Selectively Modified Lactose and N-Acetyllactosamine Analogs at Three Key Positions to Afford Effective Galectin-3 Ligands.

Galectins constitute a family of galactose-binding lectins overly expressed in the tumor microenvironment as well as in innate and adaptive immune cells, in inflammatory diseases. Lactose ((ß-D-galactopyranosyl)-(1→4)-ß-D-glucopyranose, Lac) and N-Acetyllactosamine (2-acetamido-2-deoxy-4-O-ß-D-galactopyranosyl-D-glucopyranose, LacNAc) have been widely exploited as ligands for a wide range of galectins, sometimes with modest selectivity. Even though several chemical modifications at single positions of the sugar rings have been applied to these ligands, very few examples combined the simultaneous modifications at key positions known to increase both affinity and selectivity. We report herein combined modifications at the anomeric position, C-2, and O-3' of each of the two sugars, resulting in a 3'-O-sulfated LacNAc analog having a Kd of 14.7 µM against human Gal-3 as measured by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). This represents a six-fold increase in affinity when compared to methyl ß-D-lactoside having a Kd of 91 µM. The three best compounds contained sulfate groups at the O-3' position of the galactoside moieties, which were perfectly in line with the observed highly cationic character of the human Gal-3 binding site shown by the co-crystal of one of the best candidates of the LacNAc series.

A capture and release method based on noncovalent ligand cross-linking and facile filtration for purification of lectins and glycoproteins.

Glycan-binding proteins such as lectins are ubiquitous proteins that mediate many biological functions. To study their various biological activities and structure-function relationships, researchers must use lectins in their purest form. Conventional purification techniques, especially affinity column chromatography, have been instrumental in isolating numerous lectins and glycoproteins. These approaches, however, are time-consuming, consist of multiple steps, and often require extensive trial-and-error experimentation. Therefore, techniques that are relatively rapid and facile are needed. Here we describe such a technique, called capture and release (CaRe). The strength of this approach is rooted in its simplicity and accuracy. CaRe purifies lectins by utilizing their ability to form spontaneous noncovalently cross-linked complexes with specific multivalent ligands. The lectins are captured in the solution phase by multivalent capturing agents, released by competitive monovalent ligands, and then separated by filtration. CaRe does not require antibodies, solid affinity matrices, specialized detectors, a customized apparatus, controlled environments, or functionalization or covalent modification of reagents. CaRe is a time-saving procedure that can purify lectins even from a few milliliters of crude protein extracts. We validated CaRe by purifying recombinant human galectin-3 and five other known lectins and also tested CaRe's ability to purify glycoproteins. Besides purifying lectins and glycoproteins, CaRe has the potential to purify other glycoconjugates, including proteoglycans. This technique could also be used for nonlectin proteins that bind multivalent ligands. Given the ubiquity of glycosylation in nature, we anticipate that CaRe has broad utility.

Taxonomic similarity does not predict necessary sample size for ex situ conservation: a comparison among five genera.

Effectively conserving biodiversity with limited resources requires scientifically informed and efficient strategies. Guidance is particularly needed on how many living plants are necessary to conserve a threshold level of genetic diversity in ex situ collections. We investigated this question for 11 taxa across five genera. In this first study analysing and optimizing ex situ genetic diversity across multiple genera, we found that the percentage of extant genetic diversity currently conserved varies among taxa from 40% to 95%. Most taxa are well below genetic conservation targets. Resampling datasets showed that ideal collection sizes vary widely even within a genus: one taxon typically required at least 50% more individuals than another (though Quercus was an exception). Still, across taxa, the minimum collection size to achieve genetic conservation goals is within one order of magnitude. Current collections are also suboptimal: they could remain the same size yet capture twice the genetic diversity with an improved sampling design. We term this deficiency the 'genetic conservation gap'. Lastly, we show that minimum collection sizes are influenced by collection priorities regarding the genetic diversity target. In summary, current collections are insufficient (not reaching targets) and suboptimal (not efficiently designed), and we show how improvements can be made.

Revealing the Identity of Human Galectin-3 as a Glycosaminoglycan-Binding Protein.

Human galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a ß-galactoside-binding lectin. This multitasking protein preferentially interacts with N-acetyllactosamine moieties on glycoconjugates. Specific hydroxyl groups (4-OH, 6-OH of galactose, and 3-OH of glucose/N-acetylglucosamine) of lactose/LacNAc are essential for their binding to Gal-3. Through hemagglutination inhibition, microcalorimetry, and spectroscopy, we have shown that despite being a lectin, Gal-3 possesses the characteristics of a glycosaminoglycan (GAG)-binding protein (GAGBP). Gal-3 interacts with sulfated GAGs [heparin, chondroitin sulfate-A (CSA), -B (CSB), and -C (CSC)] and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs). Heparin, CSA, and CSC showed micromolar affinity for Gal-3, while the affinity of CSPGs for Gal-3 was much higher (nanomolar). Interestingly, CSA, CSC, and a bovine CSPG, not heparin and CSB, were multivalent ligands for Gal-3, and they formed reversible noncovalent cross-linked complexes with the lectin. Binding of sulfated GAGs to Gal-3 was completely inhibited when Gal-3 was preincubated with ß-lactose. Cross-linking of Gal-3 by CSA, CSC, and the bovine CSPG was also reversed by ß-lactose. These findings strongly suggest that GAGs primarily occupy the lactose/LacNAc binding site of Gal-3. Identification of Gal-3 as a GAGBP should help to reveal new functions of Gal-3 mediated by GAGs and proteoglycans. The GAG- and CSPG-binding properties of Gal-3 make the lectin a potential competitor/collaborator of other GAGBPs such as growth factors, cytokines, morphogens, and extracellular matrix proteins.

Rapid Detection and Purification of Galectin-3 by the Capture and Release (CaRe) Method.

Specific interactions between lectins and glycoproteins determine the outcomes of numerous biological processes. To elucidate the roles of lectins and glycoproteins in those processes, it is essential to detect these proteins in biological samples and purify them to homogeneity. Conventional protein detection and purification techniques are multi-step, time-intensive, and expensive. They often require rigorous trial and error experimentations and fairly larger volumes of crude extracts. To minimize some of these challenges, we recently formulated a new method named Capture and Release (CaRe). This method is rapid, facile, precise, and inexpensive, and it works even when the sample volume is smaller. We developed this method to detect and purify recombinant human Galectin-3 and subsequently validated this method by purifying several other lectins. Besides lectins, CaRe is capable of detecting/purifying glycoproteins. In this method, targets (lectins and glycoproteins) are captured by multivalent ligands called target capturing agents (TCAs). The captured targets are then released and separated from their TCAs to obtain purified targets. CaRe can potentially be used as a tool to discover new lectins and glycoconjugates and elucidate their functions.

Mechanism of Mucin Recognition by Lectins: A Thermodynamic Study.

Isothermal titration microcalorimetry (ITC) can directly determine the thermodynamic binding parameters of biological molecules including affinity constant, binding stoichiometry, heat of binding (enthalpy) and indirectly the entropy, and free energy of binding. ITC has been extensively used to study the binding of lectins to mono- and oligosaccharides, but limitedly in applications to lectin-glycoprotein interactions. Inherent experimental challenges to ITC include sample precipitation during the experiment and relative high amount of sample required, but careful design of experiments can minimize these problems and allow valuable information to be obtained. For example, the thermodynamics of binding of lectins to multivalent globular and linear glycoproteins (mucins) have been described. The results are consistent with a dynamic binding mechanism in which lectins bind and jump from carbohydrate to carbohydrate epitope in these molecules leading to increased affinity. Importantly, the mechanism of binding of lectins to mucins appears similar to that for a variety of protein ligands binding to DNA. Recent results also show that high-affinity lectin-mucin cross-linking interactions are driven by favorable entropy of binding that is associated with the bind and jump mechanism. The results suggest that the binding of ligands to biopolymers, in general, may involve a common mechanism that involves enhanced entropic effects that facilitate binding interactions.

A Rapid and Facile Purification Method for Glycan-Binding Proteins and Glycoproteins.

Glycosylated proteins, namely glycoproteins and proteoglycans (collectively called glycoconjugates), are indispensable in a variety of biological processes. The functions of many glycoconjugates are regulated by their interactions with another group of proteins known as lectins. In order to understand the biological functions of lectins and their glycosylated binding partners, one must obtain these proteins in pure form. The conventional protein purification methods often require long times, elaborate infrastructure, costly reagents, and large sample volumes. To minimize some of these problems, we recently developed and validated a new method termed capture and release (CaRe). This method is time-saving, precise, inexpensive, and it needs a relatively small sample volume. In this approach, targets (lectins and glycoproteins) are captured in solution by multivalent ligands called target capturing agents (TCAs). The captured targets are then released and separated from their TCAs to obtain purified targets. Application of the CaRe method could play an important role in discovering new lectins and glycoconjugates. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of crude extracts containing the target proteins from soybean flour Alternate Protocol 1: Preparation of crude extracts from Jack bean meal Alternate Protocol 2: Preparation of crude extracts from the corms of Colocasia esculenta, Xanthosoma sagittifolium, and from the bulbs of Allium sativum Alternate Protocol 3: Preparation of Escherichia coli cell lysates containing human galectin-3 Alternate Protocol 4: Preparation of crude extracts from chicken egg whites (source of ovalbumin) Basic Protocol 2: Preparation of 2% (v/v) red blood cell suspension Basic Protocol 3: Detection of lectin activity of the crude extracts Basic Protocol 4: Identification of multivalent inhibitors as target capturing agents by hemagglutination inhibition assays Basic Protocol 5: Testing the capturing abilities of target capturing agents by precipitation/turbidity assays Basic Protocol 6: Capturing of targets (lectins and glycoproteins) in the crude extracts by target capturing agents and separation of the target-TCA complex from other components of the crude extracts Basic Protocol 7: Releasing the captured targets (lectins and glycoproteins) by dissolving the complex Basic Protocol 8: Separation of the targets (lectins and glycoproteins) from their respective target capturing agents Basic Protocol 9: Verification of the purity of the isolated targets (lectins or glycoproteins).