RESUMEN
A male patient in his early 40s presented to the emergency department with an acute onset of respiratory distress and facial oedema, indicative of anaphylaxis. These symptoms emerged 2 hours subsequent to a wasp sting on the left side of his face. Despite initial stabilisation, the patient's state deteriorated into somnolence and disorientation. Notably, he denied any history of seizures, sensory or motor deficits, or bowel/bladder complications. Physical examination unveiled no focal neurological deficits. Routine laboratory tests and drug screening yielded no significant findings. Subsequent brain MRI with angiography exposed bilateral thalami diffusion restriction, strongly implying an acute infarction within the artery of Percheron territory, an atypical vascular variant. The sequence of events, alongside the absence of other conclusive aetiologies, indicated a wasp sting-induced thalamic infarction driven by vasogenic and thrombogenic effects of inflammatory substances.
Asunto(s)
Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos , Avispas , Animales , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto Cerebral/etiología , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/complicaciones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Mesencéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , AdultoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The review explores the potential benefits of cognitive retraining interventions in improving healthy lifestyle-related behaviours, and its possible use as an alternative or complementary approach to traditional weight loss interventions. METHOD: Studies were selected using different electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase), to identify RCTs published in the last 23 years on cognitive retraining interventions for weight loss. A total of 12 studies were finalized for systematic review and six for meta-analysis based on the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was assessed by the two reviewers independently using the criteria outlined in the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for RCTs. The R software was used to perform meta-analysis. RESULT: The overall effect estimates slightly favoured the intervention group, with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of -0.26 [95% CI (-0.58- 0.06) P < 0.05; I2 = 0.00%]. This suggests that although the effect was not statistically significant, cognitive retraining interventions may have a small effect on weight loss. The findings of the systematic review revealed that cognitive retraining interventions may be effective in modifying lifestyle behaviours and these changes may contribute in achieving and maintaining weight loss in the long run. CONCLUSION: Interventions exhibited a positive effect on weight loss. These interventions demonstrated promise in modifying lifestyle behaviours, suggesting a potential role in achieving and sustaining long-term weight loss. Further research is warranted to refine and validate these findings.