Efficacy of sedation with dexmedetomidine plus propofol during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: During endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer, patient body movement can sometimes occur, which may cause discontinuation of the procedure. Propofol and dexmedetomidine have recently been found to be useful sedatives for endoscopic submucosal dissection. This study investigated whether sedation using propofol plus dexmedetomidine can suppress the patient's body movements during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection and compared this combination with sedation using propofol alone. METHODS: This was a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial. Patients with superficial esophageal cancers who underwent esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection at Yokohama City University Hospital were prospectively enrolled and were randomly assigned to the propofol and the propofol plus dexmedetomidine groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of restlessness. The secondary endpoints were the satisfaction score, maintenance dose of propofol, and number of rescue propofol injections. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (propofol group: n = 33; combination group: n = 33) were included. The combination group had a significantly lower incidence of restlessness than the propofol group (3.0% vs 27.3%, P = 0.02). In the combination group, the satisfaction scores of the endoscopists were significantly higher, the maintenance dose of propofol was significantly lower, and the number of rescue propofol injections was lower than those in the propofol group (3.0% vs 18.2%, P < 0.001). Although the incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in the combination group (30.3% vs 3.0%, P < 0.01), no serious adverse effects occurred. CONCLUSION: The propofol plus dexmedetomidine combination provided excellent sedation that effectively suppressed the patient's body movements during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Comparison of computed tomography findings with clinical risks factors for endoscopic therapy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding cases.

Several risk scoring systems exist for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). The clinical Rockall score (clinical RS) and the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) are major risk scores that consider only clinical data. Computed tomography (CT) findings are equivocal in non-variceal UGIB. We compared CT findings with clinical data to predict mortality, rebleeding and need for endoscopic therapy in non-variceal UGIB patients. This retrospective, single-center study included 386 patients admitted to our emergency department with diagnosis of non-variceal UGIB by urgent endoscopy between January 2009 and March 2015. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate CT findings and risk factors derived from clinical data. CT findings could not significantly predict mortality and rebleeding in non-variceal UGIB patients. However, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in CT findings better predicted the need for endoscopic therapy than clinical data. The adjusted odds ratios were 10.10 (95% CI 5.01-20.40) for clinical RS and 10.70 (95% CI 5.08-22.70) for the GBS. UGI hemorrhage in CT findings could predict the need for endoscopic therapy in non-variceal UGIB patients in our emergency department. CT findings as well as risk score systems may be useful for predicting the need for endoscopic therapy.

Continued Use of a Single Antiplatelet Agent Does Not Increase the Risk of Delayed Bleeding After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

BACKGROUND: With the aging of the population and rising incidence of thromboembolic events, the usage of antiplatelet agents is also increasing. There are few reports yet on the management of antiplatelet agents for patients undergoing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether continued administration of antiplatelet agents is associated with an increased rate of delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD. METHODS: A total of 1022 colorectal neoplasms in 927 patients were dissected at Yokohama City University Hospital and its three affiliate hospitals between July 2012 and June 2017. We included the data of 919 lesions in the final analysis. The lesions were divided into three groups: the no-antiplatelet group (783 neoplasms), the withdrawal group (110 neoplasms), and the continuation group (26 neoplasms). RESULTS: Among the 919 lesions, bleeding events occurred in a total of 31 (3.37%). The rate of bleeding after ESD was 3.3% (26/783), 4.5% (5/110), and 0% (0/26), respectively. There were no significant differences in the rate of bleeding after ESD among the three groups (the withdrawal group vs. the no-antiplatelet group, the continuation group vs. the no-antiplatelet group, and the withdrawal group vs. the continuation group). CONCLUSIONS: Continued administration of antiplatelet agents is not associated with any increase in the risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD. Prospective, randomized studies are necessary to determine whether treatment with antiplatelet agents must be interrupted prior to colorectal ESD in patients who are at a high risk of thromboembolic events.

Comparison of the early effects of vonoprazan, lansoprazole and famotidine on intragastric pH: a three-way crossover study.

To promote symptom relief from acid-related diseases, a medicine with a rapid-onset effect is ideal. The aim of this study was to investigate the early inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion after a single oral administration of vonoprazan, which represents a new class of proton pump inhibitors, and to compare this effect with those of lansoprazole and famotidine. Ten Helicobacter pylori (HP)-negative male subjects participated in this randomized, three-way crossover study. A single oral administration of vonoprazan (20 mg), lansoprazole (30 mg) or famotidine (20 mg) was performed, and the intragastric pH was continuously monitored for 6 h. Each drug was administered at least seven days apart. The average intragastric pH during the 6-h period after the administration of famotidine was higher than that after the administration of lansoprazole (median: 4.45 vs 2.65; p = 0.0284). A similar result was observed for vonoprazan and lansoprazole (median: 4.30 vs 2.65; p = 0.0322). In conclusions, oral administration of vonoprazan and famotidine in HP-negative healthy male subjects caused the intragastric pH to rise more quickly than did lansoprazole. (Trial Registration: UMIN000020989).

Assessment of colonic contents in patients with chronic constipation using MRI.

Although chronic constipation is common, colonic functional evaluating tests are uncommon. This study examines whether chronic constipation and gastrointestinal symptoms are correlated with the lateral diameter of the colon measured from MRI images. We included chronic constipation patients in a prospective, cross-sectional study using MRI at three centers. We divided 3D MRI colorectal images into 6 segments using with specified sequences and selected the maximum luminal diameter from each segment. We used the GSRS questionnaire to evaluate gastrointestinal symptoms. We evaluated the correlation between luminal diameters and GSRS scores. We found the following positive correlations: descending colon and unsatisfactory defecation symptoms; sigmoid colon and diarrhea; and rectum and constipation. The sum and ratio of the ascending and sigmoid colon diameters correlated with nausea and diarrhea. The sum of the transvers to the sigmoid colon diameter also correlated with nausea and diarrhea. The sum of all segment diameters correlated with nausea and constipation. In conclusion, we showed cross-sectional study of colonic MRI correlate with gastrointestinal symptoms. MRI might be useful for colonic motility evaluations to determine appropriate constipation treatments (Clinical trial registry number UMIN 000021274).

The α-glucosidase inhibitor voglibose stimulates delayed gastric emptying in healthy subjects: a crossover study with a 13C breath test.

The gastrointestinal effects of α-glucosidase inhibitors have not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to determine whether a single dose of pre-prandial voglibose might affect the rate of gastric emptying, determined using the 13C breath test. Ten healthy male volunteers participated in this randomized, two-way crossover study. The subjects fasted overnight and received 0.2 mg voglibose or a placebo 2 h before a test meal. They were then served a liquid test meal consisting of 200 kcal per 200 ml that contained 100 mg 13C-acetate. Breath samples were collected under both conditions until 150 min after the meal. A comparison of the control and voglibose conditions revealed that for gastric emptying rates (with values expressed as median: range), T1/2 [(87.9: 78.0-104.9 min) vs (88.4: 74.3-106.3 min), p = 1], Tlag [(47.1: 39.6-60.1 min) vs (45.4: 31.2-63.3 min), p = 0.432], ß [(1.89: 1.68-2.18) vs (1.90: 1.35-2.15), p = 0.846] and κ [(0.81: 0.71-0.98) vs (0.81: 0.50-0.94), p = 0.922] did not significantly differ between conditions. A significant difference between the control and voglibose conditions was found for the GEC [(4.28: 4.09-4.44) vs (4.06: 3.69-4.50), p = 0.0138]. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the ingestion of oral voglibose led to delayed gastric emptying of a liquid meal.

Feasibility of deep sedation with a combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine hydrochloride for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sedation with a combination of propofol (PF) and dexmedetomidine (DEX) compared with sedation with benzodiazepines in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data for 40 consecutive patients who had undergone esophageal ESD at the Yokohama City University Hospital between July 2012 and August 2014. Of these patients, 20 were sedated with benzodiazepines (conventional group) and another 20 patients were sedated with a combination of PF and DEX (combination group). Parameters for efficacy and safety of sedation were evaluated by comparisons between the two groups. RESULTS: Median procedural times in the combination group were shorter than those in the conventional group (61 min vs. 89 min, P = 0.03), and the percentage of patients who showed restlessness in the combination group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (25% vs. 65%, P = 0.025). Incidences of hypotension and bradycardia in the combination group were higher than those in the conventional group (60% vs. 15%, P = 0.008, and 60% vs. 15%, P = 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study suggests that a combination of PF and DEX may provide stable deep sedation with less body movement than benzodiazepines during esophageal ESD.

[A case of HER2-positive gastric cancer successfully treated with trastuzumab plus capecitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy as third-line treatment].

A 67-year-old woman was diagnosed as having advanced gastric cancer(poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma)with multiple liver metastases. She had received combined S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy as first-line treatment and weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy as second-line treatment, however, both had eventually proved ineffective. Because the gastric cancer was HER2-positive, she was treated with trastuzumab plus capecitabine plus cisplatin(XP)chemotherapy as third-line treatment. The primary lesion and liver metastatic lesions were confirmed to show remarkable regression. The ToGA trial revealed increased efficacy of trastuzumab in first-line treatment of cancers showing high expression levels of the HER2- protein. This case suggested the increased efficacy of trastuzumab in third-line treatment. Neutropenia and hand foot syndrome of grade 2 were all reported adverse events. She could receive trastuzumab plus XP chemotherapy safely by dose reduction or dormancy temporarily of capecitabine.

Computed diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with high b-values in the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions.

PURPOSE: The diagnosis of gallbladder lesions remains challenging. The efficacy of computed diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with high b-values and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of computed DWI with high b-values and the combination of computed DWI and ADC in differentiating malignant and benign gallbladder lesions. METHODS: Sixty patients (comprising 30 malignant and 30 benign lesions) who underwent magnetic resonance imaging for gallbladder lesions were included in this retrospective study. Qualitative evaluations were performed using conventional DWI with b1000, computed DWI with b1500, b1000 DWI/ADC, and computed b1500 DWI/ADC, and their diagnostic performances were compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of computed b1500 DWI/ADC were 90% (27/30), 80% (24/30), and 85% (51/60), respectively. The accuracy of computed b1500 DWI/ADC was higher than that of conventional b1000 DWI (52%, 31/60, p < 0.001), computed b1500 DWI (72%, 43/60, p = 0.008), and b1000 DWI/ADC (78%, 47/60, p = 0.125). The specificity of computed b1500 DWI/ADC was also higher than that of conventional b1000 DWI (7%, 2/30, p < 0.001), computed b1500 DWI (47%, 14/30, p = 0.002), and b1000 DWI/ADC (67%, 20/30, p = 0.125). No significant difference was observed in the sensitivity between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that computed DWI with high b-values combined with ADC can improve diagnostic performance when differentiating malignant and benign gallbladder lesions. Computed diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with high b-values in the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions. *Computed DWI with b1500 combined with ADC can improve diagnostic performance when differentiating gallbladder lesions compared with conventional methods (b1000 DWI).

Prognostic Impact of Sarcopenia in Patients With Biliary Tract Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.

AIM: Sarcopenia affects the treatment of various cancer types but its impact on chemotherapy efficacy and prognosis in biliary tract cancer remains unclear. Thus, we evaluated whether sarcopenia independently affects the outcome of chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 50 patients who underwent chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer at two affiliated centres were retrospectively analysed. The association of clinical factors, including sarcopenia, with overall survival and time to treatment failure was analysed. RESULTS: Sarcopenia was an independent factor negatively influencing overall survival and time to treatment failure in univariate and multivariate analyses (median overall survival, sarcopenic vs. non-sarcopenic patients: 10.6 vs. 16.6 months; hazard ratio=2.19, p=0.018; time to treatment failure: 5.3 vs. 13.1 months, hazard ratio=2.50, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia may affect the efficacy of chemotherapy and prognosis in biliary tract cancer. Thus, improving sarcopenia may improve the prognosis of patients with biliary tract cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Clinical impact of evaluation of frailty in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in elderly patients.

AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) is performed safely and effectively in elderly patients; however, whether ESD for EGC in elderly patients with frailty is safe and improves prognosis remains unclear. METHODS: In total, 142 patients aged ≥80 years who underwent ESD for EGC between September 2008 and September 2014 were included. We compared outcomes between patients with frailty and those without frailty. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) based on a patient's status before admission. Study endpoints were short- and long-term clinical outcomes after ESD. RESULTS: Patients were allocated into two groups: no frailty (CFS 1-3, n = 101) versus frailty (CFS 4-7, n = 41). Short-term clinical outcomes, specifically, adverse events and curability, did not differ between the two groups. For the long-term clinical outcomes, patients with frailty had significantly worse outcomes after ESD than those without frailty (the 3-year overall survival rates were 73.2% vs. 93.1%; P < 0.001 with log-rank test). The Cox proportional hazards model showed that frailty was only an independent risk factor for poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: ESD for EGC is safe for elderly patients with or without frailty. However, elderly patients with frailty have a significantly poorer prognosis than those without frailty after ESD. Our results indicate that the frailty evaluation may be helpful to determine whether ESD for EGC should be performed. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 461-466.

Investigation of the Local Recurrence Rate after Colorectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Is Incomplete Polyp Resection Really a Clinically Important Problem? Analysis of the Rationale for the "Resect and Discard" Strategy.

Background/Aims: The "Resect and Discard" strategy is a potentially useful strategy. At present, only the lesion size and accuracy of diagnosis are cited as considerations for clinical adoption of this strategy. On the other hand, histopathology of the resected specimens after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) reveals often an unclear or positive-margin status, implying Incomplete Polyp Resection (IPR). If IPR indeed increased the risk of local recurrence, histopathological evaluation of the margin would be indispensable and clinical adoption of this strategy is difficult. The aim of this study is to verify the association between IPR and the risk of local recurrence. Methods: The 1872 polyps and 603 EMR cases in 597 patients who had EMR between May 2013 and May 2014 were enrolled. The local recurrence rate until 3 years after the EMR in cases with the target lesions of the "Resect and Discard" strategy was determined in the negative-margin and IPR groups. Results: The final analysis was performed using the data of 1092 polyps, and 222 were categorized into the IPR group. There were no cases of recurrence in either of the groups. Conclusion: This is the world's first report conducted to examine the correlation of IPR and the local recurrence rate for clinical practice of "Resect and Discard" strategy. There is the possibility that pathological evaluation of the margins after EMR in patients with small polyps can be skipped.

Can sedation using a combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine enhance the satisfaction of the endoscopist in endoscopic submucosal dissection?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to evaluate and compare the satisfaction of the endoscopist along with the effectiveness and safety of sedation between sedation protocol using a combination of propofol (PF) and dexmedetomidine (DEX) (Combination group) and sedation protocol using PF alone (PF group) during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with gastric neoplasias scheduled for gastric ESD were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two groups. The satisfaction scores of the endoscopists and the parameters for the effectiveness and safety of sedation were evaluated by comparisons between the two groups. RESULTS: The satisfaction scores of the endoscopists, which were measured using a visual analogue scale, were significantly higher in the Combination group than in the PF group (88 vs. 69, P  = 0.003). The maintenance dose of PF was lower in the Combination group than in the PF group (2 mg/kg/h vs. 5 mg/kg/h, P  < 0.001), and the number of rescue PF injections was fewer in the Combination group than in the PF group (2 times vs. 6 times, P  < 0.001). The incidence of bradycardia (defined as a pulse rate ≤ 45 bpm) in the Combination group was higher than that in the PF group (37.9 % vs. 10.3 %, P  = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that gastroenterologist-directed sedation using a combination of PF and DEX during gastric ESD can enhance the satisfaction levels of endoscopists by providing stable sedation with an acceptable safety profile.

Early effect on intragastric pH of oral administration of rabeprazole with mosapride compared with rabeprazole alone.

BACKGROUND: An ideal medication for acid-related diseases would offer prompt stopping of blood flow as well as efficient symptom resolution. The aim of this study was to investigate the gastric acid suppression potency of a single oral dose of rabeprazole alone, compared with administration of rabeprazole plus mosapride. METHODS: Twelve male volunteers, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-negative, participated in this randomized, three-way crossover study. After a single oral administration of rabeprazole, rabeprazole with mosapride, or rabeprazole administered 1 h after mosapride, we monitored their intragastric pH constantly for 6 h. A 7-day washout period was allowed between each administration. RESULTS: The median 6-h intragastric pH after the administration of rabeprazole 1 h after mosapride was 4.41±1.22 (mean±s.d.), significantly higher than after rabeprazole alone 3.45±1.33, P=0.0376). There was no significant difference between the median 6-h pH after the administration of rabeprazole plus mosapride and that after rabeprazole alone (3.81±0.98 vs. 3.45±1.33, respectively; P=0.0927). CONCLUSION: An oral dose of rabeprazole administered 1 h after mosapride increased the intragastric pH more rapidly than rabeprazole alone, in healthy, male, H. pylori-negative volunteers.

Lubiprostone improves visualization of small bowel for capsule endoscopy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled 2-way crossover study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Lubiprostone has been reported to be an anti-constipation drug. The aim of the study was to investigate the usefulness of lubiprostone both for bowel preparation and as a propulsive agent in small bowel endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover study of subjects who volunteered to undergo capsule endoscopy (CE). A total of 20 subjects (16 male and 4 female volunteers) were randomly assigned to receive a 24-µg tablet of lubiprostone 120 minutes prior to capsule ingestion for CE (L regimen), or a placebo tablet 120 minutes prior to capsule ingestion for CE (P regimen). Main outcome was gastric transit time (GTT) and small-bowel transit time (SBTT). Secondary outcome was adequacy of small-bowel cleansing and the fluid score in the small bowel. The quality of the capsule endoscopic images and fluid in the small bowel were assessed on 5-point scale. RESULTS: The capsule passed into the small bowel in all cases. Median GTT was 57.3 (3 - 221) minutes for the P regimen and 61.3 (10 - 218) minutes for the L regimen ( P  = 0.836). Median SBTT was 245.0 (164 - 353) minutes for the P regimen and 228.05 (116 - 502) minutes for the L regimen ( P  = 0.501). The image quality score in the small bowel was 3.05 ±â€Š1.08 for the P regimen and 3.80 ±â€Š0.49 for the L regimen ( P  < 0.001). The fluid score in the small bowel was 2.04 ±â€Š1.58 for the P regimen and 2.72 ±â€Š1.43 for the L regimen ( P  < 0.001). There was a significant difference between the 2 regimens with regard to image quality. The fluid score was more plentiful for the L regimen than for the P regimen. There were no cases of capsule retention or serious adverse events in this study. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that use of lubiprostone prior to CE significantly improved visualization of the small bowel during CE as a result of inducing fluid secretion into the small bowel.

Evaluation of endoscopic findings for discriminating between early carcinomas and low-grade adenomas in superficial elevated gastric lesions.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to determine the useful endoscopic findings in a differential diagnosis between early carcinomas (EC) and low-grade adenomas (LGA) in superficial elevated gastric epithelial neoplasia during conventional endoscopy with white-light imaging (C-WLI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated 270 consecutive cases of superficial elevated gastric epithelial neoplasias, which were removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection. The pathological diagnostic criteria were based on the revised Vienna classification: category 4 (mucosal high-grade neoplasia) or 5 (submucosal invasion by carcinoma) lesions were diagnosed as EC, while category 3 (mucosal low-grade neoplasia) lesions were diagnosed as LGA. The association between the postoperative pathological diagnoses (EC or LGA) and the following endoscopic findings: localized site, lesion size, color (reddish or whitish), shape (smooth, petal, or irregular), and presences of depression, erosion, ulceration, or nodularity on the surface, were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 270 epithelial neoplasias, 222 (58 LGA and 164 EC) were retrospectively evaluated. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the lesion size [odds ratio (OR), 1.216; p<0.001) and reddish color (OR, 5.274; p<0.001) were independent findings for EC. CONCLUSION: The lesion size and reddish color were useful optical findings for discriminating between EC and LGA.

Can magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging discriminate between carcinomas and low grade adenomas in gastric superficial elevated lesions?

Background and study aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the capability of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) to discriminate between early carcinomas (EC) and low grade adenomas (LGA) in gastric superficial elevated epithelial neoplasias. Patients and methods: We investigated 100 consecutive cases of gastric superficial elevated epithelial neoplasias that were removed using endoscopic submucosal dissection. The pathological diagnostic criteria were based on the revised Vienna classification; category 4 (mucosal high grade neoplasia) and category 5 (submucosal invasion by carcinoma) lesions were diagnosed as EC, whereas category 3 (mucosal low grade neoplasia) lesions were diagnosed as LGA. The associations between the postoperative pathological diagnoses and the ME-NBI findings were analyzed, and included the shape, specification, and area of irregularity in the microvascular architecture (MV) and the microsurface structure (MS). Results: Seventy-nine EC and 21 LGA cases diagnosed postoperatively were evaluated retrospectively. The lesion size (median; range (mm)) was significantly larger in the EC group (14; 2 - 95) compared to the LGA group (5; 2 - 16) (P < 0.001). Wavy forms in the MV shapes (P = 0.031), extension in the MV specifications (P = 0.035), and area with MV irregularity (P = 0.001) were found to be statistically significant predictive findings for EC. Villous forms in the MS shapes (P = 0.026), enlargement in the MS specifications (P = 0.044), and area with MS irregularity (P = 0.021) were also found to be statistically significant predictive findings for EC. The rates of preoperative sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of ME-NBI for discriminating EC were 86.1 %, 38.9 %, and 75 %, respectively. Conclusions: The present study suggests that ME-NBI is useful for the differential diagnosis of EC and LGA in gastric superficial elevated epithelial neoplasias. STUDY REGISTRATION: UMIN000012925.

Lubiprostone decreases the small bowel transit time by capsule endoscopy: an exploratory, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled 3-way crossover study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of lubiprostone for bowel preparation and as a propulsive agent in small bowel endoscopy. Six healthy male volunteers participated in this randomized, 3-way crossover study. The subjects received a 24 µg tablet of lubiprostone 60 minutes prior to the capsule ingestion for capsule endoscopy (CE) and a placebo tablet 30 minutes before the capsule ingestion (L-P regimen), a placebo tablet 60 minutes prior to CE and a 24 µg tablet of lubiprostone 30 minutes prior to CE (P-L regimen), or a placebo tablet 60 minutes prior to r CE and a placebo tablet again 30 minutes prior to CE (P-P regimen). The quality of the capsule endoscopic images and the amount of water in the small bowel were assessed on 5-point scale. The median SBTT was 178.5 (117-407) minutes in the P-P regimen, 122.5 (27-282) minutes in the L-P regimen, and 110.5 (11-331) minutes in the P-L regimen (P = 0.042). This study showed that the use of lubiprostone significantly decreased the SBTT. We also confirmed that lubiprostone was effective for inducing water secretion into the small bowel during CE.