Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 26(7): 1683-1685, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32727322

RESUMEN

The product monograph for reference bevacizumab (Avastin) and biosimilar bevacizumab (Mvasi) recommend to infuse the first dose of bevacizumab over 90 min, second dose over 60 min and third and subsequent doses over 30 min. Despite the product monograph recommendations, many institutions adopted an accelerated bevacizumab (Avastin) 0.5 mg/kg/min infusion time. Our province adopted the accelerated infusion time at time of biosimilar bevacizumab (Mvasi) adoption. Our experience with the accelerated infusion time was well tolerated in the first five months of biosimilar bevacizumab adoption across different tumor types.


Asunto(s)
Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas
2.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 17(3): e451-e456, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29631907

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) has a poor prognosis. Current first-line chemotherapy options include FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin), NG (nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine), and GEM (gemcitabine) alone. The optimal second-line regimen is unclear. For patients with disease progression with FOLFIRINOX who have a good performance status, NG might be a reasonable second-line option. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in whom APC was diagnosed from 2012 to 2016 who underwent chemotherapy at CancerCare Manitoba were identified from the Manitoba Cancer Registry. Pharmacy records were used to identified those patients who had received first-line FOLFIRINOX, followed by second-line NG, GEM alone, or best supportive care. A retrospective analysis was performed to identify the patient and treatment characteristics, toxicity, radiologic response, and survival. Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, revised, scores were analyzed to assess symptom control. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients had received first-line FOLFIRINOX. Of those with disease progression who were offered second-line therapy, 30 received NG, 8 GEM alone, and 22 best supportive care. NG was more toxic than GEM alone; however, the dose intensity was similar between the 2 groups. The median progression-free survival was 3.61 months in the NG group and 2.51 months in the GEM-alone group. The median overall survival was 5.69 months in the NG group and 3.82 months in the GEM-alone group. No significant differences were found in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, revised, scores when stratified by the treatment received. CONCLUSION: For select patients with APC in whom first-line FOLFIRINOX fails, a role might exist for second-line NG. In our institution, second-line NG was associated with improvement in survival compared with second-line GEM alone, with a manageable toxicity profile.


Asunto(s)
Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluorouracilo/farmacología , Leucovorina/farmacología , Compuestos Organometálicos/farmacología , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Desoxicitidina/farmacología , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Combinación de Medicamentos , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Irinotecán , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organometálicos/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gemcitabina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA