MAC2 is a long-lasting marker of peripheral cell infiltrates into the mouse CNS after bone marrow transplantation and coronavirus infection.

Microglia are the primary resident myeloid cells of the brain responsible for maintaining homeostasis and protecting the central nervous system (CNS) from damage and infection. Monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages arising from the periphery have also been implicated in CNS pathologies, however, distinguishing between different myeloid cell populations in the CNS has been difficult. Here, we set out to develop a reliable histological marker that can assess distinct myeloid cell heterogeneity and functional contributions, particularly in the context of disease and/or neuroinflammation. scRNAseq from brains of mice infected with the neurotropic JHM strain of the mouse hepatitis virus (JHMV), a mouse coronavirus, revealed that Lgals3 is highly upregulated in monocyte and macrophage populations, but not in microglia. Subsequent immunostaining for galectin-3 (encoded by Lgals3), also referred to as MAC2, highlighted the high expression levels of MAC2 protein in infiltrating myeloid cells in JHMV-infected and bone marrow (BM) chimeric mice, in stark contrast to microglia, which expressed little to no staining in these models. Expression of MAC2 was found even 6-10 months following BM-derived cell infiltration into the CNS. We also demonstrate that MAC2 is not a specific label for plaque-associated microglia in the 5xFAD mouse model, but only appears in a distinct subset of these cells in the presence of JHMV infection or during aging. Our data suggest that MAC2 can serve as a reliable and long-lasting histological marker for monocyte/macrophages in the brain, identifying an accessible approach to distinguishing resident microglia from infiltrating cells in the CNS under certain conditions.

One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Subcutaneous Infliximab Maintenance Therapy Compared With Intravenous Infliximab Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Although the pharmacokinetic profile of subcutaneous (SC) infliximab (IFX) is superior to conventional intravenous (IV) IFX, long-term efficacy and safety of SC IFX in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have not been reported yet. This study aimed to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes of IBD patients treated with SC IFX compared with those of IBD patients treated with IV IFX during maintenance therapy. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled 61 IBD patients in clinical remission who received scheduled IFX maintenance therapy. Of them, 38 patients were switched to SC IFX, while 23 patients continued IV IFX with dose optimization. Enrolled patients were followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome was durable remission defined as clinical remission (Crohn's disease, Harvey-Bradshaw index <5; ulcerative colitis, partial Mayo score <2) and biochemical remission (C-reactive protein <0.5 mg/dL) with IFX trough level ≥3 µg/mL throughout the follow-up period. RESULTS: One-year clinical remission, 1-year biochemical remission, and mucosal healing did not differ between the IV and SC IFX groups (n = 20 of 23 vs 33 of 38; P = 1.000; n = 22 of 23 vs 34 of 38; P = .641; and n = 10 of 18 vs 17 of 25; P = .414, respectively). During follow-up, the number of patients with IFX trough level <3 µg/mL was significantly lower in the SC IFX group (n = 0 of 38, 0%) than in the IV IFX group (n = 10 of 23, 43%) (P < .001). The SC IFX group showed higher 1-year durable remission than the IV IFX group (n = 31 of 38, 82% vs n = 11 of 23, 48%; P = .013). The incidence of IFX-related adverse events did not differ significantly between both groups (26% vs 39%; P = .446). CONCLUSION: The SC IFX switch induced a higher 1-year durable remission rate than continuing IV IFX in patients with IBD during scheduled maintenance therapy, showing similar safety.

Long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases have not been reported yet. Switching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab showed higher 1-year durable remission than continuing intravenous infliximab during scheduled maintenance therapy, with similar safety.

A polymer-based microfluidic device for immunosensing biochips.

This paper describes the design, fabrication, and test of a PDMS/PMMA-laminated microfluidic device for an immunosensing biochip. A poly(dimethyl siloxane)(PDMS) top substrate molded by polymer casting and a poly(methyl methacrylate)(PMMA) bottom substrate fabricated by hot embossing are bonded with pressure and hermetically sealed. Two inlet ports and an air vent are opened through the PDMS top substrate, while gold electrodes for electrochemical biosensing are patterned onto the PMMA bottom substrate. The analyte sample is loaded from the sample inlet port to the detection chamber by capillary force, without any external intervening forces. For this and to control the time duration of sample fluid in each compartment of the device, including the inlet port, diffusion barrier, reaction chamber, flow-delay neck, and detection chamber, the fluid conduit has been designed with various geometries of channel width, depth, and shape. Especially, the fluid path has been designed so that the sample flow naturally stops after filling the detection chamber to allow sufficient time for biochemical reaction and subsequent washing steps. As model immunosensing tests for the microfluidic device, functionalizations of ferritin and biotin to the sensing surfaces on gold electrodes and their biospecific interactions with antiferritin antiserum and streptavidin have been investigated. An electrochemical detection method for immunosensing by biocatalyzed precipitation has been developed and applied for signal registration. With the biochip, the whole immunosensing processes could be completed within 30 min.