) as 96-h continuous infusion on days 1-4, separated by a 3-week interval. Surgery was performed 3-5 weeks after the start of the second cycle of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 30% (all partial responses). All patients underwent surgery, 32 with esophagectomy (29 transhiatal, 3 transthoracic). Median overall survival (OS) in all patients was 23 months, and was longer in responding than in non-responding patients (32 vs. 19 months). 5 patients with locally unresected tumor and 18 patients with microscopic surgical margin involvement (R1) underwent postoperative chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy. Median OS in patients after radical tumor resection (R0) was comparable with that in patients who underwent R1 resection (25 vs. 23 months). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival in patients with esophageal cancer who responded to chemotherapy compared with non-responding patients.

Biomarker-Driven Therapy in Metastatic Gastric and Esophageal Cancer: Real-Life Clinical Experience.

BACKGROUND: Precision treatment of cancer uses biomarker-driven therapy to individualize and optimize patient care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate real-life clinical experience with biomarker-driven therapy in metastatic gastric and esophageal cancer in Israel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with metastatic gastric or esophageal cancer who were treated in the participating institutions and underwent biomarker-driven therapy. Treatment was considered to have a benefit if the ratio between the longest progression-free survival (PFS) post biomarker-driven therapy and the last PFS before the biomarker-driven therapy was ≥1.3. The null hypothesis was that ≤15% of patients gain such benefit. RESULTS: The analysis included 46 patients (61% men; median age, 58 years; 57% with poorly-differentiated tumors). At least one actionable (i.e., predictive of response to a specific therapy) biomarker was identified for each patient. Immunohistochemistry was performed on all samples and identified 1-8 (median: 3) biomarkers per patient (most commonly: low TS, high TOPO1, high TOP2A). Twenty-eight patients received therapy after the biomarker analysis (1-4 lines). In the 1st line after biomarker analysis, five patients (18%) achieved a partial response and five (18%) stable disease; the median (range) PFS was 129 (12-1155) days. Twenty-four patients were evaluable for PFS ratio analysis; in seven (29.2%), the ratio was ≥1.3. In a one-sided exact binomial test vs. the null hypothesis, p = 0.019; therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated that implementing biomarker-driven analysis is feasible and could provide clinical benefit for a considerable proportion (~30%) of patients with metastatic gastric or esophageal cancer.

Small bowel obstruction caused by secondary tumors.

Small bowel obstruction in an oncology patient is a common and serious medical problem which is associated with diagnostic as well as therapeutic dilemmas. While the condition is most commonly caused by postoperative adhesions and peritoneal carcinomatosis, other causes have been reported [Cormier WJ, Gaffey TA, Welch JM, et al. Linitis plastica caused by metastatic lobular carcinoma of the breast. Mayo Clinical Proceedings 1980;55:747-53; Clavien P-A, Laffer U, Torhos J, et al. Gastrointestinal metastases as first clinical manifestation of the dissemination of a breast cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 1990;16:121-6; Bender GN, Maglinte DD, McLarney JH, et al. Malignant melanoma: patterns of metastasis to the small bowel, reliability of imaging studies, and clinical relevance. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2001;96:2392-400; Gatsoulis N, Roukounakis N, Kafetzis I, et al. Small bowel intussusception due to metastatic malignant melanoma. A case report. Technical Coloproctology 2004;8:141-3; Hung GY, Chiou T, Hsieh YL, et al. Intestinal metastasis causing intussusception in a patient treated for osteosarcoma with history of multiple metastases: a case report. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2001;31(4):165-7; Chen TF, Eardley I, Doyle PT, Bullock KN. Rectal obstruction secondary to carcinoma of the prostate treated by transanal resection of the prostate. British Journal of Urology 1992;70(6):643-7; Kamal HS, Farah RE, Hamzi HA, et al. Unusual presentation of rectal adenocarcinoma. Roman Journal of Gastroenterology 2003;12(1):47-50; Hofflander R, Beckes D, Kapre S, et al. A case of jejunal intussusception with gastrointestinal bleeding caused by metastatic testicular germ cell cancer. Digestive Surgery 1999;16(5):439-40]. One of these, reported thus far in only very few patients, is obstruction caused by secondary tumors, i.e. metastases from other organs to the small bowel wall. As cancer patients live longer with improved therapy, physicians are more likely to cope with rare phenomena of neoplasms, such as small bowel obstruction caused by secondary tumors. We hereby present a review of the relevant medical literature. The goal of this article is to define current knowledge on this phenomenon, with emphasis on its epidemiology and clinical characteristics, and to increase the awareness of the clinician treating cancer patients of such possibility.

A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating the Combination of Weekly Docetaxel and Cisplatin Together with Capecitabine and Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Esophago-Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Current treatment options for advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEGC) are still unsatisfactory. The aim of this prospective phase Ib/II study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen, AVDCX, consisting of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin together with capecitabine and bevacizumab, in AEGC. METHODS: Patients with AEGC received treatment with different dose levels of AVDCX (cisplatin and docetaxel 25-35 mg/m2, days 1,8, capecitabine 1,600 mg/m2 days 1-14, bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, day 1, Q:21 days). The study's primary objectives were to establish the recommended phase II doses of docetaxel and cisplatin in AVDCX (phase Ib part) and to determine the tumor response rate (phase II part). RESULTS: The study was closed early, after the accrual of 22 patients, due to accumulating toxicity-related deaths. The median age was 59 years and 77% of patients had gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. Grade ≥3 adverse events were documented in 18 patients (82%), usually neutropenia (36%), fatigue (54%) or diarrhea (23%). There were three fatal toxicities (14%): mesenteric thromboembolism, gastric perforation and pancytopenic sepsis. The recommended phase II doses of cisplatin and docetaxel were determined to be 25 mg/m2 and 30 mg/m2, respectively. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for response: 12 (54%) had partial response (PR), 4 (18%) had stable disease (SD) and none had complete response (CR). Hence, the objective response rate (CR+PR) was 54% and the disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 72%. For the 17 patients treated at the MTD, the objective response rate was 41% and the disease control rate was 88%. The median overall survival (OS) for these patients was 13.9 months (range, 1.5-52.2 months) and the median progression-free survival was 7.6 months (range, 1.3-26.6 months). The 2-year OS rate reached 23.7%. CONCLUSIONS: AVDCX was associated with a high rate of regimen related fatal adverse events and is not appropriate for further development in AEGC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00845884.

Anal canal adenocarcinoma with a late brain metastatic lesion - a case report / Adenocarcinoma de canal anal com lesão cerebral metastática tardia - um relato de caso

ABSTRACT Herein we present a rare case of anal canal adenocarcinoma manifesting as non-healing perianal abscess that subsequently underwent radiochemotherapy followed by abdominoperineal resection for residual disease. The patient recovered, and a year later presented with a single brain metastasis. The lesion was successfully resected, and the patient is now disease free.

RESUMO Apresentamos aqui um caso raro de adenocarcinoma de canal anal que se manifesta como abscesso perianal não cicatrizado que subsequentemente foi submetido à radioquimioterapia seguida de ressecção abdominoperineal por detecção de doença residual. O paciente recuperou-se e um ano depois apresentou uma única metástase cerebral. A lesão foi ressecada com sucesso e o paciente agora está livre da doença.

Ethnic variation in toxicity and outcome of adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric cancer in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Data on differences in toxicity and efficacy of chemotherapy and radiotherapy among different ethnic groups is limited. We evaluated differences in toxicity, tolerability and clinical outcome of Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi Jews receiving postoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 6/2000-12/2007, 84 Ashkenazi patients and 60 non-Ashkenazi patients underwent chemoradiation following resection of LAGC (INT-116 trial). RESULTS: Patients' and tumor characteristics were comparable. Ashkenazi patients experienced significantly higher rates of fatigue, anorexia, and grade 3-4 dysphagia, as well as a trend for a higher rate of diarrhea. The incidence of other toxicities, dose adjustments of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and patient prognosis did not differ. CONCLUSION: This study shows higher rates of various toxicities among Ashkenazi patients receiving postoperative chemoradiation for LAGC compared to non-Ashkenazi patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing treatment toxicity, tolerability and outcome between these two groups.

Early prediction of histopathological response of rectal tumors after one week of preoperative radiochemotherapy using 18 F-FDG PET-CT imaging. A prospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) is standard in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Initial data suggest that the tumor's metabolic response, i.e. reduction of its 18 F-FDG uptake compared with the baseline, observed after two weeks of RCT, may correlate with histopathological response. This prospective study evaluated the ability of a very early metabolic response, seen after only one week of RCT, to predict the histopathological response to treatment. METHODS: Twenty patients with LARC who received standard RCT regimen followed by radical surgery participated in this study. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV-MAX), measured by PET-CT imaging at baseline and on day 8 of RCT, and the changes in FDG uptake (ΔSUV-MAX), were compared with the histopathological response at surgery. Response was classified by tumor regression grade (TRG) and by achievement of pathological complete response (pCR). RESULTS: Absolute SUV-MAX values at both time points did not correlate with histopathological response. However, patients with pCR had a larger drop in SUV-MAX after one week of RCT (median: -35.31% vs -18.42%, p = 0.046). In contrast, TRG did not correlate with ΔSUV-MAX. The changes in FGD-uptake predicted accurately the achievement of pCR: only patients with a decrease of more than 32% in SUV-MAX had pCR while none of those whose tumors did not show any decrease in SUV-MAX had pCR. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in ΔSUV-MAX after only one week of RCT for LARC may be able to predict the achievement of pCR in the post-RCT surgical specimen. Validation in a larger independent cohort is planned.

Postoperative chemoradiation for resected gastric cancer--is the Macdonald Regimen Tolerable? a retrospective multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative chemoradiation as per Intergroup-0116 trial ("Macdonald regimen") is considered standard for completely resected high risk gastric cancer. However, many concerns remain with regards to the toxicity of this regimen. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of this regimen in a routine clinical practice setting, we analyzed our experience with its use. As we did not expect a different toxic profile in patients (pts) with positive margins (R1 resection), these were studied together with pts after complete resection (R0). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postoperative chemoradiation therapy was given according to the original Intergroup-0116 regimen. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of OS and DFS between R0 and R1 pts was done using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Between 6/2000 and 12/2007, 166 pts after R0 (129 pts) or R1 (37 pts) resection of locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma received postoperative chemoradiation; 61% were male and the median age was 63 years (range, 23-86); 78% had T ≥ 3 tumors and 81% had N+ disease; 87% of the pts completed radiotherapy and 54% completed the entire chemoradiation plan; 46.4% had grade ≥ 3 toxicity and 32% were hospitalized at least once for toxicity. Three pts (1.8%) died of toxicity: diarrhea (1), neutropenic sepsis (1) and neutropenic sepsis complicated by small bowel gangrene (1). The most common hematological toxicity was neutropenia, grade ≥ 3 in 30% of pts and complicated by fever in 15%. The most common non-hematological toxicities were nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. With a median follow-up of 51 months (range, 2-100), 62% of the R0 patients remain alive and 61% are free of disease. Median DFS and OS for R0 were not reached. R0 pts had a significantly higher 3-year DFS (60% vs. 29%, p = 0.001) and OS (61% vs. 33%, p = 0.01) compared with R1 pts. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, postoperative chemoradiation as per Intergroup-0116 seems to be substantially toxic, with a mortality rate which seems higher than reported in that trial. Efficacy data appears comparable to the original report. Following postoperative chemoradiation, involvement of surgical margins still has a detrimental impact on patient outcome.