Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound ; 14: 2, 2016 Jan 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26729298

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contrast agents are used in resting echocardiography to opacify the left ventricular (LV) cavity and to improve LV endocardial border delineation in patients with suboptimal image quality. If a wider use of contrast-enhanced echocardiography would be adopted instead of the current selective approach, diagnoses such as myocardial ischemia and LV structural abnormalities could potentially be detected earlier. The aim was therefore to retrospectively investigate if contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond the current recommendations for contrast agent usage affects assessment of wall motion abnormalities, ejection fraction (EF) and detection of LV structural abnormalities. A secondary aim was to evaluate the user dependency during image analysis. METHODS: Experienced readers (n = 4) evaluated wall motion score index (WMSI) and measured EF on greyscale and contrast-enhanced images from 192 patients without indications for contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Additionally, screening for LV structural abnormalities was performed. Repeated measurements were performed in 20 patients by the experienced as well as by inexperienced (n = 2) readers. RESULTS: Contrast analysis resulted in significantly higher WMSI compared to greyscale analysis (p < 0.003). Of the 83 patients, classified as healthy by greyscale analysis, 55% were re-classified with motion abnormalities by contrast analysis. No significant difference in EF classification (≥55%, 45-54%, 30-44%, < 30%) was observed. LV structural abnormalities, such as increased trabeculation (n = 21), apical aneurysm (n = 4), hypertrophy (n = 1) and thrombus (n = 1) were detected during contrast analysis. Intra- and interobserver variability for experienced readers as well as the variability between inexperienced and experienced readers decreased for WMSI and EF after contrast analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced echocardiography beyond current recommendations for contrast agent usage increased the number of detected wall motion and LV structural abnormalities. Moreover, contrast-enhanced echocardiography increased reproducibility for assessment of WMSI and EF.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Ecocardiografía de Estrés/métodos , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Volumen Sistólico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Ecocardiografía de Estrés/normas , Europa (Continente) , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Aumento de la Imagen/normas , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/normas , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA