Treating Rhythmic and Periodic EEG Patterns in Comatose Survivors of Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: Whether the treatment of rhythmic and periodic electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest improves outcomes is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted an open-label trial of suppressing rhythmic and periodic EEG patterns detected on continuous EEG monitoring in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a stepwise strategy of antiseizure medications to suppress this activity for at least 48 consecutive hours plus standard care (antiseizure-treatment group) or to standard care alone (control group); standard care included targeted temperature management in both groups. The primary outcome was neurologic outcome according to the score on the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale at 3 months, dichotomized as a good outcome (CPC score indicating no, mild, or moderate disability) or a poor outcome (CPC score indicating severe disability, coma, or death). Secondary outcomes were mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and duration of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: We enrolled 172 patients, with 88 assigned to the antiseizure-treatment group and 84 to the control group. Rhythmic or periodic EEG activity was detected a median of 35 hours after cardiac arrest; 98 of 157 patients (62%) with available data had myoclonus. Complete suppression of rhythmic and periodic EEG activity for 48 consecutive hours occurred in 49 of 88 patients (56%) in the antiseizure-treatment group and in 2 of 83 patients (2%) in the control group. At 3 months, 79 of 88 patients (90%) in the antiseizure-treatment group and 77 of 84 patients (92%) in the control group had a poor outcome (difference, 2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -7 to 11; P = 0.68). Mortality at 3 months was 80% in the antiseizure-treatment group and 82% in the control group. The mean length of stay in the ICU and mean duration of mechanical ventilation were slightly longer in the antiseizure-treatment group than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In comatose survivors of cardiac arrest, the incidence of a poor neurologic outcome at 3 months did not differ significantly between a strategy of suppressing rhythmic and periodic EEG activity with the use of antiseizure medication for at least 48 hours plus standard care and standard care alone. (Funded by the Dutch Epilepsy Foundation; TELSTAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02056236.).

Free water corrected diffusion tensor imaging discriminates between good and poor outcomes of comatose patients after cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 50% of comatose patients after cardiac arrest never regain consciousness. Cerebral ischaemia may lead to cytotoxic and/or vasogenic oedema, which can be detected by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Here, we evaluate the potential value of free water corrected mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) based on DTI, for the prediction of neurological recovery of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. METHODS: A total of 50 patients after cardiac arrest were included in this prospective cohort study in two Dutch hospitals. DTI was obtained 2-4 days after cardiac arrest. Outcome was assessed at 6 months, dichotomised as poor (cerebral performance category 3-5; n = 20) or good (n = 30) neurological outcome. We calculated the whole brain mean MD and FA and compared between patients with good and poor outcomes. In addition, we compared a preliminary prediction model based on clinical parameters with or without the addition of MD and FA. RESULTS: We found significant differences between patients with good and poor outcome of mean MD (good: 726 [702-740] × 10-6 mm2/s vs. poor: 663 [575-736] × 10-6 mm2/s; p = 0.01) and mean FA (0.30 ± 0.03 vs. 0.28 ± 0.03; p = 0.03). An exploratory prediction model combining clinical parameters, MD and FA increased the sensitivity for reliable prediction of poor outcome from 60 to 85%, compared to the model containing clinical parameters only, but confidence intervals are overlapping. CONCLUSIONS: Free water-corrected MD and FA discriminate between patients with good and poor outcomes after cardiac arrest and hold the potential to add to multimodal outcome prediction. KEY POINTS: • Whole brain mean MD and FA differ between patients with good and poor outcome after cardiac arrest. • Free water-corrected MD can better discriminate between patients with good and poor outcome than uncorrected MD. • A combination of free water-corrected MD (sensitive to grey matter abnormalities) and FA (sensitive to white matter abnormalities) holds potential to add to the prediction of outcome.

Prognosis After Cardiac Arrest: The Additional Value of DWI and FLAIR to EEG.

BACKGROUND: Despite application of the multimodal European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine algorithm, neurological prognosis of patients who remain comatose after cardiac arrest remains uncertain in a large group of patients. In this study, we investigate the additional predictive value of visual and quantitative brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to electroencephalography (EEG) for outcome estimation of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study in patients after cardiac arrest submitted in a comatose state to the intensive care unit of two Dutch hospitals. Continuous EEG was recorded during the first 3 days and MRI was performed at 3 ± 1 days after cardiac arrest. EEG at 24 h and ischemic damage in 21 predefined brain regions on diffusion weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery on a scale from 0 to 4 were related to outcome. Quantitative MRI analyses included mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and percentage of brain volume with ADC < 450 × 10-6 mm2/s, < 550 × 10-6 mm2/s, and < 650 × 10-6 mm2/s. Poor outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 3-5 at 6 months. RESULTS: We included 50 patients, of whom 20 (40%) demonstrated poor outcome. Visual EEG assessment correctly identified 3 (15%) with poor outcome and 15 (50%) with good outcome. Visual grading of MRI identified 13 (65%) with poor outcome and 25 (89%) with good outcome. ADC analysis identified 11 (55%) with poor outcome and 3 (11%) with good outcome. EEG and MRI combined could predict poor outcome in 16 (80%) patients at 100% specificity, and good outcome in 24 (80%) at 63% specificity. Ischemic damage was most prominent in the cortical gray matter (75% vs. 7%) and deep gray nuclei (45% vs. 3%) in patients with poor versus good outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging is complementary with EEG for the prediction of poor and good outcome of patients after cardiac arrest who are comatose at admission.

Outcome Prediction of Postanoxic Coma: A Comparison of Automated Electroencephalography Analysis Methods.

BACKGROUND: To compare three computer-assisted quantitative electroencephalography (EEG) prediction models for the outcome prediction of comatose patients after cardiac arrest regarding predictive performance and robustness to artifacts. METHODS: A total of 871 continuous EEGs recorded up to 3 days after cardiac arrest in intensive care units of five teaching hospitals in the Netherlands were retrospectively analyzed. Outcome at 6 months was dichotomized as "good" (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) or "poor" (Cerebral Performance Category 3-5). Three prediction models were implemented: a logistic regression model using two quantitative features, a random forest model with nine features, and a deep learning model based on a convolutional neural network. Data from two centers were used for training and fivefold cross-validation (n = 663), and data from three other centers were used for external validation (n = 208). Model output was the probability of good outcome. Predictive performances were evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic analysis and the calculation of predictive values. Robustness to artifacts was evaluated by using an artifact rejection algorithm, manually added noise, and randomly flattened channels in the EEG. RESULTS: The deep learning network showed the best overall predictive performance. On the external test set, poor outcome could be predicted by the deep learning network at 24 h with a sensitivity of 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 44-64%) at a false positive rate (FPR) of 0% (95% CI 0-2%), significantly higher than the logistic regression (sensitivity 33%, FPR 0%) and random forest models (sensitivity 13%, FPR, 0%) (p < 0.05). Good outcome at 12 h could be predicted by the deep learning network with a sensitivity of 78% (95% CI 52-100%) at a FPR of 12% (95% CI 0-24%) and by the logistic regression model with a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI 83-83%) at a FPR of 3% (95% CI 3-3%), both significantly higher than the random forest model (sensitivity 1%, FPR 0%) (p < 0.05). The results of the deep learning network were the least affected by the presence of artifacts, added white noise, and flat EEG channels. CONCLUSIONS: A deep learning model outperformed logistic regression and random forest models for reliable, robust, EEG-based outcome prediction of comatose patients after cardiac arrest.

Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Outcome prediction in patients after cardiac arrest (CA) is challenging. Electroencephalographic reactivity (EEG-R) might be a reliable predictor. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of EEG-R using a standardized assessment. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, a strictly defined EEG-R assessment protocol was executed twice per day in adult patients after CA. EEG-R was classified as present or absent by 3 EEG readers, blinded to patient characteristics. Uncertain reactivity was classified as present. Primary outcome was best Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC) in 6 months after CA, dichotomized as good (CPC = 1-2) or poor (CPC = 3-5). EEG-R was considered reliable for predicting poor outcome if specificity was ≥95%. For good outcome prediction, a specificity of ≥80% was used. Added value of EEG-R was the increase in specificity when combined with EEG background, neurological examination, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). RESULTS: Of 160 patients enrolled, 149 were available for analyses. Absence of EEG-R for poor outcome prediction had a specificity of 82% and a sensitivity of 73%. For good outcome prediction, specificity was 73% and sensitivity 82%. Specificity for poor outcome prediction increased from 98% to 99% when EEG-R was added to a multimodal model. For good outcome prediction, specificity increased from 70% to 89%. INTERPRETATION: EEG-R testing in itself is not sufficiently reliable for outcome prediction in patients after CA. For poor outcome prediction, it has no substantial added value to EEG background, neurological examination, and SSEPs. For prediction of good outcome, EEG-R seems to have added value. ANN NEUROL 2019.

Increased gamma and decreased fast ripple connections of epileptic tissue: A high-frequency directed network approach.

OBJECTIVE: New insights into high-frequency electroencephalographic activity and network analysis provide potential tools to improve delineation of epileptic tissue and increase the chance of postoperative seizure freedom. Based on our observation of high-frequency oscillations "spreading outward" from the epileptic source, we hypothesize that measures of directed connectivity in the high-frequency range distinguish epileptic from healthy brain tissue. METHODS: We retrospectively selected refractory epilepsy patients with a malformation of cortical development or tumor World Health Organization grade I/II who underwent epilepsy surgery with intraoperative electrocorticography for tailoring the resection based on spikes. We assessed directed functional connectivity in the theta (4-8 Hz), gamma (30-80 Hz), ripple (80-250 Hz), and fast ripple (FR; 250-500 Hz) bands using the short-time direct directed transfer function, and calculated the total, incoming, and outgoing propagation strength for each electrode. We compared network measures of electrodes covering the resected and nonresected areas separately for patients with good and poor outcome, and of electrodes with and without spikes, ripples, and FRs (group level: paired t test; patient level: Mann-Whitney U test). We selected the measure that could best identify the resected area and channels with epileptic events using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the positive and negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: We found higher total and outstrength in the ripple and gamma bands in resected tissue in patients with good outcome (rippletotal : P = .01; rippleout : P = .04; gammatotal : P = .01; gammaout : P = .01). Channels with events showed lower total and instrength, and higher outstrength in the FR band, and higher total and outstrength in the ripple, gamma, and theta bands (FRtotal : P = .05; FRin : P < .01; FRout : P = .02; gammatotal : P < .01; gammain : P = .01; gammaout : P < .01; thetatotal : P = .01; thetaout : P = .01). The total strength in the gamma band was most distinctive at the channel level (positive predictive value [PPV]good  = 74%, PPVpoor  = 43%). SIGNIFICANCE: Interictally, epileptic tissue is isolated in the FR band and acts as a driver up to the (fast) ripple frequency range. The gamma band total strength seems promising to delineate epileptic tissue intraoperatively.

Additional predictive value of optic nerve sheath diameter for neurological prognosis after cardiac arrest: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The goal is to estimate the additional value of ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement on days 1-3, on top of electroencephalography (EEG), pupillary light reflexes (PLR), and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), for neurological outcome prediction of comatose cardiac arrest patients. We performed a prospective longitudinal cohort study in adult comatose patients after cardiac arrest. ONSD was measured on days 1-3 using ultrasound. Continuous EEG, PLR, and SSEP were acquired as standard care. Poor outcome was defined as cerebral performance categories 3-5 at 3-6 months. Logistic regression models were created for outcome prediction based on the established predictors with and without ONSD. Additional predictive value was assessed by increase in sensitivity for poor (at 100% specificity) and good outcome (at 90% specificity). RESULTS: We included 100 patients, 54 with poor outcome. Mean ONSD did not differ significantly between patients with good and poor outcome. Sensitivity for predicting poor outcome increased by adding ONSD to EEG and SSEP from 25% to 41% in all patients and from 27% to 50% after exclusion of patients with non-neurological death. CONCLUSIONS: ONSD on days 1-3 after cardiac arrest holds potential to add to neurological outcome prediction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04084054. Registered 10 September 2019, https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/study/NCT04084054 .

MRI markers of brain network integrity relate to neurological outcome in postanoxic coma.

AIM: Current multimodal approaches leave approximately half of the comatose patients after cardiac arrest with an indeterminate prognosis. Here we investigated whether early MRI markers of brain network integrity can distinguish between comatose patients with a good versus poor neurological outcome six months later. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in 48 patients after cardiac arrest submitted in a comatose state to the Intensive Care Unit of two Dutch hospitals. MRI was performed at three days after cardiac arrest, including resting state functional MRI and diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI). Resting state fMRI was used to quantify functional connectivity within ten resting-state networks, and DTI to assess mean diffusivity (MD) in these same networks. We contrasted two groups of patients, those with good (n = 29, cerebral performance category 1-2) versus poor (n = 19, cerebral performance category 3-5) outcome at six months. Mutual associations between functional connectivity, MD, and clinical outcome were studied. RESULTS: Patients with good outcome show higher within-network functional connectivity (fMRI) and higher MD (DTI) than patients with poor outcome across 8/10 networks, most prominent in the default mode network, salience network, and visual network. While the anatomical distribution of outcome-related changes was similar for functional connectivity and MD, the pattern of inter-individual differences was very different: functional connectivity showed larger inter-individual variability in good versus poor outcome, while the opposite was observed for MD. Exploratory analyses suggested that it is possible to define network-specific cut-off values that could help in outcome prediction: (1) high functional connectivity and high MD, associated with good outcome; (2) low functional connectivity and low MD, associated with poor outcome; (3) low functional connectivity and high MD, associated with uncertain outcome. DISCUSSION: Resting-state functional connectivity and mean diffusivity-three days after cardiac arrest are strongly associated with neurological recovery-six months later in a complementary fashion. The combination of fMRI and MD holds potential to improve prediction of outcome.

EEG functional connectivity contributes to outcome prediction of postanoxic coma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the additional value of EEG functional connectivity features, in addition to non-coupling EEG features, for outcome prediction of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter cohort study. Coherence, phase locking value, and mutual information were calculated in 19-channel EEGs at 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after cardiac arrest. Three sets of machine learning classification models were trained and validated with functional connectivity, EEG non-coupling features, and a combination of these. Neurological outcome was assessed at six months and categorized as "good" (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] 1-2) or "poor" (CPC 3-5). RESULTS: We included 594 patients (46% good outcome). A sensitivity of 51% (95% CI: 34-56%) at 100% specificity in predicting poor outcome was achieved by the best functional connectivity-based classifier at 12 h after cardiac arrest, while the best non-coupling-based model reached a sensitivity of 32% (0-54%) at 100% specificity using data at 12 h and 48 h. Combination of both sets of features achieved a sensitivity of 73% (50-77%) at 100% specificity. CONCLUSION: Functional connectivity measures improve EEG based prediction models for poor outcome of postanoxic coma. SIGNIFICANCE: Functional connectivity features derived from early EEG hold potential to improve outcome prediction of coma after cardiac arrest.

Delirium after cardiac arrest: Phenotype, prediction, and outcome.

AIM: To establish incidence, phenotype, long-term functional outcome, and early EEG predictors of delirium after cardiac arrest. METHODS: This is an ad hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study on outcome prediction of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Patients with recovery of consciousness, who survived until hospital discharge, were subdivided in groups with and without delirium based on psychiatric consultation. Delirium phenotype and medical treatment were retrieved from patient files. All other data were prospectively collected. We used univariate analyses of baseline and early EEG characteristics for identification of possible delirium predictors. Association of delirium with neurological recovery at six months was analyzed with multinomial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 233 patients, 141 survived until hospital discharge, of whom 47 (33%) were diagnosed with delirium. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without delirium. All delirious patients were treated with relatively high dosages of psychopharmaceuticals, mostly haloperidol and benzodiazepine agonists. Prevalent characteristics were disturbed cognition, perception and psychomotor functioning (98%). Half of the patients had language disorders or shouting. Delirium was associated with longer ICU and hospital admission, and more frequent discharge to rehabilitation centre or nursing home. There was a trend towards poorer neurological recovery. EEG measurements within 12 h after cardiac arrest could predict delirium with 91% specificity and 40% sensitivity. DISCUSSION: Delirium is common after cardiac arrest, and probably leads to longer hospitalization and poorer outcome. Optimal treatment is unclear. Early EEG holds potential to identify patients at risk.

Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest.

Objective: We present relations of SSEP amplitude with neurological outcome and of SSEP amplitude with EEG amplitude in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Amplitude of SSEP recordings obtained within 48-72 h, and EEG patterns obtained at 12 and 24h after cardiac arrest were related to good (CPC 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5) outcome at 6 months. In 39% of the study population multiple SSEP measurements were performed. Additionally, SSEP amplitude was related to mean EEG amplitude. Results: We included 138 patients (77% poor outcome). Absent SSEP responses, a N20 amplitude <0.4 µV within 48-72 h, and suppressed or synchronous EEG with suppressed background at 12 or 24 h after cardiac arrest were invariably associated with a poor outcome. Combined, these tests reached a sensitivity for prediction of poor outcome up to 58 at 100% specificity. N20 amplitude increased with a mean of 0.55 µV per day in patients with a poor outcome, and remained stable with a good outcome. There was no statistically significant correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitudes in 182 combined SSEP and EEG measurements (R 2 < 0.01). Conclusions: N20 amplitude <0.4 µV is invariably associated with poor outcome. There is no correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitude. Significance: SSEP amplitude analysis may contribute to outcome prediction after cardiac arrest.

EEG reactivity testing for prediction of good outcome in patients after cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the additional value of EEG reactivity (EEG-R) testing to EEG background pattern for prediction of good outcome in adult patients after cardiac arrest (CA). METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study, EEG-R was tested twice a day, using a strict protocol. Good outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1-2 within 6 months. The additional value of EEG-R per EEG background pattern was evaluated using the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Prognostic value (sensitivity and specificity) of EEG-R was investigated in relation to time after CA, sedative medication, different stimuli, and repeated testing. RESULTS: Between 12 and 24 hours after CA, data of 108 patients were available. Patients with a continuous (n = 64) or discontinuous (n = 19) normal voltage background pattern with reactivity were 3 and 8 times more likely to have a good outcome than without reactivity (continuous: DOR, 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-12.0; p = 0.06; discontinuous: DOR, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.0-63.97; p = 0.0499). EEG-R was not observed in other background patterns within 24 hours after CA. In 119 patients with a normal voltage EEG background pattern, continuous or discontinuous, any time after CA, prognostic value was highest in sedated patients (sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 59.5%), irrespective of time after CA. EEG-R induced by handclapping and sternal rubbing, especially when combined, had highest prognostic value. Repeated EEG-R testing increased prognostic value. CONCLUSION: EEG-R has additional value for prediction of good outcome in patients with discontinuous normal voltage EEG background pattern and possibly with continuous normal voltage. The best stimuli were clapping and sternal rubbing.

Association between somatosensory evoked potentials and EEG in comatose patients after cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between SSEP results and EEG results in comatose patients after cardiac arrest, including the added value of repeated SSEP measurements. METHODS: Continuous EEG was measured in 619 patients during the first 3-5 days after cardiac arrest. SSEPs were recorded daily in the first 55 patients, and on indication in later patients. EEGs were visually classified at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after cardiac arrest, and at the time of SSEP. Outcome at 6 m was dichotomized as good (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5). SSEP and EEG results were related to outcome. Additionally, SSEP results were related to the EEG patterns at the time of SSEP. RESULTS: Absent SSEP responses and suppressed or synchronous EEG on suppressed background ≥24 h after cardiac arrest were invariably associated with poor outcome. SSEP and EEG identified different patients with poor outcome (joint sensitivity 39% at specificity 100%). N20 responses were always preserved in continuous traces at >8 Hz. Absent SSEPs did not re-emerge during the first five days. CONCLUSIONS: SSEP and EEG results may diverge after cardiac arrest. SIGNIFICANCE: SSEP and EEG together identify more patients without chance of recovery than one of these alone.