Survival trends in patients with tracheal carcinoma from 1973 to 2011.

PURPOSE: The prognosis for primary tracheal cancer is dismal. We investigated whether there has been improvement in survival in tracheal cancer patients and how treatment modality affected overall and cancer-specific survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 1144 patients with tracheal cancer were identified between 1973 and 2011. Patients were stratified by age group, gender, race, tumor histology, and treatment modality. Radical surgery and survival rates based upon these stratifications were determined. Longitudinal analyses of survival and the percentage of patients undergoing surgery and radiation were conducted. RESULTS: In the final cohort, 327 tracheal cancer patients (34%) underwent radical surgery. Patients of younger age, female gender, and who presented with non-squamous cell tumors were statistically more likely to undergo surgery. Over time, utilization of radiation has declined while use of radical surgery has increased. Concomitantly, 5-year survival has increased from approximately 25% in 1973 to 30% by 2006. Those who did not have surgery were 2.50 times more likely to die of tracheal cancer (95% Confidence Interval 2.00-3.11, p<0.001) than those who did have surgery. Additionally, patients who underwent radical surgery alone (without adjuvant radiation therapy) were 50% or 19% less likely to die of tracheal cancer than those who underwent no treatment or combination therapy, respectively (both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Survival in patients with tracheal cancer is improving over time. The utilization of radical surgery is increasing and confers the highest survival advantage to patients who are candidates.

Appendiceal Carcinoid Tumors: Is There a Survival Advantage to Colectomy over Appendectomy?

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend colectomy for appendiceal carcinoid tumors larger than 2 cm, but physicians debate whether colectomy would be beneficial in treating smaller tumors. We sought to determine when colectomy confers a survival advantage over appendectomy. METHODS: Appendiceal carcinoid patients in the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2011) were stratified by age group, gender, TNM stage, tumor grade, and race. Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression analyses relating grade, stage, and receipt of colectomy to overall and cancer-specific survival were performed. RESULTS: Of 817 patients who underwent surgical extirpation of an appendiceal carcinoid, 338 (41%) had appendectomy alone and 479 (59%) had additional colectomy. Surprisingly, patients who underwent colectomy had worse cancer-specific survival (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.32-2.98, p = 0.001) than those who underwent appendectomy, and colectomy did not confer a survival advantage over appendectomy in any subset analysis including low-grade or high-grade tumors, smaller or larger than 2 cm, or node-positive, non-metastatic tumors. Even when accounting for stage and grade, colectomy was not associated with significantly better survival rates. Furthermore, as colectomy frequency has increased over the last decade, the 5-year survival rate has trended down. The main predictors of cancer-specific mortality in carcinoid patients were high-grade (grades 3-4) and high-stage (node positive or metastatic) tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Survival in patients with carcinoid tumor of the appendix is primarily determined by tumor grade and stage. Our study found no survival advantage to colectomy over appendectomy in a large cohort of patients with the disease. Further investigation is necessary prior to recommending change of practice for patients with appendiceal carcinoid tumors.

Mid-Year Medical Knowledge Milestones and ABSITE Scores in First-Year Surgery Residents.

OBJECTIVE: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Surgery milestone ratings in the "Knowledge of Diseases and Conditions" (MK1) sub competency have been shown to correlate with American Board of Surgery In Training Examination (ABSITE) scores, and hypothesized to predict them. To better assess the predictive value of the MK1 milestone and avoid the potential bias caused by previous years' ABSITE scores, we designed a study including only first-year (PGY-1) residents and analyzed the correlation between their mid-year MK1 ratings and their scores in the ABSITE they took approximately a month later. METHODS: De-identified United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 scores, mid-year MK1 milestone ratings and the subsequent ABSITE standard scores for the five academic years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 were collected and tabulated for 247 PGY-1 preliminary- and categorical-track residents from ten ACGME-accredited surgery residency programs. RESULTS: The mid-year rating of PGY-1 residents' MK1 was predictive of their subsequent first ABSITE score for the entire cohort and for the categorical residents' subset. Notably, controlling for all other independent predictors, each half-point increase in MK1 rating was associated with a 25-point increase in ABSITE score. Preliminary residents performed significantly worse on the ABSITE, and their scores did not correlate significantly with their MK1 ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The mid-year rating of PGY-1 residents' MK1 was predictive of their subsequent first ABSITE score for the entire cohort and for the categorical but not the preliminary residents. This finding suggests that evaluators correctly rated MK1 higher in the categorical residents who did perform better on the subsequent ABSITE.

Farm Injuries: Animal Most Common, Machinery Most Lethal: An NTDB Study.

To characterize both emergency room (ER) and hospital discharge dispositions of patients presenting with farm-related injuries. The 2012 National Trauma Data Bank was queried in August 2017 for injuries occurring on a farm. Patients were stratified by gender, age group, race, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and injury type. We performed logistic regression analysis to correlate parameters with likelihood of discharge home or death. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Five thousand six hundred thirty-one patients were identified, the majority of whom were male (72%) and white (85%). The most common mechanisms of injury included animal-related (29%), followed by falls, vehicles, and other causes. The highest ISSs were seen in vehicular injuries (11% ISS of 25+) and the greatest fatality rate was seen in machinery injuries (4%). Four thousand seven hundred fifty-three (84%) patients were admitted to the hospital, and 4056 (72%) were discharged home from the ER or after hospitalization. One hundred thirty patients (2%) died of their farm-related injury. Most patients presenting to the ER with farm-related injuries survive, are admitted to the hospital, and are ultimately discharged home. Few patients die of their injuries. Animal injury is most common and machinery injury most lethal of farm trauma patients presenting to the ER.

Effect of median household income on surgical approach and survival in renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether median household income (MHI) independently predicts surgical approach (partial vs. radical nephrectomy) and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: The U.S. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database (1988-2011) was queried to examine kidney cancer cases and linked to the Area Health Resources File. We correlated surgical approach and survival, both overall and cancer-specific, with tumor stage, age, race, sex, and income data. RESULTS: Of 152,589 patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma, 24,221 (16%) patients underwent partial nephrectomy, 102,771 (67%) patients underwent radical nephrectomy, and 25,597 (17%) patients had no surgery. There was no significant difference in stage of presentation between the wealthiest and poorest MHI quartiles, with approximately 35% of patients in each quartile presenting with T1aN0M0 disease and 17% of patients presenting with metastatic disease. Despite this, 18% of patients in the wealthiest quartile underwent partial nephrectomy compared to 14% of patients in the poorest quartile. Although the percentage of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy rose over the timeframe studied in both the wealthiest and poorest quartiles, the rate of rise was highest in the wealthier group. Those in the poorest quartile were 0.10 times more likely to die of all causes (95% CI: 1.09-1.11, P<0.001) and 0.09 times more likely to die of kidney cancer (95% CI: 1.05-1.10, P<0.001) than those in the wealthiest quartile over the timeframe studied. CONCLUSIONS: Despite presenting with similar stage, patients with lower MHI less commonly undergo partial nephrectomy and are more likely to die of kidney cancer than those in the highest MHIs.

Socioeconomic and gender disparities in anal cancer diagnosis and treatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether receipt of radiation in patients with anal carcinoma is related to income level and other demographic factors. METHODS: The SEER database (1988-2011) was queried and linked to the Area Health Resources File (AHRF). We used logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses to correlate receipt of radiation and overall and cancer-specific survival with tumor stage, age, gender, and income. RESULTS: Of 28,028 patients with anal cancer, 14,783 (53%) received radiation. Patients in the lowest quartile for median household income were significantly more likely to present at higher stages, were 1.87 times more likely to receive radiation (95% CI 1.74-2.00, p < 0.001), and 1.27 times more likely to die of anal cancer (95% CI 1.18-1.33, p < 0.001) than those in the highest income quartile. Within most stages, however, the wealthiest patients were more likely to receive radiation therapy than the poorest patients. Additionally, we found that women presented at higher stages (p < 0.001), were 2.67 times more likely to receive radiation (95% CI 2.55-2.81, p < 0.001), and were 1.25 times more likely to die of anal cancer than men (95% CI 1.17-1.32, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women and poorer patients present with more advanced stages of anal cancer, more commonly receive radiation, and are more likely to die of anal cancer than men and wealthier patients, respectively.