Prognostic significance of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I-II endometrial carcinoma patients who underwent lymphadenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial carcinoma, the most common gynecologic carcinoma, has an excellent prognosis post-surgery when diagnosed early. The role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in stages I-II endometrial carcinoma remains controversial. This study assesses the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in improving prognosis for these patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1223 stage I-II endometrial carcinoma patients who underwent surgical treatment including total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymph-node biopsy or dissection across four Jikei University School of Medicine-affiliated facilities between 2001 and 2018. Patients were divided into low intermediate risk (LIR) and high intermediate risk (HIR) groups based on recurrence risk. Propensity score matching adjusted for various covariates was used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not. RESULTS: The study included 443 eligible patients, with 288 in the LIR group and 155 in the HIR group. Post propensity score matching, no significant difference in PFS or OS was observed between the observation and adjuvant chemotherapy groups within both risk categories. Notably, the 5-year OS for LIR was 97.6% in the observation group and 96.7% in the chemotherapy group; for HIR, the 5-year OS was similarly high with no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy does not significantly contribute to the improvement of recurrence or prognosis in patients with stage I-II endometrial carcinoma who are categorized outside the low-risk group and have no lymph-node metastasis.

Re-thinking the prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Whether abnormal peritoneal cytology (PC) is an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer (EC) remains controversial. This study aimed to re-think the prognostic significance of PC in not only all EC patients but also in various subgroups with similar clinicopathological and biological characteristics. METHODS: EC patients who underwent primary surgery of at least a hysterectomy and were pathologically diagnosed with EC in four hospitals affiliated with the Jikei University School of Medicine were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic significance of PC was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses in the entire cohort and subgroups stratified by surgical stages (early/advanced stages), tumor types (types 1/2), and risk classifications (low/intermediate/high). RESULTS: Of 1963 EC cases, 1616 met the inclusion criteria. Positive PC was identified as an adverse prognostic factor in analyses of all EC cases and in all subgroup analyses stratified by surgical stages and tumor types. In survival curve comparisons, the progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival in early-stage patients with positive PC were clearly located between those of stage II patients with negative PC and stage III patients. In the subgroup analyses stratified by risk classification in early-stage EC, positive PC was related to poorer PFS in the intermediate- and high-risk groups but not in the low-risk group. CONCLUSION: PC status was an independent prognostic factor of EC in all stages and tumor types. Early PC-positive cases, except for the low-risk group, may be recommended for upstaging and should be carefully managed compared with PC-negative cases.

A retrospective study of dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin plus bevacizumab (ddTC+Bev) with ddTC for advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 134 patients who received ddTC+Bev or ddTC as first-line chemotherapy for stage III-IV ovarian cancer. Progression-free survival as primary endpoint of this study was compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to analyze prognostic factors, and the frequency of adverse events was examined using the χ² test. RESULTS: We categorized 134 patients in the ddTC+Bev (n=57) and ddTC (n=77) groups who started treatment at four related institutions from November 2013 to December 2017. No patients used poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors as the first line maintenance therapy. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the ddTC+Bev group had a significantly better prognosis than that of the ddTC group (hazard ratio [HR]=0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.32-0.79; p<0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that ddTC+Bev regimen was a prognostic factor. However, intergroup comparison using PSM revealed that the PFS of the ddTC+Bev group had a nonsignificantly better prognosis than that of the ddTC group (HR=0.70; 95% CI=0.41-1.20; p=0.189). Few adverse events above G3 were noted for ddTC+Bev, which were sufficiently tolerable. CONCLUSION: This study could not demonstrate that adding Bev to ddTC improves prognosis. Further studies with more cases are warranted.

Laparoscopic Surgery for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia with Awareness Regarding the Possibility of Endometrial Cancer.

Objectives: Although atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) is considered a precancerous disease, the frequency with which AEH and endometrial cancer (EC) coexist is not low. Broadly, total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is performed for treating AEH; however, it is unclear what perioperative precautions need to be taken. This study aimed to clarify the points to be considered when performing TLH for AEH. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified 57 patients who underwent TLH for AEH in our hospitals. We extracted data on clinical characteristics, preoperative examinations (endometrial sampling and diagnostic imaging), surgical procedures, and final pathological diagnoses. Then, we statistically analyzed the difference in clinicopathological features and preoperative examinations between patients postoperatively diagnosed with EC and those diagnosed with AEH. Results: Twenty patients (35%) who underwent TLH for AEH were diagnosed with EC postoperatively (16 [28%] with stage IA EC and four [7.0%] with stage IB EC). We found no significant differences in clinical characteristics and preoperative evaluations between patients postoperatively diagnosed with EC and those diagnosed with AEH. The group with stage IB EC had a significantly higher median age and a significantly higher proportion of postmenopausal patients and patients with adenomyosis. Conclusion: It is important to recognize the risk of coexisting EC when performing TLH for AEH. High-precision endometrial sampling and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging are recommended for diagnosing AEH. In addition, surgical procedures for AEH are required to prevent cancer spillage in consideration of its coexistence, such as tubal sealing before manipulator insertion or avoiding using manipulator.