RESUMEN
Despite inferior vena cava (IVC) filter practice spanning over 50 years, interventionalists face many controversies in proper utilization and management. This article reviews recent literature and offers opinions on filter practices. IVC filtration is most likely to benefit patients at high risk of iatrogenic pulmonary embolus during endovenous intervention. Filters should be used selectively in patients with acute trauma or who are undergoing bariatric surgery. Retrieval should be attempted for perforating filter and fractured filter fragments when imaging suggests feasibility and favorable risk-to-benefit ratio. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be considered when removing filters with confirmed gastrointestinal penetration. Anticoagulation solely because of filter presence is not recommended except in patients with active malignancy. Anticoagulation while filters remain in place may decrease long-term filter complications in these patients. Patients with a filter and symptomatic IVC occlusion should be offered filter removal and IVC reconstruction. Physicians implanting filters may maximize retrieval by maintaining physician-patient relationships and scheduling follow-up at time of placement. Annual follow-up allows continued evaluation for removal or replacement as appropriate. Advanced retrieval techniques increase retrieval rates but require caution. Certain cases may require referral to experienced centers with additional retrieval resources. The views expressed should help guide clinical practice, future innovation, and research.
Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Filtros de Vena Cava , Vena Cava Inferior , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Cirugía Bariátrica , COVID-19/complicaciones , Remoción de Dispositivos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Diseño de Prótesis , Recurrencia , Medición de Riesgo , Filtros de Vena Cava/efectos adversos , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Heridas y Lesiones/complicacionesRESUMEN
Current imaging technologies are capable of acquiring volumetric data, but they are limited by the flat 2-dimensional representation of complex 3-dimensional data. This pictorial report illustrates the potential role of interactive virtual reality (VR) that enables physicians to visualize and interact with image data as if they were real physical objects. Increasing availability of tools that make the VR environment a possibility could potentially be valuable in the interventional radiology suite.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Modelos Anatómicos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Modelación Específica para el Paciente , Arteria Esplénica , Terapia Asistida por Computador , Realidad Virtual , Anciano , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Femenino , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Arteria Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Interfaz Usuario-ComputadorRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of attempted percutaneous filter fragment removal during retrieval of fractured inferior vena cava (IVC) filters and to report outcomes associated with retained filter fragments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 5-year period, 82 consecutive patients presenting with a fractured IVC filter were prospectively enrolled into an institutional review board-approved registry. There were 27 men and 55 women (mean, 47 y; range, 19-85 y). After main filter removal, percutaneous removal of fragments was attempted if they were deemed intravascular and accessible on preprocedural computed tomography (CT), cone-beam CT, and/or intravascular ultrasound; distal pulmonary artery (PA) fragments were left alone. A total of 185 fragments were identified (81 IVC, 33 PA, 16 cardiac, 2 hepatic vein, 1 renal vein, 1 aorta, 51 retroperitoneal). Mean filter dwell time was 2,183 days (range, 59-9,936 d). Eighty-seven of 185 fragments (47%) were deemed amenable to attempted removal: 65 IVC, 11 PA, 8 cardiac, 2 hepatic, and 1 aortic. Primary safety outcomes were major procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Fragment removal was successful in 78 of 87 cases (89.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 81.3-95.2). There were 6 minor complications with no consequence (6.9%; 95% CI, 2.6-14.4) involving intraprocedural fragment embolization and 1 major complication (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.0-6.2), a cardiac tamponade that was successfully treated. The complication rate from attempted cardiac fragment removal was 12.5% (1 of 8; 95% CI, 0.3-52.7). Among patients with retained cardiopulmonary fragments (n = 19), 81% remained asymptomatic during long-term clinical follow-up of 845 days (range, 386-2,071 d). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous removal of filter fragments from the IVC and proximal PAs is safe and effective overall, but attempted intracardiac fragment removal carries a higher risk of complication. Most residual filter fragments not amenable to percutaneous removal remain asymptomatic and may be monitored clinically.
Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Cuerpos Extraños/cirugía , Radiografía Intervencional , Filtros de Vena Cava/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
ChatGPT did not reliably provide accurate information to 20 questions about liver cancer surveillance and diagnosis, as assessed by six physicians who actively diagnose and/or treat liver cancer. Answers deemed inaccurate commonly related to questions on specific LI-RADS categories and included contradictory or falsely reassuring, if not wrong, information.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagenAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Arquitectura y Construcción de Instituciones de Salud , Unidades Hospitalarias/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Radiología Intervencionista/organización & administración , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Desinfección/organización & administración , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Humanos , Pandemias , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Equipo de Protección Personal , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Neumonía Viral/virología , Ropa de Protección , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria , Flujo de TrabajoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy, reliability, and readability of publicly available large language models in answering fundamental questions on hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and management. METHODS: Twenty questions on liver cancer diagnosis and management were asked in triplicate to ChatGPT-3.5 (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), and Bing (Microsoft). Responses were assessed by six fellowship-trained physicians from three academic liver transplant centers who actively diagnose and/or treat liver cancer. Responses were categorized as accurate (score 1; all information is true and relevant), inadequate (score 0; all information is true, but does not fully answer the question or provides irrelevant information), or inaccurate (score - 1; any information is false). Means with standard deviations were recorded. Responses were considered as a whole accurate if mean score was > 0 and reliable if mean score was > 0 across all responses for the single question. Responses were also quantified for readability using the Flesch Reading Ease Score and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Readability and accuracy across 60 responses were compared using one-way ANOVAs with Tukey's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: Of the twenty questions, ChatGPT answered nine (45%), Gemini answered 12 (60%), and Bing answered six (30%) questions accurately; however, only six (30%), eight (40%), and three (15%), respectively, were both accurate and reliable. There were no significant differences in accuracy between any chatbot. ChatGPT responses were the least readable (mean Flesch Reading Ease Score 29; college graduate), followed by Gemini (30; college) and Bing (40; college; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Large language models provide complex responses to basic questions on hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and management that are seldomly accurate, reliable, or readable.
RESUMEN
Low- and middle-income countries are significantly impacted by the global scarcity of medical imaging services. Medical imaging is an essential component for diagnosis and guided treatment, which is needed to meet the current challenges of increasing chronic diseases and preparedness for acute-care response. We present some key themes essential for improving global health equity, which were discussed at the 2023 RAD-AID Conference on International Radiology and Global Health. They include (1) capacity building, (2) artificial intelligence, (3) community-based patient navigation, (4) organizational design for multidisciplinary global health strategy, (5) implementation science, and (6) innovation. Although not exhaustive, these themes should be considered influential as we guide and expand global health radiology programs in low- and middle-income countries in the coming years.
Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Radiología , Radiología/organización & administración , Humanos , Equidad en Salud , Creación de Capacidad , Inteligencia Artificial , Países en Desarrollo , Congresos como Asunto , Diagnóstico por ImagenRESUMEN
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Endovascular simulation is a validated training method, allowing residents to improve technical skills with interventional equipment in a risk-free environment. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility and efficacy of supplementing the IR/DR Integrated Residency training program with a dedicated 2-year endovascular simulation curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trainees participated in a 2-year curriculum that included the completion of 8 modules using a high-fidelity endovascular simulator (Mentice AB, Gothenberg, Sweden). Procedural modules included IVC filter placement, transarterial chemoembolization, trauma embolization, uterine artery embolization, prostate artery embolization, and peripheral arterial disease interventions. Each quarter, two trainees were filmed while completing an assigned module. Sessions led by IR faculty were held with film footage review and didactics on the assigned topic. Pre- and postcase surveys were collected to evaluate trainee comfort and confidence and assess the validity of the simulation. At the conclusion of the 2-year period, a postcurriculum survey was sent to all trainees to determine how residents viewed the utility of the simulation sessions. RESULTS: Eight residents participated in the pre- and postcase surveys. The simulation curriculum significantly increased trainee confidence for these 8 residents. A separate postcurriculum survey was completed by all 16 IR/DR residents. All 16 residents felt that simulation was a helpful addition to their education. A total of 87.5% of all residents felt that the sessions improved their confidence in the IR procedure room. A total of 75% of all residents believe that the simulation curriculum should be incorporated into the IR residency program. CONCLUSION: Adoption of a 2-year simulation curriculum can be considered for existing IR/DR training programs with access to high-fidelity endovascular simulators using the described approach.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
Background: Noncontrast CT (NCCT) is used to evaluate for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and ischemia in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Large vessel occlusions (LVOs) are a major cause of AIS, but challenging to detect on NCCT. Aims: The purpose of this study is to evaluate an AI software called RAPID NCCT Stroke (RAPID, iSchemaView, Menlo Park, CA) for ICH and LVO detection compared to expert readers. Methods: In this IRB approved retrospective, multicenter study, stand-alone performance of the software was assessed based on the consensus of 3 neuroradiologists and sensitivity and specificity were determined. The platform's performance was then compared to interpretation by readers comprised of eight general radiologists (GR) and three neuroradiologists (NR) in detecting ICH and hyperdense vessel sign (HVS) indicating LVO. Results: A total of 244 cases were included. Of the 244, 115 were LVOs and 26 were ICHs. One hundred three cases did not have LVO nor ICH. Stand-alone performance of the software demonstrated sensitivities and specificities of 96.2 and 99.5% for ICH and 63.5 and 95.1% for LVO detection. Compared to all 11 readers and eight GR readers only respectively, the software demonstrated superiority, achieving significantly higher sensitivities (63.5% versus 43.6%, p < 0.0001 and 63.5% versus 40.9%, p = 0.001). Conclusion: The RAPID NCCT Stroke platform demonstrates superior performance to radiologists for detecting LVO from a NCCT. Use of this software platform could lead to earlier LVO detection and expedited transfer of these patients to a thrombectomy capable center.
RESUMEN
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. At diagnosis, most patients are ineligible for curative surgery, and approximately 20% of patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. A significant proportion of patients fall under an unresectable or intermediate-stage disease who have liver-limited disease but are not surgical candidates because of large tumor size, number of lesions, or technically inoperable disease. In this unique intermediate-stage patient population, locoregional therapies have been the de facto mainstay of treatment because of high local response rates and favorable safety profile, especially in the context of minimally effective systemic therapies. However, not all patients who receive locoregional therapy for incurable disease have improved survival, and importantly, some of these patients never receive systemic therapy because of disease progression or further decline in hepatic function. Meanwhile, with the remarkable progress that has been made with systemic therapy in the past few years, revisiting the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC seems prudent. In this review, we will highlight current and emerging strategies for treating patients with unresectable, liver-limited HCC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapiaRESUMEN
This retrospective analysis reviews five patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) who underwent percutaneous microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma between January 2017 and September 2020. Mean tumor diameter was 2.0 cm (range 1.3-2.9 cm), and mean tumor distance from TIPS was 2.3 cm (range 1.5-3.3 cm). There were no major adverse events, and the TIPS patency was 100% post-ablation. The technical success rate was 100%, and the complete response rate was 100%. In this small study, percutaneous microwave ablation appears safe and effective for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with TIPS in the short-term follow-up period.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Gastric variceal (GV) bleeding is an important and fatal complication for cirrhotic patients which has historically been controlled with sclerosants and band ligation. Cyanoacrylate glue therapy has emerged as a more favorable option with bleeding control of up to 90% and low complication rates; however, several reports show possible ectopic systemic glue migration, most commonly into the portomesenteric system and leading to portal hypertension. To decompress portal pressures and mitigate future complications, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement may be a viable rescue therapy. We present two cases of TIPS placement for an 18-year-old and 51-year-old male in the setting of endoscopic glue migration into the portomesenteric system that demonstrate feasibility and success in temporizing acute variceal bleeding. Both cases demonstrated decompressing portovenous pressures but may result in need for re-intervention.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy is playing an increasing role in the treatment of iliofemoral venous disease. Iliac stent patency is multifactorial, and current management is based on best clinical practices, varying by institution. AIM: To evaluate how thrombophilia influences management and outcomes of patients who undergo venous stenting for thrombotic iliac vein compression syndromes. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis was performed on 65 patients with thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome that underwent common iliac vein (CIV) stenting between December 2013 and December 2019 at a large academic center. Search criteria included CIV stenting and iliac vein compression. Non-thrombotic lesions and iliocaval thrombosis and/or occlusions were excluded. A total of 65 patients were selected for final analysis. Demographic information, procedural data points, and post-procedural management and outcomes were collected. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact and Chi-square tests to compare discrete variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare continuous variables between thrombophilia positive and negative patients. RESULTS: 65 patients underwent successful balloon angioplasty and CIV stenting. Of these patients, 33 (50.8%) underwent thrombophilia testing, with 16 (48.5%) testing positive. Stent patency on ultrasound did not significantly differ between thrombophilia positive and negative patients at 1 mo (92.3% vs 81.3%, P = 0.6), 6 mo (83.3% vs 80%, P > 0.9), or 12 mo (77.8% vs 76.9%, P = 0.8). Immediately after stent placement, thrombophilia patients were more likely to be placed on dual therapy (aspirin and anticoagulation) or triple therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, and anticoagulation) (50% vs 41.2%, P > 0.9), and remain on dual therapy at 6 mo (25% vs 12.5%, P = 0.5) and 12 mo (25% vs 6.7%, P = 0.6). There was no significant difference in re-intervention rates (25% vs 35.3%, P = 0.7) or number of re-interventions (average 2.3 vs 1.3 per patient, P = 0.4) between thrombophilia positive and negative patients. CONCLUSION: Half of patients with stented thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome and thrombophilia testing were positive. The presence of thrombophilia did not significantly impact stent patency or re-intervention rates.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To highlight the role of interventional radiology (IR) in the treatment of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: Retrospective review of hospitalized patients who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and had one or more IR procedures at a tertiary referral hospital in New York City during a 6-week period in April and May of 2020. RESULTS: Of the 724 patients admitted with COVID-19, 92 (12.7%) underwent 124 interventional radiology procedures (79.8% in IR suite, 20.2% at bedside). The median age of IR patients was 63 years (range 24-86 years); 39.1% were female; 35.9% in the intensive care unit. The most commonly performed IR procedures were central venous catheter placement (31.5%), inferior vena cava filter placement (9.7%), angiography/embolization (4.8%), gastrostomy tube placement (9.7%), image-guided biopsy (10.5%), abscess drainage (9.7%), and cholecystostomy tube placement (6.5%). Thoracentesis/chest tube placement and nephrostomy tube placement were also performed as well as catheter-directed thrombolysis of massive pulmonary embolism and thrombectomy of deep vein thrombosis. General anesthesia (10.5%), monitored anesthesia care (18.5%), moderate sedation (29.8%), or local anesthetic (41.1%) was utilized. There were 3 (2.4%) minor complications (SIR adverse event class B), 1 (0.8%) major complication (class C), and no procedure-related death. With a median follow-up of 4.3 months, 1.1% of patients remain hospitalized, 16.3% died, and 82.6% were discharged. CONCLUSION: Interventional radiology participated in the care of hospitalized COVID-19 patients by performing a wide variety of necessary procedures.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiología Intervencionista , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The ongoing COVID pandemic raises many concerns as our healthcare system is pushed to its limits and as a consequence, Interventional Radiology training may be compromised. Endovascular simulators allow trainees many benefits to build and maintain endovascular skills in a safe environment. Our experience demonstrates a methodology to maintain IR training with use of didactic and simulation supplementation during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may be helpful for incorporation at other institutions facing similar challenges.