Pseudoachalasia: a systematic review of the literature.

Pseudoachalasia, also known as secondary achalasia, is a clinical condition mimicking idiopathic achalasia but most commonly caused by malignant tumors of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Our aim was to systematically review and present all available data on demographics, clinical features, and diagnostic modalities involved in patients with pseudoachalasia. A systematic search of literature published during the period 1978-2019 was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (end-of-search date: June 25th, 2019). Two independent reviewers extracted data with regards of study design, interventions, participants, and outcomes. Thirty-five studies met our inclusion criteria and were selected in the present review. Overall, 140 patients with pseudoachalasia were identified, of whom 83 were males. Mean patient age was 60.13 years and the mean weight loss was 13.91 kg. A total of 33 (23.6%) patients were wrongly 'treated' at first for achalasia. The most common presenting symptoms were dysphagia, food regurgitation, and weight loss. The median time from symptoms' onset to hospital admission was 5 months. Most common etiology was gastric cancer (19%). Diagnostic modalities included manometry, barium esophagram, endoscopy, and computed tomography (CT). Pseudoachalasia is a serious medical condition that is difficult to be distinguished from primary achalasia. Clinical feature assessment along with the correct interpretation of diagnostic tests is nowadays essential steps to differentiate pseudoachalasia from idiopathic achalasia.

Severe oesophageal disease and its associations with systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: Severe oesophageal disease in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), referred as scleroderma oesophagus, is characterised by ineffective or absent peristalsis along with hypotensive oesophagogastric junction (hEGJ). The associations between scleroderma oesophagus and different clinical and laboratory manifestations of SSc is still controversial. In this study we aimed to assess associations between scleroderma oesophagus, diagnosed by high resolution manometry (HRM), and other manifestations of disease. METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive SSc patients (49 women, mean age 50.6±11.6) with oesophageal symptoms underwent clinical interview, medical records review and HRM. HRMs were analysed according to the Chicago Classification in order to provide oesophageal motility diagnosis; EGJ <9 mmHg was considered hypotensive. Demographic characteristics, patient-reported symptoms, SSc subtypes, pulmonary fibrosis, cutaneous ulcers, and anti-Scl-70 positivity were compared between SSc patients with or without scleroderma oesophagus. Comparison was also performed in computed tomography (CT) findings of oesophageal lumen in 26 patients with available data. Oesophageal dilatation was deemed present when the diameter was >9 mm. RESULTS: Absent contractility was present in 37 (68.5%) patients; among these patients hEGJP was found in 32, thus 32/54 (59.2%) patients had classic scleroderma oesophagus. There were no associations with gender, age, oesophageal symptoms, skin involvement extent, anti-Scl-70, pulmonary fibrosis and cutaneous ulcers. Notably, oesophageal dilation on chest CT was more frequent in patients with scleroderma oesophagus compared to those without (77% vs. 7%, p=0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Scleroderma oesophagus diagnosed by HRM was present in less than 2/3 of symptomatic patients with SSc and associated only with oesophageal dilation in CT. Although further studies are needed, oesophageal dilation on chest CT may be a non-invasive alternative for evaluation of SSc patients with oesophageal symptoms.

Patients with cardinal symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis. Prejudice affects clinical practice .

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia and bolus impaction are the cardinal manifestations of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Esophageal biopsy sampling is mandatory for EoE diagnosis, data though suggest that clinician do not always obtain biopsies from patients with cardinal EoE symptoms during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy even if no other entity than EoE can explain patients symptoms. We aimed to search for the esophageal biopsy procurement rate as also for factors that drive clinicians to obtain esophageal biopsies among patients with cardinal EoE symptoms. METHODS: We retrospectively searched for patients with cardinal EoE symptoms submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy between 1/2018 and 12/2023 in our department. Epidemiologic, clinical, endoscopic, and histological data were analyzed. RESULTS: In total 163 patients with cardinal EoE symptoms (dysphagia: 63 and bolus impaction: 100) were included in the study (M/F: 100/63, mean age: 54 ±â€…22 years). Biopsy sampling was obtained in 77/163 (47.2%) patients and sampling rates did not differ between patients with bolus impaction or dysphagia (47/100, 47% vs 30/63, 47.6%, P  = 0.553). Higher rates of sampling were observed in males ( P  = 0.045), those younger than 65 years old ( P  < 0.001) and patients with endoscopic EoE signs ( P  = 0.004). Age and endoscopic findings compatible to EoE were independently correlated to biopsy sampling. EoE was diagnosed in 35/74 patients (47.3%); the majority of patients were male, with a bolus impaction episode, compatible endoscopic findings and all were younger than 65 years old. CONCLUSION: Clinicians take esophageal biopsies in half of patients with cardinal EoE. Age and supportive endoscopic evidence drive clinicians' decision to obtain esophageal biopsies.

Efficacy of citalopram or amitriptyline versus no treatment in patients with functional chest pain.

Background: Functional chest pain (FCP) is characterized by the presence of chest pain of presumed esophageal origin, but with a negative workup on routine investigations, including ruling out gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Antidepressants are frequently prescribed to treat FCP and are presumed to act as neuromodulators of visceral hypersensitivity. However, there is little evidence of their efficacy in patients with FCP. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy of citalopram or amitriptyline vs. no treatment in patients with FCP. Methods: Esophageal diseases, including GERD, eosinophilic esophagitis and major esophageal motility disorders, were excluded. Thus, patients with established FCP according to Rome IV criteria were included in the study. Then, patients treated for at least 3 months with citalopram 20 mg, amitriptyline 50 mg, or observation were selected. The primary endpoint was complete disappearance or significant amelioration of symptoms at the end of treatment. Results: Over a 5-year period, 102 patients (74 female; mean age 49±10 years) were diagnosed with FCP and were recognized to have received once daily citalopram (n=32), amitriptyline (n=34), or no treatment (n=36). After a 3-month follow up, improvement in chest pain was reported by 16 (47.1%) patients treated with citalopram, 18 (56.3%) patients treated with amitriptyline, and 4 (11.1%) patients without treatment (P=0.02 and 0.01 for no treatment vs. citalopram and amitriptyline therapy, respectively). Conclusion: Both citalopram and amitriptyline are effective pharmacological options in the symptomatic relief of almost 50% patients with well characterized FCP.

Inflammatory infiltration of metaplastic epithelium and correlation to previous diagnosis of esophagitis and Barrett's length.

OBJECTIVE: The contact of the gastric refluxate with the lower esophagus results in an inflammatory-mediated tissue damage. The role of inflammation both in the development and in the advance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) has not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess the inflammatory infiltration in metaplastic Barrett's epithelium and to explore the association of microscopic inflammation to healed esophagitis and Barrett's length. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Inflammatory infiltration was qualitatively evaluated in well-characterized Barrett's specimens. Esophagitis was healed prior to histological sampling. Univariate comparative analysis was performed based on BE length. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients (78 male, mean age 58.3 ± 13.3 yrs) were retrospectively studied. Thirty-three cases with long segment BE (LSBE) (33.7%) were spotted. Inflammatory infiltration was mild, moderate, and severe in 35 (35.7%), 54 (55.1%), and 9 (9.1%) specimens, respectively. The samples with moderate/severe inflammatory infiltration were obtained from patients who had more frequently been diagnosed with esophagitis (p = 0.025). Hiatal hernia (p = 0.001), esophagitis (p = 0.019), and previous use of anti-secretory drugs (p = 0.005) were more common in LSBE. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory infiltration of Barrett's epithelium was largely moderate despite preceding healing of erosions with PPIs. Previous diagnosis of esophagitis correlated to the degree of inflammation. No association of inflammation to Barrett's length was established.

Increased expression of VEGF, COX-2, and Ki-67 in Barrett's esophagus: does the length matter?

BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a major complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease due to its neoplastic potential. The length of the metaplastic epithelium has been associated with cancer risk. Angiogenesis, inflammation, and increased cell proliferation are early events in the malignant sequence. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and Ki-67 are indirect markers of these complex mechanisms. AIMS: To examine the expression of VEGF, COX-2 and Ki-67 in BE and investigate whether there is an association to Barrett's length. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for VEGF, COX-2, and Ki-67 was performed in well-characterized Barrett's samples, evaluated using a qualitative scale and compared between long (LSBE) and short (SSBE) segments. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 98 patients (78 men). LSBE and SSBE was diagnosed in 33 (33.7%) and 65 (66.3%) cases, respectively. VEGF was expressed in vascular endothelium of all Barrett's specimens. COX-2 and Ki-67 expression in metaplastic epithelia was strong in 81.6 and 61.2% of the samples, respectively. Ki-67 expression was significantly stronger in LSBE (p = 0.035), whereas VEGF expression was significantly increased in SSBE (p = 0.031). COX-2 expression was not associated with Barrett's length. CONCLUSIONS: VEGF, COX-2, and Ki-67 were overexpressed in the majority of Barrett's samples. The length was inversely associated with VEGF expression and directly associated with Ki-67 expression.

The Lyon Consensus Criteria for GERD Diagnosis in a Greek Population: The Clinical Impact and Changes in GERD Diagnosis in a Real-World, Retrospective Study.

(1) Introduction/aim: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects 8−33% globally. The gold standard examination technique in diagnosing GERD is 24 h pHmetry ± impedance. Recently, new diagnostic criteria were introduced by the Lyon Consensus for GERD diagnosis. Our aim was to investigate the diagnostic yield of pHmetry + impedance using the Lyon Consensus criteria in a real-world study. (2) Patients and methods: Our study included 249 consecutive patients (M/F: 120/129, mean age 50 ± 15 years) who underwent 24 h pH+ impedance monitoring in our department, during a 5-year period. Epidemiological, endoscopic, clinical, and 24 h pH+ impedance data were retrospectively collected. (3) Results: Typical GERD symptoms were reported by 140/249 (56.2%) patients, whereas 99/249 (39.6%) patients reported various extraesophageal symptoms. Endoscopic findings supportive of GERD based on the Lyon Consensus were present in 42/185 (22.7%). An AET value of >6% was observed in 60/249 (24.1%). GERD diagnosis according to the Lyon Consensus criteria was set in 63/249 (25.3%) patients; a rate significantly lower than that observed by implementing the older criteria (32.1%), p < 0.001. In the multivariate analysis, the existence of endoscopic findings supportive of GERD diagnosis as defined by the Lyon Consensus (p = 0.036), a De Meester score of over 14.7, and the presence of typical GERD symptoms were correlated to GERD diagnosis (p < 0.001, respectively) using the criteria defined for pH−impedance monitoring. (4) Conclusions: Changes in the diagnostic criteria concerning the 24 h pH−impedance monitoring of GERD based on the Lyon Consensus led to a conclusive GERD diagnosis in approximately 25% of the patients. This rate of GERD diagnosis is reduced in comparison to the one confirmed with the use of previously established criteria.

Hellenic consensus on Helicobacter pylori infection.

The Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology recently organized the "Hellenic consensus on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection". The aim of this publication is to report the guidelines in order to aid the national gastroenterology community in the management of H. pylori infection. Forty-one delegates from all Greek regions, including gastroenterologists, pathologists, clinical microbiologists, epidemiologists and basic scientists, were invited to this meeting. The participants were allocated to 1 of the 4 main topics of the meeting: i.e., H. pylori diagnosis and association with diseases; H. pylori and gastric cancer; H. pylori and extragastric associated disorders; and H. pylori treatment. The results of each subgroup were submitted to a final consensus vote that included all participants. Relevant data based on international and Greek publications were presented, and the quality of evidence, strength of recommendation, and level of consensus were graded. The cutoff level of 70% was considered as acceptance for the final statement. It is hoped that the recommendations and conclusions of this report will guide Greek doctors in their daily practice concerning the management of H. pylori infection.

The effect of gastroesophageal flap valve appearance on the management of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of anti-reflux treatment in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients classified according to esophagogastric junction morphology (Hill classification). RESULTS: A symptom score and endoscopic grading of gastrooesophageal flap valve appearance were determined in 49 symptomatic patients (female 26, male 23; mean age 49 years, range 21-76 years). Patients received 8 weeks of continuous rabeprazole at a daily dose of 20 mg and, upon symptom control, continued with on-demand treatment for 3 months. The mean symptom score at 8 weeks was significantly reduced in all groups. However, at the end of the on-demand therapy, patients with Hill grade IV had used more rabeprazole tablets than those in the two other groups (II: 10.86 +/- 14.52, III: 14.73 +/- 14.58, IV: 25.78 +/- 15.85; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous treatment is effective in all groups of patients with reflux disease. Grading patients according to the gastroesophageal flap valve appearance is useful as a prognostic factor, especially when on-demand therapy is considered to be an option.

The 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone improves esophageal motor function and symptoms in systemic sclerosis: a 4-week, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute administration of the oral 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone, which is commonly used as an anxiolytic drug, may improve compromised lower esophageal sphincter function. In an open-label trial we assessed the effects of buspirone on esophageal motor function and symptoms in patients with esophageal involvement associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with SSc and symptomatic esophageal involvement, despite treatment with proton pump inhibitors, underwent high resolution manometry and chest computed tomography for assessment of motor function and esophageal dilatation, respectively. Regurgitation, heartburn, dysphagia, and chest pain severity was subjectively scored by visual analog scales. Manometric parameters (primary endpoint) and symptom severity (secondary endpoint) were re-examined after 4-week daily administration of 20 mg buspirone. Other medications remained unchanged. RESULTS: Eight patients did not complete the trial because of buspirone-associated dizziness (n = 2), or nausea (n = 2), or reluctancy to undergo final manometry. In the remaining 22 patients lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure increased from 7.7 ± 3.9 to 12.2 ± 4.6 mmHg (p = 0.00002) after buspirone administration; other manometric parameters did not change. Statistical analysis revealed negative correlation between individual increases in resting LES pressure and supra-aortic esophageal diameter (r = -0.589, p = 0.017), suggesting a more beneficial effect in patients with less severely affected esophageal function. Heartburn and regurgitation scores decreased at 4 weeks compared to baseline (p = 0.001, and p = 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings warrant more conclusive evaluation with a double-blind controlled study; however, buspirone could potentially be given under observation for objective improvement in all patients with SSc who report reflux symptoms despite undergoing standard treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02363478 Registered: 21-02-2014.

Beneficial effect of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone on esophageal dysfunction associated with systemic sclerosis: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) carries significant morbidity and is empirically managed with domperidone, albeit with questionable efficacy. The oral 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone may enhance esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function in healthy volunteers. AIM: We aimed to test the hypothesis that buspirone may exert a beneficial acute effect on esophageal motor dysfunction in symptomatic patients with SSc. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with SSc reporting esophageal symptoms underwent high-resolution manometry before and 30 minutes after administration of buspirone (10 mg). Ten other patients received domperidone (10 mg) and served as control group. Changes in LES resting and residual pressure, amplitude, duration, and velocity of distal esophageal body contractions were examined. RESULTS: Esophageal hypomotility and hypotensive LES was found in 63% and 67% of patients, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including baseline manometric parameters, were comparable between groups. Resting pressure of LES increased after buspirone from 9.42 ± 2.6 to 11.53 ± 3.4 mmHg (p = 0.0002 by paired t-test), but not after domperidone; a trend for increase of amplitude of contractions was also observed after buspirone (p = 0.09). Comparison of the individual changes revealed that buspirone was superior to domperidone in enhancing LES pressure ( + 2.11 ± 2.0 versus -0.45 ± 2.3 mmHg, p = 0.006). No significant effects of either drug were noted on other examined parameters of esophageal function. CONCLUSION: The beneficial acute effect of buspirone on impaired LES function associated with SSc suggests a role of 5-HT1A receptor-mediated interactions in these patients. Prospective studies to examine whether buspirone is of long-term therapeutic value for SSc-associated esophageal disease are warranted.

Combined use of metallic endoclips and endoloops using a single-channel scope in closing iatrogenic perforations and fistulas: two case reports and a literature review.

Iatrogenic perforation of the gastrointestinal tract is a rare complication of endoscopic procedures, whereas anastomotic leakage after surgery is not uncommon. Both conditions are associated with gut wall defects leading to significant morbidity and mortality of the patients. We describe two case reports, a colonic perforation and an esophagogastric anastomosis leakage successfully managed endoscopically using the combined technique with endoclips and endoloops. A literature review is performed on similar endoscopic techniques aiming to avoid surgical treatment in these patients.

Elevated intraesophageal pressure in patients with achalasia: a common and important manometric finding.

There is a subgroup of patients with achalasia in which manometry shows elevated intraesophageal pressure, expressed by elevation of esophageal baseline relative to gastric pressure. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of elevated intraesophageal pressure in patients with achalasia and its relationship to clinical, radiographic, endoscopic, and other manometric findings. Manometric studies of 62 patients with achalasia were analyzed and elevated intraesophageal pressure was considered any positive elevation of esophageal baseline relative to gastric pressure. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors associated with elevated intraesophageal pressure. Elevated intraesophageal pressure was found in 32 patients (51.6%). Lower esophageal sphincter pressure was the only independent variable associated with elevated intraesophageal pressure (P = 0.0167). Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly higher in patients with elevated compared to those with normal intraesophageal pressure (34 +/- 1.96 vs 26.5 +/- 1.73 mm Hg; P = 0.006). In addition, lower esophageal sphincter pressure had a positive correlation with intraesophageal pressure (r = 0.49, P < 0.001). Conversely, no correlation was found between elevated intraesophageal pressure and various symptoms, disease duration, radiologic dilation, a finding of retained fluid during endoscopy, and esophageal length. We conclude that elevated intraesophageal pressure is a common manometric finding in patients with achalasia, with a prevalence of 51.6%, and is associated with significantly higher lower esophageal sphincter pressure.