Outcomes of Next-Day Versus Non-next-Day Colonoscopy After an Initial Inadequate Bowel Preparation.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate bowel preparation is the most common cause of failed colonoscopy, and repeat failure occurs in more than 20 % of follow-up attempts. Limited data suggest that next-day follow-up may reduce the risk for repeat inadequate preparation. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate differences in prep quality with next-day follow-up after initial inadequate preparation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Academic center. PATIENTS: Outpatient screening and surveillance colonoscopies between 7/2002 and 6/2007. INTERVENTION: Comparison of next-day versus any other day ("non-next-day") repeat colonoscopy outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Aronchick scale, polyp and adenoma detection rates. RESULTS: Of 20,798 initial colonoscopies, 857 (4.1 %) had inadequate preparation. 460 (54 %) were lost to follow-up. One hundred and fourteen (13 %) had next-day and 283 (33 %) had non-next-day colonoscopy with mean follow-up of 8.8 months. On follow-up examination, 29.8 % of next-day and 23.3 % of non-next-day colonoscopies had inadequate bowel preparation (p = 0.48). The adenoma detection rate for the next-day group improved from 3.5 to 38.6 % on follow-up, compared to 20.5 and 36.8 % in the non-next-day group. There was no significant difference between groups in detection of total adenoma (p = 0.73) or advanced adenomas (p = 0.20) on follow-up examinations. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, differences in baseline colonoscopy characteristics. CONCLUSION: The results confirm the need for repeat examination after a colonoscopy with inadequate bowel prep, as there was substantial increase in adenoma detection on follow-up. There were no differences in outcomes between next-day versus non-next-day colonoscopy. These data support repeating after inadequate colonoscopy within 1 year as convenient for patient and physician.

Staged approach for abdominal wound closure following combined liver and intestinal transplantation from living donors in pediatric patients.

Primary closure of the abdominal wall after combined liver and intestine transplantation from a living donor into a pediatric patient is usually not possible, because of the size of the donor organ, graft edema, and preexisting scars or stomas of the abdominal wall. Closure under tension may lead to abdominal compartment syndrome with vascular compromise and necrosis of the transplanted organ. We describe our experience of abdominal wound closure after liver and intestinal transplant in the pediatric patient using a staged approach. From February 2003 to June 2006, we managed five pediatric liver and intestinal living donor transplant recipients. Because of the large post-transplantation abdominal wall defect, a staged technique of abdominal wound closure was utilized. Initially, an absorbable Polygalactin mesh was sutured around the layer of the defect. As soon as adequate granulation tissue was formed over the mesh a STSG was applied. From the wound stand point all five patients were managed successfully with staged wound closure after transplantation. Granulation tissue filled and covered the mesh within 7.6 wk. A STSG was then used to cover the defect. All infants recovered well and none had a significant wound complication in the immediate post-operative period following STSG. At a mean follow-up of 24 months only one patient developed an entero-cutaneous fistula five months post-transplant. Staged abdominal wall coverage with the use of Polygalactin mesh followed by STSG is a simple and effective technique. A closed wound is achieved in a timely fashion with protection of the viscera. Residual ventral hernia will need to be managed in the future with one of several reconstructive techniques.

Simultaneous or sequential combined living donor-intestine transplantation in children.

BACKGROUND: Since the report of the first successful living donor combined liver-intestine transplant in pediatric patients, three other cases have been performed. In this article, we describe surgical technique, outcome, and propose a broader application of this procedure using deceased donors. PATIENTS: Four children of mean age 15.5 months (11-24 months) and weight 9.5 kg (8-10.9 kg) affected by end-stage liver and intestinal failure underwent living donor combined liver-intestine transplant with a left lateral liver and a distal segment of jejunum. In one case, the organs were transplanted simultaneously and in three in staged procedures. In all cases the liver transplant was performed first. The intestine was always transplanted with systemic venous drainage. The biliary anastomosis was a duct-to-duct, a biliodigestive, or a combined one according to the biliary anatomy of the liver graft. The abdomen was routinely closed with a Vicryl mesh followed by a skin graft. A loop graft ileostomy was fashioned for protocol biopsies and taken down within 3 months. RESULTS: One intestine was lost to generalized ischemia. The child was promptly retransplanted with another living donor graft. All children are alive and well at an average follow-up of 30 months (18-54 months). CONCLUSIONS: Living donor combined liver-intestine transplant can be performed successfully with excellent early outcome. The in situ splitting technique here described can be applied to obtain grafts for small children from appropriate adult deceased donors.