2015-2021 Industry Payments to Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons: Analysis of Trends and Characteristics of Top-earning Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of industry payments to pediatric orthopaedic surgeons last occurred in 2017. We investigated payments to pediatric orthopaedic surgeons from 2015 to 2021 to understand surgeon characteristics associated with increased industry payments. METHODS: Open Payments Database datasets from 2015 to 2021 were queried for nonresearch payments to pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. Annual aggregates and subcategories were recorded. For surgeons receiving payments in 2021, the Hirsch index (h-index), gender, and US census division were found using the Scopus database, Open Payments Database, and online hospital profiles, respectively. χ 2 , Fisher exact, Mann-Whitney U , and t tests were used to compare surgeons in the top 25%, 10%, and 5% payment percentiles to the bottom 75%, 90%, and 95%, respectively. RESULTS: Payments rose 125% from 2015 to 2021. Education, royalties, and faculty/speaker increased most, while travel/lodging, honoraria, charitable contributions, and ownership interest decreased. Only royalties increased from 2019 to 2021. In 2021, of 419 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons receiving industry payments, men received greater median aggregate payments than women ($379.03 vs. $186.96, P =0.047). There were no differences in gender proportions between the top 75% and bottom 25% ( P =0.054), top 10% and bottom 90% ( P =0.235), and top 5% and bottom 95% ( P =0.280) earning comparison groups. The h-index was weakly positively correlated with industry payments ( rs =0.203, P <0.001). Mean h-indices in the 75th ( P <0.001, 95% CI: 2.62-7.65), 90th ( P =0.001, 95% CI: 3.28-13.03), and 95th ( P =0.005, 95% CI: 4.25-21.11) percentiles were significantly higher. Proportions of surgeons from the Middle Atlantic and West South Central in the 90th ( P =0.025) and 95th percentiles ( P =0.033), respectively, were significantly lower compared to all other regions. A higher proportion of surgeons from the Pacific were placed in the 90th ( P =0.004) and 95th ( P =0.024) percentiles. CONCLUSIONS: Industry payments to pediatric orthopaedic surgeons rose from 2015 to 2021. Most categories fell from 2019 to 2021, which may be related to the SARS-CoV-19 pandemic. In 2021, though gender was not related to aggregate payment percentile, location in select US census divisions and h-index was. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-Retrospective study.

The effect of surgical time on perioperative complications in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cases. A propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSIF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be lengthy and complication-ridden. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgical time on perioperative complications in this procedure when controlling for confounding variables with propensity score analysis. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved review of electronic health records from 2010 to 2019 at a single tertiary care children's hospital. Patients undergoing PSIF were grouped into "short" (< 6 h) or "long" (≥ 6 h) surgical time groups. Outcome measures were estimated blood loss (EBL), cell saver transfusions, packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions, length of stay (LOS), intraoperative monitoring (IOM) alerts, hematocrit, ICU transfer, neurologic loss, surgical site infection, and 90-day readmissions. We controlled for age, sex, BMI, curve severity, number of segments fused, and surgeon factors. RESULTS: After propensity score matching there were 113 patients in each group. The short surgical time group had lower EBL (median 715, IQR 550-900 vs median 875, IQR 650-1100 cc; p < 0.001), received less cell saver blood (median 120, IQR 60-168 vs median 160, IQR 97-225 cc; p = 0.001), received less intraoperative pRBCs (median 0, IQR 0-0 vs median 0, IQR 0-320, p = 0.002), had shorter average LOS (4.8 ± 1.7 vs 5.4 ± 2.5 days; p = 0.039), and fewer IOM alerts (4.3% vs 18%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with shorter surgical times had less blood loss, received less transfused blood, had a shorter LOS, and fewer IOM alerts compared to patients with longer surgical times. Surgical times < 6 h may have safety and efficacy advantages over longer times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.