Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 34(5): 477-482, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34267042

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We have increasing evidence that alterations of the intestinal microbiome have a strong influence on human health. Previous work has demonstrated the association between changes in the microbiome and metabolic risk factors. One related area of interest is the relationship between dysbiosis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), as the global prevalence of NAFLD, and its resultant complications, increases. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we summarize the hypothesized pathophysiology of dysbiosis-mediated progression of NAFLD, including promotion of an inflammatory intestinal environment, increased intestinal permeability, endogenous ethanol production, short-chain fatty acid production, secondary bile acid metabolism, and choline depletion. We also review potential therapeutic interventions of the microbiome to slow or prevent NAFLD progression, including antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, fecal microbiota transplant, and farnesoid × receptor agonism. SUMMARY: Much of the evidence supporting dysbiosis-mediated NAFLD progression has been gathered in high-quality animal trials. There remains a need for additional observational and randomized controlled trials in humans to establish causality between the suspected factors and pathogenesis of NAFLD.


Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Probióticos , Animales , Disbiosis , Humanos , Hígado , Prebióticos
2.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 19(12): 1415-1424, 2021 08 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34348238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy predisposes patients to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Data are limited regarding the incidence, management, and outcomes of one such irAE: mucositis. In this study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics, disease course, treatment, and outcomes of ICI-mediated mucositis. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients who received ICI therapy and developed oral mucositis at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 2009 to September 2019. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, a diagnosis of oral mucositis and/or stomatitis based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, and therapy using CTLA-4 or PD-1/L1 inhibitors alone or combined with other agents. RESULTS: We identified 152 patients with a mean age of 60 years, 51% of whom were men. Of the sample patients, 73% had stage IV cancer, with melanoma the most common (28%). Median time from ICI initiation to mucositis was 91 days. The most common clinical presentation of mucositis was odynophagia and/or oral pain (89%), 91% developed CTCAE grade 1-2 mucositis, and 78% received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy. Compared with anti-PD-1/L1-based therapy, anti-CTLA-4-based therapy was more frequently associated with earlier onset of mucositis (73 vs 96 days; P=.077) and a lower rate of symptom resolution (76% vs 92%; P=.029); 24% of patients required immunosuppressive therapy, which was associated with longer symptom duration (84 vs 34 days; P=.002) and higher mucositis recurrence rate (61% vs 32%; P=.006). ICI interruption was associated with worse survival (P=.037). Mucositis recurrence, immunosuppressant use, and presence of other irAEs did not affect survival. CONCLUSIONS: For ICI-mediated mucositis, a diagnosis of exclusion has not been well recognized and is understudied. Although the clinical symptoms of mucositis are mostly mild, approximately 25% of patients require immunosuppression. Mucositis recurrence can occur in approximately 39% patients. Our results showed that ICI interruption compromises overall survival.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Estomatitis , Adolescente , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Masculino , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/epidemiología
3.
Curr Urol Rep ; 19(7): 53, 2018 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29774482

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Current guidelines recommend against surgical repair of subclinical varicoceles (SCVs) for infertility; several studies demonstrate mixed fertility results after SCV correction. To determine whether surgical correction of SCV improves semen parameters and/or reproductive outcomes, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Seven biomedical literature databases were searched through January 2018 for studies that assessed reproductive outcomes and/or change in semen parameters in men with corrected SCV compared to either (1) uncorrected SCV or (2) corrected clinical varicocele. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RECENT FINDINGS: Data were extracted from 13 studies involving 1357 men. Overall, the risk of bias for included studies was high and without a consistent SCV definition across studies. Surgical correction of SCV was associated with a minor increase in sperm density and total motile sperm count (TMSC) compared to uncorrected SCV. This increase in semen parameters is not clinically significant, as men prior to varicocelectomy were on average normospermic nor was correction of a SCV associated with an increase in pregnancy rates when compared to men with uncorrected SCV. Comparing corrected SCV to corrected clinical varicocele, SCV correction resulted in a smaller increase in TMSC but no difference in average annual pregnancy rate. The risk of bias within and heterogeneity between studies assessing SCV correction are high, yet overall very little clinical benefit is derived from SCV correction.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Masculina/etiología , Varicocele/complicaciones , Humanos , Infertilidad Masculina/cirugía , Masculino , Semen , Recuento de Espermatozoides
4.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 149(7): 3637-3648, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35972690

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are effective against various malignancies. However, adverse events including diarrhea and colitis can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Recommendations for the management of ICI mediated diarrhea and colitis include steroids and biologics. Given their associated risks, this study evaluated the role of the non-immunosuppressive agents, mesalamine and or cholestyramine. METHODS: This is a retrospective, descriptive, single-center study of adults who developed ICI diarrhea and colitis between 2010 and 2020 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Clinical data and outcomes were compared between those treated with the non-immunosuppressive therapies mesalamine and/or cholestyramine alone versus those who received additional immunosuppression with steroids and biologics. RESULTS: Our sample comprised 66 patients wherein, the mean age was 63 years, 71% were males, and 97% had stage III/IV cancers. Fourteen patients were treated successfully with non-immunosuppressive therapy. They had grade 1-3 diarrhea and 1-2 colitis with no difference in the rate of histologic colitis compared to those who received immunosuppressive therapy. They had less CTLA-4 inhibitor-based therapy (36% vs. 73%, p = 0.034), delayed onset of symptoms (159 vs. 64 days, p = 0.011), lower fecal calprotectin levels (56 vs. 234, p = 0.012) and were more likely to resume ICI therapy (64% vs. 25%, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Mesalamine and/or cholestyramine may be effective for mild ICI diarrhea and colitis among patients with delayed symptom onset with lower colonic inflammatory burden. Prospective studies randomizing patients with mild colitis between mesalamine/cholestyramine and immunosuppressive treatment are warranted to assess their efficacy and safety.


Asunto(s)
Colitis , Mesalamina , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Mesalamina/efectos adversos , Resina de Colestiramina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Colitis/inducido químicamente , Colitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico
5.
Clin Endosc ; 56(6): 754-760, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37157961

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) can heal a variety of defects within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract via applying negative pressure, which reduces the defect size, aspirates the infected fluid, and promotes granulation tissue. Here we present our experience with EVT as it relates to both spontaneous and iatrogenic upper GI tract perforations, leaks, and fistulas. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at four large hospital centers. All patients who underwent EVT between June 2018 and March 2021 were included. Data on multiple variables were collected, including demographics, defect size and location, number and intervals of EVT exchanges, technical success, and hospital length of stay. Student t-test and the chi-squared test were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent EVT. The most common defect cause was spontaneous esophageal perforation (50%). The most common defect location was the distal esophagus (55%). The success rate was 80%. Seven patients were treated with EVT as the primary closure method. The mean number of exchanges was five with a mean interval of 4.3 days between exchanges. The mean length of hospital stay was 55.8 days. CONCLUSION: EVT is a safe and effective initial management option for esophageal leaks and perforations.

6.
Clin Endosc ; 54(2): 269-274, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33153247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) revised its guidelines for risk stratification of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the revision and to compare it to the previous guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 267 patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. We identified high-risk patients according to the original and revised guidelines and examined the diagnostic accuracy of both guidelines. We measured the association between individual criteria and choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: Under the original guidelines, 165 (62%) patients met the criteria for high risk, of whom 79% had confirmed choledocholithiasis. The categorization had a sensitivity and specificity of 68% and 55%, respectively, for the detection of choledocholithiasis. Under the revised guidelines, 86 (32%) patients met the criteria for high risk, of whom 83% had choledocholithiasis. The revised categorization had a lower sensitivity and higher specificity of 37% and 80%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the high-risk categorization increased with the revision, reflecting a potential decrease in diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograpies (ERCPs). Stone visualized on imaging had the greatest specificity for choledocholithiasis. Gallstone pancreatitis was not associated with the risk for choledocholithiasis. CONCLUSION: The 2019 revision of the ASGE guidelines decreases the utilization of ERCP as a diagnostic modality and offers an improved risk stratification tool.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA