Clinical impact of rapid susceptibility testing on Mueller-Hinton Rapid-SIR directly from urine specimens.

Urinary tract infection diagnosis and management generally involves a 48-h microbiological delay to obtain the antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results. In the context of multidrug resistance, reducing the time to obtain AST results is an essential factor, allowing for more timely appropriate treatment. We conducted a single-centre prospective study on urinary samples meeting two criteria: significant leukocyturia > 50/mm3 and exclusive presence of Gram-negative bacilli on direct examination. AST were performed by direct inoculation on Mueller-Hinton Rapid-SIR (MHR-SIR) agar. We evaluated the time to antibiotic adaptation by the antimicrobial stewardship team according to rapid AST results. Patients were subsequently excluded from the study if asymptomatic bacteria were confirmed, or in the absence of clinical data. Seventy patients were included. Mean age of patients was 68.8 years (± 21.3). Empirical antibiotic treatment were mainly based on third generation cephalosporins (n = 33), fluoroquinolones (n = 15), beta-lactamin/beta-lactamase inhibitors (n = 7), fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin (n = 5, each). The average time to obtain results was 7.2 h (± 1.6 h). Adaptation of therapy following MHR-SIR was performed for 29 patients (41%) with early switch to oral antibiotics, de-escalation or escalation in respectively 72.3%, 30%, and 11% of cases. Time saving of MHR-SIR compared with the standard technique was 42.6 (± 16.7) h. This study showed that rapid antibiotic susceptibility test results, using MHR-SIR method directly from urine, can be obtained 40 h earlier than conventional AST. The study also demonstrated significant clinical impact on the selection and reduction of the antibiotic therapy spectrum.

No significant difference between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in the emergence of antibiotic resistance in the gut microbiota of hospitalized patients: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime share a similar antibacterial spectrum and similar indications but have different pharmacokinetic characteristics. Ceftriaxone is administered once daily and 40% of its clearance is by biliary elimination, whereas cefotaxime requires three administrations per day and shows less than 10% biliary elimination. The high biliary elimination of ceftriaxone suggests a greater impact of this antibiotic on the gut microbiota than cefotaxime. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime on the gut microbiota. METHODS: A prospective clinical trial was performed that included 55 patients treated with intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g/24 h) or cefotaxime (1 g/8 h) for at least 3 days. Three fresh stool samples were collected from each patient (days 0, 3, and 7 or at the end of intravenous treatment) to assess the emergence of third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, toxigenic Clostridioides difficile, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. RESULTS: The emergence of 3GC-resistant gram-negative enteric bacilli (Enterobacteriaceae) (5.9% vs 4.7%, p > 0.99), Enterococcus spp, and non-commensal microorganisms did not differ significantly between the groups. Both antibiotics reduced the counts of total gram-negative enteric bacilli and decreased the cultivable diversity of the microbiota, but the differences between the groups were not significant. CONCLUSION: No significant difference was observed between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in terms of the emergence of resistance.