Effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on renal function after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) predispose to postoperative renal dysfunction. Dexmedetomidine is an α2 adrenoreceptor agonist, which has renoprotective effects after cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of dexmedetomidine on renal function after CRS and HIPEC. MATERIALS: Thirty-eight patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine (dexmedetomidine group, n = 19, loading 1 µg/kg over 20 min followed by infusion at 0.5 µg/kg/h) or 0.9% sodium chloride (control group, n = 19) during surgery. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was assessed daily until postoperative day 7. Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule (KIM)-1 were measured for 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: There was no difference in the lowest CrCl value during the first 7 days postoperatively, but the % change from baseline to the lowest value was lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group (p = .037). Urine NGAL and KIM-1 levels were increased over time in both groups, but the increases were significantly less in the dexmedetomidine group (p = .018 and 0.038, respectively). In the dexmedetomidine group, the length of intensive care unit stay was shorter (p = .034). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion did not improve renal function in terms of serum Cr-related indices following CRS and HIPEC. However, as the decrease in CrCl was attenuated and early tubular-injury markers were lower in the dexmedetomidine group, dexmedetomidine may have protective effects against early tubular injury in CRS and HIPEC. Clinical Trials Registry: http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02641938).

Perioperative Factors for Predicting the Need for Postoperative Intensive Care after Major Lung Resection.

Postoperative management after major lung surgery is critical. This study evaluates risk factors for predicting mandatory intensive care unit (ICU) admission immediately after major lung resection. We retrospectively reviewed patients for whom the surgeon requested an ICU bed before major lung resection surgery. Patients were classified into three groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, and a clinical nomogram was constructed. Among 340 patients, 269, 50, and 21 were classified into the no need for ICU, mandatory ICU admission, and late-onset complication groups, respectively. Predictive postoperative diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (47.2 (interquartile range (IQR) 43.3-65.7)% versus vs. 67.8 (57.1-79.7)%; p = 0.003, odds ratio (OR) 0.969, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-0.99), intraoperative blood loss (400.00 (250.00-775.00) mL vs. 100.00 (50.00-250.00) mL; p = 0.040, OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.000-1.002), and open thoracotomy (p = 0.030, OR 2.794, 95% CI 1.11-7.07) were significant predictors for mandatory ICU admission. The risk estimation nomogram demonstrated good accuracy in estimating the risk of mandatory ICU admission (concordance index 83.53%). In order to predict the need for intensive care after major lung resection, preoperative and intraoperative factors need to be considered.

Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Changes in head and neck position may significantly affect the performance of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) by altering the pharyngeal structure. PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the effect of changes in head and neck position on performance of SADs. DATA SOURCE: Bibliographic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and the Web of Science. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Prospective studies investigating the effects of head and neck positions on the performance of SADs. METHODS: A random effect model was applied in the all analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of device and the age of patient. The oropharyngeal leak pressure was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included peak inspiratory pressure, fibreoptic view, and ventilation score (PROSPERO, CRD42017076971). RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, the oropharyngeal leak pressure significantly increased (mean difference 4.07 cmH2O; 95% confidence interval 3.30 to 4.84) during neck flexion with adverse effects on ventilation and fibreoptic view. Conversely, the oropharyngeal leak pressure decreased (mean difference -4.05; 95% confidence interval -4.90 to -3.20) during neck extension with no significant effect on ventilation or fibreoptic view. Rotation of the head and neck did not significantly affect SAD performance. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced oropharyngeal leak pressure in the extended neck position was not associated with impaired ventilation except with the air-Q self-pressurizing airway. The flexed neck position significantly worsens ventilation and the alignment between the SAD and glottis despite improving the seal except with the air-Q self-pressurizing airway and LMA Proseal.

Accuracy and Efficacy of Impedance Cardiography as a Non-Invasive Cardiac Function Monitor.

PURPOSE: The most common method of monitoring cardiac output (CO) is thermodilution using pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), but this method is associated with complications. Impedance cardiography (ICG) is a non-invasive CO monitoring technique. This study compared the accuracy and efficacy of ICG as a non-invasive cardiac function monitoring technique to those of thermodilution and arterial pressure contour. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients undergoing liver transplantation were included. Cardiac index (CI) was measured by thermodilution using PAC, arterial waveform analysis, and ICG simultaneously in each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis to assess the degree of agreement. RESULTS: The difference by thermodilution and ICG was 1.13 L/min/m², and the limits of agreement were -0.93 and 3.20 L/min/m². The difference by thermodilution and arterial pressure contour was 0.62 L/min/m², and the limits of agreement were -1.43 and 2.67 L/min/m². The difference by arterial pressure contour and ICG was 0.50 L/min/m², and the limits of agreement were -1.32 and 2.32 L/min/m². All three percentage errors exceeded the 30% limit of acceptance. Substantial agreement was observed between CI of thermodilution with PAC and ICG at preanhepatic and anhepatic phases, as well as between CI of thermodilution and arterial waveform analysis at preanhepatic phase. Others showed moderate agreement. CONCLUSION: Although neither method was clinically equivalent to thermodilution, ICG showed more substantial correlation with thermodilution method than with arterial waveform analysis. As a non-invasive cardiac function monitor, ICG would likely require further studies in other settings.

A Simulation Study of Propofol Effect-Site Concentration for Appropriate Sedation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Brain MRI: Pharmacodynamic Analysis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to establish the propofol effect-site concentration (Ce) for appropriate sedation by pharmacodynamic analysis and to determine the propofol Ce during occurrence of sedation-related side effects in pediatric patients undergoing brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 50 pediatric patients scheduled for brain MRI, sedation was induced with 2.0 mg/kg propofol; additional propofol doses were 0.5-1 mg/kg. Propofol Ce was simulated by inputting the propofol administration profiles of patients into a pediatric compartmental model (Choi model). The relationship between propofol Ce and probabilities of sedation and recovery were analyzed using a sigmoidal Emax model. The simulated propofol Ce for sedation-related side effects was investigated. Population model parameters were estimated using the Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modelling software. RESULTS: The mean values of propofol Ce50 for sedation during the preparation, scanning, and recovery phases were 1.23, 0.43, and 0.39 µg/mL. The simulated propofol Ce values during oxygen desaturation (SpO2 <90%) (3 patients; 6%), hypotension (16 patients; 32%), and bradycardia (12 patients; 24%) were 3.01±0.04, 2.05±0.63, and 2.41±0.89 µg/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: The required propofol Ce50 for applying monitors during the preparation phase before the start of MRI was higher than the propofol Ce50 required during the scanning phase. During low-intensity stimulation phases, such as scanning, propofol bolus dose should be strictly titrated not to exceed the propofol Ce that can lead to oxygen desaturation because of the relatively low propofol Ce (Ce95, 1.43 µg/mL) required for sedation in most patients.