The roles of SFKs in the regulation of proinflammatory cytokines and NLRP3 in familial mediterranean fever patients.

Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is caused by mutations in pyrin, a protein produced in innate immune cells that regulates the development of interleukin (IL)-1ß by interacting with caspase-1 and other components of inflammasomes. Although overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines have been observed in FMF patients, no studies have been conducted on the role of Src family kinases (SFKs). The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of SFKs on the modulation of IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and NLRP3 inflammasome in patients with FMF. The study included 20 FMF patients and 20 controls. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by density gradient centrifugation. Protein expression levels of SFKs members were measured by western blot. The effect of lipopolysaccharide-induced (LPS) activation and PP2- induced inhibition of SFKs on NLRP3 and IL-1ß, IL 6, IL-8, TNF-α were examined by western blot and flow cytometry respectively. Patients with FMF have considerably greater levels of Lck expression. In addition, patients had a substantially greater basal level of NLRP3 than the control group (*p = 0.016). Most importantly, the levels of IL-1 ß were elevated with LPS stimulation and reduced with PP2 inhibition in FMF patients. These results suggest that SFKs are effective in regulation of IL-1 ß in FMF patients.

The effect of comorbidity on survival and collected CD34 + cell counts in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to report the effectiveness of hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and GATMO scores in predicting overall survival (OS) who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 263 MM and 204 lymphoma patients who underwent ASCT in the last 11 years were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Neutrophil engraftment time, thrombocyte engraftment time and collected CD34+ cell counts were similar in MM patients with HCT-CI>2 and HCT-CI≤2 (all p>0.05). Although the estimated median OS of MM patients with HCT-CI ≤2 tended to be higher than those with HCT-CI>2, this difference was not statistically significant (52.8 vs 45 months, p=0.172). No effect of GATMO score on CD34 + count, engraftment times and OS in MM patients was detected (p>0.05). The effect of HCT-CI score on lymphoma patients was examined, it was found that the neutrophil engraftment time was longer (p=0.039) and the number of collected CD34+ cells was lower (p=0.02) in patients with HCT-CI>2 than those with HCT-CI≤2. While the estimated median OS of lymphoma patients with HCT-CI≤2 was 51.5 months, the estimated median OS of patients with HCT-CI>2 was 9.5 months (p=0.012). When lymphoma patients were divided into four groups according to their GATMO scores, the OS of the four groups was found to be different from each other (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: HCT-CI and GATMO scores predict OS in lymphoma patients but not MM patients.

The effect of G-CSF used after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on engraftment times and platelet suspension replacement numbers.

BACKGROUND: With the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the duration of neutrophil engraftment and hospitalization were shortened. However, there is no consensus on the effect of G-CSF on platelet engraftment time. The primary aim of our study is to determine the effect of G-CSF use on platelet engraftment time after HSCT. Secondary purposes are to determine the number of platelet suspension, number of erythrocyte suspension and incidence of acute graft versus disease after HSCT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who had allogeneic stem cell transplantation at our center between 01.01.2011 and 01.01.2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups as those who received and did not receive G-CSF after transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were included. While 32 patients were given post-HSCT G-CSF support, the other 32 patients were not given. Neutrophil engraftment time and length of hospital stay were shorter in the group receiving G-CSF (p < 0.05). Platelet engraftment time was shorter in the group that did not receive G-CSF (p < 0.05). The incidence of acute GVHD of the patients in group 1 tended to be higher than the patients in group 2 (40.6 % vs 15.6 %, p = 0.052). Post-HSCT platelet suspension was less in the group that did not receive G-CSF, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.173). CONCLUSION: While the positive effect of post HSCT G-CSF use on duration of neutrophil engraftment and hospitalization is evident, its effects on platelet engraftment need to be investigated.