Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev Med Chil ; 143(12): 1533-8, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26928614

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To validate the BIRADS in mammography, the calculation of its predictive value in each center is required, as recommended by the American College of Radiology. AIM: To determine the predictive value of the BIRADS system in our center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All ultrasound guided needle percutaneous biopsies, performed at our center between 2006 and 2010 were reviewed. Predictive value, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of BIRADS were calculated, with a confidence interval of 95%. RESULTS: Of 1,313 biopsies available, 1,058 met the inclusion criteria. Fifty eight percent of biopsies were performed to women with mammographies classified as BIRADS 4 or 5. The presence of cancer in mammographies classified as BIRADS 0 was 4%. The prevalence of cancer for mammographies BIRADS 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were 0, 3, 2.7, 17.7 and 72.4% respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of BIRADS classification were 55 and 92 % respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution BIRADS classification 4 and 5 has a high positive predictive value for detecting cancer as in developed countries.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA