Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 131(1): 67-72, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18757894

RESUMEN

An intercomparison of ring dosemeters has been organised with the aim of assessing the technical capabilities of available extremity dosemeters and focusing on their performance at clinical workplaces with potentially high extremity doses. Twenty-four services from 16 countries participated in the intercomparison. The dosemeters were exposed to reference photon ((137)Cs) and beta ((147)Pm, (85)Kr and (90)Sr/(90)Y) fields together with fields representing realistic exposure situations in interventional radiology (direct and scattered radiation) and nuclear medicine ((99 m)Tc and (18)F). It has been found that most dosemeters provided satisfactory measurements of H(p)(0.07) for photon radiation, both in reference and realistic fields. However, only four dosemeters fulfilled the established requirements for all radiation qualities. The main difficulties were found for the measurement of low-energy beta radiation. Finally, the results also showed a general under-response of detectors to (18)F, which was attributed to the difficulties of the dosimetric systems to measure the positron contribution to the dose.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Radiometría/instrumentación , Partículas beta , Humanos , Fotones , Monitoreo de Radiación , Dispersión de Radiación
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 131(1): 87-92, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18757898

RESUMEN

An overview of the use of active personal dosemeters (APD) in interventional radiology is presented. It is based on the work done by the working package 7 of the CONRAD coordinated action supported by the EC within the frame of the 6th FP. This study was done in collaboration with the working package 4 of CONRAD to deal with the calculations required for studying the new calibration facility. The main requirements of the standard for the APD and the difficulties caused by the use of pulsed radiations are presented through the results of an intercomparison organised in a realistic calibration facility similar to the workplace situation in interventional radiology. The main characteristics of this facility are presented.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Monitoreo de Radiación/instrumentación , Radiología Intervencionista , Radiometría/instrumentación , Calibración , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Método de Montecarlo , Fantasmas de Imagen , Fotones , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Radiometría/métodos
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 123(1): 122-7, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16905761

RESUMEN

This paper presents the characterisation performed at IRSN (France) of an H(p)(10) chamber in terms of calibration coefficient and correction factors for the radiation qualities of ISO narrow spectrum series. The chamber response, expressed in H(p)(10) using conversion coefficients h(p)(K)(10; N, alpha) listed in ISO 4037-3 in the energy range from 30 to 1250 keV and for angles of incidence between 0 and 70 degrees, was found to be within approximately 10%. However, for photon energies <30 keV, an overresponse of the chamber that could reach 100% was observed. Nevertheless, this overresponse was reduced to 25% using the conversion coefficients estimated at Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB). This implies that the X-ray spectra produced by the IRSN X-ray units are very similar to those produced by PTB, both containing a little bit more high-energy photons than the spectra used in ISO 4037-3. The dose rate dependence of the chamber tested by gamma radiation from (60)Co sources was found to be within 2% in the range of 0.3 mSv h(-1) to 1 Sv h(-1). The H(p)(10) chamber can measure directly the conventional true value of H(p)(10) after calibration by a reference laboratory, and can be used for transferring H(p)(10) reference quantities from a reference laboratory.


Asunto(s)
Protección Radiológica/normas , Radiometría/instrumentación , Calibración , Diseño de Equipo , Unión Europea , Humanos , Incidencia , Dosis de Radiación , Estándares de Referencia
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 125(1-4): 369-75, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17189278

RESUMEN

IRSN has been asked by SNCF (French Railways) to carry out measurements in order to establish the values of ambient dose equivalents H*(10) in the vicinity of shipments of radioactive materials to assess the external exposure to ionising radiation to which employees may be subjected during the carriage of radioactive goods. Detailed dosimetric characterisations of the wagons have been made and the external exposure at different stages of the work that is done by the employees have been measured in terms of H*(10). For the study presented in this paper, and corresponding to a used fuel shipment composed of UO2 and UO2-PuO2, it has been observed that the photon and neutron doses are very similar. In addition, the order of magnitude of the total dose integrated by an employee who would carry out 100 times the series of essential operational tasks, has been found to be approximately 250 microSv. This value is compared with those observed for other previously investigated shipments involving the exposure to photon fields only.


Asunto(s)
Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Monitoreo de Radiación/instrumentación , Protección Radiológica/instrumentación , Radioisótopos/análisis , Vías Férreas , Manejo de Especímenes , Simulación por Computador , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Francia , Internacionalidad , Modelos Biológicos , Dosis de Radiación , Efectividad Biológica Relativa , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 120(1-4): 378-82, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16644993

RESUMEN

This work describes spectral distributions of neutrons obtained as function of energy and direction at four workplace fields at the Krümmel reactor in Germany. Values of personal dose equivalent H(p)(10) and effective dose E are determined for different directions of a person's orientation in these fields and readings of personal neutron dosemeters--especially electronic dosemeters--are discussed with respect to H(p)(10) and E.


Asunto(s)
Neutrones , Reactores Nucleares , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Dosimetría Termoluminiscente/instrumentación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Electrónica , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Alemania , Dosis de Radiación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Semiconductores , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Propiedades de Superficie , Dosimetría Termoluminiscente/métodos
6.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 96(1-3): 245-9, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11586741

RESUMEN

Following the specifications and test methods given by international standards IEC-61526 and ISO 4037, the dosimetry department of the IPSN studied the photon radiation performance of seven recent electronic personal dosemeters: The personal dosimetric performance of each piece of equipment was tested with X and gamma radiation between 12 keV and 1.25 MeV.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación Radiactiva del Aire/análisis , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Fotones , Monitoreo de Radiación/instrumentación , Protección Radiológica/instrumentación , Radiometría/instrumentación , Electrónica , Diseño de Equipo , Francia , Humanos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Radiometría/normas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
7.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 110(1-4): 459-64, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15353691

RESUMEN

An international intercomparison of criticality accident dosimetry systems took place in the SILENE reactor, in June 2002. Participants from 60 laboratories irradiated their dosemeters (physical and biological) using two different configurations of the reactor. In preparation for this intercomparison, the leakage radiation fields were characterised by spectrometry and dosimetry measurements using the ROSPEC spectrometer associated with a NE-213 scintillator, ionisation chambers, GM counters, diodes and thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLDs). For this intercomparison, a large area was required to irradiate the dosemeters both in free air and on phantoms. Therefore, measurements of the uniformity of the field were performed with activation detectors and TLDs for neutron and gammas, respectively. This paper describes the procedures used and the results obtained.


Asunto(s)
Neutrones , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Protección Radiológica/normas , Liberación de Radiactividad Peligrosa , Radiometría/instrumentación , Radiometría/normas , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo/métodos , Francia , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Reactores Nucleares , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Dosis de Radiación , Radiometría/métodos , Estándares de Referencia , Efectividad Biológica Relativa , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Factores de Riesgo , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Análisis Espectral/instrumentación , Análisis Espectral/métodos , Análisis Espectral/normas
8.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 110(1-4): 429-36, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15353686

RESUMEN

In criticality accident dosimetry and more generally for high dose measurements, special techniques are used to measure separately the gamma ray and neutron components of the dose. To improve these techniques and to check their dosimetry systems (physical and/or biological), a total of 60 laboratories from 29 countries (America, Europe, Asia) participated in an international intercomparaison, which took place in France from 9 to 21 June 2002, at the SILENE reactor in Valduc and at a pure gamma source in Fontenay-aux-Roses. This intercomparison was jointly organised by the IRSN and the CEA with the help of the NEA/OCDE and was partly supported by the European Communities. This paper describes the aim of this intercomparison, the techniques used by the participants and the two radiation sources and their characteristics. The experimental arrangements of the dosemeters for the irradiations in free air or on phantoms are given. Then the dosimetric quantities measured and reported by the participants are summarised, analysed and compared with the reference values. The present paper concerns only the physical dosimetry and essentially experiments performed on the SILENE facility. The results obtained with the biological dosimetry are published in two other papers of this issue.


Asunto(s)
Protección Radiológica/métodos , Protección Radiológica/normas , Liberación de Radiactividad Peligrosa , Radiometría/métodos , Radiometría/normas , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Francia , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Reactores Nucleares , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Dosis de Radiación , Estándares de Referencia , Efectividad Biológica Relativa , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
9.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 144(1-4): 453-8, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21186215

RESUMEN

The work package 3 of the ORAMED project, Collaborative Project (2008-11) supported by the European Commission within its seventh Framework Programme, is focused on the optimisation of the use of active personal dosemeters (APDs) in interventional radiology and cardiology (IR/IC). Indeed, a lack of appropriate APD devices is identified for these specific fields. Few devices can detect low-energy X rays (20-100 keV), and none of them are specifically designed for working in pulsed radiation fields. The work presented in this paper consists in studying the behaviour of some selected APDs deemed suitable for application in IR/IC. For this purpose, measurements under laboratory conditions, both with continuous and pulsed X-ray beams, and tests in real conditions on site in different European hospitals were performed. This study highlights the limitations of APDs for this application and the need of improving the APD technology so as to fulfil all needs in the IR/IC field.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Monitoreo de Radiación/instrumentación , Protección Radiológica/instrumentación , Radiología Intervencionista , Radiometría/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Europa (Continente) , Hospitales , Humanos , Laboratorios , Método de Montecarlo , Equipos de Seguridad , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radiación Ionizante , Radiometría/métodos , Recursos Humanos , Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA