Randomized trial comparing suture button with single 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw for ankle syndesmosis injury: similar results at 2 years.

Background and purpose - Better outcomes are reported for suture button (SB) compared with syndesmotic screws (SS) in patients treated for an acute ankle syndesmotic injury. One reason could be that screws are more rigid than an SB. A single tricortical 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw (TS) is the most dynamic screw option. Our hypothesis is that 1 SB and 1 TS provide similar results. Therefore, in randomized controlled trial, we compared the results between SB and TS for syndesmotic stabilization in patients with acute syndesmosis injury. Patients and methods - 113 patients with acute syndesmotic injury were randomized to SB (n = 55) or TS (n = 58). The American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Olerud-Molander Ankle score (OMA), visual analogue scale (VAS), EuroQol- 5D (EQ-5D), radiologic results, range of motion, complications, and reoperations (no implants were routinely removed). CT scans of both ankles were obtained after surgery, and after 1 and 2 years. Results - The 2-year follow-up rate was 84%. At 2 years, median AOFAS score was 97 in both groups (IQR SB 87-100, IQR TS 90-100, p = 0.7), median MOXFQ index was 5 in the SB group and 3 in the TS group (IQR 0-18 vs. 0-8, p = 0.2), and median OMA score was 90 in the SB group and 100 in the TS group (IQR 75-100 vs. 83-100, p = 0.2). The syndesmotic reduction was similar 2 years after surgery; 19/55 patients in the SB group and 13/58 in the TS group had a difference in anterior syndesmotic width ≥ 2 mm (p = 0.3). 0 patients in the SB group and 5 patients in the TS group had complete tibiofibular synostosis (p = 0.03). At 2 years, 10 TS were broken. Complications and reoperations were similar between the groups. Interpretation - We found no clinically relevant differences regarding outcome scores between the groups. TS is an inexpensive alternative to SB.

Prognostic value of the Haraguchi classification in posterior malleolar fractures in A0 44-C type ankle fractures.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Incidence of posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs) associated with ankle fractures is historically based on plain radiographs. Several classification systems for PMF are currently in use, but the reliability of the Haraguchi classification is not reported. The aim of this diagnostic cohort study was to assess incidence of PMF in patients with AO 44-C fractures, and test the reliability of the Haraguchi fracture classification based on CT. In addition, to evaluate the clinical outcome in patients with PMF. METHODS: 210 patients with an AO 44-C type fracture treated with syndesmotic fixation between 2011 and 2017 were included. Presence of PMF was registered, morphology was assessed and classified according to the Haraguchi classification. Interobserver agreement for the Haraguchi classification was evaluated. Patient assessment was conducted at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 years. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score (AOFAS) was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included presence of osteoarthritis. RESULTS: 125 of 210 patients (60%) had a PMF. 34% of the PMFs were missed on plain radiographs compared to CT. The interobserver agreement was 0.797, (95% CI: 0.705 to 0.889, p < 0.001), for the Haraguchi classification. The 2-year follow-up rate was 86%. Haraguchi type II fractures had a lower AOFAS compared with the no-fracture group at 6 weeks (mean difference -7.5 (95% CI; -15.0 to -0.2), p = 0.04) and 6 months (mean difference -8.4 (95% CI; -15.3 to -1.5), p = 0.01). Presence of osteoarthritis was higher in patients with Haraguchi type II PMF compared to the no PMF group, this finding was not significant (relative risk (RR) 1.6(95% CI 1.1 to 2.4, p = 0.059)). CONCLUSIONS: Plain radiographs underestimated PMF. Patients with a Haraguchi type II fracture had a poorer outcome measured by the AOFAS score compared to no PMF up until 6 months. Classification of PMF according to the Haraguchi classification was reliable.