Effects of NGM282, an FGF19 variant, on colonic transit and bowel function in functional constipation: a randomized phase 2 trial.

OBJECTIVE: NGM282 is an analog of fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19), a potent inhibitor of bile acid (BA) synthesis in animals and humans. In phase 2 trials in type 2 diabetes and primary biliary cholangitis, NGM282 was associated with dose-related abdominal cramping and diarrhea. We aimed to examine effects of NGM282 on colonic transit, stool frequency and consistency, hepatic BA synthesis (fasting serum C4), fecal fat, and BA in functional constipation (FC). METHODS: Two-dose NGM282 (1 and 6 mg, subcutaneously daily), parallel-group, randomized, placebo-controlled, 14-day study in patients with FC (Rome III criteria) and baseline colonic transit 24 h geometric center (GC) <3.0. We explored treatment interaction with SNPs in genes KLB, FGFR4, and TGR5 (GPBAR1). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: overall ANCOVA at α = 0.025 (baseline as covariate where available), with three pairwise comparisons among the three groups (α = 0.008). RESULTS: Overall, NGM282 altered bowel function (number of bowel movements, looser stool form, and increased ease of passage) and significantly accelerated gastric and colonic transit. Dose-related effects were seen with GC 24 h, but not with gastric emptying (GE) and GC 48 h. There were no differences in fecal fat or weight, but there was reduced fecal total BA excretion with NGM282. The most common adverse events were increased appetite (n = 0 with placebo, 2 with 1 mg, 9 with 6 mg), injection site reaction (n = 2 placebo, 4 with 1 mg, 8 with 6 mg), and diarrhea (n = 1 with 1 mg and 4 with 6 mg NGM282). There was treatment interaction with KLB SNP, with greater increase in colonic transit in participants with the minor A allele (p = 0.056). CONCLUSION: NGM282 significantly impacts GE and colonic transit, consistent with the observed clinical symptoms. The specific mechanism of prokinetic activity requires further research.

Rectal Gas Volume Measured by Computerized Tomography Identifies Evacuation Disorders in Patients With Constipation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Approximately one third of patients who present to gastroenterology care with constipation have rectal evacuation disorders. We aimed to compare rectal gas volume, measured by computerized tomography (CT), in constipated patients with and without rectal evacuation disorders. METHODS: In a retrospective study, we collected data from 1553 patients with constipation, evaluated over 20 years. We analyzed data from 141 patients evaluated by anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion tests, and colon transit tests, collecting records of abdominal and pelvic CT examinations. Patients were classified into 3 subgroups: those with rectal evacuation disorders, slow-transit constipation, or normal-transit constipation. Two observers used standard CT software to identify variable regions of interest on each cross-sectional CT image that contained rectum and measured areas of gas in each slice; they then summated entire volumes of rectal gas. For the 3 groups, we compared rectal gas volume, maximal rectal gas transaxial area (measured by CT), and area of rectal gas (vertical) on the 2-dimensional abdominal film (scout) using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient between 2 observers' measurements of rectal gas volume was 0.99 (P < .001). There were overall group differences in rectal gas volume and the maximal rectal gas transaxial area (both P < .001). The median rectal gas volume was higher in patients with rectal evacuation disorders (13.84 cm3) than in patients with slow-transit (2.51 cm3) or normal-transit constipation (1.33 cm3, both P < .05). Similarly, the area of rectal gas, which correlated with the maximal rectal gas transaxial area (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.7; P < .001), showed overall 3-group differences (P = .033), with greater areas of rectal gas on the abdominal scout film in patients with rectal evacuation disorders than in those with normal-transit constipation. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of patients with constipation, we found rectal gas volume, determined by abdominal CT imaging, to be greater in patients with than without rectal evacuation disorders.

Embolization of portosystemic shunts for treatment of medically refractory hepatic encephalopathy.

Treatment options for refractory hepatic encephalopathy (HE) are limited. Patients who fail medical management may harbor large portosystemic shunts (PSSs) which are possible therapeutic targets. This study aims to describe patient selection, effectiveness, and safety of percutaneous PSS embolization in those with medically refractory HE. A retrospective evaluation of consecutive adult patients with medically refractory HE referred for PSS embolization at a tertiary center was performed (2003-2015). Patient data collected included the type of HE, medications, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, shunt type, embolization approach, and materials used. Outcomes of interest were immediate (7 days), intermediate (1-4 months), and longer-term (6-12 months) effectiveness and periprocedural safety. Effectiveness was determined based on changes in hospitalization frequency, HE medications, and symptoms. Twenty-five patients with large PSS were evaluated for shunt embolization. Five were excluded due to high MELD scores (n = 1), comorbid conditions (n = 1), or technical considerations (n = 3). Of 20 patients who underwent embolization, 13 had persistent and 7 had recurrent HE; 100% (20/20) achieved immediate improvement. Durable benefit was achieved in 100% (18/18) and 92% (11/12) at 1-4 and 6-12 months, respectively. The majority (67%; 8/12) were free from HE-related hospitalizations over 1 year; 10% developed procedural complications, and all resolved. Six developed new or worsening ascites. In conclusion, PSS embolization is a safe and effective treatment strategy that should be considered for select patients with medically refractory HE. Liver Transplantation 22 723-731 2016 AASLD.

Gastrointestinal motility evaluation in children with orthostatic intolerance: Mayo Clinic experience.

OBJECTIVE: Orthostatic intolerance (OI) and autonomic dysfunction (AD) are common in adolescents and young adults. Patients experience multisystem symptoms including gastrointestinal (GI), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), orthostatic hypotension (OH), or only symptoms of OI (SOI) without significant findings on 70-degree head-up tilt testing (HUT). We hypothesize that patients with POTS, OH, and SOI show differences in GI symptoms and motility test and that heart rate (HR) changes on HUT predict severity of GI dysmotility. STUDY DESIGN: From medical records of patients (<18 years) with OI, we collected demographics, presenting symptoms, GI manifestations, and GI motility testing. Data were compared between the 3 groups (POTS, OH, and SOI). We assessed changes in HR on HUT with changes on GI motility evaluation. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients were included (73% females). Abdominal pain (65%), nausea (49%), vomiting (18%), and constipation (24%) were the most common GI symptoms. In patients who had motility evaluation, there were 27% (53/193) with delayed gastric emptying (GE) at 4 hours, 35% (32/92) with delayed colonic transit (CT), 55% (17/31) with reduced gastric accommodation (GA), and 75% (21/28) with dyssynergic defecation (DD). Among 100 POTS, 34 OH, and 95 SOI patients, no significant differences in GI symptoms or motility tests were identified and HR changes on HUT were not associated with changes on motility tests. CONCLUSION: GI symptoms are frequent in adolescents with OI and are associated with delayed GE, reduced GA, delayed CT, and presence of DD.

GLP-1 Analog Modulates Appetite, Taste Preference, Gut Hormones, and Regional Body Fat Stores in Adults with Obesity.

PURPOSE: Obesity is associated with alterations in appetite, gastrointestinal hormone levels and excessive fat mass. We previously published a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 16-week trial on effects of once-daily glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog, liraglutide on weight, satiation, and gastric functions in obese volunteers. The aim of this substudy is to compare to placebo the effects of liraglutide on appetite, taste preference, regional body fat stores, and anthropometric measurements. METHODS: Forty obese adults received standard instruction for weight management, monthly behavioral intervention utilizing motivational interviews, and 16-week treatment of once-daily liraglutide (escalated to 3 mg SQ daily). At baseline and 16 weeks, the following were measured: appetite and taste preferences rated every 30 min for 5 h after ingesting 300 mL Ensure®; maximal tolerated volume (MTV) with a nutrient drink test; fasting and postprandial bioactive GLP-1 (7-36) and peptide YY (PYY) levels; total and regional body fat with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and waist and hip circumference. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants (17 liraglutide; 18 placebo) completed the trial. Compared to placebo group, liraglutide group had significant reductions in MTV; prospective food consumption score; desire to eat something sweet, salty, savory or fatty; and an increase in perceived fullness. Postprandial plasma levels of GLP-1 decreased and PYY levels increased with liraglutide relative to baseline. Significant reductions in total body, trunk, and upper and lower body fat without reduction in lean body mass were observed. CONCLUSION: Liraglutide 3 mg SQ modulates appetite, taste preference, gut hormones, and regional body fat stores in adults with obesity without reduction in lean body mass.

Effects of liraglutide on weight, satiation, and gastric functions in obesity: a randomised, placebo-controlled pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Liraglutide, a long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist, is approved for treatment of obesity; however, the mechanisms of action of liraglutide are incompletely understood. We compared effects of liraglutide versus placebo on gastric motor functions, satiation, satiety, and weight in obese individuals over 16 weeks. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial at a single centre (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA). Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) by a computer generated randomisation schedule with no stratification to receive subcutaneous liraglutide (3·0 mg) or placebo, with standardised nutritional and behavioural counselling. Allocation was concealed from participants and study investigators. Otherwise healthy, local residents aged 18-65 years with body-mass index (BMI) 30 kg/m2 or higher were included. Liraglutide or placebo was escalated by 0·6 mg/day each week for 5 weeks and continued until week 16. The primary outcome was change in gastric emptying (delay relative to baseline) of solids T1/2 (time taken for half the radiolabelled meal to empty from the stomach), measured at 5 weeks and 16 weeks in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, with missing data imputed. Secondary outcomes included weight loss at weeks 5 and 16, satiation (volume to fullness and maximum tolerated volume), satiety, and fasting and postprandial gastric volumes at 16 weeks. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02647944, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between Dec 18, 2015, and Sept 1, 2016, 40 adults were enrolled and randomly allocated (19 to the liraglutide group; 21 to the placebo group). Compared with placebo, liraglutide delayed gastric emptying of solids at 5 weeks (median 70 min [IQR 32 to 151] vs 4 min [-21 to 18]; p<0·0001) and 16 weeks (30·5 min [-11 to 54] vs -1 min [-19 to 7]; p=0·025). There was also significantly greater weight loss in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group (at 5 weeks: median 3·7 kg [IQR 2·8 to 4·8] vs 0·6 kg [-0·3 to 1·4], p<0·0001; at 16 weeks: 5·3 kg [5·2 to 6·8] vs 2·5 kg [0·1 to 4·2], p=0·0009). Satiation, as assessed by maximum tolerated volume at 16 weeks, was lower in the liraglutide group (median 750 mL [IQR 651 to 908]) compared with the placebo group (1126 mL [944-1185]; p=0·054). No significant differences were noted between groups in terms of volume to fullness, satiety, or fasting and postprandial gastric volumes at week 16. Post-hoc analysis showed that the T1/2 of gastric emptying of solids at 5 weeks correlated with change in weight loss at week 16 with liraglutide (Rs 0·567, p=0·018). Nausea was the most common adverse event in the liraglutide group (12 of 19) compared with placebo (four of 21). INTERPRETATION: Effects of liraglutide on weight loss are associated with delay in gastric emptying of solids; measurement of gastric emptying (eg, at 5 weeks of treatment) may be a biomarker of responsiveness and may help to select individuals for prolonged treatment with this class of drug. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health grant R56-DK67071.