Preoperative sleep-disordered breathing and craniofacial abnormalities are risk factors for postoperative sleep-disordered breathing in patients undergoing skin-flap oropharyngeal reconstruction surgery for oral cavity cancer: a prospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: After oropharyngeal reconstruction surgery, excessive flap volume within the oral cavity may increase the risk of pharyngeal obstruction during sleep. This prospective observational study aimed to test a hypothesis that the skin-flap oropharyngeal reconstructive surgery increases nocturnal apnea-hypopnea index (nAHI, primary variable) after surgery. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing oropharyngeal reconstruction surgery participated in this study. The hypothesis was tested by comparing the results of portable type 4 sleep study and craniofacial assessments with lateral head and neck computed tomography scout image before and after surgery. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for nAHI increase after the surgery. RESULTS: In 15 patients, a postoperative sleep study was performed at 41 (27, 59) (median (IQR)) days after the surgery. nAHI did not increase after the surgery (mean (95% CI), 13.0 (7.2 to 18.7) to 18.4 (10.2 to 26.6) events.hour-1, p = 0.277), while apnea index significantly increased after the surgery (p = 0.026). Use of the pedicle flap for the oropharyngeal reconstruction (p = 0.051), small mandible (p = 0.008), longer lower face (0.005), and larger tongue size (p = 0.008) were independent predictors for worsening of nAHI after surgery. Hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with the pedicle flap (n = 8) than in those with the free flap (n = 7) (p = 0.014), and the period of hospital stay was directly associated with increase of nAHI after surgery (r = 0.788, p < 0.001, n = 15). CONCLUSIONS: Oropharyngeal reconstruction surgery worsens sleep-disordered breathing in some patients with craniofacial and surgical risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000036260, March 22, 2019), https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/s/detail/um?trial_id=UMIN000036260.

Relationship Between Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Accelerometer-measured Physical Activity and Sleep in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia.

OBJECTIVE: Available treatment for chronic neuropathic pain is still limited, and the positive effects are modest. Thus, clinicians aim to improve activity and quality of life despite pain. The objective monitoring of activity is attracting attention in chronic pain assessments. Therefore, we objectively evaluated daytime activity and sleep in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), using actigraphy to determine risk factors for decreased activity. METHODS: Participants with PHN wore an actigraph (a wristwatch-like accelerometer) on the nondominant hand. The actigraph measured day-time activity and sleep, which were compared with participant-reported subjective pain and sleep assessments. RESULTS: Fifty-four individuals with PHN who visited our outpatient clinic completed questionnaires and a week of actigraph monitoring. Subjective scores of pain intensity, neuropathic pain, disability in daily life, pain-catastrophizing thoughts, and insomnia were all well correlated. However, the actigraph-monitored activity levels, using 2 equations, and sleep quality were not associated with any pain or sleep-related subjective scores. CONCLUSION: The discrepancy between the subjective and objective scores in this study may be due to (1) features of PHN, an archetype of peripheral neuropathic pain affecting no motor nerves, (2) actigraph measurement limitations regarding the sedentary life of the elderly, or (3) activity misperception, a new proposition explaining the discrepancy between subjective and objective measures of activity, similar to the sleep state misperception. In patients with PHN, high pain intensity may be reported in those with highly maintained activity, in which treatment must be selected cautiously to prevent interruption of their physical abilities.

Changes in mandibular position during midface distraction in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in mandibular position during midface distraction. Midface distraction was performed in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis to increase upper airway volume. Although this treatment resulted in changes in occlusion, the concomitant changes in mandibular position were poorly understood. In this retrospective study, three-dimensional (3D) cephalograms were obtained before and after midface distraction in 15 patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. Perioperative polysomnography scores and changes in maxillary and mandibular position, mandibular volume, and upper airway volume were analyzed. Results showed a significant improvement in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (from 20.6 ± 21.3 to 6.9 ± 5.1, p < 0.05) and upper airway volume (from 2951.65 ± 2286.38 to 5218.04 ± 3150.05 mm3, p < 0.001). When the lowest point of the sella turcica was set as the reference point, the mandible moved significantly in an anterior direction (from 47.9 ± 11.5 to 51.9 ± 9.8 mm, p < 0.05). Mandibular volume did not change significantly perioperatively (from 32530.19 ± 10726.01 to 35590.50 ± 14879.21 mm3, p = 0.10). There were positive correlations between the rates of improvement in AHI and the amount of mandibular movement in the anterior and inferior directions (both p < 0.05). Within the limitations of the study, it seems that the mandible moved in the anterior-inferior direction after midface distraction, and the amount of movement correlated with improvement in respiratory function. Therefore, it is important to consider the position of the mandible when determining the direction of midface distraction, as it may influence the therapeutic effect.