Empiric slow pathway ablation in non-inducible supraventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: The data supporting the practice of empiric slow pathway ablation (ESPA) in patients with documented supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) who are non-inducible at electrophysiology study (EPS) is limited. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of ESPA in adults. METHODS: A multi-center cohort study of patients who had ESPA between January 2008 and October 2013 was performed. Patients were identified by screening sequential SVT ablation procedures. RESULTS: Forty-three (5%) out of 859 SVT ablation procedures were identified as ESPA. The median age was 53 (IQR: 24) years; 63% were female. All patients had pre-EPS documentation of SVT (either strip or ECG). In 23 (53.5%) cases, pre-EPS ECG showed short RP tachycardia. Thirty-two (74.4%) patients had dual atrioventricular nodal physiology (DAVNP) plus echo beats. Junctional rhythm (JR) as procedural endpoint was noted in 39 (90.7%) patients. In 18 (41.9%) patients, the abolishment of DAVNP was achieved. No complications were encountered. A median follow-up of 17 months (range: 6 to 31 months) revealed 83.7% (36 of 43) success rate, defined as the absence of pre-procedural symptoms and any documented sustained arrhythmia. As compared to patients with recurrence (n=7), patients with no recurrence (n=36) had significantly higher prevalence of clinical short RP tachycardia (61.1% vs. 14.3%, p=0.038), and EPS finding of DAVNP plus echo beats (80.6% vs. 42.9%, p=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: ESPA is a reasonable approach in patients with documented SVT, in particular in short RP tachycardia, who are not inducible at EPS. Larger studies are required to assess this practice.

Magnetic resonance estimates of the extent and heterogeneity of scar tissue in ICD patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy predict ventricular arrhythmia.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation under current guidelines never develop sustained ventricular arrhythmia; therefore, better markers of risk for sustained ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation are needed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify cardiac magnetic resonance arrhythmic risk predictors of ischemic cardiomyopathy before ICD implantation. METHODS: Forty-three subjects (mean age, 64.5 ± 11.9 years) with previous myocardial infarction who were referred for ICD implantation were evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI protocol included left ventricular functional parameter assessment using steady-state free precession and late gadolinium enhancement MRI using inversion recovery fast gradient echo. Left ventricular functional parameters were measured using cardiac magnetic resonance software. Subjects were followed up for 6-46 months, and the events of appropriate ICD treatments (shocks and antitachycardia pacing) were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients experienced 46 spontaneous episodes during a median follow-up duration of 30 months. The total myocardial infarct (MI) size (18.05 ± 11.44 g vs 38.83 ± 19.87 g; P = .0006), MI core (11.63 ± 7.14 g vs 24.12 ± 12.73 g; P = .0002), and infarct gray zone (6.43 ± 4.64 g vs 14.71 ± 7.65 g; P = .0004) were significantly larger in subjects who received appropriate ICD therapy than in those who did not experience an episode of ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation. Multivariate regression analyses for the infarct gray zone and MI core adjusted for New York Heart Association class, diabetes, and etiology (primary or secondary prevention) revealed that the gray zone and MI core were predictors of appropriate ICD therapies (P = .0018 and P = .007, respectively). CONCLUSION: The extent of MI scar may predict which patients would benefit most from ICD implantation.