Activities and participation after primary total hip arthroplasty; posterolateral versus direct anterior approach in 860 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the past decade, a shift occurred in surgical total hip arthroplasty (THA) approaches to the posterolateral (PLA) and direct anterior approach (DAA). Comparisons of postoperative activities and participation between surgical approaches for THA are sparse. We therefore investigated the association between PLA and DAA for THA regarding the construct "activity and participation" (ICF model) during the first postoperative year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational cohort study on osteoarthritis patients scheduled for primary THA in 2 hospitals. Questionnaires to assess the ICF domain "activity and participation" were completed preoperatively, and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (HOOS Activities of daily living (ADL) and Sport and Recreation Function (SR), Hospital for Special Surgery Hip Replacement Expectations Survey, and questions regarding return to work). Each hospital exclusively performed one approach (PLA [Alloclassic-Zweymüller stem] or DAA [Taperloc Complete stem]) for uncemented THA. Hospital was included as instrumental variable, thereby addressing bias by (un)measured confounders. Adjusted mixed-effect models were used, stratified by employment. RESULTS: Total population: 238 PLA (24% employed) and 622 DAA (26% employed) patients. At 12 months, the PLA group had a lower ADL score (-7, 95% CI -12 to -2 points). At 6 months, significantly fewer PLA patients had fulfillment of the expectation sports-performance (OR = 0.3, CI 0.2-0.7]. Other outcomes were comparable. Employed population: At 6 and 12 months, PLA patients scored clinically lower on ADL (respectively -10, CI -19 to 0 and -9, CI -19 to 0 points) and SR (respectively -13, CI -21 to -4 and -9, CI -18 to -1 points). At 6 months, fewer PLA patients fulfilled the expectation joining recreational activities (OR = 0.2, CI 0.1-0.7]. Fulfillment of other expectations was comparable between groups. PLA patients less often returned to work within 3 months (31% vs. 45%), but rates were comparable at 12 months (86% vs. 87%). INTERPRETATION: Overall, functional recovery regarding "activity and participation" was comparable for PLA and DAA. Among employed patients, DAA resulted in better functional recovery and more fulfillment of expectations compared with PLA patients. DAA might also facilitate faster return to work.

Comparison of KOOS Scores of Middle-Aged Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty to the General Dutch Population Using KOOS Percentile Curves: The LOAS Study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the application of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) percentile curves, using preoperative and postoperative data of patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We used Longitudinal Leiden Orthopedics Outcomes of Osteo-Arthritis study data of patients between 45 and 65 years and undergoing primary TKA. KOOS scores (0-100) were obtained preoperatively and 6, 12, and 24 months after TKA. Preoperative knee radiographs were assessed according to Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) in a subset (37%) of patients. Comorbidities were self-reported using a standardized questionnaire. The median (interquartile range) population-level KOOS scores were plotted on previously developed population-based KOOS percentile curves. In addition, we assessed the application of the curves on patient level and investigated differences in scores between patients with preoperative KL scores ≤2 and ≥3 and presence (vs absence) of comorbidities. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 853 patients (62% women, mean age 59 years, body mass index 30 kg/m2) with knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA. Preoperatively, median KOOS scores of all subscales were at or below the 2.5th percentile. Scores increased to approximately the 25th percentile 12 months postoperatively. Greater improvements were observed in pain and less improvements in sport and recreational function and quality of life. Patients with higher preoperative KL scores and without comorbidities showed greater improvements. CONCLUSION: The KOOS percentile curves provided visual insights in knee complaints of patients relative to the general population. Furthermore, the KOOS percentile curves give insight in how preoperative patient characteristics are correlated with postoperative results.

Five-year migration and insert wear of uncemented tibial components with either conventional polyethylene or sequentially annealed highly crosslinked polyethylene inserts: a blinded randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis.

The primary objective of this study was to compare the five-year tibial component migration and wear between highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) inserts and conventional polyethylene (PE) inserts of the uncemented Triathlon fixed insert cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondary objectives included clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A double-blinded, randomized study was conducted including 96 TKAs. Tibial component migration and insert wear were measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at three, six, 12, 24, and 60 months postoperatively. PROMS were collected preoperatively and at all follow-up timepoints. There was no clinically relevant difference in terms of tibial component migration, insert wear, and PROMs between the HXLPE and PE groups. The mean difference in tibial component migration (maximal total point migration (MTPM)) was 0.02 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.07 to 0.11), which is below the value of 0.2 mm considered to be clinically relevant. Wear after five years for HXLPE was 0.16 mm (95% CI 0.05 to 0.27), and for PE was 0.23 mm (95% CI 0.12 to 0.35). The mean difference in wear rate was 0.01 mm/year (95% CI -0.02 to 0.05) in favour of the HXLPE group. Wear is mainly present on the medial side of the insert. There is no clinically relevant difference in tibial component migration and insert wear for up to five years between the HXLPE conventional PE inserts. For the implant studied, the potential advantages of a HXLPE insert remain to be proven under clinical conditions at longer-term follow-up.

Feasibility of Collecting Multiple Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Alongside the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

BACKGROUND: Compliance rates with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected alongside arthroplasty registries vary in the literature. We described the feasibility of a routinely collected set PROMs alongside the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. METHODS: The longitudinal Leiden Orthopaedics Outcomes of OsteoArthritis Study is a multicenter (7 hospitals), observational study including patients undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). A set of PROMs: Short Form-12, EuroQol 5 Dimensions, Hip/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Oxford Hip/Knee Score was collected preoperatively and at 6, 12, 24 months, and every 2 years thereafter. Participation rates and response rates were recorded. RESULTS: Between June 2012 and December 2014, 1796 THA and 1636 TKA patients were invited, of whom 1043 THA (58%; mean age 68 years [standard deviation, SD: 10]) and 970 TKA patients (59%; mean age 71 years [SD 9.5]) participated in the study. At 6 months, 35 THA/38 TKA patients were lost to follow-up. Response rates were 90% for THA (898/1000) and 89% for TKA (827/932) participants. At 1 and 2 years, 8 and 18 THA and 17 and 11 TKA patients were lost to follow-up, respectively. The response rates among those eligible were 87% (866/992) and 84% (812/972) for THA and 84% (771/917) and 83% (756/906) for TKA patients, respectively. The 2-year questionnaire was completed by 78.5% of the included THA patients and by 77.9% of the included TKA patients. CONCLUSIONS: About 60% of patients undergoing THA or TKA complete PROMs preoperatively, with more than 80% returning follow-up PROMs. To increase the participation rates, more efforts concerning the initial recruitment of patients are needed.

Preoperative Radiographic Osteoarthritis Severity Modifies the Effect of Preoperative Pain on Pain/Function After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results at 1 and 2 Years Postoperatively.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) severity as demonstrated by preoperative radiographs and preoperative pain play an important role in the indication for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We investigated whether preoperative radiographic evidence of OA severity modified the effect of preoperative self-reported pain on postoperative pain and function 1 and 2 years after TKA for OA. METHODS: Data from the Longitudinal Leiden Orthopaedics Outcomes of Osteoarthritis Study (LOAS), a multicenter cohort study on outcomes after TKA, were used. OA severity was assessed radiographically with the Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) score (range, 0 to 4). Pain and function were evaluated with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). After adjustment for body mass index (BMI), age, sex, and the Mental Component Summary scores from the Short Form-12, multivariate linear regression analyses with an interaction term between the preoperative KL score and preoperative pain were performed. RESULTS: The study included 559 patients. The preoperative KL score was independently associated with 1-year postoperative pain and function (ß = 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4 to 9.4, and ß = 7.7, 95% CI = 3.2 to 12.2), while preoperative pain was associated only with postoperative pain (ß = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.6) and not with postoperative function (ß = 0.2, 95% CI = -0.2 to 0.5). Comparable associations were found between 2-year postoperative pain and KL score (ß = 8.0, 95% CI = 3.2 to 12.7) and preoperative pain (ß = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.8) and between 2-year postoperative function and KL score (ß = 7.7, 95% CI = 3.2 to 12.2). The study showed a trend toward the KL score modifying the effect of preoperative pain on 1-year postoperative pain (ß = -0.1, 95% CI = -0.1 to 0.0) and 2-year postoperative pain (ß = -0.1, 95% CI = -0.2 to 0.0) and on 1 and 2-year function (ß = -0.1, 95% CI = -0.2 to 0.0 for both), with the effect of preoperative pain on postoperative pain and function seeming to become less important when there was radiographic evidence of greater preoperative OA severity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with less pain and higher KL grades preoperatively had better function and pain outcomes 1 and 2 years after TKA. However, the effect of preoperative pain on the postoperative outcomes seems to become less important when the patient has radiographic evidence of more severe OA. We believe that analysis of the severity of preoperative pain is an important proxy for optimal postoperative patient outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.