Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Glob Chang Biol ; 26(11): 6235-6250, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32851731

RESUMEN

Prioritizing the management of invasive alien species (IAS) is of global importance and within Europe integral to the EU IAS regulation. To prioritize management effectively, the risks posed by IAS need to be assessed, but so too does the feasibility of their management. While the risk of IAS to the EU has been assessed, the feasibility of management has not. We assessed the feasibility of eradicating 60 new (not yet established) and 35 emerging (established with limited distribution) species that pose a threat to the EU, as identified by horizon scanning. The assessment was carried out by 34 experts in invasion management from across Europe, applying the Non-Native Risk Management scheme to defined invasion scenarios and eradication strategies for each species, assessing the feasibility of eradication using seven key risk management criteria. Management priorities were identified by combining scores for risk (derived from horizon scanning) and feasibility of eradication. The results show eradication feasibility score and risk score were not correlated, indicating that risk management criteria evaluate different information than risk assessment. In all, 17 new species were identified as particularly high priorities for eradication should they establish in the future, whereas 14 emerging species were identified as priorities for eradication now. A number of species considered highest priority for eradication were terrestrial vertebrates, a group that has been the focus of a number of eradication attempts in Europe. However, eradication priorities also included a diverse range of other taxa (plants, invertebrates and fish) suggesting there is scope to broaden the taxonomic range of attempted eradication in Europe. We demonstrate that broad scale structured assessments of management feasibility can help prioritize IAS for management. Such frameworks are needed to support evidence-based decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Ecosistema , Especies Introducidas , Animales , Europa (Continente) , Estudios de Factibilidad , Vertebrados
2.
Glob Chang Biol ; 25(3): 1032-1048, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30548757

RESUMEN

The European Union (EU) has recently published its first list of invasive alien species (IAS) of EU concern to which current legislation must apply. The list comprises species known to pose great threats to biodiversity and needs to be maintained and updated. Horizon scanning is seen as critical to identify the most threatening potential IAS that do not yet occur in Europe to be subsequently risk assessed for future listing. Accordingly, we present a systematic consensus horizon scanning procedure to derive a ranked list of potential IAS likely to arrive, establish, spread and have an impact on biodiversity in the region over the next decade. The approach is unique in the continental scale examined, the breadth of taxonomic groups and environments considered, and the methods and data sources used. International experts were brought together to address five broad thematic groups of potential IAS. For each thematic group the experts first independently assembled lists of potential IAS not yet established in the EU but potentially threatening biodiversity if introduced. Experts were asked to score the species within their thematic group for their separate likelihoods of i) arrival, ii) establishment, iii) spread, and iv) magnitude of the potential negative impact on biodiversity within the EU. Experts then convened for a 2-day workshop applying consensus methods to compile a ranked list of potential IAS. From an initial working list of 329 species, a list of 66 species not yet established in the EU that were considered to be very high (8 species), high (40 species) or medium (18 species) risk species was derived. Here, we present these species highlighting the potential negative impacts and the most likely biogeographic regions to be affected by these potential IAS.


Asunto(s)
Biodiversidad , Ecosistema , Especies Introducidas/tendencias , Animales , Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Política Ambiental , Unión Europea , Especies Introducidas/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 16(12): 1966-8, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21122233

RESUMEN

We describe Brucella sp. infection and associated lesions in a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) found on the coast of Belgium. The infection was diagnosed by immunohistochemistry, transmission electron microscopy, and bacteriology, and the organism was identified as B. ceti. The infection's location in the porpoise raises questions of abortion and zoonotic risks.


Asunto(s)
Brucella/aislamiento & purificación , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Phocoena/microbiología , Animales , Bélgica , Brucella/clasificación , Brucelosis/complicaciones , Brucelosis/diagnóstico , Brucelosis/patología , Resultado Fatal , Femenino
4.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 60(12): 2187-96, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21051051

RESUMEN

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) are the European umbrella regulations for water systems. It is a challenge for the scientific community to translate the principles of these directives into realistic and accurate approaches. The aim of this paper, conducted by the Benthos Ecology Working Group of ICES, is to describe how the principles have been translated, which were the challenges and best way forward. We have tackled the following principles: the ecosystem-based approach, the development of benthic indicators, the definition of 'pristine' or sustainable conditions, the detection of pressures and the development of monitoring programs. We concluded that testing and integrating the different approaches was facilitated during the WFD process, which led to further insights and improvements, which the MSFD can rely upon. Expert involvement in the entire implementation process proved to be of vital importance.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Política Ambiental , Contaminación del Agua/prevención & control , Ecosistema , Monitoreo del Ambiente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Europa (Continente) , Especies Introducidas , Contaminación del Agua/legislación & jurisprudencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA