Integrated analyses of the genetic and clinicopathological features of cholangiolocarcinoma: cholangiolocarcinoma may be characterized by mismatch-repair deficiency.

Cholangiolocarcinoma (CLC) is a primary liver carcinoma that resembles the canals of Hering and that has been reported to be associated with stem cell features. Due to its rarity, the nature of CLC remains unclear, and its pathological classification remains controversial. To clarify the positioning of CLC in primary liver cancers and identify characteristics that could distinguish CLC from other liver cancers, we performed integrated analyses using whole-exome sequencing (WES), immunohistochemistry, and a retrospective review of clinical information on eight CLC cases and two cases of recurrent CLC. WES demonstrated that CLC includes IDH1 and BAP1 mutations, which are characteristic of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). A mutational signature analysis showed a pattern similar to that of iCCA, which was different from that of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CLC cells, including CK7, CK19, and EpCAM, were positive for cholangiocytic differentiation markers. However, the hepatocytic differentiation marker AFP and stem cell marker SALL4 were completely negative. The immunostaining patterns of CLC with CD56 and epithelial membrane antigen were similar to those of the noncancerous bile ductules. In contrast, mutational signature cluster analyses revealed that CLC formed a cluster associated with mismatch-repair deficiency (dMMR), which was separate from iCCA. Therefore, to evaluate MMR status, we performed immunostaining of four MMR proteins (PMS2, MSH6, MLH1, and MSH2) and detected dMMR in almost all CLCs. In conclusion, CLC had highly similar characteristics to iCCA but not to HCC. CLC can be categorized as a subtype of iCCA. In contrast, CLC has characteristics of dMMR tumors that are not found in iCCA, suggesting that it should be treated distinctly from iCCA. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Ferroptosis-related gene glutathione peroxidase 4 promotes reprogramming of glucose metabolism via Akt-mTOR axis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

The role of the ferroptosis-related gene glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) in oncology has been extensively investigated. However, the clinical implications of GPX4 in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of GPX4 and its underlying molecular mechanisms in patients with ICC. Fifty-seven patients who underwent surgical resection for ICC between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the immunohistochemistry, patients were divided into GPX4 high (n = 15) and low (n = 42) groups, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Furthermore, the roles of GPX4 in cell proliferation, migration and gene expression were analyzed in ICC cell lines in vitro and in vivo. The results from clinical study showed that GPX4 high group showed significant associations with high SUVmax on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (≥8.0, P = 0.017), multiple tumors (P = 0.004), and showed glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) high expression with a trend toward significance (P = 0.053). Overall and recurrence-free survival in the GPX4 high expression group were significantly worse than those in the GPX4 low expression group (P = 0.038 and P < 0.001, respectively). In the experimental study, inhibition of GPX4 attenuated cell proliferation and migration in ICC cell lines. Inhibition of GPX4 also decreased the expression of glucose metabolism-related genes, such as GLUT1 or HIF1α. Mechanistically, these molecular changes are regulated in Akt-mechanistic targets of rapamycin axis. In conclusion, this study suggested the pivotal value of GPX4 serving as a prognostic marker for patients with ICC. Furthermore, GPX4 can mediate glucose metabolism of ICC.

Comprehensive analyses of the clinicopathological features and genomic mutations of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma.

AIM: Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare primary liver cancer that has two different tumor phenotypes in a single tumor nodule. The relationship between genetic mutations and clinicopathological features of cHCC-CCA remains to be elucidated. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing analyses were carried out in 13 primary and 2 recurrent cHCC-CCAs. The whole-exome analyses and clinicopathological information were integrated. RESULTS: TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene in this cohort, followed by BAP1, IDH1/2, and NFE2L2 mutations in multiple cases. All tumors with diameters <3 cm had TP53 mutations. In contrast, six of seven tumors with diameters ≥3 cm did not have TP53 mutations, but all seven tumors had mutations in genes associated with various pathways, including Wnt, RAS/PI3K, and epigenetic modulators. In the signature analysis, the pattern of mutations shown in the TP53 mutation group tended to be more similar to HCC than the TP53 nonmutation group. Mutations in recurrent cHCC-CCA tumors were frequently identical to those in the primary tumor, suggesting that those tumors originated from identical clones of the primary cHCC-CCA tumors. Recurrent and co-occurrent HCC tumors in the same patients with cHCC-CCA had either common or different mutation patterns from the primary cHCC-CCA tumors in each case. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggested that there were two subtypes of cHCC-CCA, one involving TP53 mutations in the early stage of the carcinogenic process and the other not involving such mutations. The comparison of the variants between primary and recurrent tumors suggested that cHCC-CCA was derived from an identical clone.

Is routine lymph node dissection recommended for liver resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the therapeutic effects of routine lymph node dissection (LND) with liver resection on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: Databases, including MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched to identify studies comparing LND and non-LND for ICC liver resection. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), in-hospital morbidity, blood loss, and R0 rate. RESULTS: Seventeen studies involving 4407 patients were included. The OS did not differ between the LND (n = 2158) and non-LND (n = 2249) groups (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.32). The secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Subgroup analyses stratified by the risk of bias showed a significant difference in OS between the high- and low-risk groups (P = 0.0008). In the low-risk group, LND (vs. non-LND) was associated with superior OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98). Most studies in low-risk groups involved patients who were clinically node-negative. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic effects of routine LND for ICC have not been demonstrated. However, LND had a positive impact on OS in studies with a low risk of bias, thus suggesting that there may be a subset of ICC patients who would benefit from LND.

Preoperative Endoscopic Minor Papilla Sphincterotomy for Pancreas Divisum in a Patient with Pancreatic Cancer Who Underwent Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas divisum (PD) is a congenital anomaly that occurs due to failure of fusion of the dorsal and ventral pancreatic ductal systems.1-3 In PD, pancreatic juice drains mainly through the minor papilla via the dorsal duct, leading to high intraductal pressure, which can cause pancreatitis.1-3 We report a case of PD that underwent preoperative decompression using endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy (EMPS) before laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) for pancreatic cancer.3 METHODS: The patient was a 74-year-old woman with pancreatic tail cancer, measuring 35 mm in size, in PD with an entirely dilated dorsal duct, implying high, intraductal pressure caused by minor papillary dysfunction. We performed EMPS to prevent postoperative pancreatitis and pancreatic fistula before LDP using a left-posterior approach, as previously described.4 As the pancreatic transection margin was positive for high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia on intraoperative pathology, an additional resection of the pancreatic head to the right side of the portal vein was performed after the liberation of the gastroduodenal artery with both the dorsal and ventral pancreatic ducts ligated and divided. RESULTS: The operative time was 421 min, and blood loss was 70 mL. The postoperative course was uneventful, with no evidence of pancreatitis or pancreatic fistula. The patient was discharged on postoperative Day 10. Postoperative computed tomography revealed reduced dilatation of the dorsal duct. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative EMPS may be effective in preventing pancreatic fistula after LDP in patients with PD.

Protocol of the RACB study: a multicenter, single-arm, prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of resection of initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: Although the standard therapy for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is systemic chemotherapy, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (atezo + bev) with a high objective response rate may lead to conversion to resection in patients with initially unresectable HCC. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of atezo + bev in achieving conversion surgery and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) for initially unresectable HCC. METHODS: The RACB study is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of combination therapy with atezo + bev for conversion surgery in patients with technically and/or oncologically unresectable HCC. The main eligibility criteria are as follows: (1) unresectable HCC without a history of systemic chemotherapy, (2) at least one target lesion based on RECIST ver. 1.1, and (3) a Child‒Pugh score of 5-6. The definition of unresectable tumors in this study includes macroscopic vascular invasion and/or extrahepatic metastasis and massive distribution of intrahepatic tumors. Patients will be treated with atezolizumab (1200 mg/body weight) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. If the patient is considered resectable on radiological assessment 12 weeks after initial chemotherapy, the patient will be treated with atezolizumab monotherapy 3 weeks after combination chemotherapy followed by surgery 3 weeks after atezolizumab monotherapy. If the patient is considered unresectable, the patient will continue with atezo + bev and undergo a radiological assessment every 9 weeks until resectable or until disease progression. The primary endpoint is PFS, and the secondary endpoints are the overall response rate, overall survival, resection rate, curative resection rate, on-protocol resection rate, and ICG retention rate at 15 min after atezo + bev therapy. The assessments of safety and quality of life during the treatment course will also be evaluated. The number of patients has been set at 50 based on the threshold and the expected PFS rate at 6 months after enrollment of 40% and 60%, respectively, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.05 and power of 0.80. The enrollment and follow-up periods will be 2 and 1.5 years, respectively. DISCUSSION: This study will elucidate the efficacy of conversion surgery with atezo + bev for initially unresectable HCC. In addition, the conversion rate, safety and quality of life during the treatment course will also be demonstrated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs051210148, January 7, 2022).

Impact of the Intermittent Pringle Maneuver for Predicting Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure: A Cohort Study of 597 Consecutive Patients.

BACKGROUND: Intermittent Pringle maneuver (PM) is widely performed to reduce blood loss during hepatectomy; however, its impact on clinically relevant post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the impact of PM on PHLF and explore whether PM provides additional value for predicting PHLF. METHODS: Consecutive patients, who underwent hepatectomy without biliary and/or vascular reconstruction between 2011 and 2018 in a single institution, were retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome was PHLF grades B/C as defined by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. A multivariable logistic regression model of variables significantly associated with PHLF was established. The model's predictive ability was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: Among 597 patients, PHLF occurred in 42 (7.0%). PM was applied in 421 patients (70.5%) and was associated with the development of PHLF (PM vs. no-PM: 9.7 vs. 0.6%, P < 0.001). After the propensity score matching, patients with PM experienced significantly increased rates of PHLF (P = 0.010). Rem-ALPlat index (including future liver remnant, preoperative albumin level, and platelet count; P < 0.001), the number of PMs (P = 0.032), and blood loss (P = 0.007) were identified as significant predictors of PHLF. The model's AUROC combined with the intraoperative variables was higher than that of the preoperative model alone (0.877 vs. 0.789, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: PM was involved in the occurrence of clinically relevant PHLF. Further, intraoperative factors including PM may provide additional value to predict PHLF and may facilitate early post-hepatectomy intervention.

A Conceptual Classification of Resectability for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUNDS: In the era of multidisciplinary treatment strategy, resectability for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) should be defined. This study aimed to propose and validate a resectability classification of HCC. METHODS: We proposed following the three groups; resectable-(R), borderline resectable-(BR), and unresectable (UR)-HCCs. Resectable two groups were sub-divided according to the value of indocyanine green clearance of remnant liver (ICG-Krem) and presence of macrovascular invasion (MVI); BR-HCC was defined as resectable HCCs with MVI and/or ICG-Krem≥0.03-<0.05, and R-HCC was the remaining. Consecutive patients with HCC who underwent liver resection (LR) and non-surgical treatment(s) (i.e., UR-HCC) between 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed to validate the proposed classification. RESULTS: A total of 361 patients were enrolled in the study. Of these, R-, BR- and UR-HCC were found in 251, 46, and 64 patients, respectively. In patients with resected HCC, ICG-Krem≥0.05 was associated with decreased risk of clinically relevant posthepatectomy liver failure (p=0.013) and the presence of MVI was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (p<0.001). The 3-5-years OS rates according to the proposed classification were 80.3, and 68.3% versus 51.4, and 35.6%, in the R and BR groups, respectively (both p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed BR-HCC was independently associated with poorer OS (p<0.001) after adjusting for known tumor prognostic factors. Meanwhile, BR-HCC was associated with benefit in terms of OS compared with UR-HCC (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our proposal of resectability for HCC allows for stratifying survival outcomes of HCC and may help to determine treatment strategy.

Impact of liver volumetric regeneration on survival outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after major hepatectomy.

PURPOSE: Prognostic value of liver volumetric regeneration (LVR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo major hepatectomy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of LVR on long-term outcomes in these patients. METHODS: Data of 399 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent major hepatectomy between 2000 to 2018 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional database. The LVR-index was defined as the relative increase in liver volume from 7 days to 3 months (RLV3m/RLV7d, where RLV3m and RLV7d is the remnant liver volume around 3 months and postoperative 7 days after surgery). The optimal cut-off value was determined using the median value of LVR-index. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were eligible in this study. The optimal cut off value of LVR-index was 1.194. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients in the high LVR-index group were significantly better compared to those in the low LVR-index group (95.5%, 84.8%, 75.4% and 49.1% vs. 95.4%, 70.2%, 56.4%, and 19.9%, p = 0.002). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference with regards to time to recurrence between the two groups (p = 0.607). Significance of LVR-index for OS was retained after adjusting for known prognostic factors (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In patients with HCC undergoing major hepatectomy, LVR-index may serve as a prognostic indicator for OS.

Impact of patient-specific three-dimensional printed liver models on hepatic surgery safety: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Simulation and navigation technologies in hepatobiliary surgery have been developed recently. In this prospective clinical trial, we evaluated the accuracy and utility of our patient-specific three dimensional (3D)-printed liver models as an intraoperative navigation system to ensure surgical safety. METHOD: Patients requiring advanced hepatobiliary surgeries during the study period were enrolled. Three cases were selected for comparison of the computed tomography (CT) scan data of the models with the patients' original data. Questionnaires were completed after surgeries to evaluate the utility of the models. Psychological stress was used as subjective data and operation time and blood loss as objective data. RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent surgery using the patient-specific 3D liver models. The difference between patient-specific 3D liver models and the original data was less than 0.6 mm in the 90% area. The 3D model assisted with intra-liver hepatic vein recognition and the definition of the cutting line. According to the post-operative subjective evaluation, surgeons found the models improved safety and reduced psychological stress during operations. However, the models did not reduce operative time or blood loss. CONCLUSION: The patient-specific 3D-printed liver models accurately reflected patients' original data and were an effective intraoperative navigation tool for meticulously difficult liver surgeries. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000025732).

[Simultaneous living donor liver transplantation and pancreatoduodenectomy for an extensive cholangiocarcinoma with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case report].

The treatment of choice for a resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma is hepatectomy. Alternative treatment for unresectable cases includes liver transplantation;however, curative surgery is hindered by a distal cholangiocarcinoma extension into the intrapancreatic duct. Herein, we present a case of simultaneous living donor liver transplantation and pancreaticoduodenectomy for an extensive cholangiocarcinoma that is associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis, involving the perihilar and intrapancreatic duct. The treatment strategy involved neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy, an exploratory laparoscopy and laparotomy for accurate staging, en-bloc whole bile duct and hepatoduodenal ligament resection, portal vein reconstruction with an interposition graft, and arterial reconstruction with the middle colic artery. The patient was discharged 122 days postoperatively although she suffered from postoperative ascites and delayed gastric emptying. Simultaneous living donor liver transplantation and pancreatoduodenectomy should be considered as treatment options for advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

Impact of Preoperative CEA Uptrend on Survival Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis After Hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been reported as a prognostic factor in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) after hepatectomy. However, the impact of a preoperative "CEA uptrend" on prognosis after hepatectomy in these patients remains unknown. This study assessed the impact of CEA uptrend on prognosis in patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM. METHODS: Consecutive patients with CRLM who underwent hepatectomy between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with CRLM for whom CEA was measured both around 1 month before (CEA-1m) and within 3 days (CEA-3d) before hepatectomy were enrolled. A CEA-3d higher than both the upper limit of normal (5 ng/ml) and CEA-1m was defined as a CEA uptrend. RESULTS: Study participants comprised 212 patients with CRLM. Of these, 88 patients (41.5%) showed a CEA uptrend. CEA uptrend indicated better discriminatory ability (corrected Akaike information criteria, 733.72) and homogeneity (likelihood ratio chi-square value, 18.80) than CEA-3d or CEA-1m. Patients with CEA uptrend showed poorer overall survival than those without CEA uptrend (p < 0.001). After adjusting for known prognostic factors, the prognostic significance of CEA uptrend retained (hazard ratio 2.63, 95% confidence interval 1.63-4.26, p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, the prognostic significance of CEA uptrend was retained irrespective of the status of RAS mutation or response to preoperative chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: CEA uptrend offers better prediction of survival outcomes than conventional CEA measurements in patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM.

Learning process of laparoscopic liver resection and postoperative outcomes: chronological analysis of single-center 15-years' experience.

BACKGROUND: Limited studies have reported the actual learning process of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). This study aimed to chronologically evaluate our 15 years' experience of LLR. METHODS: All consecutive LLRs between 2006 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The time period was divided into three groups; first (2006-2010), second (2011-2015), and third (2016-2020) period. The primary endpoint of this study was a composite of overall (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II) or major (grade ≥ IIIa) postoperative complications within 30 days. Using the IWATE criteria (four difficulty levels based on six indices), LLR was categorized as basic (< 7 points) and advanced (≥ 7 points) one. All analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principles. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 382 LLRs were gradually performed (first period, n = 54; second period, n = 114, and third period, n = 214). Low incidences of overall and major complications were maintained (9.3, 10.5, and 7.0%, p = 0.514, and 1.9, 2.6, and 2.3%, p = 1.000). Meanwhile, pure LLRs (i.e., LLRs without hand-assisted or hybrid approach) and advanced LLRs were increasingly performed in 25 (46.3%), 71 (62.3%), and 205 (95.8%) patients (p < 0.001) and 3 (5.6%), 18 (15.8%), and 58 (27.1%) patients (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that stepwise approach from basic to advanced procedures and use of hand-assisted or hybrid approach during the early phases for starting LLR practice may allow for maintaining low morbidity in specialized center.

Surgery for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Achieving Long-term Survival.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). BACKGROUND: HCC recurs with high incidence after liver resection. Little is known about long-term outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for recurrent HCC. METHODS: Among 989 patients who underwent R0/R1 liver resection for HCC between 1995 and 2014, 676 patients who exhibited recurrence were included. Repeat surgery was performed in 128 patients (RS group), and not in the remaining 548 patients (NS group). Prognostic value after repeat surgery was evaluated by comparing survival after recurrence (SAR) between the RS and NS groups. Subgroup analyses according to the 3 recurrence patterns [intrahepatic recurrence (IHR), extrahepatic recurrence (EHR), and intra plus extrahepatic recurrence (IHR + EHR)] were performed. RESULTS: Seventy-three of 430 patients (17.0%) with IHR, 17 of 57 patients (29.8%) with EHR, and 38 of 189 patients (20.1%) with IH + EHR underwent repeat surgery. Compared with the NS group, the RS group had better liver function and their time to recurrence was significantly longer (16.5 vs 11.4 months; P < 0.001). In the overall and 3 recurrence patterns, the 5-year SAR rate was better in the RS group compared with the NS group (RS vs NS group; overall, 53.0% vs 25.7%; IHR, 73.8% vs 37.2%; EHR, 30.0% vs 0%; IHR + EHR, 34.1% vs 10.6%; all P < 0.001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, repeat surgery was identified as an independent factor for better SAR (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgery for recurrent HCC may yield long-term survival for not only IHR but also for EHR in selected patients.

Liver Transection-First Approach in Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Safe and Secure Technique for the Early Assessment of Curable Resection and Vascular Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is often indicated in the resection of cholangiocarcinoma but is associated with high mortality.1-3 From a risk-benefit perspective, HPD can be justified only when curative resection is achievable.4-6 METHODS: A liver transection-first approach is a surgical technique in which liver transection precedes pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and skeletonization of the hepatoduodenal ligament in HPD. This approach enables an early assessment of resectability and curability. RESULTS: A 64-year-old with jaundice had a tumor located mainly in the proximal bile duct, spreading from the confluence of hepatic ducts (dominant in the left hepatic duct) to the intrapancreatic bile duct. The right hepatic artery and portal vein existed in close proximity to the tumor. HPD (left hemi-hepatectomy and subtotal stomach-preserving PD) with vascular resection was performed. After liver transection along the Cantlie line, the right Glissonean pedicle was collectively secured inside the liver. The right hepatic artery, right portal vein, and right hepatic duct (RHD) were isolated, and the feasibility of vascular reconstruction was confirmed. After the RHD was divided and the negative margin was confirmed, we proceeded to perform PD. The portal vein was reconstructed between the right portal vein and the portal vein trunk. The right hepatic artery was anastomosed to the second jejunal artery of the jejunal loop with the right gastroepiploic artery as an interposition graft. CONCLUSION: The liver transection-first technique in HPD facilitates early assessment of curability and resectability as well as a safe and secure manipulation and reconstruction of the hepatic artery and portal vein.

Identifying Patients Who May Benefit from Liver Resection Compared to Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using 18F-FDG PET.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess an oncologic setting where patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) could benefit from liver resection (LR) compared to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography. METHODS: The consecutive data of patients with HCC who underwent 18F-FDG PET before LR (LR group, n = 314) and LDLT (LDLT group, n = 65) between 2003 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor 18F-FDG avidity was quantified as the tumor to liver standardized uptake value ratio (TLR, cut-off value was defined at 2). Multivariate analysis was performed to assess significant preoperative tumor factors in the LR group. Survival outcomes between the two groups were stratified by these factors. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS: 56.9% vs. 73.8%, LR vs. LDLT, p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival rate (RFS: 27.4% vs. 70.7%, p < 0.001) were significantly better in the LDLT group compared to the LR group. In the LR study, multivariate analysis identified TLR and tumor multiplicity as significant preoperative tumor factors for OS. In patients with solitary and TLR < 2 HCC, the 5-year OS rate was not significantly different between the LR and LDLT groups (70.3% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.352); meanwhile, RFS rate was better in the LDLT group (34.3% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LDLT is associated with better long-term outcomes than LR in patients with HCC; however, selected patients with solitary and TLR < 2 HCC may benefit from LR.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Controlled Study with Propensity Score Matching.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is associated with fewer postoperative complications than open liver resection (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, this issue remains controversial since the data may have been attributable to an imbalance in patients' background. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 290 hepatectomies for HCC undertaken between 2011 and 2019. Liver resection difficulty was based on the 3 levels of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification. Resection ratio was calculated using computed tomography volumetry. Patient characteristics were compared between the LLR and OLR groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was adopted to adjust the imbalance between the cohorts, and the incidence of postoperative complications was compared. RESULTS: The difficulty and resection ratio were significantly lower in LLR (n = 112) than in OLR (n = 178) (difficulty grade I/II/III: 84/10/18 vs. 43/39/96, p < 0.001; resection ratio: 11.4 ± 12.7 vs. 22.7 ± 17.2%, p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or more) was lower in LLR (2.7% vs. 21.9%, p < 0.001), which was mainly attributable to fewer incidences of ascites and pleural effusion. PSM generated 68 well-matched patients in each group. The lower incidence of postoperative complications in LLR was also maintained in the PSM cohort (2.9% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.017). On multivariate analysis, LLR was the independent predictor of postoperative complications (OR 0.184, 95% CI 0.051-0.672, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that a laparoscopic approach reduces the incidence of postoperative complications in liver resection for HCC.

Low level of postoperative plasma antithrombin III is associated with portal vein thrombosis after liver surgery.

PURPOSE: Although decreased antithrombin-III (AT-III) is a risk factor for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with liver cirrhosis, the association between postoperative PVT and postoperative AT-III levels is unknown in patients undergoing hepatectomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative PVT was assessed on CT at days 6-9 after hepatectomy. One-to-one propensity score (PS) matching was used to match the baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 295 patients included in this analysis, 19 patients (6.4%) were diagnosed with postoperative PVT. The AT-III level on postoperative day (POD) 3 predicted postoperative PVT with a sensitivity/specificity of 74%/59% (AUC, 0.644; cut-off value, 60%; p = 0.032). Multivariate analysis revealed that AT-III levels ≤ 60% on POD3 (OR, 3.01; 95% CI 1.02-8.89; p = 0.046), cirrhosis (OR, 5.88; 95% CI 1.92-18.0; p = 0.002) and right-sided hepatectomy (OR, 4.16; 95% CI 1.45-11.9; p = 0.0079) were significant risk factors for postoperative PVT. After PS matching, 56 patients with and without AT-III supplementation were analyzed. The two groups had a similar incidence of PVT (p = 0.489). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AT-III levels ≤ 60% on POD3 should be carefully followed up regarding postoperative PVT. Our results did not support the efficacy of routine AT-III supplementation for the prophylaxis of postoperative PVT.

Quantitative assessment of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma using preoperative serological and imaging markers.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to establish a quantitative equation to predict microvascular invasion (MVI) for patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 219 patients with resected HCC from 2004 to 2015. All had available three pre-operative serological markers (alfa-feto protein (AFP), fucosylated AFP (AFP-L3), and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP)), and one imaging marker (tumor to liver ratio of SUVmax (TLR) by 18F-FDG-PET). A multiple linear regression model for predicting MVI was developed (2004-2009, n = 111) and then validated (2010-2015, n = 108). Further, impact on the obtained model on survival outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: Using the derivation cohort, following equation was developed; MVI probability (%) = 14.2 × log10DCP + 9.9 × TLR - 22.0. This model resulted in an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of 0.806 and 0.751, in the derivation and validation cohort, respectively. Furthermore, MVI probability ≥40% determined by ROC analysis was associated with worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival in the derivation and the validation cohort (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A quantitative model, using DCP and TLR, was able to preoperatively predict with good performance MVI and long-term outcomes in patients with HCC after liver resection.

Laparoscopic liver resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) play central roles to treat early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, ≤3 cm, 1-3 nodules, and no macrovascular involvement), although data are lacking regarding whether LLR or RFA is preferable. This study aimed to compare outcomes of both treatments for small HCCs. METHODS: Treatment outcomes of small HCCs were compared between all the minor LLRs performed between 2005 and 2016 and RFAs performed between 2011 and 2016 at Kyoto University. RESULTS: A total of 85 and 136 patients underwent LLR and RFA, respectively. Patients that underwent LLR had higher incidence of blood transfusions, complications, and longer hospital stay. Overall and disease-specific survival rates were similar between LLR and RFA; however, recurrence-free (49.2% vs. 22.1% at 3-year) and local recurrence-free survival rates (94.9% vs. 63.6% at 3-year) were higher after LLR. Multivariate analyses identified that multiple nodules and 65-year-old and above are predictors of disease-specific survival, and that RFA is a predictor of recurrence and local recurrence. CONCLUSION: RFA is less invasive, although both LLR and RFA are safe and effective. LLR provides better local control with superior recurrence-free and local-recurrence free survival. These results help optimize treatment selection based on patient-specific factors.