Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Gynecol Pathol ; 43(1): 61-66, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37255420

RESUMEN

Placental site nodules (PSNs) are non-neoplastic remnants of chorionic-type intermediate trophoblastic cells from a previous gestation that form a well-defined single nodule or multiple nodules in the uterine and extrauterine sites. As the cases of PSNs transformed into gestational trophoblastic tumors were described in the literature, "atypical placental site nodules" (APSNs) have been considered as putative transitional lesions between PSNs and gestational trophoblastic tumors. Although histologic criteria and cutoff point of Ki-67 proliferation index for differentiating an APSN from a typical PSN have not been clearly defined, nodules larger than 5 mm with increased cellularity, a corded or nested appearance, marked nuclear atypia, increased mitotic activity, and an increased Ki-67 proliferation index (>5% or >8%) of intermediate trophoblastic cells seem to be accepted as diagnostic criteria for APSNs. However, some of the criteria, including lesion size and histologic features of the trophoblastic cells in the nodule are not only subjective but have features inherent of the intermediate trophoblastic cells of the fetal membrane and a typical PSN. We thought that it is not reasonable to consider them as diagnostic features of APSNs, if not associated with cellular proliferation. We present 2 cases of incidentally identified PSNs that were larger than 10 mm in size with a corded or nested arrangement of trophoblastic cells, which could have been categorized as APSNs according to the currently proposed criteria to discuss whether the currently proposed diagnostic criteria for APSNs are appropriate.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Trofoblástica Gestacional , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Tumor Trofoblástico Localizado en la Placenta , Neoplasias Uterinas , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Placenta/patología , Antígeno Ki-67 , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/patología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/patología , Útero/patología , Enfermedad Trofoblástica Gestacional/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Trofoblástica Gestacional/patología , Tumor Trofoblástico Localizado en la Placenta/diagnóstico , Tumor Trofoblástico Localizado en la Placenta/patología
2.
Int J Gynecol Pathol ; 2024 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38916173

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to investigate the pathologic prognostic factors such as tumor cell clusters (TCCs) in the fallopian tube lumen, myometrial invasion patterns, and positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) in women with Stage I endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). From 2009 to 2020, consecutive patients with Stage I EEC who underwent hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy were included. The primary outcome was the recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, and the clinicopathological factors affecting RFS were analyzed. A total of 765 patients were enrolled. Seventeen patients (2.2%) had TCC in the fallopian tube lumen, and 58 patients showed a microcystic elongated and fragmented pattern (7.6%). PPC was found in 19 patients (2.5%). The median follow-up period was 61.0 months (range: 2.0-149.7). The majority (88.6%) of patients had Stage IA EEC. The 5-year RFS and overall survival rates were 97.5% and 98.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis for RFS, the significant prognostic factors were lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio = 4.604; 95% CI: 1.387-15.288; P = 0.013) and grade (grade 2; hazard ratio = 4.949; 95% CI: 1.035-23.654; P = 0.045, and grade 3; hazard ratio = 5.469; 95% CI: 1.435-20.848; P = 0.013). Other pathologic factors including TCC in the fallopian tube lumen, myometrial invasion patterns, PPC, and hormonal status had no prognostic significance. TCC in the fallopian tube lumen, myometrial invasion pattern, PPC, and estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity were not significant prognostic factors in Stage I EEC. In contrast, lymphovascular invasion and grade were significant prognostic factors.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA