Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 31(7): 1529-38, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27038863

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty is a successful operation for treatment of arthritis. However, devastating wound complications and infections can compromise the knee joint, particularly in revision situations. METHODS: Soft tissue loss associated with poor wound healing and multiple operations can necessitate the need for reconstruction for wound closure and protection of the prosthesis. RESULTS: Coverage options range from simple closure methods to complex reconstruction, including delayed primary closure, healing by secondary intention, vacuum-assisted closure, skin grafting, local flap coverage, and distant microsurgical tissue transfer. CONCLUSION: Understanding the advantages and pitfalls of each reconstructive option helps to guide treatment and avoid repeated operations and potentially devastating consequences such as knee arthrodesis or amputation.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Rodilla/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Rodilla/irrigación sanguínea , Rodilla/fisiopatología , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Reoperación/métodos , Trasplante de Piel , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/irrigación sanguínea , Cicatrización de Heridas , Heridas y Lesiones/etiología , Heridas y Lesiones/fisiopatología , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 4(9): e868, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27757333

RESUMEN

The incidence and cost of nonmelanoma skin cancers are skyrocketing. Five million cases cost $8.1 billion in 2011. The average cost of treatment per patient increased from $1000 in 2006 to $1600 in 2011. We present a study of the economics and costs of skin cancer management in Medicare patients. METHODS: We studied data released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in 2014. Treatment modalities for the management of skin cancer were reviewed, and costs of treatment were quantified for a sample of 880,000 providers. RESULTS: Review of Medicare payment records related to the management of skin cancer yielded data from over 880,000 health care providers who received $77 billion in Medicare payments in 2012. From 1992 to 2009, the rate of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has increased by 700%, and these procedures typically have Medicare payments 120% to 370% more than surgical excision, even when including pathology fees. From 1992 to 2009, MMS increased by 700%, whereas surgical excisions increased by only 20%. In 2009, 1800 providers billed Medicare for MMS; in 2012, that number increased to 3209. On average, 1 in 4 cases of skin cancer is treated with MMS. CONCLUSION: Mohs excision is more expensive than surgical excision in an office setting. Procedures requiring the operating room are much more expensive than office procedures. In an era of high deductible health plans, patients' financial burden is much less with simple excisions of skin cancers done in a clinic when compared with Mohs surgery or operative interventions.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA