RESUMEN
A variety of immune-related adverse events(irAEs)occur during the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and delayed detection may make it difficult to continue treatment. To detect irAEs as early as possible, we have been administering an irAEs self-reported interview system(ISRIS)to all outpatients using a tablet device. We conducted a retrospective study of outpatients who received pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, ipilimumab, and durvalumab and utilized the ISRIS from June 2019 to May 2020. The survey items were the primary disease, initial symptoms of irAEs, and detected irAEs. The total number of patients was 140, and the total number of interviews was 1,095. Overall, 42 irAEs occurred. The ISRIS is useful for detecting subjective skin disorders. However, its detection rate of myocarditis and thyroid, hepatic, and renal dysfunction was low, and there is room for improvement. We are currently developing an ISRIS application that maintains sensitivity and increases specificity to allow for early detection of irAEs at home.
Asunto(s)
Nivolumab , Humanos , Autoinforme , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , IpilimumabRESUMEN
Screening for total pain and sharing of patient information including adverse events for patients receiving chemotherapy by medical staff is needed in clinical practice. We introduced a sharing system for patient-oriented outcome sheets via a touch panel at an outpatient chemotherapy clinic. This study aimed to assess whether the system contributes to the improved management of treatment-related adverse events. We retrospectively analyzed data from a total of 215 patients at Ehime University Hospital using their electronic medical records from April to August 2015. Forty of these patients had received interventions relating to treatment-related adverse events. The proportion of a total number of interventions before and after the sharing system was 42/282(14.9%)and 45/215(20.9%), respectively. The proportion of a total number of interventions at the first course of outpatient chemotherapy also increased from 9/40(22.5%)to 14/40(35%)compared with before the sharing system. The purpose of interventions were for insomnia, anorexia, and cancer-related pain, etc., listed in order of degree of frequency. These results suggest that a sharing system of patient-reported interview sheets contributes to tracking treatment -related adverse events and aids in ensuring interventions can be efficiently performed by multidisciplinary team members.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Venous pain induced by peripheral intravenous infusion of gemcitabine has remained an unresolved issue in clinical practice. This study aimed to identify differences between gemcitabine formulations as well as risk factors associated with gemcitabine-induced venous pain in patients with cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from consecutive patients with cancer who had received chemotherapy including a lyophilized or liquid formulation of gemcitabine diluted with 5% glucose solution via a peripheral vein. The study was conducted at Ehime University Hospital using electronic medical records dated between January 2015 and July 2017. The primary end point was the prevalence of venous pain at the administration site during gemcitabine infusion, classified as injection site reaction of grade ≥2 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. A multivariate logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data was used to identify risk factors for venous pain during all courses of gemcitabine treatment. FINDINGS: A total of 1150 treatment courses in 141 Japanese patients were evaluated in this study. Venous pain occurred in 115 courses (10.0%) and in 49 patients (34.8%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations revealed that a dose increase of gemcitabine and use of the liquid formulation of gemcitabine were significantly associated with an increased risk for venous pain (dose increase, adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.11-1.40 [P < 0.001]; and liquid formulation, adjusted OR = 12.43, 95% CI, 5.61-27.51 [P < 0.001]), whereas age, course number of gemcitabine, and use of the soft-back product of 5% glucose solution were significantly associated with a reduced risk for venous pain (age, adjusted OR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.98 [P = 0.037]; course number, adjusted OR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99 [P = 0.023]; and soft back, adjusted OR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-0.74 [P = 0.004]). IMPLICATIONS: The use of the liquid formulation of gemcitabine was associated with a significant increase in the frequency of gemcitabine-induced venous pain despite dilution with 5% glucose solution compared to that with the lyophilized formulation. The lyophilized formulation of gemcitabine should hence be used in peripheral intravenous infusion for the treatment of patients with cancer.