Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo de estudio
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Spec Oper Med ; 23(4): 75-80, 2023 Dec 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38079353

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Committee on En Route Combat Casualty Care recently ranked the patient handoff as their fourth research priority. Bluetooth technology has been introduced to the battlefield and has the potential to improve the tactical patient handoff. The purpose of this study is to compare the traditional methods of communication used in tactical medical evacuation by Special Operations medical personnel (radio push-to-talk [PTT] and Tactical Medic Intercom System [TM-ICS]) to Bluetooth communication. METHODS: Twenty-four simulated tactical patient handoffs were performed to compare Bluetooth and traditional methods of communication used in tactical medical evacuation. Patient scenario order and method of communication were randomized. Accuracy and time required to complete the patient handoff were determined. The study took place using a rotary-wing aircraft kept at level 2 to simulate real-world background noise. Preferred method of communication for each study participant was determined. RESULTS: There were no differences in accuracy of the received patient handoffs between groups or patient handoff transmission times at the ramp of the aircraft. However, when comparing patient handoff times to the medical team within the aircraft, Bluetooth communication was significantly faster than both TM-ICS and radio PTT, while Bluetooth PTT and radio PTT were also significantly faster than TM-ICS. Bluetooth communication was ranked as the preferred method of handoff by all study participants. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that utilization of Bluetooth technology for patient handover results in faster handoffs compared with traditional methods without sacrificing any accuracy in a scenario with high levels of noise.


Asunto(s)
Pase de Guardia , Humanos , Comunicación
2.
J Spec Oper Med ; 16(4): 110-113, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28088829

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Review application of telemedicine support for penetrating trauma. Clinical context: Special Operations Resuscitation Team (SORT) deployed in Africa Area of Responsibility (AOR) Organic expertise: Internal Medicine physician, two Special Operations Combat medics (SOCMs), and one radiology technician Closest surgical support: Non-US surgical support 20km away; a nonsurgeon who will perform surgeries; neighboring country partner-force surgeon 2 hours by fixedwing flight. Earliest evacuation: Evacuated 4 days after presentation to a neighboring country with surgical capability.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Medicina Militar , Derivación y Consulta , Telemedicina , Heridas Punzantes/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , África , Preescolar , Fluidoterapia , Hemotórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemotórax/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor , Derrame Pericárdico/diagnóstico por imagen , Derrame Pericárdico/terapia , Neumopericardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumopericardio/terapia , Neumoperitoneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumoperitoneo/terapia , Radiografía Torácica , Ultrasonografía , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas Penetrantes/terapia , Heridas Punzantes/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA