The Multi-Institutional Experience in Single-Port Robotic Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Management.

PURPOSE: Single-port (SP) robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) through the transvesical approach is a novel surgical option in the management of large prostatic glands. We present the first multi-institutional study to further assess the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of SP RASP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2019 to November 2021, 91 consecutive patients of 3 separate institutions underwent transvesical RASP using the da Vinci® SP robotic surgical system. Surgeries were performed by 3 experienced surgeons. Through a suprapubic incision and transvesical access, the SP robot is docked directly into the bladder, and the prostatic enucleation is performed. Prospective data collection, including baseline characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, was performed. The mean followup period was 4.6 months. RESULTS: The mean (SD) prostate volume was 156 (62) ml. The mean (SD) total operative time was 159 (45) minutes, and the median (IQR) estimated blood loss was 100 (50, 200) cc. The median (IQR) postoperative hospital stay was 21.0 (6.5, 26.0) hours; however, 42% of all patients were discharged the same day. The median (IQR) Foley catheter duration was 5 (5, 7) days. Only 3 patients (3%) developed Clavien grade 2 postoperative complications. At 9-month followup, the median (IQR) International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life score were 4 (2, 5) and 0 (0, 1), respectively, with a mean (SD) maximum flow rate and post-void residual of 21 (17) ml/second and 40 (55) ml, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a multi-institutional setting, the SP RASP promotes a pain-free procedure, same-day discharge, short Foley catheter duration, low complication rate and quick recovery.

Transvesical versus extraperitoneal single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare our initial perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the single-port (SP) transvesical radical prostatectomy (TVRP) approach with the single-port extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (ERP) approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initial consecutive seventy-eight patients underwent SP TVRP between December 2020 and October 2021. Patients with extensive previous abdominal surgeries, or low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer were selected. Data of consecutive 169 patients treated with SP ERP between February 2019 and November 2020, were used for comparison. Optimal matched-paired analysis of PSA value, biopsy Gleason score, and prostate volume was performed. Preoperative, perioperative, and early functional outcomes were included in the analysis. The median follow-up was 7 months and 9 months for TVRP and ERP groups respectively. RESULTS: The median total operative time was longer in the TVRP compared to the ERP group (p = .002). There were no differences in intraoperative complications or surgical margin status. TVRP group had less rate of grade 3a Clavien-Dindo complications (p = .026). The Foley catheter duration was 3 (3, 4) days in the TVRP group compared to 7 (7, 8) days in the ERP group (p < .001). There was a consistently improved continence rate in the TVRP group at 6 weeks (72% TVRP, 48% ERP, p = .004), 3 months (97% TVRP, 81% ERP, p = .008), and 6 months postoperatively (100% TVRP, 93% ERP, p = .047). There was no difference in biochemical recurrence at 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: In our initial series, TVRP allows for a faster continence recovery, without other functional or oncological compromises.

Contemporary techniques of da Vinci SP radical prostatectomy: multicentric collaboration and expert opinion.

BACKGROUND: The da Vinci SP robot consists of an innovative single port trocar that houses a flexible camera and three biarticulated arms, which minimizes the number of incisions to assess the surgical site, allowing a less invasive procedure. However, due to its recent release in the market, the current literature reporting SP-RARP is still restricted to a few centers. In this scenario, after performing a literature search with all available techniques of SP-RARP, our objective is to report a multicentric opinion of referral centers on different techniques to approach SP-RARP. RESULTS: The SP literature is provided by only a few centers due to the limited number of this new console in the market. Five different approaches are available: transperitoneal, extraperitoneal, Retzius-Sparing, transperineal and transvesical. None of the current studies describe long-term functional or oncological outcomes. However, all approaches had satisfactory operative performance with minimum complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Several techniques of SP-RARP have been reported in the literature. We performed a multicentric collaboration describing and illustrating the most challenging steps of this surgery. We believe that the details provided in this article are useful teaching material for new centers willing to adopt the SP technology.

Da Vinci SP radical prostatectomy: a multicentric collaboration and step-by-step techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Several techniques of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the da Vinci SP (SP) have been described since its clearance by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in 2018 (1, 2). Even with the expanding literature about this robot, the SP technology has been restricted to a few centers in the US and Asia due to the recent release of this robot in the marked.3 In this scenario, we provided, in this video compilation, a consensus of SP referral centers describing the current approaches and techniques of da Vinci SP Radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: We have illustrated five different techniques, including transperitoneal, extraperitoneal, Retzius-sparing, transvesical, and transperineal (4-6). Each surgery demonstrated crucial steps from the trocar placement until anastomosis. All approaches follow anatomic concepts and landmarks to minimize positive surgical margins, optimize oncological outcomes and promote optimal functional recovery. The trocar placement and the use of an assistant port were selected according to the operative technique of each institution. None of these surgeries had intra- or postoperative complications, and the pain management until discharge was controlled without using narcotics. All patients were discharged in less than 16 hours of surgery. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy performed with the da Vinci SP is feasible and safe with optimal perioperative outcomes. Five different approaches were described in this video compilation, and we believe that the technical details provided by this multicentric collaboration are crucial for centers willing to initiate the SP approach to radical prostatectomy.

Single-port transvesical versus open simple prostatectomy: a perioperative comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the initial perioperative outcomes of single-port transvesical simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) patients to those of open simple prostatectomy (OSP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Perioperative data from 42 consecutive patients with BPH who underwent SP RASP were prospectively reviewed. Similarly, data from forty-three consecutive patients who underwent the standard OSP, were retrospectively collected. Through direct suprapubic bladder access, prostatic enucleation was performed using the prostatic capsule as a landmark. Then a complete vesicourethral mucosal advancement flap was accomplished. OSP was performed according to the standard approach. Demographics, Intra- and perioperative data were analyzed and assessed with a descriptive analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except for the preoperative median post-void residual volume, which was higher in the OSP group (p = 0.004). The SP RASP group had less intraoperative estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), no need for continuous bladder irrigation (p < 0.001), and less in-hospital opioid use (p < 0.001). Patients in the SP RASP group were discharged on postoperative day zero, compared to a median of 2 days for OSP (p < 0.001). The median Foley catheter duration was 7 days for SP RASP, compared to a median of 10 days for OSP (p < 0.001). SP RASP group had fewer postoperative complications, however, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: SP RASP is an alternative approach in treating surgical BPH. It may offer patients less morbidity in comparison to OSP.

Single-port Extraperitoneal and Transperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Propensity-Score Matched Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative and early postoperative outcomes between single-port (SP) extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EPRP) and SP transperitoneal radical prostatectomy (TPRP), in a multi-institutional setting. METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at 6 different institutes. Data of 650 patients were collected and divided into 2 groups based on the surgical approach: SP EPRP or SP TPRP. A Propensity-score matched-pair analysis for body mass index (BMI), prostate size, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk was performed with a 1:1 ratio. Analysis of perioperative and postoperative outcomes was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: After matching, 238 patients were included in each arm. The median follow-up period was 7 and 6 months for EPRP and TPRP groups, respectively. The total operative time was longer in the EPRP group (206 vs 155 minutes, P < .001). The EPRP group had a shorter length of hospitalization and same-day discharge rate compared to the TPRP approach (P < .001). There was no difference in the overall intraoperative or postoperative complications rate between the 2 groups, nor positive surgical margin rates. CONCLUSION: The SP extraperitoneal approach is associated with a shorter hospital stay and higher rate of same-day discharge, with no difference in the surgical margin, or complication rates.

A Transition Toward a Faster Recovery in Single-Port Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy.

Objectives: To present the updated technique and evaluate the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of single-port transvesical simple prostatectomy (SP TVSP) Patients and Methods: Forty-two consecutive patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia indicated for surgery underwent SP TVSP in a single institution. Through direct suprapubic bladder access, the SP robot was docked. Prostatic enucleation was performed using the prostatic capsule as a landmark. Then a complete vesicourethral mucosal advancement flap was accomplished. Demographics, perioperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected. Mean follow-up period was 12 months. Results: All procedures were effectively performed with no conversion, additional port placement, or intraoperative complication. The median prostatic volume was 170 cc. Ninety-five percent of the patients did not require opioids analgesia after discharge. Excluding planned admissions, 92% (21/23 patients) were discharged after a median (interquartile range) of 4.6 (4.1-5.7) hours after surgery. The median Foley catheter duration for all cohort was 7 days, and decreased to 3 days after technique adjustment for the last 19 consecutive patients. The median international prostate symptom score decreased from 23 before surgery to 2.5 after surgery. All patients had a significant postoperative improvement in maximum flow rate with a 200% improvement over baseline (19 vs 6.5 mL/sec). Conclusion: In our initial series, SP TVSP allows for favorable perioperative and early postoperative outcomes including low complication same-day discharge, short Foley catheter stay, minimal opioids use, and quick recovery.

Long-term comparative outcomes of partial nephrectomy and cryoablation in patients with solitary kidneys: a single-center analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with solitary kidneys are amenable to postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after PN. We compared the functional and oncological outcomes of cryoablation (CA) and PN in patients with a solitary kidney and a cT1a renal mass. METHODS: From a single-institution series, we analyzed 74 patients (31 PN, 43 CA) with a solitary kidney who underwent treatment for a cT1a renal mass. The functional outcomes were AKI and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) preservation. Oncological outcomes were recurrence and death. Linear mixed-effects and logistic regression models were used for functional outcomes analysis, whereas oncological outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 63.9 months. PN group had lower median age (59 years vs. 68, P<0.001) and larger median tumor size (2.80 cm vs. 2.0, p =0.003). AKI was more common in the PN group on postoperative day 1 (58% vs. 2.8%, P<0.001). However, only one patient in the PN group required temporary dialysis in the perioperative period. eGFR preservation was similar at postoperative 3 months (89% vs. 90%, P=0.083), or 12 months (85% vs. 94%, P=0.2) follow-up. CA group had higher recurrence rate (29% vs. 3.2%, P=0.005), and worse recurrence-free survival (P=0.027). Overall survival (OS) was comparable (P=0.31). CONCLUSIONS: In a solitary kidney setting, CA is associated with a lower risk of AKI at postoperative day 1 compared to PN. Functional outcome is comparable upon longer follow-up. The local recurrence rates are significantly higher in the CA group with no significant difference in OS.

Single-port Robotic Transvesical Partial Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Initial Series and Description of Technique.

BACKGROUND: Partial prostatectomy has been described as an alternative to focal therapy for the management of localized low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: To describe early outcomes and technique for single-port (SP) transvesical partial prostatectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis was performed for nine patients with low-volume, localized, low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer (Gleason ≤7) undergoing SP transvesical partial prostatectomy replicating the inclusion criteria for focal therapy by a single surgeon from November 2020 to March 2022. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The daVinci SP access port was inserted percutaneously into the bladder and pnuemovesicum was achieved. The camera, robotic instruments, assistant port, and flexible suction tubing were introduced through the access port. The Koelis transrectal ultrasound with preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging fusion was used for intraoperative guidance. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic information, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were collected in an institutional review board-approved database, and a descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All cases were completed without requiring extra ports or conversion. No intraoperative complications were noted, and all patients were discharged on the day of surgery. Pathology showed Gleason scores of 3 + 3 = 6 in one case, 3 + 4 = 7 in seven cases, and 4 + 3 = 7 in one case, all with negative intraoperative margin assessment. At 6 wk, the median prostate-specific antigen was 0.5 and the median Sexual Health Inventory for Men score was 17.5 from 23 preoperatively. All patients were continent at 6 wk. The limitations include a small number of patients, short follow-up, and single-surgeon experience. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility of the SP robotic transvesical partial prostatectomy. Early functional outcomes show impressive time to continence and erectile function. Continued follow-up will evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: We performed partial prostatectomies in selected patients as an alternative to focal therapy using a novel transvesical single-port approach. Our approach was safe and feasible, with fewer complications and promising initial return to continence and erectile function.

Management of Antimicrobial Agents in Abdominal Organ Transplant Patients in Intensive Care Unit.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Early diagnosis of infections and immediate initiation of appropriate antimicrobials are crucial in the management of patients before and after organ transplantation. We reviewed the most recent literature and guidelines in this field and organized the current recommendations for healthcare professionals caring for critically ill organ transplant recipients. RECENT FINDINGS: The incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms is increasing. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria comprise about 14% of organisms. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infections are also on the rise, as 20.5% of nosocomial enterococci are now vancomycin-resistant, changing empiric antibiotic selection. Fluconazole-resistant Candida species comprise up to 46% of cases of candidemia in hospitalized patients. Consequently, new guidelines recommend primary use of echinocandins in patients with candidemia who have moderate-to-severe disease. Finally, the incidence of emergence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infection in patients is 5-12%, requiring early recognition and change to alternative regimens in the case of poor response to therapy. SUMMARY: Bloodstream infections are a major cause of mortality and morbidity in solid organ transplantation. Mortality as high as 24% and 50% have been reported with sepsis and septic shock respectively. As such, bloodstream infections should be diagnosed rapidly and intravenous antibiotics should be started immediately. Appropriate resuscitation should be initiated and the number and/or dose of immunosuppressive drugs should be reduced. Proper source control must also be achieved with radiologic drainage or surgical intervention as appropriate. Initial antibiotic treatment of these patients should cover both Gram-positive organisms, especially in the presence of intravascular catheters, and Gram-negative bacteria. Echinocandins like caspofungin should also be considered especially in critically ill patients, particularly if a patient has been on total parenteral nutrition or broad-spectrum antibiotics.

A cross-sectional study of sexual function and fertility status in adults with congenital genitourinary abnormalities in a U.S. tertiary care centre.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate sexual function, sexual knowledge, and fertility status in adult patients with congenital genitourinary abnormalities (CGUA). METHODS: Adult patients with CGUA who were referred to a single transitional urology clinic between 2014 and 2017 were prospectively recruited to participate in the study. Questionnaires about general demographics, bowel and bladder continence, fertility, and sexuality were gathered. Validated questionnaires, including the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) and Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women (BISF-W), were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 167 adults with CGUA were referred to our clinic within the defined time frame. Sixty patients (25 males, 35 females) with a mean age of 25.4 years (range 18-75) met inclusion criteria and responded to questionnaires pertaining to sexuality and fertility. Forty-five (75%) responded to the fertility questionnaire; 26 (58%) had never heard of assisted reproductive technologies, and only one had received prior fertility counselling. Fifty-eight participants (97%) responded to the sexuality questionnaire; 21 (36%) reported a history of sexual activity, with 12 (21%) being currently sexually active. Twenty (34%) wanted to learn more about sexuality and/or fertility. The SHIM response rate was 44%, and only three females (9%) completed the BISF-W in its entirety. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with CGUA desire more sexuality and fertility education, yet they are uncomfortable completing current questionnaires. Our sexuality and fertility questionnaires are too challenging for this patient population to complete despite assistance. Thus, modifications are urgently needed. Additionally, medical providers should discuss sexual and reproductive health with these patients earlier and in more detail.

Outcomes of Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection in Adults with Congenital Spinal Dysraphism in Tertiary Transitional Urology Clinic.

PURPOSE: Published data regarding intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA in adults with congenital spinal dysraphism are scarce. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the outcomes of intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Billing codes were used to identify 149 patients who underwent onabotulinumtoxinA injection between 2012-2016 at our tertiary transitional urology clinic. Charts were then reviewed to identify patients with congenital spinal dysraphism. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients with the mean age of 20.76 (±3.03) years at the time of 1st onabotulinumtoxinA injection were identified. All patients had urinary incontinence. Urinary incontinence improved by injection of 200 or 300 U of onabotulinumtoxinA in 81.2% of patients and 63.6% of them became dry (p= 0.023). Mean glomerular filtration rate before and 13.3 (±9) months after treatment was 100.2 (±17.2) and 120.1 (±16.6) mL/min/1.73 m2 respectively (p= 0.41). Baseline hydronephrosis improved in 3 of 4 patients. Repeat urodynamic study after injection was done in 11 patients who did not clinically improve or who had loss of bladder compliance at baseline (29.3 Vs. 67.2 ml/cmH2O). Mean maximum cystometric capacity before and after injection was 310.1 and 380.2 mL (p= 0.045). Mean bladder compliance before and after treatment was 29.2 and 28.7 ml/cmH2O respectively (p= 0.48) in this high risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection may improve refractory urinary incontinence in selected adults with spinal dysraphism. However, despite improvement in maximum cystometric capacity, bladder compliance does not improve following therapy in patients who had loss of compliance at baseline.

Disease-Specific Outcomes of Botulinum Toxin Injections for Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.

Intradetrusor injection of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) is an effective option for managing patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) who do not respond to or tolerate oral pharmacologic agents. There is level I evidence that intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA for refractory NDO in patients with multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury is associated with a significantly greater achievement of goals and improved performance in urodynamic studies than placebo. Pilot studies or small case series support BTX-A for NDO in patients with Parkinson's disease and cerebrovascular accident. BTX-A seems to be effective in children with myelomeningocele. However, no adult data exists.

Da Vinci SP radical prostatectomy: a multicentric collaboration and step-by-step techniques

ABSTRACT Introduction Several techniques of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the da Vinci SP (SP) have been described since its clearance by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in 2018 ( 1 , 2 ). Even with the expanding literature about this robot, the SP technology has been restricted to a few centers in the US and Asia due to the recent release of this robot in the marked.3 In this scenario, we provided, in this video compilation, a consensus of SP referral centers describing the current approaches and techniques of da Vinci SP Radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP). Surgical Technique We have illustrated five different techniques, including transperitoneal, extraperitoneal, Retzius-sparing, transvesical, and transperineal ( 4 - 6 ). Each surgery demonstrated crucial steps from the trocar placement until anastomosis. All approaches follow anatomic concepts and landmarks to minimize positive surgical margins, optimize oncological outcomes and promote optimal functional recovery. The trocar placement and the use of an assistant port were selected according to the operative technique of each institution. None of these surgeries had intra- or postoperative complications, and the pain management until discharge was controlled without using narcotics. All patients were discharged in less than 16 hours of surgery. Conclusion Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy performed with the da Vinci SP is feasible and safe with optimal perioperative outcomes. Five different approaches were described in this video compilation, and we believe that the technical details provided by this multicentric collaboration are crucial for centers willing to initiate the SP approach to radical prostatectomy.

Contemporary techniques of da Vinci SP radical prostatectomy: multicentric collaboration and expert opinion

ABSTRACT Background The da Vinci SP robot consists of an innovative single port trocar that houses a flexible camera and three biarticulated arms, which minimizes the number of incisions to assess the surgical site, allowing a less invasive procedure. However, due to its recent release in the market, the current literature reporting SP-RARP is still restricted to a few centers. In this scenario, after performing a literature search with all available techniques of SP-RARP, our objective is to report a multicentric opinion of referral centers on different techniques to approach SP-RARP. Results The SP literature is provided by only a few centers due to the limited number of this new console in the market. Five different approaches are available: transperitoneal, extraperitoneal, Retzius-Sparing, transperineal and transvesical. None of the current studies describe long-term functional or oncological outcomes. However, all approaches had satisfactory operative performance with minimum complication rates. Conclusions Several techniques of SP-RARP have been reported in the literature. We performed a multicentric collaboration describing and illustrating the most challenging steps of this surgery. We believe that the details provided in this article are useful teaching material for new centers willing to adopt the SP technology.