RESUMEN
Objectives. To explore effects of coalitions (Community Engagement and Planning [CEP]) versus technical assistance (Resources for Services [RS]) for depression collaborative care and the effects of social determinants on long-term remission outcomes. Methods. We randomized 95 health care and community programs in Los Angeles County, California, to CEP or RS. In 2010, 1246 depressed (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-8] ≥ 10) adults enrolled and were invited for baseline and 6-, 12-, and 36-month surveys. Of 598 3-year completers, 283 participated at 4 years (2016). We examined effects of CEP versus RS, social factors (e.g., family income, food insecurity) on time to and periods in clinical (PHQ-8 < 10) and community-defined (PHQ-8 < 10 or PHQ-2 < 3; mental health composite score [MCS-12] > 40, or mental wellness) remission during the course of 3 years, and at 4 years. Results. We found that CEP versus RS increased 4-year depression remission and, for women, community-defined remission outcomes during the course of 3 years. Social factors and clinical factors predicted remission. Conclusions. At 4 years, CEP was more effective than RS at increasing depression remission. Public Health Implications. Coalitions may improve 4-year depression remission, while addressing social and clinical factors associated with depression may hold potential to enhance remission.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Federación para Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Federación para Atención de Salud/tendencias , Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Los Angeles , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The primary cause of death among African American women older than 50 years is cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease affects more than 16.8 million Americans and occurs when plaque builds up in the arteries that provide blood to the heart. This often leads to a partial or complete blockage, causing a myocardial infarction (heart attack). There is limited research regarding the lived experiences of African American women before and after a myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the experiences of African American women living in the southern region of the United States who have experienced a myocardial infarction. METHODS: A hermeneutic phenomenological framework guided the study. Semistructured, audiotaped interviews were conducted to elicit narratives from 7 participants. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and then coded and analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological analysis framework. RESULTS: The findings revealed 6 major themes: life before myocardial infarction, causes of my myocardial infarction, myocardial infarction warning signs, life after myocardial infarction, cardiac rehabilitation, and family support. Lifestyle changes must be implemented to prevent a second blockage. Attending cardiac rehabilitation and incorporating regular physical exercise are recommended to help prevent further heart damage and to improve quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/psicología , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Research is needed to better understand barriers to smoking cessation and sustained abstinence among racial/ethnic minority polydrug users. We conducted community dialogue groups involving 49 clients in substance use treatment programs with predominantly ethnic minority clientele and individual dialogues/interviews with seven program providers (stakeholders). Most clients were African American, under 40 years old, women, current smokers, and high school graduates. Smoking cessation services in these programs were considered inadequate and community programs insufficiently culturally tailored and economically and geographically inaccessible. Participants discussed individual "willpower" and choice; agency tobacco-related programs and policies; the relationships between smoking, smoking cessation, and treatment goals; and steps needed to reshape agency services and policies to provide greater support for smoking cessation in this at-risk population.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar/etnología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/etnología , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background: Little has been written about engaging potentially eligible members of a health care system who are not accessing the care to which they are entitled. Knowing more about the experiences of African American Veterans who regularly experience health care access challenges may be an important step toward equitable, coordinated Veterans Health Administration (VHA) care. This article explores the experiences of African American Veterans who are at risk of experiencing poor care coordination. Design: We partnered with a community organization to recruit and engage Veterans in three exploratory engagement workshops between October 2015 and February 2016. Participants and Setting: Veterans living in South Los Angeles, California. Main Outcome Measures: Veterans were asked to describe their experiences with community care and the VHA, a division of the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Field notes taken during the workshops were analyzed by community and academic partners using grounded theory methodology to identify emergent themes. Results: 12 Veterans and 3 family members of Veterans participated in one or more engagement workshops. Their trust in the VA was generally low. Positive themes included: Veterans have knowledge to share and want to help other Veterans; and connecting to VA services can result in positive experiences. Negative themes included: functional barriers to accessing VA health care services; insensitive VA health care environment; lack of trust in the VA health care system; and Veteran status as disadvantageous for accessing non-VA community services. Conclusions: Veterans living in underserved areas who have had difficulty accessing VA care have unique perspectives on VA services. Partnering with trusted local community organizations to engage Veterans in their home communities is a promising strategy to inform efforts to improve care access and coordination for vulnerable Veterans.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/normas , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Humanos , Los Angeles , Masculino , Área sin Atención Médica , Evaluación de Necesidades , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/normas , Salud de los VeteranosRESUMEN
The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) supports patient-centered clinical comparative effectiveness research (CER) including health disparities and engagement portfolios. In 2013, PCORI launched the Pipeline to Proposal (P2P) mechanism to support development of novel patient- and stakeholder-centered partnerships focused on designing clinical CER funding proposals. By providing a tiered structure of successive small contracts and technical assistance, the P2P mechanism encourages development of new research partnerships among diverse stakeholders. As a comparatively new field, patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) has few well-delineated methods for engaging patients and other non-scientists in effective teams with academics or clinicians to develop and implement rigorous, scientific research proposals. Community partnered participatory research (CPPR) provides a useful framework for structuring new partnerships. In this article we highlight the origins, development, and prospects of three current examples of funded P2P initiatives based in New Orleans and Los Angeles. We outline how these projects - Prisoner to Patient, the NOLA Partnership, and Resilience Among African American Men - use CPPR principles. We also describe how they have collaborated with, and contributed to, a two-way learning and knowledge exchange among members of the PCORI-funded Community and Patient Partnered Research Network. Lessons learned may be applicable to other groups planning to create new partnerships focused on implementing PCOR.
Asunto(s)
Redes Comunitarias/organización & administración , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Participación del Paciente , Participación de los Interesados , Distinciones y Premios , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad/métodos , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad/organización & administración , Humanos , Los Angeles , Modelos Organizacionales , Nueva Orleans , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
Objective: To assess the feasibility of a novel, partnered technology development process to co-create mobile health applications (apps) addressing community health priorities, using psychoeducation of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) principles for enhancing resilience as an example. Design: Stakeholder engagement, workgroups, pilot feasibility study using mixed methods during October 2013 through January 2016 over three phases: 1) defining the vision of the project and increasing technical capacity, 2) co-development and pilot testing of the app, and 3) planning for sustainability. Setting: An academic-community partnership in South Los Angeles, California. Participants: Eight stakeholders; 30 pilot participants from the community. Main Outcome Measures: Qualitative analysis of audio-recordings of the app development process and stakeholder interviews, surveys of stakeholders' perception of the development process, app use data, and feedback from pilot participants. Results: The participatory technology development process resulted in creation and pilot-testing of a resiliency-focused text messaging app. Of the 1,107 messages sent, 23 out of 30 (77%) app users responded to explore interactive content. Stakeholders reported increased perceived competency in creating mobile apps and that the process fostered a culture of co-leadership. There was also sustained engagement in mobile app development by stakeholders beyond the initial project period. Conclusions: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to demonstrate the feasibility of participatory technology development, an approach involving direct participation in the development, tailoring and maintenance of a mobile app by a broad set of stakeholders with high representation from racial/ethnic minorities from an under-resourced community. Participatory technology development is a promising approach for creating sustainable, relevant and engaging health technologies across different technological, clinical and community settings.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Redes de Comunicación de Computadores/organización & administración , Área sin Atención Médica , Salud de las Minorías , Resiliencia Psicológica , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/tendencias , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Los Angeles , Aplicaciones Móviles/tendencias , Proyectos Piloto , Participación de los InteresadosRESUMEN
Objective: With internal validity being a central goal of designed experiments, we seek to elucidate how community partnered participatory research (CPPR) impacts the internal validity of public health comparative-effectiveness research. Methods: Community Partners in Care (CPIC), a study comparing a community-coalition intervention to direct technical assistance for disseminating depression care to vulnerable populations, is used to illustrate design choices developed with attention to core CPPR principles. The study-design process is reviewed retrospectively and evaluated based on the resulting covariate balance across intervention arms and on broader peer-review assessments. Contributions of the CPIC Council and the study's design committee are highlighted. Results: CPPR principles contributed to building consensus around the use of randomization, creating a sampling frame, specifying geographic boundaries delimiting the scope of the investigation, grouping similar programs into pairs or other small blocks of units, collaboratively choosing random-number-generator seeds to determine randomized intervention assignments, and addressing logistical constraints in field operations. Study protocols yielded samples that were well-balanced on background characteristics across intervention arms. CPIC has been recognized for scientific merit, has drawn attention from policymakers, and has fueled ongoing research collaborations. Conclusions: Creative and collaborative fulfillment of CPPR principles reinforced the internal validity of CPIC, strengthening the study's scientific rigor by engaging complementary areas of knowledge and expertise among members of the investigative team.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Depresión/terapia , Adulto , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad/métodos , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad/normas , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa/métodos , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa/normas , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Colaboración Intersectorial , Masculino , Área sin Atención Médica , Salud Pública/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
Community partnered participatory research (CPPR) emphasizes community engagement, respect, and empowerment as guiding principles to promote mental health equity. This article describes the "Vision" stage of a CPPR-informed model to implement evidence-based practices for depression in two African American churches in Harlem, New York. Essential parts of the Vision include engagement of stakeholders and collaborative planning. The engagement process increased awareness about the project via a community-focused mental health symposium. The collaborative planning stage resulted in creating a multi-disciplinary Community Coalition for Mental Health, establishing the Coalition's values, agreeing to change the initial chosen study intervention from Interpersonal Counseling to Mental Health First Aid, and developing a website to disseminate the group's work. Key lessons learned from our partnered process are: 1) support from the lead pastor is crucial; 2) balancing community and academic interests can be challenging; 3) icebreaker activities foster relationships and reinforce CPPR principles; 4) multiple communication channels can enhance community participation; and, 5) should organize data in ways that make them easier to interpret.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Consejo , Depresión , Salud Mental/etnología , Misiones Religiosas/organización & administración , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/métodos , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Participación de la Comunidad/métodos , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Consejo/métodos , Consejo/organización & administración , Depresión/etnología , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/terapia , Humanos , Colaboración Intersectorial , New York , Apoyo SocialRESUMEN
Background: Patient and community engagement in under-resourced communities is a key issue for precision medicine research. We report proceedings from a community-academic partnered conference in Los Angeles to promote community understanding of precision medicine and generate engagement recommendations. Methods: Planning group review of planning, presentations, and audience discussions from facilitator notes and participant survey data from a one-day conference. Findings: Community-academic planning broadened community participation and presentations. More than 80% of survey participants indicated they would participate in the national precision medicine initiative, and most were willing to share diverse sources of data. Discussions identified trust concerns related to historical research abuses, data privacy, potential effects of findings on health care, personal safety, research procedures, the time-frame for benefit, and confusion about different initiatives. Concerns were balanced by belief in science to improve health. Recommendations included a community partnered participatory approach with support for local community and academic teams to engage stakeholders with written/online resources and partnered workgroups addressing key concerns. Conclusion: Conference participants expressed high willingness to participate in precision medicine studies, but discussions highlighted trust and transparency issues and suggested community partnered research with local capacity building.
Asunto(s)
Medicina de Precisión , Salud Pública , Creación de Capacidad , Participación de la Comunidad/métodos , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Congresos como Asunto , Ética en Investigación , Humanos , Los Angeles , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/tendencias , Salud Pública/ética , Salud Pública/métodos , Salud Pública/tendencias , Poblaciones VulnerablesRESUMEN
Objective: We describe the rationale, development, and progress on the Community and Patient Partnered Research Network (CPPRN). The CPPRN builds on more than a decade of partnered work and is designed to promote health equity by developing partnered research on behavioral health and social risk factors in Los Angeles and New Orleans. Setting: A community-academic partnership across Los Angeles County and New Orleans. Methods: Review of rationale, history, structure, activities and progress in applying community partnered participatory research (CPPR) to CPPRN. Findings: Patient and community stakeholders participated in all phases of development, including local and national activities. Key developments include partnered planning efforts, progress on aggregating a large, de-identified dataset across county agencies, and development of an information technology-supported screening approach for behavioral and social determinants in health care, social, and community-based settings. Conclusion: The CPPRN represents a promising approach for research data networks, balancing the potential benefit of information technology and data analytic approaches while addressing potential risks and priorities of relevant stakeholders.
Asunto(s)
Redes Comunitarias/organización & administración , Equidad en Salud/organización & administración , Salud Mental/normas , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/normas , Participación de la Comunidad/métodos , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Humanos , Los Angeles , Nueva Orleans , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Mejoramiento de la CalidadRESUMEN
Significance: Prior research suggests that Community Engagement and Planning (CEP) for coalition support compared with Resources for Services (RS) for program technical assistance to implement depression quality improvement programs improves 6- and 12-month client mental-health related quality of life (MHRQL); however, effects for clients with multiple chronic medical conditions (MCC) are unknown. Objective: To explore effectiveness of CEP vs RS in MCC and non-MCC subgroups. Design: Secondary analyses of a cluster-randomized trial. Setting: 93 health care and community-based programs in two neighborhoods. Participants: Of 4,440 clients screened, 1,322 depressed (Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ8) provided contact information, 1,246 enrolled and 1,018 (548 with ≥3 MCC) completed baseline, 6- or 12-month surveys. Intervention: CEP or RS for implementing depression quality improvement programs. Outcomes and Analyses: Primary: depression (PHQ9 <10), poor MHRQL (Short Form Health Survey, SF-12<40); Secondary: mental wellness, good physical health, behavioral health hospitalization, chronic homelessness risk, work/workloss days, services use at 6 and 12 months. End-point regressions were used to estimate intervention effects on outcomes for subgroups with ≥3 MCC, non-MCC, and intervention-by-MCC interactions (exploratory). Results: Among MCC clients at 6 months, CEP vs RS lowered likelihoods of depression and poor MHRQL; increased likelihood of mental wellness; reduced work-loss days among employed and likelihoods of ≥4 behavioral-health hospitalization nights and chronic homelessness risk, while increasing faith-based and park community center depression services; and at 12 months, likelihood of good physical health and park community center depression services use (each P<.05). There were no significant interactions or primary outcome effects for non-MCC. Conclusions: CEP was more effective than RS in improving 6-month primary outcomes among depressed MCC clients, without significant interactions.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Participación de la Comunidad/métodos , Depresión , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Análisis por Conglomerados , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/métodos , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/normas , Depresión/fisiopatología , Depresión/rehabilitación , Femenino , Asistencia Técnica a la Planificación en Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/psicología , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/rehabilitación , Sistemas de Apoyo Psicosocial , Mejoramiento de la CalidadRESUMEN
The wide variety of dissemination and implementation designs now being used to evaluate and improve health systems and outcomes warrants review of the scope, features, and limitations of these designs. This article is one product of a design workgroup that was formed in 2013 by the National Institutes of Health to address dissemination and implementation research, and whose members represented diverse methodologic backgrounds, content focus areas, and health sectors. These experts integrated their collective knowledge on dissemination and implementation designs with searches of published evaluations strategies. This article emphasizes randomized and nonrandomized designs for the traditional translational research continuum or pipeline, which builds on existing efficacy and effectiveness trials to examine how one or more evidence-based clinical/prevention interventions are adopted, scaled up, and sustained in community or service delivery systems. We also mention other designs, including hybrid designs that combine effectiveness and implementation research, quality improvement designs for local knowledge, and designs that use simulation modeling.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos , Proyectos de Investigación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the design and rationale of the Healthy Community Neighborhood Initiative (HCNI), a multi-component study to understand and document health risk and resources in a low-income and minority community. DESIGN: A community-partnered participatory research project. SETTING: A low-income, biethnic African American and Latino neighborhood in South Los Angeles. PARTICIPANTS: Adult community residents aged >18 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Household survey and clinical data collection; neighborhood characteristics; neighborhood observations; and community resources asset mapping. RESULTS: We enrolled 206 participants (90% of those eligible), of whom 205 completed the household interview and examination, and 199 provided laboratory samples. Among enrollees, 82 (40%) were aged >50 years and participated in functional status measurement. We completed neighborhood observations on 93 street segments; an average of 2.2 (SD=1.6) study participants resided on each street segment observed. The community asset map identified 290 resources summarized in a Community Resource Guide given to all participants. CONCLUSIONS: The HCNI community-academic partnership has built a framework to assess and document the individual, social, and community factors that may influence clinical and social outcomes in a community at high-risk for preventable chronic disease. Our project suggests that a community collaborative can use culturally and scientifically sound strategies to identify community-centered health and social needs. Additional work is needed to understand strategies for developing and implementing interventions to mitigate these disparities.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Pobreza , Características de la Residencia , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Enfermedad Crónica , Centros Comunitarios de Salud , Planificación Ambiental , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Los Angeles , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To understand the health care access issues faced by Los Angeles (LA) County's uninsured and residually uninsured after implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and to identify potential solutions using a community-partnered dialogue. DESIGN: Qualitative study using a community-partnered participatory research framework. SETTING: Community forum breakout discussion. DISCUSSANTS: Representatives from LA County health care agencies, community health care provider organizations, local community advocacy and service organizations including uninsured individuals, and the county school district. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Key structural and overarching value themes identified through community-partnered pile sort, c-coefficients measuring overlap between themes. RESULTS: Five overarching value themes were identified - knowledge, trust, quality, partnership, and solutions. Lack of knowledge and misinformation were identified as barriers to successful enrollment of the eligible uninsured and providing health care to undocumented individuals. Discussants noted dissatisfaction with the quality of traditional sources of health care and a broken cycle of trust and disengagement. They also described inherent trust by the uninsured in "outsider" community-based providers not related to quality. CONCLUSIONS: Improving health care for the residually uninsured after ACA implementation will require addressing dissatisfaction in safety-net providers, disseminating knowledge and providing health care through trusted nontraditional sources, and using effective and trusted partnerships between community and health care agencies with mutual respect. Community-academic partnerships can be a trusted conduit to discuss issues related to the health care of vulnerable populations.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Asociación entre el Sector Público-Privado/organización & administración , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
There are differences in cancer-risk perception among racial/ethnic groups that may affect health risk behaviors. Using a community partnered-participatory research approach, we conducted a survey on cancer screening, risk behaviors, and related knowledge/attitudes within 11 churches in South Los Angeles with predominantly African-American parishioners. This analysis examines correlates of perceived risk of developing cancer among 755 African American adults. Almost 15 % of participants indicated higher perceived risk for cancer compared to the average man/woman of the same age, 38 % indicated same risk, whereas 48 % perceived lower risk. Sixty-nine individuals (9 %) reported a cancer history and 63 % reported at least one blood relative with cancer. Controlling for demographic characteristics and healthcare access, participants who reported higher risk of cancer had higher level of cancer-related knowledge; were current and ex-smokers; had poorer health status; had a blood relative with cancer; had a cancer history; and had discussed their risk of cancer with their doctor. The bivariate association between high perceived cancer risk and lack of exercise and obesity disappeared after adjusting for demographic characteristics and perceived health status. Our data suggest that a substantial proportion of African Americans in South Los Angeles may underestimate their cancer risk. Additionally, lack of exercise and obesity are not recognized as independent cancer risk factors as much as smoking and personal and family history of cancer. Next steps will be to inform participating churches about our findings and explore their interest in taking steps to reduce health risk behaviors among their parishioners.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Neoplasias/etnología , Percepción , Medición de Riesgo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud/etnología , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Asunción de Riesgos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As medical homes are developing under health reform, little is known regarding depression services need and use by diverse safety-net populations in under-resourced communities. For chronic conditions like depression, primary care services may face new opportunities to partner with diverse community service providers, such as those in social service and substance abuse centers, to support a collaborative care model of treating depression. OBJECTIVE: To understand the distribution of need and current burden of services for depression in under-resourced, diverse communities in Los Angeles. DESIGN: Baseline phase of a participatory trial to improve depression services with data from client screening and follow-up surveys. PARTICIPANTS: Of 4,440 clients screened from 93 programs (primary care, mental health, substance abuse, homeless, social and other community services) in 50 agencies, 1,322 were depressed according to an eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) and gave contact information; 1,246 enrolled and 981 completed surveys. Ninety-three programs, including 17 primary care/public health, 18 mental health, 20 substance abuse, ten homeless services, and 28 social/other community services, participated. MAIN MEASURES: Comparisons by setting in 6-month retrospective recall of depression services use. KEY RESULTS: Depression prevalence ranged from 51.9 % in mental health to 17.2 % in social-community programs. Depressed clients used two settings on average to receive depression services; 82 % used any setting. More clients preferred counseling over medication for depression treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Need for depression care was high, and a broad range of agencies provide depression care. Although most participants had contact with primary care, most depression services occurred outside of primary care settings, emphasizing the need to coordinate and support the quality of community-based services across diverse community settings.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Área sin Atención Médica , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/normas , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa/métodos , Conducta Cooperativa , Femenino , Planificación en Salud/organización & administración , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Los Angeles , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Calidad de Vida , Método Simple Ciego , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Depression contributes to disability and there are ethnic/racial disparities in access and outcomes of care. Quality improvement (QI) programs for depression in primary care improve outcomes relative to usual care, but health, social and other community-based service sectors also support clients in under-resourced communities. Little is known about effects on client outcomes of strategies to implement depression QI across diverse sectors. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of Community Engagement and Planning (CEP) and Resources for Services (RS) to implement depression QI on clients' mental health-related quality of life (HRQL) and services use. DESIGN: Matched programs from health, social and other service sectors were randomized to community engagement and planning (promoting inter-agency collaboration) or resources for services (individual program technical assistance plus outreach) to implement depression QI toolkits in Hollywood-Metro and South Los Angeles. PARTICIPANTS: From 93 randomized programs, 4,440 clients were screened and of 1,322 depressed by the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) and providing contact information, 1,246 enrolled and 1,018 in 90 programs completed baseline or 6-month follow-up. MEASURES: Self-reported mental HRQL and probable depression (primary), physical activity, employment, homelessness risk factors (secondary) and services use. RESULTS: CEP was more effective than RS at improving mental HRQL, increasing physical activity and reducing homelessness risk factors, rate of behavioral health hospitalization and medication visits among specialty care users (i.e. psychiatrists, mental health providers) while increasing depression visits among users of primary care/public health for depression and users of faith-based and park programs (each p < 0.05). Employment, use of antidepressants, and total contacts were not significantly affected (each p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Community engagement to build a collaborative approach to implementing depression QI across diverse programs was more effective than resources for services for individual programs in improving mental HRQL, physical activity and homelessness risk factors, and shifted utilization away from hospitalizations and specialty medication visits toward primary care and other sectors, offering an expanded health-home model to address multiple disparities for depressed safety-net clients.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Adulto , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/normas , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa/métodos , Conducta Cooperativa , Femenino , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/métodos , Planificación en Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Los Angeles , Masculino , Área sin Atención Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Calidad de Vida , Método Simple Ciego , Factores Socioeconómicos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most theoretical formulations acknowledge that knowledge and awareness of cancer screening and prevention recommendations significantly influence health behaviors. This study compares perceived knowledge of cancer prevention and screening with test-based knowledge in a community sample. We also examine demographic variables and self-reported cancer screening and prevention behaviors as correlates of both knowledge scores, and consider whether cancer related knowledge can be accurately assessed using just a few, simple questions in a short and easy-to-complete survey. METHODS: We used a community-partnered participatory research approach to develop our study aims and a survey. The study sample was composed of 180 predominantly African American and Hispanic community individuals who participated in a full-day cancer prevention and screening promotion conference in South Los Angeles, California, on July 2011. Participants completed a self-administered survey in English or Spanish at the beginning of the conference. RESULTS: Our data indicate that perceived and test-based knowledge scores are only moderately correlated. Perceived knowledge score shows a stronger association with demographic characteristics and other cancer related variables than the test-based score. Thirteen out of twenty variables that are examined in our study showed a statistically significant correlation with the perceived knowledge score, however, only four variables demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with the test-based knowledge score. CONCLUSION: Perceived knowledge of cancer prevention and screening was assessed with fewer items than test-based knowledge. Thus, using this assessment could potentially reduce respondent burden. However, our data demonstrate that perceived and test-based knowledge are separate constructs.