Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 39(11): 848-852, 2023 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36728549

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Debriefing in the pediatric emergency department (PED) is an invaluable tool to improve team well-being, communication, and performance. Despite evidence, surveys have reported heavy workload as a barrier to debriefing leading to missed opportunities for improvement in an already busy ED. The study aims to determine the association between the incidence of debriefing after pediatric trauma resuscitations and PED crowding. METHODS: A total of 491 Trauma One activations in Riley Children's Hospital Pediatric Emergency Department that presented between April 2018 to December 2019 were included in the study. Debriefing documentations, patient demographics, time and date of presentation, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, disposition from PED, and length of stay (LOS) were collected and analyzed. The National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale score at arrival, Average LOS, total PED census, total PED waiting room census, and rates of left without being seen were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 491 Trauma One activations presented to our PED, 50 (10%) trauma evaluations had documented debriefing. The National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale score at presentation was significantly lower in those with debriefing versus without debriefing. In addition, the PED hourly census, waiting room census, average LOS, and left without being seen were also significantly lower in the group with debriefing. In addition, trauma cases with debriefing had a higher proportion of patients with profound injuries and discharges to the morgue. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric emergency department crowding is a significant barrier to debriefing after trauma resuscitations. However, profound injuries and traumatic pediatric deaths remain the strongest predictors in conducting debriefing regardless of PED crowding status.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Resucitación , Humanos , Niño , Tiempo de Internación , Carga de Trabajo , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Aglomeración , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 39(1): 1-5, 2023 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36279221

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Widespread Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae immunization has decreased occult bacteremia and bacterial meningitis rates. Practice has evolved in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) to favor fewer diagnostic tests for and empiric treatment of invasive bacterial infection. We lack evidence-based guidance on evaluation and treatment of unimmunized (UnI) or underimmunized (UnderI) febrile children. This study aims to determine how parental report of immunization status in febrile PED patients impacts rates of diagnostic testing, interventions, and hospital admissions. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study with chart review of encounters of children aged 3 to 36 months presenting to an academic, tertiary care PED in 2019 using International Classification of Diseases-10 code for fever (R50.9). Inclusion criteria were documented fever of 38°C and higher and well appearance. Encounters were excluded if there was a history of chronic illness or documentation of ill appearance or hemodynamic instability. Encounters were grouped by provider-documented immunization status. Fischer exact test and logistic regression compared rates of diagnostic testing (serum, urine or cerebrospinal fluid laboratory studies, and chest radiographs), interventions (intravenous fluid bolus, intravenous antibiotic or steroid administration, respiratory support, or breathing treatment), and hospital admissions between UnderI, UnI, and fully immunized (FI) groups. RESULTS: Of the 1813 encounters reviewed, 1093 (60%) included provider-documented immunization status and 788 (43%) met final inclusion criteria: 23 (2.1%) UnI, 44 (5.8%) UnderI, and 721 (92.1%) FI. The UnderI and UnI children experienced significantly higher rates of laboratory evaluation including complete blood count and blood culture, medical intervention, and antibiotic prescriptions while in the PED. No significant differences were observed for rates of chest radiographs, hospital admissions, or 72-hour PED return visits. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of laboratory testing and interventions were observed in UnderI and UnI versus FI febrile patients at a PED, likely demonstrating increased clinical suspicion for invasive bacterial infection in this group despite lacking national guidelines. Given continued vaccine hesitancy, further studies are needed for guiding management of febrile UnI and UnderI children presenting for emergency care.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Fiebre , Humanos , Niño , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fiebre/diagnóstico , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
3.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(1): e12-e16, 2022 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32658116

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the impact of opening an inpatient child psychiatric unit in an urban tertiary care pediatric emergency department (PED). DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of pediatric patients seen in the PED at a large tertiary care center who presented for a primary psychiatric concern before opening of the inpatient psychiatric unit within the same hospital and 6 months following, allowing for a 6-month adjustment period. Patients were identified via query of the ED Cube model, an institutional database by a "behavioral health" flag that is documented in triage. Patients were excluded if subsequent chart review did not reveal a psychiatric concern and the patient did not undergo psychiatric evaluation during the PED visit. Charts were reviewed for baseline patient demographics, psychiatric interventions performed, and disposition. Additional flow metrics obtained were PED volume, percentage of psychiatric visits, and length of stay for both psychiatric-related visits compared with the general population. RESULTS: Visits to the PED for psychiatric evaluation increased 135% from 91 to 226 after initiation of an inpatient psychiatric unit. There was no difference in baseline patient demographics or rate of medical/mechanical restraints used. Percentage of behavioral health patients admitted to medical units decreased, although overall admission rate remained stable. Length of stay for behavioral health patients was longer after opening of the unit and remained significantly higher than the general population before opening of the inpatient unit, 363 minutes versus 177 minutes, respectively, and further lengthened after to 418 minutes versus 188 minutes. DISCUSSION: Patients presenting for psychiatric evaluation are a significant burden to PED flow both in volume and time for evaluation and boarding. This is to the detriment of patients seeking appropriate mental health services and to the rest of patients in the PED. Both inpatient and outpatient psychiatric services are overwhelmed creating a downstream affect; limited resources delays disposition and increases boarding in the PED. Further resources are needed to appropriately address psychiatric concerns, such as dedicated psychiatric holding units and brief PED interventions targeted to safety planning and interventions.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Pacientes Internos , Niño , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Headache ; 54(2): 335-42, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24512578

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Migraine headache is a common presenting condition to the pediatric emergency department (PED). Dopamine receptor antagonists, such as prochlorperazine and metoclopramide, serve as the primary treatment for migraine headache in many emergency departments; however, in 2012, our institution experienced a shortage of these drugs, resulting in the use of alternative medications. Chlorpromazine was included as an option for treatment at our institution during this shortage, although limited data exist on the effectiveness in children. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were: (1) to compare the treatment failure rate of chlorpromazine in the treatment of migraine headache in youth presenting to the PED with those who received prochlorperazine; and (2) to identify the frequency and type of adverse events, and change in pain score. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients 12-21 years of age treated for migraine headache in our emergency department. Our treatment group received intravenous chlorpromazine between February and April 2012, while the comparison group consisted of children treated with intravenous prochlorperazine between February and April 2011. The outcomes of interest were: (1) treatment failure, defined as need for additional therapy, hospitalization or 48-hour return; (2) adverse reactions to drug therapy; and (3) change in pain score. RESULTS: This study yielded 75 patients in the treatment group and 274 in the comparison group. Forty percent (30/75) of the treatment group had treatment failure compared with 15% (41/274) of the comparison group. There was no difference in mean change in pain score between the groups. The most common adverse effects included hypotension in the treatment group (12%) and akathisia in the comparison group (12%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that has examined the use of chlorpromazine as a therapy in pediatric migraines. Abortive therapy for migraine headache in the PED with chlorpromazine is associated with greater need for rescue medication and hospitalization, and higher rates of hypotension.


Asunto(s)
Clorpromazina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Pediatría , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metoclopramida/uso terapéutico , Dimensión del Dolor , Proclorperazina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 30(8): 546-51, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25062292

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine if motivation to quit is associated with parental smoker's perceived presence of a personal or child health illness or risk due to tobacco use. DESIGN/METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of 218 parental smokers who presented to the pediatric emergency department with their child. We assessed factors related to motivation to quit, including personal and child smoking-related illness, perceived personal and child health risk, smoking behaviors, and demographic characteristics. Motivation to quit was measured using the Contemplation Ladder score. RESULTS: The mean score on the Contemplation Ladder was 6.2 (SD, 2.5), representing the response: thinking about cutting down or quitting . Eighty-four participants (39%) had high motivation to quit (Contemplation Ladder score 8). Bivariate analysis showed significant associations between high motivation to quit and perceived child health risk with continued smoking and perceived personal and child health benefit following smoking cessation. Parents with high motivation to quit were more likely to have high perceived self-efficacy and confidence in their ability to quit, prior quit attempts, and lower nicotine dependence. With the exception of race/ethnicity, demographic variables were not associated with motivation to quit. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of parental smokers who present to the pediatric emergency department endorse strong motivation to quit. Parents who endorse health risk or quitting-related health benefits in their child are more likely to have high motivation to quit smoking. Future studies are needed to determine if high motivation translates into smoking cessation.


Asunto(s)
Motivación , Padres/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos
7.
Appl Clin Inform ; 14(3): 487-493, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37054982

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In September 2021, a military camp in the United States was identified for an initial relocation of over 6,600 Afghanistan refugees. This case report describes a novel use of existing health information exchange to expedite and provide health care for a large refugee population throughout the state during the duration of their entry into the United States. METHODS: Medical teams of the health systems and military camp partnered to provide a scalable, reliable mechanism for clinical data exchange leveraging an existing regional health information exchange. Exchanges were evaluated for clinical type, originating source, and closed loop communication with the refugee camp and personnel military camp. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of the camp residents were under the age of 18 years. Over 20 weeks, approximately 4.51% of the refugee camp residents were cared for in participating health systems. A total of 2,699 clinical data messages were exchanged, 62% of which were clinical documents. CONCLUSION: All health systems participating in care were offered support to utilize the tool and process set up using the regional health information exchange. The process and guiding principles may be applied to other refugee health care efforts to provide efficient, scalable, and reliable means of clinical data exchange to health care providers in similar situations.


Asunto(s)
Intercambio de Información en Salud , Refugiados , Humanos , Estados Unidos
8.
Cureus ; 14(8): e28109, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36158353

RESUMEN

Background Recent studies have shown a higher incidence of complications from acute appendicitis in Hispanic populations. Hispanic ethnicity alone has been shown to be a risk factor. In contrast, one study found little evidence of racial disparities in complication rates. The objective of this study was to identify physician bias regarding whether ethnicity drives further testing after initial radiologic imaging has been obtained in the evaluation of appendicitis in our pediatric emergency department (PED). The use of computed tomography (CT) scan in the diagnosis of appendicitis was compared between Hispanic versus non-Hispanic populations when ultrasound (US) was indeterminate. Methodology This is a retrospective cohort study of Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients aged 2-18 who presented to the PED with right lower quadrant abdominal pain over a one-year period (January 1, 2017 to December 29, 2017). Both groups were subdivided into positive, negative, or indeterminate US findings for appendicitis. Each subgroup was analyzed based on those who had CT imaging done. Results A total of 471 ultrasounds were performed, 162 Hispanic and 309 non-Hispanic patients. Indeterminate US scans were documented in 90/162 (56%) Hispanic versus 155/309 (50%) non-Hispanic patients. Of those with indeterminate US scans, 30% Hispanic versus 32% non-Hispanic patients received CT scans. Negative US scans were documented in 54/162 (33%) Hispanic versus 102/309 (33%) non-Hispanic patients. Of those with negative US scans, 7% Hispanic versus 5% non-Hispanic patients received CT scans. Chi-square analysis comparing both the proportion of CT scans received for indeterminate US scans (p=0.71) and negative US scans (p=0.52) showed no statistical significance. Conclusions There was no significant difference in the number of CT scans ordered for indeterminate US scans between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients. One can infer that there is no inherent bias toward ordering advanced imaging in Hispanic children based on ethnicity alone.

9.
Arch Dis Child ; 103(9): 835-840, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29117964

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine clinical variables in children tested for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) that predict PE+ outcome for the development of paediatric PE prediction rule. METHODS: Data were collected by query of a laboratory database for D-dimer from January 2004 to December 2014 for a large multicentre hospital system and the radiology database for pulmonary vascular imaging in children aged 5-17. Using explicit, predefined methods, trained abstractors, determined if D-dimer was sent in the evaluation of PE and then recorded predictor data which was tested for association with PE+ outcome using univariate techniques. RESULTS: D-dimer was ordered in 526 children for clinical suspicion of PE. Thirty-four of 526 were PE+ (6.4%, 95% CI 4.3% to 8.7%). The radiology database identified 17 additional patients with PE (n=51 PE+ total). Children evaluated for PE were primarily in the ED setting (80%), teenagers (88%) and 2:1 female:male. Children with PE had higher mean heart and higher respiratory rate and a lower pulse oximetry and haemoglobin concentration. On univariate analysis, five conditions were more frequent in PE+ compared with no PE: surgery, central line, limb immobility, prior PE or deep vein thrombosis and cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of PE diagnosis in children with D-dimer was 6.4%, similar to that seen in adults; most children with PE are over 13 years and had clinical predictors known to increase probability of PE in symptomatic adults. Future studies should use these criteria to develop a clinical decision rule for PE in children.


Asunto(s)
Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Biomarcadores/sangre , Niño , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Indiana/epidemiología , Masculino , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Respiratoria/fisiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Arch Dis Child ; 103(9): 832-834, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29117965

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We sought to measure the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer in children with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: We queried our electronic medical record for quantitative D-dimer values obtained in all children ages 5-17 over 10 years in our 10-hospital system. Patients who had a D-dimer obtained in the evaluation of PE underwent supervised chart review to extract baseline demographics (age, sex, ethnicity), medical history, laboratory data and imaging results. PE was confirmed by imaging positive for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE and excluded by imaging or no DVT or PE diagnosis within 90 days. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, we identified 13 792 orders for D-dimer testing in 2554 unique patients. Chart review indicated that 526 (20.6%) unique patients had D-dimer testing performed in the evaluation of PE (Cohen's kappa=0.95, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.0). Most D-dimers (465/526, 88%) were ordered in children aged >12 years. Of these 526 children, 34 (6.4%, 95% CI) had a criterion standard positive for new or recurrent PE. The mean D-dimer value was 2104±1394 ng/mL in the 34/34 PE+ children and 586±962 ng/mL in PE- children with a sensitivity of 34/34 (100%, 89% to 100%) and a specificity of 290/492 (58%, 54% to 63%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.90 ((0.9)87-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: D-dimer is currently ordered in children for suspected PE in the emergency care setting, mostly in teenagers. The observed lower limit 95% CIs of 89% and 54% for diagnostic sensitivity and the specificity, respectively, suggest if used in patients with low-clinical probability, a normal D-dimer can safely exclude PE in children.


Asunto(s)
Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Biomarcadores/sangre , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico
11.
Thromb Res ; 168: 1-4, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29864629

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The pulmonary embolism rule out criteria (PERC) reliably predicts a low probability of PE in adults. We examine the diagnostic accuracy of the objective components of the PERC rule in children previously tested for PE. METHODS: Children aged 5-17 who had a D-dimer or pulmonary vascular imaging ordered from 2004 to 2014 in a large multicenter hospital network were identified by query of administrative databases. Using explicit, predefined methods, trained abstracters selected charts of children clearly tested for PE, collected the 8 objective variables for PERC, and determined PE criterion standard status (image or autopsy confirmed PE or deep vein thrombosis within 30 days by query of the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC)). RESULTS: We identified 543 patients, including 56 (10.3%, 95% CI: 7.8-13.1%) who were PE+, with a mean and median age of 15 years. All 8 objective criteria from PERC were negative in 170 patients (31%), including one with PE (false negative rate 0.6%, 0-3.2%). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 98.2% (90.5-100%), and 34.7 (30.5-39.1%), respectively, leading to a likelihood ratio negative = 0.05 (0.1-0.27). When treated as a diagnostic test based upon sum of criteria positive, PERC had good discrimination between PE+ vs PE- with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.81 (0.75-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of children and teenagers with suspected PE, the PERC rule was negative in 31%, and demonstrated good overall diagnostic accuracy, including a low false negative rate. These data support the need for a large, prospective diagnostic validation study of PERC in children.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Embolia Pulmonar/patología
12.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 50(6): 529-34, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21262757

RESUMEN

Asthma remains a common cause for presentation to the emergency department. Multiple clinical asthma scores (CAS) have been developed to assess the severity of an asthma exacerbation. The objective of this retrospective study was to determine if adoption of a CAS and asthma guidelines identifies patients with more severe asthma and to identify factors that predict the need for hospital admission. The results identified the admission rates in the pre- and post-CAS groups to be similar. Within the post-CAS group, patients requiring admission received more aggressive therapy and were frequently hypoxic on initial presentation. In conclusion, CAS aids in identifying severe asthma exacerbations. Lack of response to aggressive therapy or hypoxia on initial presentation should prompt the emergency department physician to arrange for admission.


Asunto(s)
Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Admisión del Paciente/normas , Asma/complicaciones , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoxia/etiología , Hipoxia/terapia , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA