Position statements of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists: An historical perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To review the concept, purpose, and subjects of Position Statements of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists since their inception in 1971, and to consider changes to enhance their value. METHOD: We scrutinised the procedure in producing, revising, and rescinding Position Statements, and the nature of the subjects covered. RESULTS: Position Statements were initiated by the College Board, various College committees and members. The format and procedures of revising and rescinding them varied considerably. We identified 11 subject areas encompassing professional practice and research, their association with societal developments, and the implications for College policy. CONCLUSION: Position Statements have proved to be a dynamic vehicle to keep abreast of significant changes in psychiatry. Methodical appraisal is required to optimise their objective in conveying College policies to members and relevant stakeholders.

Codes of ethics for psychiatrists: past, present and prospect.

BACKGROUND: Codes of ethics in medicine have an ancient tradition, extending back to the Oath of Hippocrates. Yet it was only in the early 1970s that the speciality of psychiatry developed a specific code to address the unique ethical dilemmas and complexities arising in psychiatric practice. As the 50th anniversary of the publication of psychiatry's first code of ethics approaches, it is timely to reflect on the progress, role, and impact of such codes.Our aim is to provide a historically informed review of codes of ethics in psychiatry - their origins and evolution, the current picture, and the possibilities for future development. METHODS: We conducted a selective review of relevant literature (including all codes of ethics accessible on the websites of World Psychiatric Association members states), analysis of the form and content of codes and related documents in psychiatry, and interviews of psychiatrists who have played central roles in their evolution. RESULTS: Of the 143 WPA member states, only 15 codes of ethics for psychiatrists were identified, and few of these were associated with professional disciplinary processes. We found that these codes are rarely revised and sometimes supplemented with other statements and guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: While there are difficulties in measuring the direct effectiveness of codes of ethics on the practice of psychiatrists, we conclude that these codes help to (1) promote professional solidarity and autonomy, (2) enhance moral sensitivity, and (3) aid in psychiatric education and training.

The 30th anniversary of the code of ethics of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists-a worthy milestone.

OBJECTIVE: To appraise the evolution of the RANZCP's Code of Ethics on the occasion of its 30th anniversary. METHOD: We scrutinised its five editions, focussing on the revision procedure and changes made, and reviewed relevant literature. RESULTS: The procedure of revision has remained constant: incorporating feedback from college members, committees and faculties, and consulting professional medical bodies and mental health advocacy organisations. Seven major themes of change have emerged with respect to patient exploitation, recognition of family and carers, the special place of Indigenous Peoples, confidentiality, engaging patients in decision-making, multidisciplinary collaboration and the well-being of psychiatrists. CONCLUSIONS: The code has proved to be a dynamic instrument in keeping abreast of changes in psychiatry and society, and promises to maintain a prominent role in promoting high ethical standards in the profession.

Revising the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists code of ethics.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the process adopted by the Committee for Professional Practice (CPP) of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) in devising the 5th edition of its code of ethics and to outline principal changes. METHODS: CPP members planned, scrutinised and documented the steps taken in preparing the new edition. RESULTS: The process, following that used in all previous updates of the code and which had proved effective and productive on each occasion, comprised consultations with RANZCP committees and relevant external stakeholders. Canvasing the views of so many groups was regarded as essential to ensure that multiple perspectives were considered and any bias of the CPP avoided. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) was examined with two aims: promoting a robust clinician and patient partnership, and acknowledging the psychiatrist's advocacy role. The psychiatrist's duty to be alert to colleagues' wellbeing and to safeguard respectful professional relationships was highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive, rigorous and established review process occurred and was carefully documented resulting in a sound and contemporary revision of the code of ethics. RANZCP members will be duty-bound to adhere to, and apply, the code to optimise their ethical standards.