Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 98
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(6): 1283-1285, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37209695

RESUMEN

The US Coast Guard Academy began adenovirus vaccination of incoming cadets in 2022. Of 294 vaccine recipients, 15%-20% had mild respiratory or systemic symptoms within 10 days postvaccination but no serious adverse events after 90 days. Our findings support the continued use of adenovirus vaccines in congregate military settings.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Adenovirus , Personal Militar , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Vacunas contra el Adenovirus/efectos adversos
2.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 19(6): 394-407, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35404773

RESUMEN

During 2001-2002, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), at the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, collaborated with the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) at the United States Department of Labor to conduct a voluntary survey of U.S. employers regarding the use of respiratory protective devices. In 2003, the survey results were jointly published by NIOSH and BLS. This study highlights and evaluates the scientific impact of the 2001-2002 survey by using the Science Impact Framework which provides a historical tracking method with five domains of influence. The authors conducted interviews with original project management as well as a thorough document review and qualitative content analysis of published papers, books, presentations, and other relevant print media. A semi-structured and cross-vetted coding was applied across the five domains: Disseminating Science, Creating Awareness, Catalyzing Action, Effecting Change, and Shaping the Future. The 2001-2002 survey findings greatly enhanced understanding and awareness of respirator use in occupational settings within the United States. It also led to similar surveys in other countries, regulatory initiatives by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Mine Safety and Health Administration, and ultimately to a renewed partnership between NIOSH and BLS to collect contemporary estimates of respirator use in the workplace within the United States.


Asunto(s)
Salud Laboral , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Estados Unidos , Ventiladores Mecánicos
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(12): 2217-2225, 2021 12 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33598716

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We investigated patients with potential severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reinfection in the United States during May-July 2020. METHODS: We conducted case finding for patients with potential SARS-CoV-2 reinfection through the Emerging Infections Network. Cases reported were screened for laboratory and clinical findings of potential reinfection followed by requests for medical records and laboratory specimens. Available medical records were abstracted to characterize patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical course, and laboratory test results. Submitted specimens underwent further testing, including reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), viral culture, whole genome sequencing, subgenomic RNA PCR, and testing for anti-SARS-CoV-2 total antibody. RESULTS: Among 73 potential reinfection patients with available records, 30 patients had recurrent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms explained by alternative diagnoses with concurrent SARS-CoV-2 positive RT-PCR, 24 patients remained asymptomatic after recovery but had recurrent or persistent RT-PCR, and 19 patients had recurrent COVID-19 symptoms with concurrent SARS-CoV-2 positive RT-PCR but no alternative diagnoses. These 19 patients had symptom recurrence a median of 57 days after initial symptom onset (interquartile range: 47-76). Six of these patients had paired specimens available for further testing, but none had laboratory findings confirming reinfections. Testing of an additional 3 patients with recurrent symptoms and alternative diagnoses also did not confirm reinfection. CONCLUSIONS: We did not confirm SARS-CoV-2 reinfection within 90 days of the initial infection based on the clinical and laboratory characteristics of cases in this investigation. Our findings support current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance around quarantine and testing for patients who have recovered from COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Humanos , Laboratorios , Reinfección
4.
Prev Med ; 152(Pt 1): 106734, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34344523

RESUMEN

Since 1999, the Office of the United States Surgeon General has identified suicide prevention as a national public health priority. The National Strategy on Suicide Prevention, coordinated by the public-private Action Alliance, was most recently updated in 2012. In early 2021, the Surgeon General's office released a Call to Action to fully implement the national strategy. Six core types of actions to prevent suicide include adopting a broad public health approach, addressing upstream factors including social determinants of health, reducing access to multiple forms of lethal means, adopting evidence-based care for persons at risk, enhancing crisis care and care transitions, and improving the quality and use of suicide-related data. From 1999 through 2018, suicide rates in the U.S. increased by approximately one-third, and suicide had become the tenth leading cause of death. While most recent national data indicate a small reduction in the suicide rate, decreases were not seen across all demographic groups. Population groups which may require special emphasis or outreach efforts include adolescents, working age adults, military veterans, and American Indians/Alaskan Natives. Increases in social isolation, mental distress, and economic hardship during the COVID-19 pandemic indicate clear needs to address the full spectrum of suicidal behavior. This will require a multisector and whole of government approach, using contemporary evidence-informed approaches and best practices as well as innovative methods including those based on predictive analytics.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Prevención del Suicidio , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Ideación Suicida , Estados Unidos
5.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 20(1): 60, 2020 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32143633

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a minimally invasive procedure used for the treatment of lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. There is increased usage of hemoclips during EMR for the prevention of delayed bleeding. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of hemoclips in the prevention of delayed bleeding after EMR of upper and lower GI tract lesions. METHOD: This is a retrospective cohort study using the Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) EMR registry. Lesions in upper and lower GI tracts that underwent EMR between January 2012 and December 2015 were analyzed. Rates of delayed bleeding were compared between the hemoclip and no-hemoclip groups. Analysis was stratified by upper GI and lower GI lesions. Lower GI group was further stratified by right and left colon. We examined the relationship between clip use and several clinically-relevant variables among the patients who exhibited delayed bleeding. Furthermore, we explored possible procedure-level and endoscopist-level characteristics that may be associated with clip usage. RESULTS: A total of 18 out of 657 lesions (2.7%) resulted in delayed bleeding: 7 (1.1%) in hemoclip group and 11 (1.7%) in no-hemoclip group (p = 0.204). There was no evidence that clip use moderated the effects of the lesion size (p = 0.954) or lesion location (p = 0.997) on the likelihood of delayed bleed. In the lower GI subgroup, clip application did not alter the effect of polyp location (right versus left colon) on the likelihood of delayed bleed (p = 0.951). Logistic regression analyses showed that the clip use did not modify the likelihood of delayed bleeding as related to the following variables: use of aspirin/NSAIDs/anti-coagulants/anti-platelets, pathologic diagnoses (including different types of colon polypoid lesions), ablation, piecemeal resection. The total number of clips used was 901 at a minimum additional cost of $173,893. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic hemoclip application did not reduce delayed post-EMR bleed for upper and lower GI lesions in this retrospective study performed in a large-scale community practice setting. Routine prophylactic hemoclip application during EMR may lead to significantly higher healthcare cost without a clear clinical benefit.


Asunto(s)
Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentación , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Técnicas Hemostáticas/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
6.
Am J Public Health ; 108(S3): S179-S182, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30192670

RESUMEN

Following Hurricane Katrina, the uniformed US Public Health Service created an updated system through which its officers participated in emergency responses. The Rapid Deployment Force (RDF) concept, begun in 2006, involved five teams of officers with diverse clinical and public health skill sets organized into an incident command system led by a team commander. Each team can deploy within 12 hours, according to a defined but flexible schedule. The core RDF mission is to set up and provide care for up to 250 patients, primarily persons with chronic diseases or disabilities, in a temporary federal medical station. Between 2006 and 2016, the RDF 3 team deployed multiple times in response to natural disasters and public health emergencies. Notable responses included Hurricane Sandy in 2012, the unaccompanied children mission in 2014, and the Louisiana floods in 2016. Lessons learned from the RDF 3 experience include the need for both clinical and public health capacity, the value of having special mental health resources, the benefits of collaboration with other federal medical responders, and recognition of the large burden of chronic disease management issues following natural disasters.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Desastres , Desastres/historia , Salud Pública , Tormentas Ciclónicas/historia , Inundaciones/historia , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Louisiana , New Jersey
7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(8): 243-246, 2018 Mar 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29494567

RESUMEN

Globally, one in three adults has some level of measurable hearing loss, and 1.1 billion young persons are at risk for hearing loss attributable to noise exposure. Although noisy occupations such as construction, mining, and manufacturing are primary causes of hearing loss in adults, nonoccupational noise also can damage hearing. Loud noises can cause permanent hearing loss through metabolic exhaustion or mechanical destruction of the sensory cells within the cochlea. Some of the sounds of daily life, including those made by lawn mowers, recreational vehicles, power tools, and music, might play a role in the decline in hearing health. Hearing loss as a disability largely depends on a person's communication needs and how hearing loss affects the ability to function in a job. The loss of critical middle and high frequencies can significantly impair communication in hearing-critical jobs (e.g., law enforcement and air traffic control).


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Femenino , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
8.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(37): 1036-1039, 2018 Sep 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30235185

RESUMEN

Healthy aging is not merely the absence of disease or disability, but requires physical and mental health and ongoing social engagement (1). As the average U.S. life expectancy increases, recognition that public health can play a vital role in promoting healthy, successful aging even in the face of increased prevalence of chronic diseases, including types of dementia, among older adults (i.e., aged ≥65 years) has grown. Furthermore, actively engaging adults in prevention and wellness along with involving their caregivers (i.e., the family and friends of older adults who provide them with unpaid and informal support and services) can serve to prevent or delay the onset of physical disabilities and cognitive decline. Adults often are reluctant to discuss their concerns about worsening memory with their health care providers although such discussions can lead to earlier diagnosis and better care, planning, and support. As advances in public health and health care have helped increase life expectancy, public health professionals and health care providers have the opportunity to improve the quality of life for older adults and their caregivers and reduce the burdens associated with aging.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Salud Mental , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidadores , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Práctica de Salud Pública , Estados Unidos
9.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 15: E79, 2018 06 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29908052

RESUMEN

Scientific writing and publication are essential to advancing knowledge and practice in public health, but prospective authors face substantial challenges. Authors can overcome barriers, such as lack of understanding about scientific writing and the publishing process, with training and resources. The objective of this article is to provide guidance and practical recommendations to help both inexperienced and experienced authors working in public health settings to more efficiently publish the results of their work in the peer-reviewed literature. We include an overview of basic scientific writing principles, a detailed description of the sections of an original research article, and practical recommendations for selecting a journal and responding to peer review comments. The overall approach and strategies presented are intended to contribute to individual career development while also increasing the external validity of published literature and promoting quality public health science.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Edición/normas , Escritura/normas , Guías como Asunto , Humanos
10.
Am J Public Health ; 107(S2): S122-S125, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28892452

RESUMEN

Recent high-profile activations of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Emergency Operations Center (EOC) include responses to the West African Ebola and Zika virus epidemics. Within the EOC, emergency responses are organized according to the Incident Management System, which provides a standardized structure and chain of command, regardless of whether the EOC activation occurs in response to an outbreak, natural disaster, or other type of public health emergency. By embedding key scientific roles, such as the associate director for science, and functions within a Scientific Response Section, the current CDC emergency response structure ensures that both urgent and important science issues receive needed attention. Key functions during emergency responses include internal coordination of scientific work, data management, information dissemination, and scientific publication. We describe a case example involving the ongoing Zika virus response that demonstrates how the scientific response structure can be used to rapidly produce high-quality science needed to answer urgent public health questions and guide policy. Within the context of emergency response, longer-term priorities at CDC include both streamlining administrative requirements and funding mechanisms for scientific research.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./normas , Planificación en Desastres/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Epidemias/prevención & control , Guías como Asunto , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Estados Unidos
11.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(50): 1379-1382, 2017 Dec 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29267263

RESUMEN

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease, is a rapidly progressive fatal neurologic disease. Currently, there is no cure for ALS and the available treatments only extend life by an average of a few months. The majority of ALS patients die within 2-5 years of diagnosis, though survival time varies depending on disease progression (1,2). For approximately 10% of patients, ALS is familial, meaning it and has a genetic component; the remaining 90% have sporadic ALS, where etiology is unknown, but might be linked to environmental factors such as chemical exposures (e.g., heavy metals, pesticides) and occupational history (3).


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/epidemiología , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/prevención & control , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/etnología , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/psicología , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(33): 888-890, 2017 Aug 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28837548

RESUMEN

Newborn screening is a public health program that benefits 4 million U.S. infants every year by enabling early detection of serious conditions, thus affording the opportunity for timely intervention to optimize outcomes (1). States and other U.S. jurisdictions decide whether and how to regulate newborn screening practices. Most newborn screening is done through laboratory analyses of dried bloodspot specimens collected from newborns. Point-of-care newborn screening is typically performed before discharge from the birthing facility. The Recommended Uniform Screening Panel includes two point-of-care conditions for newborn screening: hearing loss and critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). The objectives of point-of-care screening for these two conditions are early identification and intervention to improve neurodevelopment, most notably language and related skills among infants with permanent hearing loss, and to prevent death or severe disability resulting from delayed diagnosis of CCHD. Universal screening for hearing loss using otoacoustic emissions or automated auditory brainstem response was endorsed by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing in 2000 and 2007* and was incorporated in the first Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2005. Screening for CCHD using pulse oximetry was recommended by the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children in 2010 based on an evidence review† and was added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2011.§.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Neonatal/métodos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estados Unidos
13.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(9): 242-245, 2017 Mar 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28278146

RESUMEN

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a drug withdrawal syndrome that most commonly occurs in infants after in utero exposure to opioids, although other substances have also been associated with the syndrome (1). NAS usually appears within 48-72 hours of birth with a constellation of clinical signs, including central nervous system irritability (e.g., tremors), gastrointestinal dysfunction (e.g., feeding difficulties), and temperature instability (1) (Box 1). Opioid exposure during pregnancy might result from clinician-approved use of prescription opioids for pain relief; misuse or abuse of prescription opioids; illicit use (e.g., heroin); or medication-assisted treatment (MAT) of opioid use disorder (2) (Box 2).


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/prevención & control , Práctica de Salud Pública , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Legislación como Asunto , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Health Promot Pract ; 18(3): 327-331, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28125904

RESUMEN

Mentoring is commonly used to facilitate professional growth and workforce development in a variety of settings. Organizations can use mentoring to help achieve broader personnel goals including leadership development and succession planning. While mentorship can be incorporated into training programs in public health, there are other examples of structured mentoring, with time commitments ranging from minutes to months or longer. Based on a review of the literature in public health and aggregated personal subject matter expertise of existing programs at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we summarize selected mentoring models that vary primarily by time commitments and meeting frequency and identify specific work situations to which they may be applicable, primarily from the federal job experience point of view. We also suggest specific tasks that mentor-mentee pairs can undertake, including review of writing samples, practice interviews, and development of the mentee's social media presence. The mentor-mentee relationship should be viewed as a reciprocally beneficial one that can be a source of learning and personal growth for individuals at all levels of professional achievement and across the span of their careers.


Asunto(s)
Tutoría/organización & administración , Salud Pública/educación , Desarrollo de Personal/organización & administración , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Rol Profesional , ARN Catalítico , Factores de Tiempo
15.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(34): 894-7, 2016 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27584004

RESUMEN

Suicide in the United States is a major public health problem with approximately 42,000 reported suicides in 2014 among persons aged >10 years (1). The overall suicide rate is increasing, with a 27% increase from 2000 (12.1 per 100,000 population) to 2014 (15.4 per 100,000) (Figure 1). Males, youths and young adults, and certain racial/ethnic groups have historically had higher rates of suicide. In 2014, suicide rates were approximately four times higher among males (24.3 per 100,000) than females (6.8 per 100,000), and suicide was the second leading cause of death among youths and young adults aged 10-34 years (1). Among persons aged 10-24 years, the 2014 suicide rate among non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Natives was 20.2 per 100,000, 1.9 times higher than non-Hispanic whites (10.5 per 100,000), 3.5 times higher than non-Hispanic blacks (5.8 per 100,000), and 3.7 times higher than Hispanics (5.5 per 100,000) (1). Adults aged 35-64 years are an emerging group at risk, with suicide rates increasing 33% since 2000 and accounting for the largest proportion of suicides (1).


Asunto(s)
Práctica de Salud Pública , Prevención del Suicidio , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta Autodestructiva/epidemiología , Conducta Autodestructiva/terapia , Ideación Suicida , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
16.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(32): 826-30, 2016 Aug 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27536925

RESUMEN

Preterm birth (delivery before 37 weeks and 0/7 days of gestation) is a leading cause of infant morbidity and mortality in the United States. In 2013, 11.4% of the nearly 4 million U.S. live births were preterm; however, 36% of the 8,470 infant deaths were attributed to preterm birth (1). Infants born at earlier gestational ages, especially <32 0/7 weeks, have the highest mortality (Figure) and morbidity rates. Morbidity associated with preterm birth includes respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intraventricular hemorrhage; longer-term consequences include developmental delay and decreased school performance. Risk factors for preterm delivery include social, behavioral, clinical, and biologic characteristics (Box). Despite advances in medical care, racial and ethnic disparities associated with preterm birth persist. Reducing preterm birth, a national public health priority (2), can be accomplished by implementing and monitoring strategies that target modifiable risk factors and populations at highest risk, and by providing improved quality and access to preconception, prenatal, and interconception care through implementation of strategies with potentially high impact.


Asunto(s)
Nacimiento Prematuro/prevención & control , Práctica de Salud Pública , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Mortalidad Infantil/tendencias , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(50-51): 1434-1438, 2016 Dec 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28033311

RESUMEN

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a complex and serious illness that is often misunderstood. Experts have noted that the terminology "chronic fatigue syndrome" can trivialize this illness and stigmatize persons who experience its symptoms (1). The name was coined by a group of clinicians convened by CDC in the late 1980s to develop a research case definition for the illness, which, at the time, was called chronic Epstein-Barr virus syndrome. The name CFS was suggested because of the characteristic persistent fatigue experienced by all those affected and the evidence that acute or reactivated Epstein-Barr virus infection was not associated with many cases (2). However, the fatigue in this illness is striking and quite distinct from the common fatigue everyone experiences. A variety of other names have been used, including myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), ME/CFS, chronic fatigue immune dysfunction, and most recently, systemic exertion intolerance disease (3). The lack of agreement about nomenclature need not be an impediment for advancing critically needed research and education. The term ME/CFS will be used in this article.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/terapia , Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Educación Médica/organización & administración , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/etiología , Humanos , Salud Pública , Estados Unidos
18.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(46): 1291-1294, 2016 Nov 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27880748

RESUMEN

Although many efforts in cancer prevention and control have routinely focused on behavioral risk factors, such as tobacco use, or on the early detection of cancer, such as colorectal cancer screening, advances in genetic testing have created new opportunities for cancer prevention through evaluation of family history and identification of cancer-causing inherited mutations. Through the collection and evaluation of a family cancer history by a trained health care provider, patients and families at increased risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome can be identified, referred for genetic counseling and testing, and make informed decisions about options for cancer risk reduction (1). Although hereditary cancers make up a small proportion of all cancers, the number of affected persons can be large, and the level of risk among affected persons is high. Two hereditary cancer syndromes for which public health professionals have worked to reduce the burden of morbidity and mortality are hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) and Lynch syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Genómica , Anamnesis , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/prevención & control , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Gobierno Federal , Femenino , Predicción , Genómica/tendencias , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Práctica de Salud Pública , Gobierno Estatal , Estados Unidos
19.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 22(4): 409-14, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26049676

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe scientific information usage and publication patterns of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Public Health Library and Information Center patrons. DESIGN: Administratively collected patron usage data and aggregate data on CDC-authored publications from the CDC Library for 3 consecutive years were analyzed. SETTING: The CDC Public Health Library and Information Center, which serves CDC employees nationally and internationally. PARTICIPANTS: Internal patrons and external users of the CDC Library. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Three-year trends in full-text article publication and downloads including most common journals used for each purpose, systematic literature searches requested and completed, and subscriptions to a weekly public health current literature awareness service. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2013, CDC scientists published a total of 7718 articles in the peer-reviewed literature. During the same period, article downloads from the CDC Library increased 25% to more than 1.1 million, completed requests for reviews of the scientific literature increased by 34%, and electronic subscriptions to literature compilation services increased by 23%. CONCLUSIONS: CDC's scientific output and information use via the CDC Library are both increasing. Researchers and field staff are making greater use of literature review services and other customized information content delivery. Virtual public health library access is an increasingly important resource for the scientific practice of public health.


Asunto(s)
Difusión de la Información/métodos , Materiales Bibliográficos/normas , Salud Pública/métodos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organización & administración , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./estadística & datos numéricos , Exactitud de los Datos , Humanos , Materiales Bibliográficos/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos
20.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(47): 1312-4, 2015 Dec 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26633233

RESUMEN

Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the United States, and most cases are preventable. Persons with certain genetic risk factors, including having a lighter natural skin color; blue or green eyes; red or blonde hair; dysplastic nevi or a large number of common moles; and skin that burns, freckles, or reddens easily or becomes painful after time in the sun, have increased risk for skin cancer. Persons with a family or personal history of skin cancer, especially melanoma, are also at increased risk. Although these genetic factors contribute to individual risk, most skin cancers are also strongly associated with ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure. Most UV exposure comes from the sun, although some persons use UV-emitting indoor tanning devices (e.g., beds, booths, and lamps).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA