RESUMEN
Although RAF monomer inhibitors (type I.5, BRAF(V600)) are clinically approved for the treatment of BRAFV600-mutant melanoma, they are ineffective in non-BRAFV600 mutant cells1-3. Belvarafenib is a potent and selective RAF dimer (type II) inhibitor that exhibits clinical activity in patients with BRAFV600E- and NRAS-mutant melanomas. Here we report the first-in-human phase I study investigating the maximum tolerated dose, and assessing the safety and preliminary efficacy of belvarafenib in BRAFV600E- and RAS-mutated advanced solid tumours (NCT02405065, NCT03118817). By generating belvarafenib-resistant NRAS-mutant melanoma cells and analysing circulating tumour DNA from patients treated with belvarafenib, we identified new recurrent mutations in ARAF within the kinase domain. ARAF mutants conferred resistance to belvarafenib in both a dimer- and a kinase activity-dependent manner. Belvarafenib induced ARAF mutant dimers, and dimers containing mutant ARAF were active in the presence of inhibitor. ARAF mutations may serve as a general resistance mechanism for RAF dimer inhibitors as the mutants exhibit reduced sensitivity to a panel of type II RAF inhibitors. The combination of RAF plus MEK inhibition may be used to delay ARAF-driven resistance and suggests a rational combination for clinical use. Together, our findings reveal specific and compensatory functions for the ARAF isoform and implicate ARAF mutations as a driver of resistance to RAF dimer inhibitors.
Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/genética , Mutación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas A-raf/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas A-raf/genética , Quinasas raf/antagonistas & inhibidores , Animales , Línea Celular , Línea Celular Tumoral , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Ratones , Multimerización de Proteína/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas A-raf/química , Quinasas raf/químicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The effectiveness of gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear in cholangiocarcinoma. We investigated the role of adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) in a homogeneous group of high-risk patients with resected, lymph node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Adenocarcinoma of perihilar or distal bile duct with regional lymph node metastasis who underwent curative-intent surgery (R0/R1) was eligible. Patients were randomized to receive GemCis (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) or capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14) every 3 weeks for 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and safety. All p values are 1 sided and were considered significant if <0.1. Between July 2017 and November 2020, 101 patients (50 in the GemCis and 51 in the capecitabine group) were included in the intention-to-treat population. Perihilar and distal bile ducts were the primary sites in 45 (44.6%) and 56 (55.4%) patients, respectively, and 32 (31.7%) had R1 resections. Median (1-sided 90% CI) follow-up duration was 33.4 (30.5-35.8) months. In the GemCis and capecitabine group, 2-year disease-free survival rates were 38.5% (29.5%-47.4%) and 25.1% (17.4%-33.5%) [HR=0.96 (CI, 0.71-1.30), p=0.430], and median overall survival was 35.7 months (29.5-not estimated) and 35.7 months (30.9-not estimated) [HR=1.08 (CI, 0.71-1.64), 1-sided p=0.404], respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 42 (84.0%) and 8 patients (16.0%) in the GemCis and capecitabine groups, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In resected lymph node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, adjuvant GemCis did not improve survival outcomes compared with capecitabine.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Humanos , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Gemcitabina , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugía , Colangiocarcinoma/etiología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/inducido químicamente , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is one of the standard first-line therapies in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, there is no globally accepted second-line therapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX. METHODS: Patients with BRPC and LAPC (n = 647) treated with first-line mFOLFIRINOX between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. The details of the treatment outcomes and patterns of subsequent therapy after mFOLFIRINOX were reviewed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 44.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.3-47.6), 322 patients exhibited disease progression on mFOLFIRINOX-locoregional progression only in 177 patients (55.0%) and distant metastasis in 145 patients (45.0%). The locoregional progression group demonstrated significantly longer post-progression survival (PPS) than that of the distant metastasis group (10.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.002). In the locoregional progression group, survival outcomes did not differ between second-line chemoradiation/radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (progression-free survival with second-line therapy [PFS-2], 3.2 vs. 4.3 months; p = 0.649; PPS, 10.7 vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.791). In patients who received second-line systemic chemotherapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX (n = 211), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with better disease control rates (69.2% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.005) and PFS-2 (3.8 vs. 1.7 months, p = 0.035) than gemcitabine monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed the real-world practice pattern of subsequent therapy and clinical outcomes following progression on first-line mFOLFIRINOX in BRPC and LAPC. Further investigation is necessary to establish the optimal therapy after failure of mFOLFIRINOX.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Gemcitabina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Irinotecán , OxaliplatinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The MORPHEUS platform comprises multiple open-label, randomized, phase Ib/II trials designed to identify early efficacy and safety signals of treatment combinations across cancers. Atezolizumab (anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 [PD-L1]) was evaluated in combination with PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase (PEGPH20). METHODS: In 2 randomized MORPHEUS trials, eligible patients with advanced, previously treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) or gastric cancer (GC) received atezolizumab plus PEGPH20, or control treatment (mFOLFOX6 or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel [MORPHEUS-PDAC]; ramucirumab plus paclitaxel [MORPHEUS-GC]). Primary endpoints were objective response rates (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 and safety. RESULTS: In MORPHEUS-PDAC, ORRs with atezolizumab plus PEGPH20 (n = 66) were 6.1% (95% CI, 1.68%-14.80%) vs. 2.4% (95% CI, 0.06%-12.57%) with chemotherapy (n = 42). In the respective arms, 65.2% and 61.9% had grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs); 4.5% and 2.4% had grade 5 AEs. In MORPHEUS-GC, confirmed ORRs with atezolizumab plus PEGPH20 (n = 13) were 0% (95% CI, 0%-24.7%) vs. 16.7% (95% CI, 2.1%-48.4%) with control (n = 12). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 30.8% and 75.0% of patients, respectively; no grade 5 AEs occurred. CONCLUSION: Atezolizumab plus PEGPH20 showed limited clinical activity in patients with PDAC and none in patients with GC. The safety of atezolizumab plus PEGPH20 was consistent with each agent's known safety profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03193190 and NCT03281369).
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamiento farmacológico , Hialuronoglucosaminidasa/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Several preclinical studies demonstrate that antitumor efficacy of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade can be improved by combination with other checkpoint inhibitors. Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) is an inhibitory checkpoint receptor involved in T cell exhaustion and tumor immune escape. Here, we describe ABL501, a bispecific antibody targeting LAG-3 and PD-L1 in modulating immune cell responses against tumors. ABL501 that efficiently inhibits both LAG-3 and PD-L1 pathways enhances the activation of effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with a higher degree than a combination of single anti-LAG-3 and anti-PD-L1. The augmented effector T cell responses by ABL501 resulted in mitigating regulatory-T-cell-mediated immunosuppression. Mechanistically, the simultaneous binding of ABL501 to LAG-3 and PD-L1 promotes dendritic cell (DC) activation and tumor cell conjugation with T cells that subsequently mounts effective CD8+ T cell responses. ABL501 demonstrates its potent in vivo antitumor efficacy in a humanized xenograft model and with knockin mice expressing human orthologs. The immune profiling analysis of peripheral blood reveals an increased abundance of LAG-3hiPD-1hi memory CD4+ T cell subset in relapsed cholangiocarcinoma patients after gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy, which are more responsive to ABL501. This study supports the clinical evaluation of ABL501 as a novel cancer immunotherapeutic, and a first-in-human trial has started (NCT05101109).
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Antígenos CD , Antígeno B7-H1 , Neoplasias , Animales , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/farmacología , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos , Células Dendríticas , Ratones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1 , Escape del Tumor , Proteína del Gen 3 de Activación de LinfocitosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who have progressed on gemcitabine plus cisplatin is dismal. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer that has progressed on gemcitabine plus cisplatin. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2b (NIFTY) study was done at five academic institutions in South Korea and included patients aged 19 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic biliary tract cancer that had progressed on first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. By use of an interactive web-based response system integrated with an electronic data capture system, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks (block size 4) to receive either intravenous liposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2 for 90 min) plus intravenous leucovorin (400 mg/m2 for 30 min) and intravenous fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2 for 46 h) every 2 weeks or leucovorin and fluorouracil only every 2 weeks, and were stratified by primary tumour site, previous surgery with curative intent, and participating centre. Study treatment was continued until the patient had disease progression or unacceptable toxicities, or withdrew consent. The primary endpoint was blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed progression-free survival. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the full analysis set and the safety analysis set, respectively, both of which comprised all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03524508, and enrolment is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 5, 2018, and Feb 18, 2020, 193 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 174 (88 in the liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin group and 86 in the fluorouracil plus leucovorin group) were enrolled and included in the full analysis and safety analysis sets. At a median follow-up of 11·8 months (IQR 7·7-18·7), the median BICR-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin group (7·1 months, 95% CI 3·6-8·8) than in the fluorouracil and leucovorin group (1·4 months, 1·2-1·5; hazard ratio 0·56, 95% CI 0·39-0·81; p=0·0019). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (21 [24%] of 88 in the liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin group vs one [1%] of 86 in the fluorouracil and leucovorin group) and fatigue or asthenia (11 [13%] vs three [3%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 37 (42%) patients receiving liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin and 21 (24%) patients receiving fluorouracil and leucovorin. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Adding liposomal irinotecan to fluorouracil and leucovorin significantly improved BICR-assessed progression-free survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin could be considered a standard-of-care second-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer. FUNDING: Servier and HK inno. N TRANSLATION: For the Korean translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/patología , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Supervivencia sin Progresión , República de Corea , Tasa de Supervivencia , Inhibidores de Topoisomerasa I/uso terapéutico , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal prognostic markers for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer are not yet established. METHOD: Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery and underwent FDG-PET/CT between July 2012 and December 2017 were included. Metabolic parameters including standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on PET/CT, and response evaluations using PERCIST criteria, were investigated for its impact on survival and recurrence. Cox proportional hazards model was performed. Differences in risk were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95 per cent confidence interval. RESULTS: The patients with borderline resectable (N = 106) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (N = 82) were identified. The median survival was 33.6 months. Decreased metabolic parameters of PET/CT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were associated with positive impacts on survival and recurrence such as SUVmax (HR 1.16, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 1.32, P = 0.025), SUVpeak (HR 1.26, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 1.51, P = 0.011), and MTV (HR 1.15, 95 per cent c.i. 1.04 to 1.26, P = 0.005). Large delta values were related to a positive impact on recurrence such as SUVmax (HR 1.21, 95 per cent c.i. 1.06 to 1.38, P = 0.005). Post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy SUVmax ≥3 (HR 3.46, 95 per cent c.i. 1.21 to 9.91; P = 0.036) was an independent prognostic factor for negative impact on survival. Patients with post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy SUVmax <3 showed more chemotherapy cycles (8.7 versus 6.2, P = 0.001), more frequent complete metabolic response (25 versus 2.2 per cent, P = 0.002), smaller tumour size (2.1 versus 3.1 cm, P = 0.002), and less frequent lymphovascular invasion (23.7 versus 51.1 per cent, P = 0.020) than patients with SUVmax ≥3. CONCLUSION: Reduction in metabolic tumour parameters of FDG- PET/CT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicates improved overall survival and recurrence-free survival.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Anciano , Femenino , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Páncreas/diagnóstico por imagen , Páncreas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The optimal systemic chemotherapy for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) has not yet been defined. The definition and classification of cHCC-CCA has changed recently in the 5th edition of WHO classification. We reviewed the pathological findings with the new classification and analysed the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in patients with unresectable/metastatic cHCC-CCA. METHODS: Among 254 patients with histologically confirmed cHCC-CCA from 1999 to 2015 in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, 99 patients who received systemic chemotherapy for unresectable/metastatic disease were included. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Sorafenib (n = 62) and cytotoxic chemotherapy (n = 37) were administered as first-line chemotherapies; the ORR was 14.1%, and the median PFS and OS were 3.8 and 10.6 months, respectively, with a median follow-up duration of 39.6 months. The efficacy outcomes were not significantly different between patients who received sorafenib and those who received cytotoxic chemotherapy (ORR, 9.7% vs 21.6%, P = .14; median PFS, 4.2 vs 2.9 months, P = .52; median OS, 10.7 vs 10.6 months, P = .34). In multivariate analysis, large intrahepatic tumour burden (≥30% of liver volume), elevated serum bilirubin and non-platinum containing first-line chemotherapy remained as significant prognostic factors for poorer OS. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy outcomes according to first-line treatment were not significantly different between sorafenib and cytotoxic chemotherapy, and pathological findings were not found to help for determining appropriate therapeutic agent or assessing the prognosis. To overcome the poor treatment outcomes, further studies are needed to find proper treatment targets, biomarkers and the best treatment strategies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Colangiocarcinoma , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/tratamiento farmacológico , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , República de Corea , Estudios Retrospectivos , SeúlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify multiparametric MRI biomarkers to predict the tumor response to neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX therapy in patients with borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: From May 2016 to March 2018, adult patients with BR or LA PDAC were prospectively enrolled in this study. They received eight cycles of FOLFIRINOX therapy and underwent multiparametric MRI twice (at baseline and after the second cycle). MRI evaluations included dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging, and assessment of T2* relaxivity (R2*) and the change in T1 relaxivity (ΔR1, equilibrium phase R1 minus non-enhanced R1) of the tumors. Factors to predict the responders determined by the best overall response during FOLFIRINOX therapy and those to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (mean age, 60.3 years ± 9.3; 24 men) were included. Among the clinical and MRI factors, the baseline ΔR1 (adjusted odds ratio, 31.07; p = 0.008) was the only independent predictor for tumor response. The baseline ΔR1 was also an independent predictor for PFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.40; p = 0.033) along with R0 resection. The use of a cutoff ΔR1 value of ≥ 1.31 s-1 enabled prognostic stratification (median PFS, 16.0 months vs.10.0 months; p = 0.029; median OS, 34.9 months vs. 16.6 months; p = 0 .023, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The baseline tumor ΔR1 value may be useful to predict tumor response and survival in patients with BR or LA PDAC receiving FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant therapy. KEY POINTS: ⢠Baseline ΔR1 was an independent predictor for tumor response (adjusted odds ratio, 31.07; p = 0.008) and progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.40; p = 0.033) in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX therapy. ⢠The criterion of baseline ΔR1 value ≥ 1.31 s-1 allowed for the prediction of favorable tumor response and survival outcome after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX therapy.
Asunto(s)
Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo , Humanos , Irinotecán , Leucovorina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Oxaliplatino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the ability of CT-determined resectability, as defined by a recent version of NCCN criteria, and associated CT findings to predict margin-negative (R0) resection in patients with PDAC after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. METHODS: Sixty-four patients (36 men and 28 women; mean age, 58.8 years) with borderline resectable or unresectable PDAC who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were evaluated retrospectively. CT findings were independently assessed by two abdominal radiologists according to NCCN criteria (version 3. 2019). Tumor resectability was classified as resectable, borderline resectable, or unresectable, and change in resectability was classified as regression, stability, or progression. The associations of R0 resection rate with CT-determined resectability and change in resectability categories were evaluated, as were the sensitivity and specificity of NCCN criteria for R0 resection. Factors associated with R0 resection were identified by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: R0 resection rate did not differ significantly among the resectable, borderline resectable, or unresectable PDAC (67-73%, p = 0.95) or among PDAC with regression, stability, or progression (56-77%, p = 0.39). The sensitivity and specificity for R0 resection were 67% and 37%, respectively, for resectability (resectable/borderline vs. unresectable) and 80% and 21%, respectively, for changes in resectability (regression/stable vs. progression). Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery (≤ 46.4 HU) was independently associated with R0 resection (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: CT-determined resectability after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy was relatively insensitive and non-specific for predicting R0 resection. Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery may increase the ability of CT to predict R0 resection. KEY POINTS: ⢠Margin-negative resection rate of pancreatic cancer following FOLFIRINOX therapy did not differ among each resectability (67-73%, p = 0.95) based on NCCN criteria or changes in resectability categories (56-77%, p = 0.39). ⢠The sensitivity and specificity for margin-negative resection were 67% and 37% for resectability (resectable/borderline vs. unresectable) and 80% and 21% for changes in resectability (regression/stable vs. progression). ⢠Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery (≤ 46.4 HU) was independently associated with margin-negative resection (p = 0.01).
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fluorouracilo , Humanos , Irinotecán , Leucovorina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oxaliplatino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) have poor prognosis with upfront surgery. METHODS: This was a single-arm Phase 2 trial for clinical and biomarker analysis. The primary endpoint is 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Patients received 8 cycles of neoadjuvant modified (m) FOLFIRINOX. Up to 6 cycles of gemcitabine were given for patients who underwent surgery. Plasma immune cell subsets were measured for analysing correlations with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between May 2016 and March 2018, 44 chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-naïve patients with BRPC were included. With neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX, the objective response rate was 34.1%, and curative-intent surgery was done in 27 (61.4%) patients. With a median follow-up duration of 20.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.7-21.6 months), the median PFS and OS were 12.2 months (95% CI, 8.9-15.5 months) and 24.7 months (95% CI, 12.6-36.9), respectively. The 1-year PFS rate was 52.3% (95% CI, 37.6-67.0%). Higher CD14+ monocyte (quartile 4 vs 1-3) and lower CD69+ γδ T cell (γδ TCR+/CD69+) levels (quartiles 1-3 vs 4) were significantly associated with poor OS (p = 0.045 and p = 0.043, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX followed by postoperative gemcitabine were feasible and effective in BRPC patients. Monocyte and γδ T cells may have prognostic implications for patients with pancreatic cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02749136.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Biomarcadores de Tumor/inmunología , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/inmunología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Antígenos CD/metabolismo , Antígenos de Diferenciación de Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Antígenos CD4/metabolismo , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/farmacología , Esquema de Medicación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/farmacología , Humanos , Linfocitos Intraepiteliales/inmunología , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Irinotecán/farmacología , Lectinas Tipo C/metabolismo , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/farmacología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monocitos/inmunología , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/farmacología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/inmunología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
Background No preoperative model is available for predicting postsurgical prognosis of patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Purpose To develop and validate a preoperative risk scoring system using clinical and CT variables to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) after upfront surgery in patients with resectable PDAC. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with resectable PDAC underwent upfront surgery from January 2014 to December 2015 (development set) and from January 2016 to January 2017 (test set). In the development set, multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling with bootstrapping was used to select clinical and CT variables associated with RFS and to construct a risk scoring system. The discrimination capability of the risk score was assessed by using the Harrell C-index and compared with that of pathologic American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor stage. The risk score was validated in the test set. Results A total of 395 patients were evaluated, including 262 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 64 years ± 10; 155 men) in the development set and 133 (mean age, 64 years ± 9; 79 men) in the test set. Five independent variables predicted risk of recurrence or death: tumor size (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05, 1.44; P = .009), hypodense tumor in the portal venous phase (HR, 1.66; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.73; P = .04), tumor necrosis (HR, 2.04; 95% CI: 1.38, 3.03; P < .001), peripancreatic tumor infiltration (HR, 1.50; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.11; P = .02), and suspicious metastatic lymph nodes (HR, 1.94; 95% CI: 1.38, 2.72; P < .001). In the test set, the risk score showed good discrimination capability (C-index of 0.68; 95% CI: 0.63, 0.74) and outperformed the pathologic tumor stage (C-index of 0.60; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.66; P = .03). Patients were categorized into favorable, intermediate, and poor prognosis groups with 1-year RFS of 0.87, 0.58, and 0.26, respectively. Conclusion The presented preoperative risk score can predict recurrence-free survival after upfront surgery in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Pandharipande and Anderson in this issue.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
Nanorobots are safe and exhibit powerful functionalities, including delivery, therapy, and diagnosis. Therefore, they are in high demand for the development of new cancer therapies. Although many studies have contributed to the progressive development of the nanorobot system for anticancer drug delivery, these systems still face some critical limitations, such as potentially toxic materials in the nanorobots, unreasonable sizes for passive targeting, and the lack of several essential functions of the nanorobot for anticancer drug delivery including sensing, active targeting, controlling drug release, and sufficient drug loading capacity. Here, we developed a multifunctional nanorobot system capable of precise magnetic control, sufficient drug loading for chemotherapy, light-triggered controlled drug release, light absorption for photothermal therapy, enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, and tumor sensing. The developed nanorobot system exhibits an in vitro synergetic antitumor effect of photothermal therapy and chemotherapy and outstanding tumor-targeting efficiency in both in vitro and in vivo environments. The results of this study encourage further explorations of an efficient active drug delivery system for cancer treatment and the development of nanorobot systems for other biomedical applications.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Hipertermia Inducida , Nanoestructuras , Neoplasias/terapia , Fototerapia , Robótica , Línea Celular Tumoral , Humanos , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/patologíaRESUMEN
Lanreotide autogel is a long-acting somatostatin analogue with proven efficacy and safety in patients with well-differentiated (WD) gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) in a prior randomized phase III trial (CLARINET). However, the CLARINET study only enrolled patients with Ki-67 index <10%, and few patients of Asian ethnicity were included. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of lanreotide in Korean patients with GEP-NETs in the daily practice setting. Between January 2015 and May 2018, 64 patients with metastatic WD GEP-NETs received lanreotide at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Of them, 45 (70.3%) patients who received lanreotide as monotherapy were included in the current analysis. The most common primary tumor site was the pancreas (n = 22, 48.9%), followed by the rectum (10, 22.2%) and the small bowel (7, 15.6%). According to RECIST v1.1, a partial response was achieved in one patient (2.2%) and stable disease was achieved in 40 patients (88.9%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.4 months (95% confidence interval, 9.5-23.3 months). There were no differences in PFS according to the primary tumor site (p = 0.77). Hepatic tumor volume > 25% and prior systemic therapy were significantly associated with poorer PFS in the multivariate analysis. Lanreotide is well-tolerated and effective for Korean patients with GEP-NETs in the daily practice setting.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Intestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptidos Cíclicos/uso terapéutico , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Pueblo Asiatico , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Péptidos Cíclicos/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , República de Corea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Somatostatina/efectos adversos , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Carga Tumoral , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) is standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). However, prognostic factors for patients with mPC treated with AG, are largely unknown. We retrospectively identified prognostic factors, including inflammation-based prognostic scores, in patients with mPC, and recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with AG as first-line treatment. Method A total of 203 patients with histologically-confirmed recurrent or metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated with first-line AG in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between February 2016 and December 2016 were included in this analysis. As inflammation-based scores, baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and modified Glasgow prognostic scores (mGPS) were tested. Result Median age was 62 years and 116 patients (57%) were male. With median follow-up duration of 21.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 (95% CI 6.2-7.9) months, and overall survival (OS) was 15.1 (95% CI 12.6-17.6) months. In the multivariate analysis, PFS was significantly associated with liver metastasis (HR 1.43), distant lymph node metastasis (HR 1.48), and elevated CA19-9 (HR 1.56). In multivariate analysis for OS, elevated CA19-9 (HR 1.75), liver metastasis (HR 1.76), distant lymph node metastasis (HR 1.41), and high mGPS (mGPS ≥1 vs.0: HR 1.64) were independent prognostic factors. NLR and PLR were not significantly associated with PFS and OS. Conclusion Among the inflammation based prognostic scores, mGPS was a reliable prognostic indicator that could stratify survival outcomes in patients with recurrent or mPC who received AG as first-line chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Plaquetas/patología , Inflamación/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Linfocitos/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neutrófilos/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for early prediction of standard anatomic response and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving Regorafenib. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with mCRC refractory to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy were enrolled and received Regorafenib (160 mg/day on days 1-21, following a 7-day break). Standard anatomical response was evaluated every 8 weeks. Both scans were performed before and on day 21 of Regorafenib. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients included in per-protocol analysis, complete response was not observed, but partial response was observed in 8.2% (n = 5), stable disease in 67.2% (n = 41), and progressive disease in 24.6% (n = 15). The objective response rate was 8.2% and disease control rate 75.4%. Five responders (8.2%) and 13 non-responders (21.3%) met the CT and 18F-FLT PET/CT criteria (maximum standardized uptake value decrease ≥ 10.6% for responders). Forty-three (70.5%) exhibited discordant responses on CT and 18F-FLT PET/CT (McNemar test, P < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 8.9 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 3.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.34-3.80 months) and 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.95-10.10 months), respectively. Comparison of PFS and OS according to 18F-FLT PET/CT response revealed slightly longer PFS (P = 0.015) in responders, but the correlation with OS was not significant. The PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumours (PERCIST) of 18F-FDG PET/CT revealed differences in PFS and OS between partial metabolic response (PMR) and non-PMR (P = 0.048 and P = 0.014, respectively), and between progressive metabolic disease (PMD) and non-PMD (P = 0.189 and P = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Survival outcome was significantly associated with PERCIST using 18F-FDG PET/CT but the change of 18F-FLT uptake was only slightly associated with PFS. 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used as imaging biomarker to predict clinical outcomes early in patients with mCRC receiving Regorafenib.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Didesoxinucleósidos/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/normas , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Radiofármacos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Didesoxinucleósidos/normas , Femenino , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18/efectos adversos , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Valor Predictivo de las PruebasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the correlation between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) and the impact of initiation time of apheresis on stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with multiple myeloma were randomized into one of the two groups (early vs. late). Lenograstim at 10 µg/kg/day once daily was injected for at least 4 consecutive days. Apheresis was initiated 2 hours after the fourth dose of lenograstim in the early collection group and 16 hours after the fourth dose of lenograstim in the late collection group. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetics was performed within 30 minutes before, and 1, 2, 6, and 24 hours after the fourth dose of lenograstim. RESULTS: Overall, the two groups (early vs. late, n = 10 vs. 14) exhibited similar baseline characteristics including age, sex, subtype of myeloma, stage distribution, and myeloma-associated symptoms. No correlation was found between plasma lenograstim concentration and peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell counts or hematopoietic progenitor cells. In the late collection group, the median number of apheresis procedures for minimal collection was significantly lower (early vs. late: 2 vs. 1; p = 0.04) and there was a higher number of total collected PB CD34+ cells in a single session of apheresis (1.4 vs. 3.1; p = 0.06). There were no differences in median overall PB stem cell collection efficiency. CONCLUSION: Late collection positively impacted the number of apheresis procedures for minimal collection, with numerically improved PB stem cell collection efficiency at first apheresis in patients with multiple myeloma.
Asunto(s)
Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética , Lenograstim/farmacología , Lenograstim/farmacocinética , Mieloma Múltiple/metabolismo , Antígenos CD34/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Lenograstim/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes highly express programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) that interacts with its ligand, programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1) on tumors. PD-1/PD-L1 interactions cause functional exhaustion of effector T cells and impair antitumor immunity, allowing tumors to escape immune surveillance. In addition to such extrinsic interactions, tumors proliferate by transmitting intrinsic PD-L1 signals via the mTOR pathway. Here, we simultaneously silenced PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions on CTLs and colon tumors using PD-1 siRNA/PD-L1 siRNA-loaded PLGA nanoparticles and investigated functional activation of tumor-specific CTLs. When compared to a single PD-1 silencing on CTLs or a single PD-L1 silencing on tumors, cosilencing of PD-1/PD-L1 on CTLs and tumors more efficiently promoted effector functions of tumor-specific CTLs. Moreover, PD-L1-silenced tumors inhibited mTOR signaling and showed an antiproliferative response independent of the adaptive immune response. Ultimately, systemic administration of PD-1 and PD-L1 siRNA via PLGA nanoparticles restored the effector functions of tumor-specific CTLs in MC38 tumor-bearing mice. Compared with antitumor effects of single silencing of PD-1 or PD-L1 alone, cosilencing of PD-1 and PD-L1 showed more significant tumor growth suppression and long-term tumor inhibition in colon cancer. Thus, this study provides an efficient therapeutic strategy for achieving immunotherapy in colon cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/metabolismo , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , Nanopartículas/química , Copolímero de Ácido Poliláctico-Ácido Poliglicólico/química , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/metabolismo , ARN Interferente Pequeño/fisiología , Animales , Apoptosis/genética , Apoptosis/fisiología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/metabolismo , Línea Celular Tumoral , Humanos , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , ARN Interferente Pequeño/químicaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To translate promising preclinical data on the combination of vorinostat and ixabepilone for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) into clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a randomized two-arm Phase IB clinical trial of ascending doses of vorinostat and ixabepilone in prior -treated MBC patients. To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), 37 patients were randomized to schedule A: every-3-week ixabepilone + vorinostat (days 1-14), or schedule B: weekly ixabepilone + vorinostat (days 1-7; 15-21) Pharmacokinetics were assessed. Nineteen additional patients were randomized to schedule A or B and objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: The schedule A MTD was vorinostat 300 mg daily (days 1-14), ixabepilone 32 mg/m2 (day 2); 21-day cycle 27% dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The schedule B MTD was vorinostat 300 mg daily (days 1-7; 15-21), ixabepilone 16 mg/m2 (days 2, 9, 16); 28-day cycle; no DLTs. Vorinostat and ixabepilone clearances were 194 L/h and 21.3 L/h/m2, respectively. Grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy was reported in 8% (A) and 21% (B) of patients. The ORR and CBR were 22 and 22% (A); 30 and 35% (B). Median PFS was 3.9 (A) and 3.7 (B) months. OS was 14.8 (A) and 17.1 (B) months. CONCLUSIONS: We established the MTD of vorinostat and ixabepilone. This drug combination offers a novel therapy for previously treated MBC patients. The potential for lower toxicity and comparable efficacy compared to current therapies warrants further study.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Epotilonas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Histona Desacetilasas/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Hidroxámicos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/clasificación , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Epotilonas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Inhibidores de Histona Desacetilasas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ácidos Hidroxámicos/efectos adversos , Células MCF-7 , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , VorinostatRESUMEN
Background The objective of this study was to assess the safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor efficacy of CKD-581, a novel pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma (MM) refractory to standard therapy. Methods In this phase I study, CKD-581 was intravenously administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. A standard 3 + 3 cohort design was used to determine the MTD. Acetylated histones H3 and H4 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were measured for pharmacodynamic assessment in a subpopulation of patients. Results Thirty-nine patients were treated with CKD-581 at 9 dose levels from 10 mg/m2 to 210 mg/m2. The DLTs were grade 3 neutropenia that delayed the treatment for >2 weeks (one patient at a dose of 50 mg/m2) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (two patients at a dose of 210 mg/m2). The MTD of CKD-581 was 160 mg/m2. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n = 5, 12.8%) and neutropenia (n = 2, 5.1%). The peak concentration and area under the curve values for CKD-581 increased in proportion to the dose, indicating linear pharmacokinetics. A partial response was observed in 2 patients (5.6%), and stable disease was observed in 16 (44.4%) patients. In the pharmacodynamic evaluation, acetylation of H3 and H4 was observed at all doses of ≥50 mg/m2. Conclusion CKD-581 was well tolerated by the patients with lymphoma or MM refractory to standard therapy. It exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and modest anti-tumor efficacy.