Post-operative recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis according to pre-transplant treatment after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) after kidney transplantation (KT) is a serious complication and a significant risk factor for graft failure. However, there is no clear evidence of the effectiveness of pre-transplant treatment using plasmapheresis (PP) or rituximab in preventing post-operative FSGS recurrence after KT. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 99 adult patients with biopsy-proven primary FSGS who underwent KT between 2007 and 2018. The patients were divided into the pre-treatment group (N = 53, 53.5%) and no pre-treatment group (N = 46, 46.5%). In the pre-transplant group, prophylactic PP was administered before KT in patients undergoing living donor transplantation and the day after KT in those undergoing deceased donor transplantation. RESULTS: The rate of immediate post-operative recurrence was significantly higher in the no pre-treatment group (16 [34.8%]) than in the pre-treatment group (5 [9.4%]; P = 0.002). There were three cases of graft failure due to recurrent FSGS, all of which were in the no pre-treatment group. After adjusting for possible confounding factors, age (per 10-year increase; OR = 0.61, CI, 0.42-0.90; P = 0.012) and pre-transplant treatment (vs. no pre-transplant treatment; OR = 0.17, CI, 0.05-0.54; P = 0.003) were identified as significant factors associated with FSGS recurrence. The rate of death-censored graft survival was significantly superior in the pretransplant treatment group (P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Pre-transplant treatment with PP was associated with beneficial effects on preventing FSGS recurrence after KT.

Serum procalcitonin as a biomarker for differentiating between infectious and non-infectious fever after pancreas transplantation.

Laboratory biomarkers that can differentiate non-infectious fever from infectious fever after pancreas transplantation have yet to be discovered. Non-infectious fever was defined as the presence of fever (>38.3°C) in the absence of a documented clinical diagnosis of infection or a positive culture. Among 184 consecutive recipients, a total of 91 recipients developed fever within 1-month post-transplant, of whom 46 had infectious fever and 45 had non-infectious fever at our center between August 2014 and July 2019. The onset of fever was earlier in the non-infectious fever group (14.4 ± 3.7 post-transplant days) compared with the infectious fever group (16.5 ± 5.8 post-transplant days; p = .033). Multivariate analysis showed that serum procalcitonin at the peak of fever could significantly differentiate infectious fever from non-infectious fever (OR 53.378, 95% CI: 6.819-417.802, p < .001). The area under the curve for differentiating between the two groups was 0.853 (95% CI, 0.780-0.926) for procalcitonin and 0.667 (95% CI, 0.549-0.785) for CRP. The best cutoff values of serum procalcitonin and CRP were 0.405 ng/ml (sensitivity, 77.1%; specificity, 80.8%) and 7.355 mg/dl (sensitivity, 66.7%; specificity, 67.3%), respectively. Serum procalcitonin may be useful for differentiating non-infectious fever from infectious fever after pancreas transplantation.

Epidemiology and risk factors associated with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients after 6-month trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is recommended. The aim of this study was to investigate incidence and risk factors for PCP in KTRs after 6-month TMP-SMX prophylaxis. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of patients with PCP who received 6-month PCP prophylaxis with TMP-SMX after kidney transplantation (KT). In cases of rejection, PCP prophylaxis was provided for six additional months after anti-rejection therapy. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was not considered an indication for PCP prophylaxis due to concerns of nephrotoxicity associated with TMP-SMX. RESULTS: Among 3941 kidney or pancreas-kidney transplant recipients, 67 (1.7%) developed PCP after discontinuing TMP-SMX. A total of 47 patients with KT PCP and 94 controls were included. Duration of PCP prophylaxis was similar between cases and controls (median 6 months, P = .53). In multivariate analysis, rejection (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.4-11.1) and CMV infection (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.0-5.8) were independently associated with PCP development after TMP-SMX. Rejection or CMV infection was observed in 70% of patients with PCP. Time to PCP development after rejection (median [IQR] 6 [5-19] months) was slightly shorter than after CMV infection (median [IQR] 9 [5-12] months; P = .18). CONCLUSION: Post-prophylaxis PCP occurred in <2% of KTRs, and about two-thirds of these experienced rejection or CMV infection. These data suggest that at least 6 to 9-month additional chemoprophylaxis may be needed to prevent PCP in KTRs with transplant rejection or CMV infection.

Pneumocystis pneumonia occurrence and prophylaxis duration in kidney transplant recipients according to perioperative treatment with rituximab.

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is a life-threatening fungal infection that can occur in kidney transplantation (KT) recipients. A growing number of KT recipients are receiving perioperative treatment with rituximab, which is associated with prolonged B-cell depletion and possible risk of PCP occurrence; however, the optimal prophylaxis duration according to rituximab treatment is yet unknown. We compared the occurrence of PCP and the duration of prophylaxis in KT recipients according to rituximab treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 2110 patients who underwent KT between January 2009 and December 2016, who were divided into non-Rituximab group (n = 1588, 75.3%) and rituximab group (n = 522, 24.7%). RESULTS: In the rituximab group, the estimated number needed to treat (NNT) for prophylaxis prolongation from 6 to 12 months was 29.0 with a relative risk reduction of 90.0%. In the non-rituximab group, the estimated NNT value was 133.3 and the relative risk reduction was 66.4%. Rituximab treatment (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.09; P <  0.01) and acute rejection (HR = 2.19; P = 0.03) were significant risk factors for PCP in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that maintaining PCP prophylaxis for 12 months may be beneficial in KT recipients treated with rituximab for desensitization or acute rejection treatment.

The results of HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation according to pre-transplant crossmatch tests: Donor-specific antibody as a prominent predictor of acute rejection.

BACKGROUND: Crossmatching (XM) between organ donors and recipients is correlated with clinical outcomes. This study evaluates the results of HLA-incompatible kidney transplant (HLA-i KT) according to pre-transplant XM modalities. METHODS: This study included 731 consecutive patients. HLA-i KT was defined as a transplant under conditions of complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) XM positivity, flow-cytometric XM (FCXM) positivity, and/or maximal donor-specific antibody (DSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ≥5000. RESULTS: The incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) within 1 year after transplant was significantly higher in the HLA-i group than in the HLA compatible (HLA-c) group (15 vs 9 patients, 14.2% vs 1.4%; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis indicated that a DSA MFI ≥5000 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-6.98; P = 0.05) was significantly associated with acute rejection (AR), whereas CDC (OR = 2.09; 95% CI, 0.55-7.99; P = 0.28) and FCXM positivity (OR = 2.07; 95% CI, 0.73-5.87; P = 0.17) were not. Similarly, DSA MFI ≥ 5000 (OR = 4.14; P = 0.02) was the only significant factor affecting the risk of AMR. CONCLUSIONS: Of the various XM tests, DSA MFI ≥5000 was the most prominent predictor of AR in patients undergoing HLA-i KT.

Intracranial aneurysms in patients receiving kidney transplantation for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited kidney disease, leading to kidney failure. One of the most serious extrarenal complications of ADPKD is comorbid intracranial aneurysms. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence, rupture rate, and treatment outcomes of intracranial aneurysms in ADPKD. METHODS: Adult patients with a documented diagnosis of ADPKD who received kidney transplantation at our center from January 1994 to December 2018 were included in the study. Medical history, physical examination, laboratory findings, imaging studies, and operation records were collected and analyzed from our database. RESULTS: Among 154 kidney transplant recipients with ADPKD, 113 (73.4%) patients were screened for intracranial aneurysms preoperatively. Twenty three patients (14.9%) had intracranial aneurysms with mean diameter size of 4.5 ± 2.7 mm. Nine patients (5.8%) experienced aneurysm rupture and the mean age at time of rupture was 34.9 ± 9.3 years. Twelve patients (52.2%) presented with multiple aneurysms. The most common aneurysm location was the bifurcation of the middle cerebral artery (34.9%). Clipping was the most common treatment in both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial aneurysms are more frequent in patients with ADPKD, and the average age of intracranial artery rupture in patients with ADPKD is earlier than in the general population. It is necessary to consider proper evaluation and management of intracranial aneurysms when counseling ADPKD patients who will undergo kidney transplantation.

Impact of pretransplant donor-specific antibodies on kidney allograft recipients with negative flow cytometry cross-matches.

The Luminex test can detect low levels of donor-specific antibody (DSA) that cannot be detected by flow-cytometric cross-matching (FCXM) in kidney transplantation (KT). This study evaluated the impact of DSA on clinical outcomes in KT recipients negative on FCXM. Of 575 consecutive patients who underwent living donor KT between January 2013 and July 2016, 494 (85.9%) were DSA-negative and 81 (14.1%) were DSA-positive. Although rates of acute cellular rejection (ACR) at 1 year were similar in the 2 groups (P = .54), the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) was significantly higher in the DSA-positive group (P < .01). There was no statistically significant association between rejection-free graft survival (RFGS) rates and pretransplant class I DSA. However, evaluation of pretransplant class II DSA showed that RFGS rates were significantly lower in patients with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) >3000 than in patients with DSA-negative (P < .01). On multivariate analyses, class II DSA MFI ≥5000 was a significant risk factor for acute rejection (hazard ratio, 7.48; P < .01). These findings suggested that pretransplant DSA alone did not affect graft survival in KT recipients without desensitization. However, class II DSA MFI >5000 was an independent predictor of acute rejection in DSA-positive patients.

Isoniazid treatment to prevent TB in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients based on an interferon-γ-releasing assay: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We performed a randomized trial of isoniazid treatment based on interferon-γ-releasing assay (IGRA) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients in an intermediate-TB-burden country. METHODS: All adult patients admitted to a KT institute between June 2010 and May 2013 were enrolled. The IGRA (T-SPOT.TB assay) was performed on all patients, and isoniazid treatment was given to those with clinical risk factors for latent TB infection (LTBI). Patients with positive IGRA who had no clinical risk factors for LTBI were randomly assigned to isoniazid treatment or a control group. The development of TB after KT was monitored between June 2010 and November 2013. The primary endpoint was the development of TB. RESULTS: Of the 784 patients who had no clinical risk factors for LTBI, 445 (57%) gave negative results in the IGRA, 76 (10%) indeterminate results and 263 (33%) positive results. Of the latter, 131 were allocated to isoniazid treatment and 132 to the control group. Three (2%) of the control group developed TB, whereas none of the isoniazid treatment group developed TB (rate difference 1.22 per 100 person-years, P = 0.09). Of the 521 patients with negative or indeterminate IGRA results, 4 [0.8%, 0.43 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.12-1.09)] developed TB after KT. CONCLUSIONS: IGRA-based isoniazid treatment has a trend towards reducing TB development in KT recipients without clinical risk factors, but careful monitoring of TB development is needed in negative-IGRA KT recipients.

Long-term impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatches combined with expanded criteria donor on allograft outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation.

The long-term impact of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches combined with expanded criteria donors (ECD) on clinical outcomes has not been fully evaluated in recipients of deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantations. Of 595 DD renal transplant recipients in our center between 1991 and 2011, 210 recipients (36%) had 0-3 HLA mismatches/standard criteria donor (SCD), 353 (59%) had 4-6 HLA mismatches/SCD or 0-3 HLA mismatches/ECD, and 32 (5%) had 4-6 HLA mismatches/ECD. The mortality rate was significantly highest in the patients with 4-6 HLA mismatches/ECD (p = 0.040). The most common cause of death in this group was infection (50%). There were no significant differences in overall graft survival and death-censored graft survival. The biopsy-proven acute rejection rate was significantly higher in the 4-6 HLA mismatches/ECD group (p = 0.011). Cox-regression multivariate analyses showed that 4-6 HLA mismatches plus ECD (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-10.56) and diabetes (AHR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.50-12.28) were significant predictors of recipient mortality. In conclusion, ≥4 HLA mismatches plus ECD were associated with significantly higher rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection and mortality compared with other groups undergoing DD kidney transplantation.

Predicting prognostic factors in kidney transplantation using a machine learning approach to enhance outcome predictions: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate forecasting of clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation is essential for improving patient care and increasing the success rates of transplants. Our study employs advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify crucial prognostic indicators for kidney transplantation. By analyzing complex datasets with ML models, we aim to enhance prediction accuracy and provide valuable insights to support clinical decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analyzing data from 4077 KT patients (June 1990 - May 2015) at a single center, this research included 27 features encompassing recipient/donor traits and peri-transplant data. The dataset was divided into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. Four ML models-eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Feedforward Neural Network, Logistic Regression, and Support Vector Machine-were trained on carefully selected features to predict the success of graft survival. Performance was assessed by precision, sensitivity, F1 score, Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC), and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve. RESULTS: XGBoost emerged as the best model, with an AUROC of 0.828, identifying key survival predictors like T-cell flow crossmatch positivity, creatinine levels two years post-transplant and human leukocyte antigen mismatch. The study also examined the prognostic importance of histological features identified by the Banff criteria for renal biopsy, emphasizing the significance of intimal arteritis, interstitial inflammation, and chronic glomerulopathy. CONCLUSION: The study developed ML models that pinpoint clinical factors crucial for KT graft survival, aiding clinicians in making informed post-transplant care decisions. Incorporating these findings with the Banff classification could improve renal pathology diagnosis and treatment, offering a data-driven approach to prioritizing pathology scores.

Immunoprotective Effect of Liver Allograft on Patients with Combined Liver and Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) and kidney transplantation (KT) after liver transplantation (LT) provide potential treatment options for patients with end-stage liver and kidney disease. There is increasing attention being given to liver-kidney transplantation (LTKT), particularly regarding the immune-protective effects of the liver graft. This retrospective, single-center, observational study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of KT in LTKT patients - either SLKT or KT after LT (KALT) - compared to KT alone (KTA). MATERIAL AND METHODS We included patients who underwent KT between January 2005 and December 2020, comprising a total of 4312 patients divided into KTA (n=4268) and LTKT (n=44) groups. The LTKT group included 11 SLKT and 33 KALT patients. To balance the difference in sample sizes between the 2 groups, we performed 3: 1 propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS There was no significant difference in graft survival between the groups. However, the LTKT group exhibited significantly superior rejection-free survival compared to the KTA group (P.

Multicenter, prospective, observational study for urinary exosomal biomarkers of kidney allograft fibrosis.

Severity of deceased donor kidney fibrosis impacts graft survival in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. Our aim was to identify potential miRNA biomarkers in urinary exosomes that mirror interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) severity. Among 109 urine samples from deceased donors, 34 displayed no IFTA in the zero-day biopsy (No IFTA group), while the remaining 75 deceased donor kidneys exhibited an IFTA score ≥ 1 (IFTA group). After analyzing previous reports and electronic databases, six miRNAs (miR-19, miR-21, miR-29c, miR-150, miR-200b, and miR-205) were selected as potential IFTA biomarker candidates. MiR-21, miR-29c, miR-150, and miR-205 levels were significantly higher, while miR-19 expression was significantly lower in the IFTA group. MiR-21 (AUC = 0.762; P < 0.001) and miR-29c (AUC = 0.795; P < 0.001) showed good predictive accuracy for IFTA. In the No IFTA group, the eGFR level at 1 week after transplantation was significantly higher compared to the IFTA group (41.34 mL/min/1.73m2 vs. 28.65 mL/min/1.73m2, P = 0.012). These findings signify the potential of urinary exosomal miRNAs as valuable biomarker candidates for evaluating the severity of IFTA in deceased donor kidneys before they undergo recovery.

Development and validation of risk prediction model for post-donation renal function in living kidney donors.

This study aimed to create and validate a predictive model for renal function following live kidney donation, using pre-donation factors. Accurately predicting remaining renal function post live kidney donation is currently insufficient, necessitating an effective assessment tool. A multicenter retrospective study of 2318 live kidney donors from two independent centers (May 2007-December 2019) was conducted. The primary endpoint was the reduction in eGFR to below 60 mL/min/m2 6 months post-donation. The primary endpoint was achieved in 14.4% of the training cohort and 25.8% of the validation cohort. Sex, age, BMI, hypertension, preoperative eGFR, and remnant kidney proportion (RKP) measured by computerized tomography (CT) volumetry were found significant in the univariable analysis. These variables informed a scoring system based on multivariable analysis: sex (male: 1, female: 0), age at operation (< 30: 0, 30-39: 1, 40-59: 2, ≥ 60: 3), preoperative eGFR (≥ 100: 0, 90-99: 2, 80-89: 4, < 80: 5), and RKP (≥ 52%: 0, < 52%: 1). The total score ranged from 0 to 10. The model showed good discrimination for the primary endpoint in both cohorts. The prediction model provides a useful tool for estimating post-donation renal dysfunction risk, factoring in the side of the donated kidney. It offers potential enhancement to pre-donation evaluations.

Living donor and recipient screening for latent tuberculosis infection by tuberculin skin test and interferon-gamma releasing assay in a country with an intermediate burden of tuberculosis.

There are few data on donor screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) using the tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma releasing assay (IGRA). In South Korea, most renal allografts involve living donors (average, 80%). Hence, we have an opportunity to evaluate donor and recipient screening for LTBI by TST and IGRA. All donors and recipients admitted for kidney transplantation during a 20-month period were evaluated prospectively by using TST and Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay. The study population consisted of 205 living donor-recipient pairs (≥16 years) including 15 (7%) who yielded indeterminate donor or recipient ELISPOT results. Of the 205 donors, 63 (31%) gave a positive TST ≥5 mm, 33 (16%) a positive TST ≥10 mm, and 96 (47%) a positive ELISPOT. Of the 205 recipients, 9 (5%) gave a positive TST ≥5 mm, 3 (2%) a positive TST ≥10 mm, and 79 (39%) had a positive ELISPOT. Of the 205 donor-recipient pairs, only 59 (29%) gave negative donor and recipient ELISPOT results and 139 (68%) negative donor and recipient TSTs (<5 mm) (P < 0.001). One third of donor-recipient pairs tends to be positive in the TST, and two thirds of the donor-recipient pairs tends to be positive in the ELISPOT. Given the high positive rate of LTBI obtained by screening donors, further studies on the clinical value of solid organ transplant donors with positive TST or ELISPOT and health economics analysis in countries with intermediate burden of TB are needed for policy decisions on isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis.

Robot-assisted kidney transplantation in a morbidly obese patient with incisional hernia reconstruction and abdominoplasty: a case report.

Performing kidney transplantations in patients with morbid obesity presents unique challenges using the conventional retroperitoneal approach. Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) offers several advantages, such as better access to hard-to-reach areas. A 56-year-old morbidly obese woman presented with end-stage renal disease due to diabetic nephropathy. The patient had a history of obesity for over 20 years, with a peak body mass index (BMI) of 46.9 kg/m2. Before transplantation, she successfully reduced her BMI to 28.9 kg/m2, but was left with excessive skin folds. The surgery began with the removal of the sac from the incisional hernia and umbilical hernia, which was then used as the site for the GelPOINT port. The da Vinci X robot system was utilized to perform RAKT. After completing RAKT, the plastic surgery team initiated abdominal reconstruction involving panniculectomy, followed by hernial reconstruction and abdominoplasty. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and she was discharged on postoperative day 7. Her creatinine level was 0.69 mg/dL, and she did not experience any episodes of rejection during the 16 months following RAKT. This case report describes the successful combination of RAKT with incisional hernia reconstruction and abdominoplasty in a patient with morbid obesity.

Comparison of long-term outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant versus simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and living donor kidney transplant.

Simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and living donor kidney transplant (SPLK) has certain advantages over conventional simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) and may be beneficial for overcoming the paucity of organs needed for diabetic patients requiring transplant. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent either SPK (n = 149) or SPLK (n = 46) in terms of pre- and post-transplantation variables, development of de novo DSA, occurrence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and graft survival rates. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the SPK and SPLK groups except for the shorter cold ischemic time of kidney grafts, shorter duration of diabetes, older age of pancreas graft-donors, and younger age of kidney graft-donors in the SPLK group. Our results showed that the death-censored pancreas graft survival rate was lower in the SPLK group. In addition, the incidence of BPAR of the pancreas graft was higher in the SPLK group. There was no significant difference in the presence of de novo DSA and the rates of kidney graft failure, kidney BPAR, and mortality. Our results show that SPLK can be considered an alternative option for SPK although higher incidences of BPAR and graft failure of pancreas after SPLK need to be overcome.

Transplant-associated Kaposi's sarcoma in a kidney allograft: a case report.

Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is a disease that is not widely known among the general public, but has a high prevalence among organ transplant recipients. Here, we present a rare case of intragraft KS after kidney transplantation. A 53-year-old woman who had been on hemodialysis due to diabetic nephropathy underwent deceased-donor kidney transplantation on December 7, 2021. Approximately 10 weeks after kidney transplantation, her creatinine level increased to 2.99 mg/dL. Upon examination, ureter kinking was confirmed between the ureter orifices and the transplanted kidney. As a result, percutaneous nephrostomy was performed, and a ureteral stent was inserted. During the procedure, bleeding occurred due to a renal artery branch injury, and embolization was performed immediately. Subsequently, kidney necrosis and uncontrolled fever developed, leading to graftectomy. Surgical findings revealed that the kidney parenchyma was necrotic as a whole, and lymphoproliferative lesions had formed diffusely around the iliac artery. These lesions were removed during graftectomy, and a histological examination was performed. The kidney graft and lymphoproliferative lesions were diagnosed as KS based on a histological examination. We report a rare case in which a recipient developed KS in the kidney allograft as well as in adjacent lymph nodes.

Evaluating anti-thymocyte globulin induction doses for better allograft and patient survival in Asian kidney transplant recipients.

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is currently the most widely prescribed induction regimen for preventing acute rejection after solid organ transplantation. However, the optimal dose of ATG induction regimen in Asian kidney recipients is unclear. Using the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry, we performed a retrospective cohort study of 4579 adult patients who received renal transplantation in South Korea and divided them into three groups according to the induction regimen: basiliximab group (n = 3655), low-dose ATG group (≤ 4.5 mg/kg; n = 467), and high-dose ATG group (> 4.5 mg/kg; n = 457). We applied the Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups (TWANG) package to generate high-quality propensity score weights for intergroup comparisons. During four-year follow-ups, the high-dose ATG group had the highest biopsy-proven acute rejection rate (basiliximab 20.8% vs. low-dose ATG 22.4% vs. high-dose ATG 25.6%; P < 0.001). However, the rates of overall graft failure (4.0% vs. 5.0% vs. 2.6%; P < 0.001) and mortality (1.7% vs. 2.8% vs. 1.0%; P < 0.001) were the lowest in the high-dose ATG group. Our results show that high-dose ATG induction (> 4.5 mg/kg) was superior to basiliximab and low-dose ATG induction in terms of graft and patient survival in Asian patients undergoing kidney transplant.

A prospective, randomized, non-blinded, non-inferiority pilot study to assess the effect of low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin with low-dose tacrolimus and early steroid withdrawal on clinical outcomes in non-sensitized living-donor kidney recipients.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) as an induction regimen in Asian living-donor kidney recipients is unclear. METHODS: This is a pilot study in which 36 consecutive patients undergoing living-donor kidney transplantation were randomly assigned to receive either 4.5 mg/kg (n = 19) or 6.0 mg/kg (n = 17) of ATG; all patients had corticosteroid withdrawal within 7 days. The primary end point was a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, de novo donor-specific antibody formation, and graft failure. RESULTS: At 12 months post-transplant, biopsy-proven acute rejection was more common in the ATG4.5 group (21.1%) than in the ATG6.0 group (0%)(P = .048). Importantly, the rate of the composite end point was significantly higher in the ATG4.5 group (36.8% vs 0%)(P = .006). There were significant differences in neither the renal function nor adverse events between the two groups. One case of death-censored graft failure occurred in the ATG4.5 group and no mortality was observed overall. Compared with pre-transplantation, T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and natural killer T (NKT) cells were significantly decreased in the first week post-transplantation except for B cells. Although T and NKT cells in both groups and NK cells in the ATG4.5 group had recovered to the pre-transplant levels, NK cells in the ATG6.0 group remained suppressed until six months post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ATG 6.0 mg/kg, ATG 4.5 mg/kg with early corticosteroid withdrawal and low dose maintenance regimen was associated with higher rates of acute rejection in non-sensitized Asian living-donor kidney recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02447822.

Hepatocellular carcinoma and cancer-related mortality after kidney transplantation with rituximab treatment.

PURPOSE: There are increased therapeutic usages of rituximab in kidney transplantation (KT). However, few studies have evaluated the effect of rituximab on cancer development following KT. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of rituximab on the cancer occurrence and mortality rate according to each type of cancer. METHODS: Five thousand consecutive recipients who underwent KT at our center were divided into era1 (1990-2007) and era2-rit- (2008-2018), and era2-rit+ (2008-2018) groups. The era2-rit+ group included patients who received single-dose rituximab (200-500 mg) as a desensitization treatment 1-2 weeks before KT. RESULTS: The 5-year incidence rates of malignant tumors after KT were 3.1%, 4.3%, and 3.5% in the era1, era2-rit-, and era2-rit+ group, respectively. The overall incidence rate of cancer after transplantation among the 3 study groups showed no significant difference (P = 0.340). The overall cancer-related mortality rate was 17.1% (53 of 310). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) had the highest mortality rate (61.5%) and relative risk of cancer-related death (hazard ratio, 8.29; 95% confidence interval, 2.40-28.69; P = 0.001). However, we found no significant association between rituximab and the incidence of any malignancy. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that single-dose rituximab for desensitization may not increase the risk of malignant disease or cancer-related mortality in KT recipients. HCC was associated with the highest risk of cancer-related mortality in an endemic area of HBV infection.