Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 33(2 Suppl 89): S-113-5, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26016760

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance between a vascular specialist and a rheumatologist not familiar with vascular ultrasound when applying the compression sign for the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with suspicion of giant cell arteritis were examined by both examiners. Compression of the temporal artery on both sides (stem and both branches) was performed to define whether signs of vasculitis, no vasculitis or an indefinite result were present. Each examiner was blinded to the result of the other. RESULTS: In 59/60 patients, the examiners found an identical result. The interobserver agreement (Krippendorf alpha) was 0.92. CONCLUSIONS: The new compression sign for the diagnosis of temporal arteritis is a simple and robust sonographic marker with an excellent interobserver agreement.


Asunto(s)
Arteritis de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Temporales/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Reumatología , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex
2.
Ultraschall Med ; 34(1): 47-50, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22693039

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In patients with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA), a search for the perivascular halo sign, a sophisticated color duplex ultrasound (CDU) finding, at experienced centers reliably identifies inflamed temporal arteries (TA). We tested whether TA compression in patients with GCA, a simple, largely operator-independent maneuver, elicits contrasting echogenicity between the diseased artery wall and the surrounding tissue (compression sign). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 80 individuals with suspected GCA were prospectively enrolled in this single-center study. In all study participants, bilateral ultrasound examination of the TA established the presence/absence of the halo and compression sign. A positive compression sign was defined as visibility of the TA upon transducer-imposed compression of the artery. Based on ACR criteria, a team of specialized physicians independently grouped patients as GCA versus non-GCA. RESULTS: 43/80 study participants were grouped as GCA. Both the halo sign and the compression sign were positive in 34/43 patients in the GCA group, and negative in all 37/37 of the non-GCA group, resulting in a sensitivity of 79 % and a specificity of 100 % for both the halo and the compression sign. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of individuals with suspected GCA, the halo sign and the compression sign were equal in their diagnostic performance. The simplicity of the compression sign suggests a level of reliability warranting further evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Arteritis de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Arterias Temporales/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculo Liso Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Músculo Liso Vascular/patología , Presión , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Transductores
3.
Ultraschall Med ; 33(7): E256-E262, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22660962

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of noninvasive central venous pressure (CVP) assessment by compression ultrasound of a forearm vein (CUS), inferior vena cava (IVC-C) and internal jugular vein collapsibility (IJV-C) compared to invasive CVP measurement (invCVP) as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CUS, IVC-C and IJV-C were performed in a random sequence in 81 consecutive intensive care patients with simultaneous invCVP monitoring. Examiners were blinded to invCVP and previous examinations. RESULTS: Median invCVP was 12.0 mmHg (range 1 - 23). CUS, IVC-C and IJV-C could be obtained in 89 %, 95 % and 100 % of cases, respectively, within a median time of 188 sec [IQR 125; 270], 133 sec [IQR 100; 211] and 60 sec [IQR 50; 109], respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficient between invCVP and CUS, IVC-C, and IJV-C was 0.485 95 %-CI [0.25; 0.65], -0.186 [-0.42; 0.07], and -0.408 [-0.59; -0.18], respectively. The median absolute difference between CUS and invCVP was 3 mmHg [IQR 2; 6.75]. CVP was categorized as low (< 7 mmHg; collapsibility > 0.6), normal (7 - 12 mmHg; collapsibility 0.6 - 0.2) and high (> 12 mmHg; collapsibility < 0.2) as prespecified. The proportions of identical CVP classifications compared to invCVP were 61.4% 95%-CI [49.3%; 72.4%] with CUS, 48.7% [37.4%; 60%] with IVC-C and 51.3% [40.3%; 62.3%] with IJV-C (p > 0.10 for all pair-wise comparisons). CONCLUSION: The overall ability of CUS, IVC-C and IJV-C to assess invCVP was only moderate. CUS seems to be the preferable method if absolute CVP values are needed. IJV-C seems to be the fastest and most easily acquirable method, and thus may be especially valuable in emergency rooms.


Asunto(s)
Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/instrumentación , Presión Venosa Central/fisiología , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Ultrasonografía/instrumentación , Anciano , Femenino , Antebrazo/irrigación sanguínea , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen
6.
Vasa ; 35(3): 174-7, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16941406

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This paper introduces a proof-of-concept trial in progress, supposedly providing new important information on anti-platelet drugs used in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The Arteriogenesis Competence Network (Art.Net.) of the Universities of Basel, Berlin, and Freiburg could show in animal models that Aspirin (ASA), in contrast to Clopidogrel, inhibits the formation of an appropriate collateral network (arteriogenesis). This trial is supposed to reproduce the animal data in man. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, double-blind, parallel-group, bi-national (D, CH), multicentre trial, 250 patients will be randomised to either 100 mg ASA or 75 mg Clopidogrel once daily. Patients will then enter a three months structured rehabilitation programme with daily physical training supposed to induce arteriogenesis. The claudication distances will be tested as the primary endpoint at baseline, 6 weeks, and at 3 months. Also, the 24h physical activity profile of all patients will be electronically documented. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will provide information on potential disadvantages when using ASA in PAD patients. If data emerging from animal pharmacology can be reproduced in man, the present standard scheme of anti-aggregant treatment in PAD patients has to be reconsidered.


Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/sangre , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Clopidogrel , Circulación Colateral/efectos de los fármacos , Terapia Combinada , Contraindicaciones , Método Doble Ciego , Prueba de Esfuerzo/efectos de los fármacos , Alemania , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/sangre , Claudicación Intermitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Neovascularización Fisiológica/efectos de los fármacos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Suiza , Ticlopidina/efectos adversos , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico
7.
Vasa ; 35(3): 178-84, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16941407

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The magnitude of potential changes in Quality-of-Life (QoL) after structured institution-based or home-based peripheral arterial disease (PAD) rehabilitation programs are largely unknown at present. This pilot study provides first QoL data after PAD rehabilitation or a home-based PAD training. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a non-randomized, open-label pilot study three groups of out-patients were compared: group 1 (n = 18) PAD rehabilitation; group 2 (n = 17) PAD rehabilitation + clopidogrel 75 mg once daily; group 3 (n = 20) home-based training. The training period was 3 months, which was followed by a 3-month observation phase (without prescribed training). The institution-based rehabilitation program consisted of 3 training hours per week whereas patients training at home were instructed to walk for 1 hour per day on an outdoor track. QoL assessment was performed using MOS SF-36, PAVK-86 and PAD-WIQ questionnaires. RESULTS: At baseline background variables, demographics and claudication distances were comparable between groups. After three months of training the percentage changes for the initial and the absolute claudication distance (ICD, ACD) for groups 1, 2, and 3 amounted to 164%, 201%, 44% (ICD) and 83%, 131%, 5% (ACD), respectively. Statistically significant QoL improvements were recorded for physical functions, pain and disease related anxiety in all three study groups; statistically significant inter-group differences were not found. CONCLUSIONS: In sharp contrast to the development of the claudication distances the improvement in QoL, found after 3 months of training, was comparable and not consistently different between the groups.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Hospitalización , Claudicación Intermitente/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Anciano , Clopidogrel , Terapia Combinada , Prueba de Esfuerzo/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Proyectos Piloto , Centros de Rehabilitación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico
8.
Thromb Res ; 135(2): 217-25, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25541030

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) includes a number of conditions such as myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, stroke, and venous thromboembolism. CVD is a leading health problem worldwide and a major cause of mortality, morbidity, and disability; it is also associated with high healthcare costs. The incidence of CVD is predicted to increase in the forthcoming years, and thus it is crucial that physicians are aware of the benefits and limitations of the available therapies to ensure patients receive optimized treatment. Current clinical practice guidelines provide recommendations on the use of anticoagulants and antiplatelets for both the prevention and treatment of CVD. Aspirin is the most studied antiplatelet agent in this context. The benefits of aspirin are well documented and supported by data from robust clinical trials for CVD conditions, such as acute coronary syndrome and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, the clinical benefits of aspirin are less clear for other conditions, namely for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopaedic surgery, particularly in comparison with newer drugs such as the direct oral anticoagulants. This article provides an outline of the current guidelines and a critical assessment of the efficacy and safety data supporting the recommendations for the use of aspirin in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism and other cardiovascular disorders.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Humanos
9.
Ultraschall Med ; 28(1): 45-51, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17304412

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Colour coded duplex sonography (DS) is widely used for the assessment of renal artery stenosis (RAS). Different criteria have been specified for the detection of significant RAS. The aim of our study was to compare routinely used DS criteria, both with intra-arterial pressure gradients and arteriographic degree of stenosis, and to validate different cut-off points of these DS criteria for the assessment of haemodynamically significant RAS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed forty-nine patients (median age 67 years, 29 male) with RAS documented by duplex sonography, referred for renal arterial subtraction arteriography and intra-arterial pressure measurement (93 renal arteries). DS measurement of peak systolic velocity (PSV) in the main renal artery, the renal/aortal velocity ratio (RAR) and the side-to-side differences of the intrarenal resistive indices (DeltaRI) were correlated to intra-arterial pressure measurements and arteriographic degree of stenosis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used to determine the best cut-off value of DS criteria. RESULTS: 39 (41 %) renal arteries had normal findings or non significant stenosis < 50 %, 23 (25 %) had a diameter reduction between 50 % and 69 %, and 31 (33 %) > or = 70 %. The systolic pressure gradient showed good correlation with the arteriographic degree of RAS (r = 0.77, p < 0.001) and the PSV measured by duplex sonography (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). Mean systolic pressure gradient was 24 mmHg at 50 % stenosis and 23 mmHg at PSV of 200 cm/sec. A PSV of > or = 200 cm/sec provided a sensitivity of 92 % and specificity of 81 % for detecting RAS of > or = 50 %. Similar results were found for RAR > or = 2.5 with a sensitivity of 92 % and specificity of 79 %. These cut-off values have a negative predictive value of 100 % for excluding high-grade RAS of > or = 70 %. A DeltaRI of > or =0.05 has low sensitivity of 31 %, but a high specificity of 97 % for detecting RAS of > or = 50 %. CONCLUSION: DS measurements and the severity of arteriographic diameter reduction correlate well with systolic pressure gradients. Clinically expedient DS criteria for detecting RAS of > or = 50 % are a PSV of > or = 200 cm/sec or a RAR of > or =2.5. These criteria allow reliable exclusion of severe RAS of > or = 70 %.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Renal/fisiopatología , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Angiografía , Presión Sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/fisiopatología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Sístole , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA