Biliary complications after adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation: An international multicenter study of 3633 cases.

In living-donor liver transplantation, biliary complications including bile leaks and biliary anastomotic strictures remain significant challenges, with incidences varying across different centers. This multicentric retrospective study (2016-2020) included 3633 adult patients from 18 centers and aimed to identify risk factors for these biliary complications and their impact on patient survival. Incidences of bile leaks and biliary strictures were 11.4% and 20.6%, respectively. Key risk factors for bile leaks included multiple bile duct anastomoses (odds ratio, [OR] 1.8), Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (OR, 1.4), and a history of major abdominal surgery (OR, 1.4). For biliary anastomotic strictures, risk factors were ABO incompatibility (OR, 1.4), blood loss >1 L (OR, 1.4), and previous abdominal surgery (OR, 1.7). Patients experiencing biliary complications had extended hospital stays, increased incidence of major complications, and higher comprehensive complication index scores. The impact on graft survival became evident after accounting for immortal time bias using time-dependent covariate survival analysis. Bile leaks and biliary anastomotic strictures were associated with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.7 and 1.8 for graft survival, respectively. The study underscores the importance of minimizing these risks through careful donor selection and preoperative planning, as biliary complications significantly affect graft survival, despite the availability of effective treatments.

Preoperative assessment of microvascular invasion risk using gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for predicting outcomes after liver transplantation for single hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria.

OBJECTIVE: To compare therapeutic outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) between hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) with low and high risk for microvascular invasion (MVI) within the Milan criteria evaluated preoperatively. METHODS: Eighty patients with a single HCC who underwent LT as the initial therapy between 2008 and 2017 were included from two tertiary referral medical centers in a HBV-predominant population. A preoperative MVI-risk model was used to identify low- and high-risk patients. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) after LT between the two risk groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves with the log-rank test. Prognostic factors for RFS were identified using a multivariable Cox hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included (mean age, 51.8 years +/- 7.5 [standard deviation], 65 men). Patients were divided into low-risk (n = 64) and high-risk (n = 16) groups for MVI. The RFS rates after LT were significantly lower in the MVI high-risk group compared to the low-risk group at 1 year (75.0% [95% CI: 56.5-99.5%] vs. 96.9% [92.7-100%], p = 0.048), 3 years (62.5% [42.8-91.4%] vs. 95.3% [90.3-100%], p = 0.008), and 5 years (62.5% [42.8-91.4%] vs. and 95.3% [90.3-100%], p = 0.008). In addition, multivariable analysis showed that MVI high risk was the only significant factor for poor RFS (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: HCC patients with a high risk of MVI showed significantly lower RFS after LT than those without. This model could aid in selecting optimal candidates in addition to the Milan criteria when considering upfront LT for patients with HCC if alternative treatment options are available. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: High risk for microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma patients lowered recurrence-free survival after liver transplantation, despite meeting the Milan criteria. Identifying MVI risk could aid candidate selection for upfront liver transplantation, particularly if alternative treatments are available. KEY POINTS: • A predictive model-derived microvascular invasion (MVI) high- and low-risk groups had a significant difference in the incidence of MVI on pathology. • Recurrence-free survival after liver transplantation (LT) for single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria was significantly different between the MVI high- and low-risk groups. • The peak incidence of tumor recurrence was 20 months after liver transplantation, probably indicating that HCC with high risk for MVI had a high risk of early (≤ 2 years) tumor recurrence.

Risk Factors Associated With Surgical Morbidities of Laparoscopic Living Liver Donors.

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the incidence and risk factors for surgical morbidities of laparoscopic living donors. BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic living donor programs have been established safely in leading centers, donor morbidities have not been discussed sufficiently. METHODS: Laparoscopic living donors operated on from May 2013 to June 2022 were reviewed. Donor complications were reviewed, and factors related to bile leakage and biliary stricture were analyzed using the multivariable logistic regression method. RESULTS: A total of 636 donors underwent laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy. The open conversion rate was 1.6%, and the 30-day complication rate was 16.8% (n=107). Grade IIIa and IIIb complications occurred in 4.4% (n=28) and 1.9% (n=12) of patients, respectively. The most common complication was bleeding (n=38, 6.0%). Fourteen donors (2.2%) required reoperation. Portal vein stricture, bile leakage, and biliary stricture occurred in 0.6% (n=4), 3.3% (n=21), and 1.6% (n=10) of cases, respectively. The readmission rate and reoperation rate were 5.2% (n=33) and 2.2% (n=14), respectively. Risk factors related to bile leakage were 2 hepatic arteries in the liver graft (OR=13.836, CI=4.092-46.789, P <0.001), division-free margin<5 mm from the main duct (OR=2.624, CI=1.030-6.686, P =0.043), and estimated blood loss during operation (OR=1.002, CI=1.001-1.003, P =0.008), while the Pringle maneuver (OR=0.300, CI=0.110-0.817, P =0.018) was protective against leakage. Regarding biliary stricture, bile leakage was the only significant factor (OR=11.902, CI=2.773-51.083, P =0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic living donor surgery showed excellent safety for the majority of donors, and critical complications were resolved with proper management. To minimize bile leakage, cautious surgical manipulation is needed for donors with complex hilar anatomy.

Novel Benchmark for Adult-to-Adult Living-donor Liver Transplantation: Integrating Eastern and Western Experiences.

OBJECTIVE: To define benchmark values for adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). BACKGROUND: LDLT utilizes living-donor hemiliver grafts to expand the donor pool and reduce waitlist mortality. Although references have been established for donor hepatectomy, no such information exists for recipients to enable conclusive quality and comparative assessments. METHODS: Patients undergoing LDLT were analyzed in 15 high-volume centers (≥10 cases/year) from 3 continents over 5 years (2016-2020), with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Benchmark criteria included a Model for End-stage Liver Disease ≤20, no portal vein thrombosis, no previous major abdominal surgery, no renal replacement therapy, no acute liver failure, and no intensive care unit admission. Benchmark cutoffs were derived from the 75th percentile of all centers' medians. RESULTS: Of 3636 patients, 1864 (51%) qualified as benchmark cases. Benchmark cutoffs, including posttransplant dialysis (≤4%), primary nonfunction (≤0.9%), nonanastomotic strictures (≤0.2%), graft loss (≤7.7%), and redo-liver transplantation (LT) (≤3.6%), at 1-year were below the deceased donor LT benchmarks. Bile leak (≤12.4%), hepatic artery thrombosis (≤5.1%), and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI ® ) (≤56) were above the deceased donor LT benchmarks, whereas mortality (≤9.1%) was comparable. The right hemiliver graft, compared with the left, was associated with a lower CCI ® score (34 vs 21, P < 0.001). Preservation of the middle hepatic vein with the right hemiliver graft had no impact neither on the recipient nor on the donor outcome. Asian centers outperformed other centers with CCI ® score (21 vs 47, P < 0.001), graft loss (3.0% vs 6.5%, P = 0.002), and redo-LT rates (1.0% vs 2.5%, P = 0.029). In contrast, non-benchmark low-volume centers displayed inferior outcomes, such as bile leak (15.2%), hepatic artery thrombosis (15.2%), or redo-LT (6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Benchmark LDLT offers a valuable alternative to reduce waitlist mortality. Exchange of expertise, public awareness, and centralization policy are, however, mandatory to achieve benchmark outcomes worldwide.

Pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil may be associated with reduced intrahepatic cholangiopathy in ABO-incompatible liver transplantation.

Intrahepatic cholangiopathy is a life-threatening sequela of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. We analyzed the clinical impact of pretransplant administration of mycophenolate mofetil in reducing intrahepatic cholangiopathy in ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. Patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation between 2010 and April 2022 were included. Pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil was started in November 2020. A comparison between patients who experienced intrahepatic cholangiopathy and who did not among ABO-incompatible transplantation was performed. Recipients of ABO-incompatible transplantations were categorized based on donor surgery into open, laparoscopy without pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil, and laparoscopy with pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil groups. Cox analysis of intrahepatic cholangiopathy was performed. A total of 234 ABO-incompatible transplantations were included. Intrahepatic cholangiopathy occurred in 1.1% (n=1/94), 13.3% (n=12/90), and 2.0% (n=1/50) of patients who received an ABO-incompatible liver with open surgery, laparoscopic donor surgery without pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil and laparoscopic donor surgery with pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil. ( p = 0.001) Multivariable analysis showed that transplantations involving a donor who underwent a laparoscopic hepatectomy and a recipient who did not receive pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil were associated with a higher risk of intrahepatic cholangiopathy (HR=13.449, CI=1.710-105.800, p = 0.02) compared with transplantations from donors who underwent open surgery. Transplantations involving a donor who underwent laparoscopic donor surgery and a recipient who received pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil resulted in no increased risk compared with transplantations from donors who underwent open surgery. (HR=5.307, CI=0.315-89.366, p = 0.25) Laparoscopic donor hepatectomy was a risk factor for intrahepatic cholangiopathy in ABO-incompatible liver transplantation, while pretransplant mycophenolate mofetil was related to risk reduction of intrahepatic cholangiopathy.

Comparison of pure laparoscopic donor right posterior sectionectomy versus right hemihepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation.

The right posterior section (RPS) graft for living donor liver transplantation is an alternative graft in a live liver donor with insufficient remnant left lobe volume and portal vein anomaly. Although there have been some reports regarding pure laparoscopic donor right posterior sectionectomy (PLDRPS), no study has compared PLDRPS versus pure laparoscopic donor right hemihepatectomy (PLDRH). The aim of our study was to compare the surgical outcomes of PLDRPS versus PLDRH at centers achieving a complete transition from open to laparoscopic approach in liver donor surgery. From March 2019 to March 2022, a total of 351 living donor liver transplantations, including 16 and 335 donors who underwent PLDRPS and PLDRH, respectively, were included in the study. In the donor cohort, there were no significant differences in major complication (≥grade III) rate and comprehensive complication index between the PLDRPS versus PLDRH group (6.3% vs. 4.8%; p = 0.556 and 2.7 ± 8.6 vs.1.7 ± 6.4; p = 0.553). In the recipient cohort, there was a significant difference in major complication (≥grade III) rate (62.5% vs. 35.2%; p = 0.034) but no significant difference in comprehensive complication index (18.3 ± 14.9 vs. 15.2 ± 24.9; p = 0.623) between the PLDRPS and PLDRH groups. PLDRPS in live liver donors with portal vein anomaly and insufficient left lobe was technically feasible and safe with experienced surgeons. The PLDRPS group might be comparable with the PLDRH group based on the surgical outcomes of donors and recipients. However, in terms of recipient outcomes, more careful selection of donors of the RPS graft and further research in a large number of cases are necessary to evaluate the usefulness of PLDRPS.

Improved recurrence-free survival in patients with HCC with post-transplant plasma exchange.

Total plasma exchange (TPE) can play a role in cancer treatment by eliminating immune checkpoint inhibitors. This study investigated whether TPE improved oncological outcomes in patients with HCC who underwent ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (LT). The study included 152 patients who underwent ABO-incompatible living donor LT for HCC between 2010 and 2021 at Samsung Medical Center. Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve, whereas HCC-specific recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed using the cumulative incidence curve after propensity score matching. Cox regression and competing risks subdistribution hazard models were used to identify the risk factors associated with overall survival and HCC-specific RFS, respectively. The propensity score matching resulted in 54 matched pairs, grouped according to whether they underwent postoperative TPE [post-transplant TPE(+)] or not [post-transplant TPE(-)]. The 5-year HCC-specific RFS cumulative incidence was superior in the post-transplant TPE (+) group [12.5% (95% CI: 3.1%-21.9%)] compared with the post-transplant TPE(-) group [38.1% (95% CI: 24.4%-51.8%), p = 0.005]. In subgroup analysis for patients with microvascular invasion and those beyond the Milan criteria, the post-transplant TPE(+) group showed significantly superior HCC-specific survival. The multivariable analysis also showed that postoperative TPE had a protective effect on HCC-specific RFS (HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10-0.64, p = 0.004) and that the more post-transplant TPE was performed, the better RFS was observed (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55-0.93, p = 0.012). Post-transplant TPE was found to improve RFS after ABO-incompatible living donor LT for HCC, particularly in advanced cases with microvascular invasion and beyond Milan criteria. These findings suggest that TPE may have a potential role in improving oncological outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing LT.

Near-zero open conversion rate of laparoscopic liver resection: a high-volume single-center experience of the past 5 years.

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption and technological advances in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), conversion to laparotomy can still occur unexpectedly. Several studies have explored risk factors of open conversion (OC). However, most of these studies were conducted before 2018 and included all patients who underwent surgery at an early stage after starting LLR. The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence and risk factors of OC in patients within the past 5 years (2017-2021). METHODS: Patients who underwent LLR at Samsung Medical Center from January 2017 to December 2021 were investigated. The incidence and causes of OC were investigated and risk factors associated with OC were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of, 1951 patients were investigated. OC was observed in 34 patients (1.74%). The percentage of previous surgeries (50% vs. 25.5%, P < 0.001), history of hepatectomy (23.5% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.002), multi-focal disease (29.4% vs. 13.9%, P = 0.037), and posterosuperior (PS) location (64.7% vs. 39%, P = 0.004) were higher in the OC group. The most common cause of OC was adhesion (44.1%). In the analysis of risk factors associated with OC, PS location (OR 2.79, P = 0.007) and maximum tumor size (OR 0.92, P = 0.037) were statistically significant factors in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The updated incidence of OC was 1.74%. The main cause of OC was adhesion. In addition, PS location and smaller tumor size were risk factors associated with OC.

Contribution of Salvaged Blood Red Blood Cell Transfusion During Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of allogeneic blood products can have adverse effects and profoundly influence postoperative liver transplantation outcomes, including graft survival. To minimize allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, salvaged blood can be used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of salvaged blood to allogeneic RBC transfusion in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. METHODS: Data of 311 adult-to-adult LDLT recipients between January 2015 and April 2019 were analyzed. The primary outcome was a change in requirement for allogeneic RBCs due to the use of salvaged blood. Additionally, predictors of intraoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion were investigated. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three (49.2%) recipients required allogeneic RBC transfusion. If recipients did not receive salvaged blood, 253 (81.4%) recipients would have needed allogeneic RBC transfusion. The total volume of salvaged blood transfused into recipients during surgery was 269,165 mL, which corresponded to 993 units of allogeneic RBCs and accounted for 76.1% of total RBC transfusion volume. Multivariate analysis showed that male recipients, model for end-stage liver disease score, preoperative hemoglobin level, and volume of salvaged blood used during surgery were independent predictors of the need for intraoperative allogenic RBC transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative use of salvaged blood significantly reduced allogeneic RBC transfusion in LDLT recipients. It can help transplant teams manage transfusion of allogeneic RBCs during liver transplantation.

Analysis of Antibody Responses After COVID-19 Vaccination in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplant (LT) recipients were considered a vulnerable population during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The clinical efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine is unknown in immunocompromised patients. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence of antibody responses after COVID-19 vaccination in LT recipients. METHODS: This study enrolled 46 patients who underwent LT at Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) before implementation of the one-dose vaccine in Korea. Those who completed the two-dose COVID-19 vaccine between August 2021 and September 2021 were included and followed through December 2021. Semiquantitative anti-spike serologic testing was performed using the Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S enzyme immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkereuz, Switzerland) with a positive cutoff of at least 0.8 U/mL. RESULTS: Among all 46 participants, 40 (87%) demonstrated an antibody response after the second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, while six (13%) had no antibody response after the second dose. Upon univariate analysis, patients with higher antibody titer had longer years since LT (2.3 ± 2.8 vs. 9.4 ± 5.0, P < 0.001). A lower median tacrolimus (TAC) level before vaccination and after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine indicated a significantly higher antibody response (2.3 [1.6-3.2] vs. 7.0 [3.7-7.8], P = 0.006, 2.5 [1.6-3.3] vs. 5.7 [4.2-7.2], P = 0.003). Period between 2nd vaccination and serologic testing was significantly higher in the antibody-response group compared to the no-antibody-response group (30.2 ± 24.0 vs. 65.9 ± 35.0, P = 0.012). A multivariate analysis of antibody responses revealed TAC level before vaccination as a statistically significant factor. CONCLUSION: A higher TAC level before vaccination resulted in less effective vaccination in LT patients. Booster vaccinations are required, especially for patients in the early stage after LT who have compromised immune function.

Outcomes of living liver donors are worse than those of matched healthy controls.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Donor death is the most serious complication of living liver donation but is reported rarely. We investigated the actual mortality of living liver donors (LLDs) compared with matched control groups based on analysis of the Korean National Health Insurance Services (NHIS) database. METHODS: This cohort study included 12,372 LLDs who donated a liver graft between 2002 and 2018, and were registered in the Korean Network for Organ Sharing. They were compared to 3 matched control groups selected from the Korean NHIS and comprising a total of 123,710 individuals: healthy population (Group I); general population without comorbidities (Group II); and general population with comorbidities (Group III). RESULTS: In this population, 78.5% of living liver donors were 20-39 years old, and 64.7% of all donors were male. Eighty-nine donors (0.7%) in the LLD group died (68 males and 21 females), a mortality rate (/1,000 person-years) of 0.91 (0.74-1.12). Mortality rate ratio and the adjusted hazard ratio of the LLD group was 2.03 (1.61-2.55) and 1.71 (1.31-2.25) compared to Control Group I, 0.75 (0.60-0.93) and 0.63 (0.49-0.82) compared to Control Group II, and 0.58 (0.46-0.71) and 0.49 (0.39-0.60) compared to Control Group III. LLD group, depression, and lower income were risk factors for adjusted mortality. The incidence of liver failure, depression, cancer, diabetes, hypertension, brain infarction, brain hemorrhage, and end-stage renal disease in the LLD group was significantly higher than in Control Group I. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of the LLD group were worse than those of the matched healthy control group despite the small number of deaths and medical morbidities in this group. LLDs should receive careful medical attention for an extended period after donation. LAY SUMMARY: The incidence of mortality, liver failure, depression, cancer, diabetes, hypertension, brain infarction, brain hemorrhage, and end-stage renal disease in the living liver donor group was significantly higher than in the matched healthy group. Careful donor evaluation and selection processes can improve donor safety and enable safe living donor liver transplantation.

Blood Salvage and Autotransfusion With Single Leukoreduction Does Not Increase the Risk of Tumor Recurrence After Liver Transplantation for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether autotransfusion of salvaged blood with single leukoreduction is associated with post-transplant tumor recurrence in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have consistently demonstrated the safety of autotransfusion of salvaged and leukoreduced blood during liver transplantation for HCC. However, the effects of this technique remained unknown for advanced HCC. METHODS: Of 349 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation for advanced HCC: 74 of 129 without autotransfusion were matched with 74 of 220 with autotransfusion using propensity score based on tumor biology, allogeneic transfusion, and others. Survival analysis was performed with death as a competing risk event. The primary outcome was HCC recurrence. RESULTS: Recipients in autotransfusion group received 811 (497-1247) mL of salvaged blood with single leukoreduction. In the matched cohort, cumulative overall recurrence probability at 1/2/5 years after transplantation was 24.6%/ 38.3%/39.7% for nonautotransfusion group and 16.2%/23.1%/32.5% for autotransfusion group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in overall recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.72 (0.43-1.21)], intrahepatic recurrence [HR = 0.70 (0.35-1.40)], and extrahepatic recurrence [HR = 0.82 (0.46-1.47)]. Also, there were no significant differences in overall death [HR = 0.57 (0.29-1.12)], HCC-related death [HR = 0.59 (0.29-1.20)], and HCC-unrelated death [HR = 0.48 (0.09-2.65)]. CONCLUSIONS: When allogeneic transfusion was matched, autotransfusion was not significantly related to HCC recurrence, with more favorable probabilities for autotransfusion, in patients with advanced HCC. Thus, blood salvage and autotransfusion could be safely used with single leukoreduction, without double-filtered leukoreduction, during liver transplantation for HCC with potential benefits from avoiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion.

Complete transition from open surgery to laparoscopy: 8-year experience with more than 500 laparoscopic living donor hepatectomies.

This study was designed to review laparoscopic living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs) at a single center that achieved complete transition from open surgery to laparoscopy. LDLTs performed from January 2013 to July 2021 were reviewed. Comparisons between open and laparoscopic surgeries were performed according to periods divided into initial, transition, and complete transition periods. A total of 775 LDLTs, 506 laparoscopic and 269 open cases, were performed. Complete transition was achieved in 2020. Bile duct variations were significantly abundant in the open group both in the initial period (30.2% vs. 8.1%; p < 0.001) and transition period (48.1% vs. 24.3%; p < 0.001). Portal vein variation was more abundant in the open group only in the initial period (13.0% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.03). Although the donor reoperation rate (0.0% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.02) and Grade III or higher complication rate (5.6% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.03) were significantly higher in the laparoscopy group in the initial period, there were no differences during the transition period as well as in overall cases. Median number of opioids required by the donor (three times [interquartile range, IQR, 1-6] vs. 1 time [IQR, 0-3]; p < 0.001) was lower, and the median hospital stay (10 days [IQR, 8-12] vs. 8 days [IQR, 7-9]; p < 0.001) was shorter in the laparoscopy group. Overall recipient bile leakage rate (23.8% vs. 12.8%; p < 0.001) and overall Grade III or higher complication rate (44.6% vs. 37.2%; p = 0.009) were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group. Complete transition to laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy was possible after accumulating a significant amount of experience. Because donor morbidity can be higher in the initial period, donor selection for favorable anatomy is required for both the donor and recipient.

Bile duct anastomosis does not promote bacterial contamination of autologous blood salvaged during living donor liver transplantation.

Bile duct surgeries are conventionally considered to promote bacterial contamination of the surgical field. However, liver transplantation recipients' bile produced by the newly implanted liver graft from healthy living donors may be sterile. We tested bacterial contamination of autologous blood salvaged before and after bile duct anastomosis (BDA) during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In 29 patients undergoing LDLT, bacterial culture was performed for four blood samples and one bile sample: two from autologous blood salvaged before BDA (one was nonleukoreduced and another was leukoreduced), two from autologous blood salvaged after BDA (one was nonleukoreduced and another was leukoreduced), and one from bile produced in the newly implanted liver graft. The primary outcome was bacterial contamination. The risk of bacterial contamination was not significantly different between nonleukoreduced autologous blood salvaged before BDA and nonleukoreduced autologous blood salvaged after BDA (44.8% and 31.0%; odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.03-1.86; p = 0.228). No bacteria were found after leukoreduction in all 58 autologous blood samples. All bile samples were negative for bacteria. None of the 29 patients, including 13 patients who received salvaged autologous blood positive for bacteria, developed postoperative bacteremia. We found that bile from the newly implanted liver graft is sterile in LDLT and BDA does not increase the risk of bacterial contamination of salvaged blood, supporting the use of blood salvage during LDLT even after BDA. Leukoreduction converted all autologous blood samples positive for bacteria to negative. The clinical benefit of leukoreduction for salvaged autologous blood on post-LDLT bacteremia needs further research.

Healthy Spouses can be Considered as Living Liver Donors.

BACKGROUND: Spousal donors have gradually been accepted as an alternative living liver donors to alleviate the organ shortage and prevent donations from children. No information is available regarding the effects of spousal donation on donor safety and recipient outcomes. Our purpose in this study was to determine how spousal liver grafts in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) affect donor safety and recipient outcomes compared with those of LDLT from children. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 656 patients, including spouses and children, who underwent a right or extended right hepatectomy for living liver donation between January 2009 and December 2018. RESULTS: Spouses represented 18.8% (n = 123) of living liver donors. Female donors comprised 78.9% (n = 97) of spousal donors, and the proportion of male donors in the children group was 72.6% (n = 387). The mean donor operation time of the spousal group was shorter than that of the children group (330 min vs. 358 min; P = 0.011), and the complication rate in the spousal group was lower than that in the children group (12.2% vs. 22.9%; P = 0.006). However, there were no differences in severe complication rates, hospitalization, or liver function tests between the 2 groups at 3 months after donor surgery. The overall survival of recipients in the spousal group was not reduced compared to that of recipients in the children group. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that, with careful selection, spousal donation is feasible and safe in LDLT.

Surgical Resection Is Preferred in Selected Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: Sorafenib is the standard care for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), though it offers limited survival. This study was designed to compare clinical outcomes between liver resection (surgery) and transarterial chemoembolization plus radiotherapy (TACE-RT) as the initial treatment modality for resectable treatment-naïve solitary HCC combined with subsegmental (Vp1), segmental (Vp2), and lobar (Vp3) PVTT. METHODS: From the institutional HCC registry, we identified 116 patients diagnosed with resectable treatment-naïve HCC with Vp1-Vp3 PVTT based on radiologic images who received surgery (n = 44) or TACE-RT (n = 72) as a primary treatment between 2010 and 2015. A propensity score matching (PSM) model was created. RESULTS: The TACE-RT group had a higher tumor burden (tumor size, extent, and markers) than the surgery group. Cumulative patient survival curve in the surgery group was significantly higher than that in the TACE-RT group before and after PSM. Liver function was relatively well preserved in the surgery group compared with the TACE-RT group. TACE-RT group, male, increased alkaline phosphatase, and increased platelet count were predisposing factors for patient death in resectable treatment-naïve solitary HCC with PVTT. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that surgery is considered as an initial treatment in selectively resectable treatment-naïve solitary HCC with Vp1-Vp3 PVTT.

Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy Regarding the Anatomical Variation of the Portal Vein: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

This study is designed to analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic living donor right hemihepatectomy in living donors with portal vein variation. Living donor liver transplantation cases using a right liver graft during the period of January 2014 to September 2019 were included. Computed tomographic angiographies of the donor were 3-dimensionally reconstructed, and the anatomical variation of the portal vein was classified. To reduce selection bias, a 1:1 ratio propensity score-matched analysis between the laparoscopy group and the open group was performed. Surgical and recovery-related outcomes as well as portal vein complication-free survival, graft survival, and overall survival rates were analyzed. After matching, 171 cases in each group from 444 original cases were compared. The laparoscopy group had a shorter operation time (P < 0.001), a smaller number of additional opioids required by the donor (P < 0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001). There were no differences in the portal vein complication-free survival (P = 0.16), graft survival (P = 0.26), or overall survival rates (P = 0.53). Although portal vein complication-free survival was inferior in portal veins other than type I (P = 0.01), the laparoscopy group showed similar portal vein complication-free survival regardless of the anatomical variation of portal vein (P = 0.35 in type I and P = 0.30 in other types). Laparoscopic living donor right hemihepatectomy can be performed as safely as open surgery regardless of the anatomical variation of the portal vein.

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Category on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation Within the Milan Criteria: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the association between Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after primary liver transplantation (LT) within the Milan criteria. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included 140 recipients who underwent living donor LT (LDLT) for treatment-naïve HCC and pretransplant contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between 2009 and 2013. LI-RADS categories were assigned using LI-RADS version 2018. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and associated factors were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank test. Histological grading and microvascular invasion (MVI) were analyzed on the pathologic examinations of explanted livers. RESULTS: The overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year RFS rates were 95.6%, 92.6%, 90.2%, and 89.3%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, independent predictors of recurrence included HCCs categorized as LR-M (hazard ratio [HR], 18.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.79-60.23; P < 0.001) and the largest tumor size of ≥ 3 cm on MRI (HR, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.42-12.37; P = 0.010). The 5-year RFS rate was significantly lower in patients with HCCs categorized as LR-M than in those with HCCs categorized as LR-5 or 4 (LR-5/4) (36.9% vs. 95.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). HCCs categorized as LR-M exhibited significantly more MVI than HCCs categorized as LR-5/4 (57.1% vs. 17.5%, respectively; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HCCs categorized as LR-M using LI-RADS version 2018 may have a worse prognosis after primary LT within the Milan criteria than those with HCCs categorized as LR-5/4.

Image guidance using two-dimensional illustrations and three-dimensional modeling of donor anatomy during living donor hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: For living donor liver transplantation, preoperative imaging is required for the safety of both the donor and the recipient. We previously initiated our image-guidance program using two-dimensional illustrations and three-dimensional modeling in September 2018; herein, we analyzed the resultant changes in the clinical outcomes. METHODS: Living donors and recipients who underwent liver transplantation between September 2017 and August 2019 were included. Cases with image guidance were compared to those without image guidance regarding the operative outcome, especially bile-duct opening in the graft as well as surgical complications. RESULTS: Among 200 living donor transplantation, 90 transplantations were completed with image guidance. The image-guidance group had a higher rate of laparoscopy (80.9% vs. 97.8%; p < .001) as compared with the group without image guidance. Although there was no difference in the type of bile duct (p = .144), more grafts with single bile-duct openings were found in the image-guidance group (52.7% vs. 80.0%; p = .001). Consequently, achievements in bile-duct openings were superior in the image-guidance group (p = .022). There were no differences in bile leakage, graft failure, or number of deaths during the first month post-transplantation. CONCLUSION: As we initiated our image-guidance program for living donor liver transplantation, clinical outcomes, especially bile-duct division, were improved relative to before implementation.

Poor outcomes of early recurrent post-transplant bloodstream infection in living-donor liver transplant recipients.

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a common complication after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Some patients develop recurrent BSIs. We evaluated the impacts of early recurrent BSIs (ER-BSIs) on outcomes in LDLT recipients. LDLT cases between 2008 and 2016 were included. Early BSI (E-BSI) was defined as a BSI event that occurred within 2 months after LDLT. ER-BSIs were defined as new-onset BSIs within 2 months due to another pathogen at a ≥ 48-h interval or a relapse of BSIs by the same pathogen at a ≥ 1-week interval, with negative cultures in between. The primary objective was evaluating the all-cause mortality of each group of LDLT recipients (90 days and 1 year). The secondary objectives were analyzing associated factors of each all-cause mortality and risk factors for early single BSI and ER-BSI. Among 727 LDLT recipients, 108 patients experienced 149 events of E-BSI with 170 isolated pathogens. Twenty-eight patients (25.9%, 28/108) experienced ER-BSI. The 1-year survival rates of patients without BSI, with early single BSI event, and with ER-BSIs were 92.4%, 81.3%, and 28.6%, respectively. ER-BSI was the most significant risk factor for 1-year mortality (adjusted HR = 5.31; 95% CI = 2.27-12.40). Intra-abdominal and/or biliary complications and early allograft dysfunction were risk factors for both early single BSI and ER-BSI. Interestingly, longer cold ischemic time and recipient operative time were associated with ER-BSI. LDLT recipients with ER-BSI showed very low survival rates accompanied by intra-abdominal complications. Clinicians should prevent BSI recurrence by being aware of intra-abdominal complications.